Department Order No. 183 series of 2017 | Power to suspend effects of termination | DOLE Secretary | JURISDICTION & REMEDIES

LABOR LAW AND SOCIAL LEGISLATION > II. JURISDICTION & REMEDIES > G. DOLE Secretary > 3. Power to Suspend Effects of Termination > a. Department Order No. 183, Series of 2017


1. Introduction to the Power to Suspend Effects of Termination

Under Philippine labor laws, the Secretary of Labor and Employment (DOLE Secretary) holds specific powers aimed at ensuring the equitable and lawful treatment of workers and employers. One such power is the authority to suspend the effects of termination. This authority is primarily exercised to protect employees from unjust dismissal while also affording employers due process in disputes.

The issuance of Department Order (DO) No. 183, Series of 2017, operationalizes this power and establishes the procedural and substantive framework for the suspension of termination effects in cases where labor disputes are ongoing.


2. Legal Basis of DO No. 183

  • Labor Code of the Philippines:

    • Article 277(b) (now Article 292): Empowers the DOLE Secretary to assume jurisdiction over labor disputes involving industries indispensable to national interest or certify the same to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for compulsory arbitration.
    • Implies the authority to impose temporary measures, including the suspension of termination effects, to preserve industrial peace.
  • Constitutional Mandate:

    • Protection of labor is enshrined under Section 18, Article II of the 1987 Constitution, emphasizing the State’s role in protecting workers’ rights and promoting social justice.

3. Key Provisions of DO No. 183

The Department Order provides a comprehensive mechanism for the suspension of termination effects. The key features include:

a. Scope and Coverage

  • Applies to industries considered vital to national interest, including but not limited to:

    • Healthcare
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
    • Manufacturing critical to public welfare
  • Covers terminations resulting from:

    • Collective bargaining deadlocks
    • Unfair labor practice complaints
    • Other disputes certified by the DOLE Secretary as involving national interest

b. Authority of the DOLE Secretary

  • The DOLE Secretary is empowered to:
    • Issue orders suspending the effects of termination pending the resolution of the labor dispute.
    • Direct employers to reinstate affected employees on a payroll or actual basis.

c. Grounds for Suspension The effects of termination may be suspended upon finding that:

  • The termination is a result of a labor dispute certified to involve national interest.
  • Prima facie evidence exists that the termination was conducted without lawful cause or due process.
  • Continuation of termination effects may aggravate labor unrest or disrupt public interest.

d. Reinstatement Orders

  • Employers may be required to:
    • Reinstate employees to their previous positions.
    • Pay back wages and benefits from the time of termination to reinstatement.
    • Provide payroll reinstatement as an alternative to actual reinstatement, depending on the circumstances.

e. Interim Reliefs

  • DO No. 183 allows the issuance of interim measures, including the suspension of retrenchment, closure, or dismissal processes, until a final resolution of the case.

4. Procedural Requirements

To invoke the suspension of termination effects under DO No. 183, the following procedures must be observed:

a. Filing of a Petition

  • Affected employees, their representatives, or the union must file a petition with the DOLE Secretary, outlining:
    • The facts and circumstances of termination.
    • Evidence supporting the claim of unjust dismissal or labor dispute.

b. Preliminary Investigation

  • The DOLE shall conduct a summary investigation to determine:
    • The validity of the petition.
    • Whether the dispute falls within the scope of industries critical to national interest.

c. Issuance of an Order

  • Upon finding sufficient grounds, the DOLE Secretary may issue an Order of Suspension, specifying:
    • The terms of reinstatement.
    • The duration of suspension, pending resolution of the dispute.

5. Implications and Enforcement

a. For Employers

  • Employers must comply with the reinstatement order or face penalties, including:

    • Fines for non-compliance.
    • Contempt proceedings.
  • Non-compliance may also result in additional labor liabilities, such as moral damages or punitive damages for bad faith.

b. For Employees

  • Employees benefit from immediate relief and protection from economic displacement.
  • Provides leverage in ongoing labor disputes.

c. For Industrial Relations

  • Prevents labor unrest by maintaining the status quo pending the resolution of disputes.
  • Strengthens the DOLE’s role as a mediator and arbiter in critical industries.

6. Jurisprudence on Suspension of Termination Effects

While DO No. 183 is administrative in nature, its principles have been affirmed in various Supreme Court decisions, including:

  • San Miguel Corporation v. NLRC (G.R. No. 78724): Reinforced the authority of the DOLE Secretary to issue temporary measures in labor disputes.
  • Paloma v. NLRC (G.R. No. 166798): Highlighted the significance of reinstatement orders in protecting employees from wrongful termination.

7. Challenges and Criticisms

a. Employers' Concerns

  • Allegations of undue interference with management prerogative.
  • Potential abuse by employees or unions.

b. Employees' Concerns

  • Delayed implementation due to bureaucratic processes.
  • Limited applicability to industries not explicitly covered.

c. Administrative Challenges

  • Resource constraints in enforcing compliance.
  • Balancing competing interests of labor and management.

8. Conclusion

Department Order No. 183, Series of 2017, reflects the DOLE’s commitment to safeguarding workers’ rights while maintaining industrial harmony. By empowering the DOLE Secretary to suspend the effects of termination in critical labor disputes, the Order ensures a fair and just resolution process, particularly in industries vital to national interest. However, continuous refinement and effective implementation remain key to addressing challenges and ensuring balanced labor relations.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.