Solidary liability | Liability of local recruitment agency and foreign employer | INTRODUCTION TO LABOR LAW: FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES/CONCEPTS

Solidary Liability of Local Recruitment Agency and Foreign Employer: Philippine Labor Law

Overview

In Philippine labor law, the concept of solidary liability arises from the relationship between local recruitment agencies and foreign employers in the context of deploying Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). This liability ensures the protection of workers’ rights, offering a clear recourse for claims related to employment violations.

Solidary liability is codified in the Labor Code of the Philippines, relevant Administrative Orders, and jurisprudence, particularly in cases involving violations of employment contracts, illegal termination, non-payment of wages, or other forms of maltreatment.

---

Legal Basis

1. Labor Code of the Philippines

   • Article 18 of the Labor Code explicitly provides that local recruitment agencies and foreign principals or employers are jointly and severally liable for any claims or damages arising from violations of employment contracts.

2. Republic Act No. 8042 (Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995) as amended by R.A. 10022

   • Section 10 states that recruitment agencies and their foreign principals/employers are jointly and severally liable for monetary claims, damages, and other benefits due to OFWs arising out of the employment relationship.
   • This liability is a form of protectionist measure for OFWs, ensuring accountability on both local and foreign entities.

3. Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) Rules and Regulations

   • The POEA requires recruitment agencies to submit proof of a foreign employer’s undertaking to comply with the terms of the employment contract. This includes an express agreement to share solidary liability.

---

Nature of Solidary Liability

1. Joint and Several Liability Defined

   • Under Philippine civil law principles, solidary liability means that the worker may claim the entirety of any award or liability from either the local recruitment agency or the foreign employer. This provides the worker with a direct and effective avenue for redress.

2. Recruitment Agencies’ Role

   • Recruitment agencies act as agents of the foreign employer. Their liability extends to acts and omissions of their foreign principals.
   • Agencies are required to verify that foreign employers comply with employment standards and provide adequate safeguards for the worker’s welfare.

3. Purpose of Solidary Liability

   • To ensure access to justice for OFWs by making local recruitment agencies accountable within the jurisdiction of Philippine courts.
   • To prevent foreign employers from evading liability due to jurisdictional challenges.

---

Scope of Solidary Liability

1. Contract Violations

   • Includes failure to pay wages, wrongful dismissal, breach of contract terms, and any act violating Philippine labor standards.

2. Illegal Recruitment

   • Recruitment agencies may also be held solidarily liable for illegal recruitment activities under R.A. 8042, even if the acts were directly committed by the foreign employer.

3. Tortious Acts

   • Covers acts of maltreatment, physical abuse, or other forms of harassment committed by the foreign employer against the OFW.

4. Monetary Claims

   • Claims may include unpaid salaries, damages for wrongful dismissal, and moral and exemplary damages, among others.

---

Jurisprudence

1. G.R. No. 143349 (Agapito v. PoEA and Saudi Arabian Airlines)

   • The Supreme Court upheld the principle of solidary liability, emphasizing the responsibility of recruitment agencies to ensure compliance with employment standards by their foreign principals.

2. G.R. No. 167938 (Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Saudi Arabia v. Estrella and POEA)

   • Recruitment agencies were held liable for non-payment of wages even though the foreign employer was based abroad, underscoring the solidary liability concept as a protection for workers.

3. G.R. No. 165848 (San Miguel Corporation v. WCC and Worker)

   • Reinforced the obligation of recruitment agencies to ensure the solvency and reliability of their foreign employers.

---

Key Procedural Implications

1. Filing of Complaints

   • OFWs can file complaints with the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) or the Philippine Overseas Labor Office (POLO) to claim damages or monetary awards.

2. Execution of Awards

   • If the foreign employer cannot satisfy the judgment, the recruitment agency may be compelled to pay the full amount, ensuring that the worker’s rights are protected.

3. Mandatory Bond

   • Recruitment agencies are required to post bonds to cover potential liabilities arising from claims by deployed workers. This ensures financial capacity to satisfy judgments.

---

Challenges and Mitigating Measures

1. Difficulty in Enforcing Judgments Abroad

   • Solidary liability addresses this by allowing workers to pursue claims against local recruitment agencies, sidestepping issues of jurisdiction and enforcement in foreign territories.

2. Evasion of Liability

   • The POEA enforces strict accreditation requirements and monitoring of recruitment agencies to minimize risks of evasion by unscrupulous operators.

---

Conclusion

The principle of solidary liability between local recruitment agencies and foreign employers is a cornerstone of Philippine labor law, designed to safeguard the rights of OFWs. It places a shared burden on recruitment agencies and their foreign counterparts, ensuring accountability and accessible remedies for aggrieved workers. By holding both entities equally liable, Philippine labor law upholds its commitment to protecting the dignity and welfare of Filipino workers deployed overseas.