Conflict of Laws | Effect and Application of Laws | PRELIMINARY TITLE

Topic: Civil Law > I. Preliminary Title > A. Effect and Application of Laws > Conflict of Laws

Conflict of Laws, also known as private international law, is the branch of law that addresses situations where foreign elements intersect with the domestic legal system. In the Philippines, this area governs instances where there is a conflict between the local law and the laws of a foreign jurisdiction. The goal is to determine the applicable law, the appropriate jurisdiction, and how to enforce judgments that involve foreign elements.

Key Principles and Rules in Conflict of Laws

1. Lex Loci and the Principle of Territoriality

   • Under the principle of territoriality, Philippine laws generally govern all persons, properties, and events within the Philippines (Article 14, Civil Code).
   • Lex loci contractus (law of the place where the contract is made) and lex loci delicti (law of the place where the tort was committed) are often applied in determining the applicable law in cross-border contracts or torts.

2. Personal Law Doctrine

   • Lex nationalii: This rule applies an individual’s national law to matters such as status, capacity, and family relations. In the Philippines, issues like marriage, divorce, and adoption are often resolved based on the national law of the individuals involved.
   • Lex domicilii: For individuals without a nationality, the domicile law applies in determining personal matters.
   • In certain family relations, such as the legitimacy of children and succession, the Philippines observes the nationality principle, per Article 15 of the Civil Code.

3. Contracts and Obligations with Foreign Elements

   • Autonomy of Contracts: The parties to a contract have the freedom to choose the governing law, provided that the chosen law does not contravene public policy.
   • If the contract does not specify a governing law, lex loci contractus or the law of the place where the contract was entered into may apply.
   • Certain contracts, such as those involving real property, are strictly governed by the lex situs (the law of the place where the property is located).

4. Marriage and Family Relations

   • Marriage and its validity are generally governed by the national law of each individual.
   • Filipino citizens are prohibited from obtaining a divorce abroad to remarry in the Philippines, as divorce is generally not recognized under Philippine law. However, in cases where a foreign spouse initiates the divorce, a Filipino citizen may petition for the recognition of that foreign divorce (Republic Act No. 9225).
   • The legitimacy of children, adoption, and other family relations involving foreign elements are typically governed by the lex nationalii.

5. Property and Succession

   • Immovable property is governed by lex situs, meaning the law of the location where the property is situated.
   • For movable property, the general rule follows the owner’s nationality (Article 16, Civil Code).
   • In terms of succession, Article 16 of the Civil Code provides that intestate and testamentary succession, with respect to the order of succession, amount of successional rights, and intrinsic validity of wills, are governed by the national law of the deceased.
   • However, procedural matters in succession are governed by the law of the forum (the Philippine court, if it has jurisdiction).

6. Foreign Judgments

   • In the Philippines, foreign judgments are not automatically enforceable. Instead, they must undergo a process of exequatur where a domestic court examines the judgment for compliance with basic principles of justice and fairness (Rule 39, Section 48 of the Rules of Court).
   • The local court will not enforce a foreign judgment if it goes against Philippine public policy or fundamental fairness.

7. Public Policy Exception

   • A foreign law or judgment that contravenes Philippine public policy may not be enforced or applied, regardless of general principles on the recognition of foreign laws. For instance, matters involving polygamous marriages, same-sex marriages, or gambling contracts may be unenforceable if they conflict with Philippine standards.

8. Renvoi Doctrine

   • The renvoi doctrine addresses situations where a court in one country may refer a legal issue back to the law of the foreign jurisdiction, leading to potential circular references.
   • The Philippines generally applies the renvoi doctrine only in cases involving issues of succession or the validity of marriages, following the country’s general interest in safeguarding its own citizens' status and rights under the law.

9. Forum Non Conveniens

   • Philippine courts may dismiss a case on the basis of forum non conveniens when the forum is deemed inappropriate for adjudicating the case due to factors such as the location of evidence, the connection of the parties to the forum, or if another jurisdiction is better suited to handle the matter.
   • Forum non conveniens is applied at the court’s discretion to prevent forum shopping and to ensure that cases are heard in the most appropriate jurisdiction.

10. Choice of Law and Forum Clauses

    • Choice of law and choice of forum clauses in contracts are typically respected in the Philippines as an exercise of party autonomy.
    • Philippine courts, however, may reject such clauses if they are unjust, if they deprive Filipino citizens of their legal protections, or if the chosen law or forum would violate Philippine public policy.

11. Procedural vs. Substantive Law Distinction

    • Substantive laws, like those governing contracts, property, and family relations, are often determined by the foreign law if the foreign element is dominant.
    • Procedural matters, on the other hand, are strictly governed by Philippine law when the case is brought before Philippine courts. This includes matters related to evidence, pleadings, and appeals.

Judicial Doctrines and Supreme Court Rulings

The Philippine Supreme Court has established various principles that further refine the country’s approach to conflict of laws, particularly in cases involving complex foreign elements. Some of these rulings highlight the importance of Filipino legal principles, such as the protection of family, while also recognizing international comity.

For example:

• Llorente v. Court of Appeals (1994): The Supreme Court held that the nationality principle applies to determine the citizenship and personal law of individuals, emphasizing that foreign laws on citizenship and status are recognized.
• Van Dorn v. Romillo Jr. (1985): This case permitted a Filipino woman who was previously married to a foreigner to remarry after the foreigner obtained a divorce abroad. This ruling recognized the right to remarry as a function of foreign divorce obtained by the foreign spouse.

---

Conflict of Laws in the Philippines balances respect for foreign laws and judgments with the country’s commitment to safeguarding its own laws and policies. Courts meticulously consider each case’s unique circumstances, foreign law applicability, and the potential impact on Filipino citizens.