Presumption of Revocation | Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

PRESUMPTION OF REVOCATION IN TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION

In the Philippine legal system, the presumption of revocation under testamentary succession arises when circumstances suggest that a will, previously executed by the testator, is no longer valid due to actions or omissions by the testator. This principle is rooted in the Civil Code of the Philippines, specifically in the provisions governing the revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions. Below is a meticulous breakdown of the concept:

I. LEGAL BASIS

  1. Article 830 of the Civil Code:

    • A will may be revoked by the testator at any time before their death. This revocation can occur:
      • (a) By implication or presumption.
      • (b) By executing a subsequent will or codicil.
      • (c) By performing acts that indicate the intent to revoke the will, such as physical destruction or mutilation.

  2. Article 831 of the Civil Code:

    • This article supports the idea that a will may be revoked by the presumption of revocation when it cannot be found, and circumstances suggest that the testator intended to revoke it.

II. CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO PRESUMPTION OF REVOCATION

The presumption of revocation is primarily based on the absence or destruction of the original will or other suggestive actions by the testator. These circumstances include:

  1. Loss or Absence of the Will:

    • When a will, last known to be in the possession of the testator, is not found after their death, a presumption arises that the testator destroyed it with the intent to revoke it.
    • This presumption is rebuttable with sufficient evidence to the contrary.

  2. Testator's Physical Acts on the Will:

    • If the will is found but shows signs of intentional destruction, tearing, burning, or obliteration, it is presumed that the testator intended to revoke it.
    • The acts of revocation must have been done with deliberate intent.

  3. Subsequent Inconsistent Dispositions:

    • The presumption of revocation can also arise when a testator executes a subsequent will or other testamentary dispositions that are inconsistent with the terms of the prior will, even if the latter is not explicitly revoked.

  4. Alterations or Cancellation:

    • Significant alterations to the original will, such as striking out portions or adding notes, can give rise to a presumption of revocation if they imply an intent to abandon or modify the prior testamentary dispositions.

III. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESUMPTION TO APPLY

  1. Possession of the Will by the Testator:

    • The presumption only applies if the will was last known to be in the custody or possession of the testator.
    • If it was in the possession of another person, the presumption is weakened, and evidence must show that the testator intentionally revoked the will.

  2. Intent to Revoke:

    • The law requires that any act or omission leading to revocation must be accompanied by the clear intent to revoke the will.
    • Accidental destruction, misplacement, or loss without intent does not constitute revocation.

  3. Rebuttal of the Presumption:

    • Interested parties may rebut the presumption of revocation by presenting evidence that the testator did not intend to revoke the will. For instance:
      • The will was lost or destroyed accidentally.
      • The testator reaffirmed their intention to uphold the will before their death.

IV. EFFECT OF PRESUMPTION

  1. Invalidity of the Will:

    • If the presumption of revocation is not rebutted, the will is deemed revoked, and the testator’s estate will be distributed according to any subsequent valid will or, in its absence, through intestate succession.

  2. Burden of Proof:

    • The burden of proof rests on the party seeking to overcome the presumption. This may include producing a duplicate or copy of the will, presenting testimony, or proving the testator’s intent through circumstantial evidence.

V. CASE LAW

  1. Key Decisions from the Supreme Court:
    • Maninang v. Court of Appeals:
      • The Court ruled that the absence of a will from the testator's known possession at the time of death creates a presumption of revocation, which may be rebutted by sufficient evidence.
    • Abadilla v. Dela Cruz:
      • The Court emphasized that revocation of a will must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, especially when a presumption arises due to the loss or destruction of the document.
    • Rodriguez v. Salvador:
      • The case clarified that accidental loss or destruction of a will does not suffice for presumption of revocation unless accompanied by proof of the testator’s intent to revoke.

VI. PRACTICAL APPLICATION

  1. Advising Executors and Heirs:

    • Ensure that wills are stored securely, and steps are taken to avoid accidental loss or destruction that might give rise to the presumption of revocation.
    • Keep records of the testator’s actions and statements regarding their testamentary intent to counter any future claims of implied revocation.

  2. Contesting Presumed Revocation:

    • Present evidence that rebuts the presumption, such as:
      • Witness testimony.
      • Secondary evidence like photocopies of the will or digital records indicating its contents and existence.

  3. Drafting Subsequent Wills:

    • Clearly state revocation of prior wills to prevent ambiguity and disputes regarding intent.

VII. CONCLUSION

The presumption of revocation is a legal doctrine designed to reflect the testator’s likely intent when a will cannot be produced or has been altered or destroyed. This presumption, however, is not conclusive and may be rebutted with appropriate evidence. Legal practitioners must carefully assess the factual circumstances and available evidence to uphold or contest the validity of a presumed revoked will.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login