Parents | In Particular | Persons Made Responsible for Others | The Tortfeasor | QUASI-DELICTS

CIVIL LAW: QUASI-DELICTS

XI. Quasi-Delicts > B. The Tortfeasor > 2. Persons Made Responsible for Others > b. In Particular > i. Parents

Under Philippine law, quasi-delicts are governed by Articles 2176 to 2194 of the Civil Code. The liability of parents for quasi-delicts committed by their children falls under Article 2180 of the Civil Code. Below is a detailed discussion of the topic, structured meticulously for clarity and thoroughness.

1. Legal Basis

Article 2180 of the Civil Code:

"The obligation imposed by Article 2176 is demandable not only for one's own acts or omissions but also for those of persons for whom one is responsible.

The father and, in case of his death or incapacity, the mother, are responsible for the damages caused by the minor children who live in their company."

This provision establishes the vicarious liability of parents for damages caused by their minor children residing with them.

2. Nature of Liability

  • The liability of parents is vicarious:

    • It is not based on the parent's own fault or negligence but on their legal responsibility for their minor children.
    • It arises from the presumed inability of minors to fully discern right from wrong or foresee the consequences of their actions.

  • This liability is a form of strict liability, subject to specific conditions outlined below.

3. Requisites for Liability

For parents to be held liable under Article 2180, the following requisites must be present:

  1. The child must be a minor:

    • Defined as a person under 18 years of age (consistent with the Family Code of the Philippines, Article 234, as amended by RA 6809).

  2. The child must have caused damage to another person:

    • The act must be a quasi-delict as defined under Article 2176:

      "Whoever by act or omission causes damage to another, there being fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for the damage done."

    • The act must involve fault or negligence but not amount to a criminal offense.

  3. The minor must be living in the company of the parents:

    • The law presumes that parents have authority, custody, and control over their minor children who reside with them.
    • If the minor is not residing with the parents, liability under this provision does not attach.

4. Defenses Available to Parents

Parents can avoid liability under Article 2180 by proving the following:

  1. Exercise of Diligence of a Good Father of a Family:

    • The parents must prove that they exercised due diligence in supervising their minor children.
    • "Diligence of a good father of a family" (Article 1173 of the Civil Code) requires reasonable care in teaching children moral conduct, discipline, and proper behavior to avoid harming others.

  2. No Proximate Cause:

    • Parents can argue that the child’s act was not the proximate cause of the injury or damage.

  3. Minor not Living in Their Company:

    • If the child is living independently (e.g., studying away from home, residing with relatives, or working elsewhere), parents may not be held liable.

  4. Act of God or Fortuitous Event:

    • If the damage resulted from circumstances beyond the control of the child or the parents, liability may be mitigated or avoided.

5. Other Relevant Provisions

Article 2194: Joint and Several Liability

If two or more persons are liable for a quasi-delict (e.g., both parents and another responsible party), they may be held solidarily liable.

Family Code of the Philippines: Parental Authority and Responsibility

  • Article 220 of the Family Code complements the Civil Code by reinforcing the duty of parents to supervise and discipline their children.
  • Article 221 provides for civil liability of parents for damages caused by their minor children.

6. Related Jurisprudence

Philippine jurisprudence has clarified and interpreted the application of Article 2180:

  1. Guilatco v. Fernando (G.R. No. 93030, June 25, 1992):

    • The Supreme Court emphasized that liability attaches only when minors live under the authority of their parents.

  2. Falgui v. Philippine Airlines, Inc. (G.R. No. 119194, April 4, 2001):

    • The diligence defense was discussed, highlighting the burden on parents to prove they were not negligent in supervising their child.

  3. Barredo v. Garcia (G.R. No. L-48006, July 8, 1942):

    • While addressing quasi-delicts generally, the case emphasized the importance of proving negligence or fault under Article 2176.

7. Relationship to Criminal Liability

  • If a minor child commits a criminal act, Article 101 of the Revised Penal Code may apply, holding parents civilly liable for damages arising from the offense.
  • However, quasi-delicts (Article 2176) remain distinct from criminal liability, and the rules on parental liability under Article 2180 apply independently of criminal cases.

8. Limitations and Mitigating Factors

  • Legal Emancipation:
    • If the minor is legally emancipated (e.g., marriage or reaching 18), parents are no longer liable under Article 2180.
  • Independent Living:
    • As previously mentioned, liability does not attach if the minor lives apart from their parents.

9. Practical Implications

  • Insurance Coverage:
    • Parents should consider insuring against liability for acts of their minor children.
  • Parental Training:
    • Vigilance in supervising and disciplining minors is critical to mitigate risks of liability.

Conclusion

The liability of parents for quasi-delicts committed by their minor children under Article 2180 of the Civil Code is a significant legal obligation designed to uphold social responsibility. Parents must exercise due diligence in supervising their children to avoid liability. The law balances the interests of aggrieved parties with fairness to parents by allowing defenses based on diligent supervision and the absence of proximate causation.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login