Peaceful Concerted Activities - Labor Code, R.A. No. 6727 | LABOR RELATIONS

Comprehensive Discussion of Peaceful Concerted Activities under Philippine Labor Law and R.A. No. 6727

1. Constitutional and Statutory Framework
   The right of workers to engage in peaceful concerted activities is deeply rooted in the Philippine legal framework. The 1987 Philippine Constitution explicitly guarantees the rights of workers to self-organization, collective bargaining and negotiations, and to engage in peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law (Article XIII, Section 3). This constitutional mandate finds detailed implementation through the Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended), particularly in Book V, and related statutes such as R.A. No. 6727 (the Wage Rationalization Act).

2. Scope and Meaning of Peaceful Concerted Activities
   Peaceful concerted activities refer to collective efforts by employees—most notably union members but also non-unionized workers acting in concert—to assert their rights, improve working conditions, safeguard benefits, and secure recognition of their legitimate demands. These may take various forms, including:

   • Strikes (cessation of work as a form of protest)
   • Picketing (peaceful presence near the employer’s premises displaying placards or making demands known)
   • Boycotts (coordinated action refraining from patronizing a product or service)
   • Other lawful demonstrations or mass actions related to labor disputes

   The Labor Code, Book V, Title VIII (Articles 263-272, as renumbered by later amendments) provides the substantive and procedural rules that govern these concerted activities.

3. Legal Basis and Limitations Under the Labor Code

   • Right to Strike and Picket:
     Under Article 263 (formerly Article 264) of the Labor Code, employees and their labor organizations have the right to strike in cases of bargaining deadlocks and unfair labor practices, subject to specific procedural and substantive requirements. Picketing is also recognized as a lawful and peaceful means of expressing grievances, provided it is conducted within the parameters set by law.

   • Purpose of the Strike:
     Strikes may be grounded on two general categories of labor disputes:

     1. Bargaining Deadlocks: When management and the union fail to reach an agreement on terms and conditions of employment during collective bargaining.
     2. Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs): When the employer commits acts interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of their right to self-organization, discriminating against union members, or violating the duty to bargain collectively in good faith.

   • Notice Requirements and Cooling-Off Periods:
     Before declaring a strike, the union must file a notice of strike with the National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB), indicating the grounds and the steps taken to negotiate. There are mandated cooling-off periods—30 days in cases of bargaining deadlocks and 15 days for unfair labor practice disputes—designed to encourage peaceful settlement. Additionally, a mandatory strike vote must be conducted by secret ballot and submitted to the NCMB. Failure to comply with these requisites renders the strike illegal.

   • Conciliation and Mediation:
     The Labor Code encourages conciliation and mediation efforts by the NCMB to amicably settle disputes. Only when conciliation efforts fail should workers resort to strikes. The emphasis is on exhausting all peaceful means of resolving disputes before engaging in disruptive concerted activities.

   • The Right to Peaceful Picketing:
     Workers are allowed to picket at or near the employer’s premises to publicize their grievances, provided such activity is peaceful and does not obstruct ingress and egress, threaten property, or intimidate non-striking employees, customers, or the public. Violence, coercion, or similar conduct vitiates the lawfulness of the concerted activity.

   • Legal and Illegal Strikes:
     A strike is legal if it strictly adheres to substantive and procedural requirements: proper notice, observance of cooling-off periods, a valid strike vote, peaceful conduct, and a just or lawful cause.
     A strike is illegal if it is grounded on non-strikeable issues (e.g., wage distortion claims without proper procedure, trivial or contrived causes), is conducted without proper notice or strike vote, is staged during the pendency of a mandatory arbitration proceeding, defies assumption orders or certifications for compulsory arbitration by the Secretary of Labor, or involves illegal acts such as violence or property destruction.

   • Effects of Illegal Strikes on Employment:
     Participation in an illegal strike may result in disciplinary action. Rank-and-file employees who participated may be terminated if found to have committed illegal acts during the strike. Union officers who knowingly participated or led an illegal strike generally lose their employment status. However, these sanctions must be imposed following due process.

   • Management Lockouts:
     Employers have a parallel right to declare a lockout under similar circumstances of bargaining deadlock or union unfair labor practices (e.g., union’s refusal to bargain in good faith). However, just like strikes, lockouts are subject to notice requirements and must be exercised peacefully and lawfully.

4. Intervention by the Secretary of Labor and Employment (SOLE)
   Under Articles 263-264, the Secretary of Labor and Employment has extraordinary powers to assume jurisdiction over or certify labor disputes to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) when such disputes affect the national interest (e.g., industries indispensable to national security or public interest). Upon assumption or certification, any intended or ongoing strike or lockout must cease, and the parties are required to revert to normal operations. Defiance of this assumption or certification order renders the strike or lockout illegal.

5. No-Strike, No-Lockout Clauses and Grievance Machinery
   Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) often contain grievance procedures and arbitration clauses designed to prevent precipitous strikes. The Labor Code encourages the inclusion of such mechanisms so that disputes are resolved internally before resorting to concerted activities. Grievance machinery, voluntary arbitration, and mediation are central features of industrial peace promotion.

6. Link to Wage Legislation (R.A. No. 6727)
   Republic Act No. 6727, the Wage Rationalization Act, established Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards (RTWPBs) to set minimum wage rates by region. While R.A. No. 6727 itself does not govern the right to strike or picket directly, it greatly influences the context within which peaceful concerted activities occur.

   • Wage Disputes and Concerted Activities: Employees often resort to peaceful concerted activities—like strikes—to press for wage increases or to protest the inadequacy of mandated minimum wages. Before R.A. No. 6727, wage increases often had to be legislated nationwide or negotiated directly. Now, regional boards periodically set and adjust minimum wage rates. Disputes over these wage settings, perceptions of unjust wage levels, or alleged employer non-compliance can trigger demands for collective action.
   • Wage-Related Strikes: While wage-fixing is largely now a function of RTWPBs, bargaining for improvements above the minimum wage remains within the sphere of collective bargaining. Unresolved wage bargaining deadlocks can lawfully support a strike. Thus, while R.A. No. 6727 rationalized and regionalized wage determination, the possibility of peaceful concerted activities remains a critical avenue for workers to push for better wages beyond the minimum set by boards.
   • R.A. No. 6727 and Labor-Management Dialogue: The law fosters tripartism—government, labor, and management involvement in setting wages—which may reduce the frequency of wage-related strikes. However, if workers perceive that wage boards’ determinations are inadequate or if certain employers fail to comply with mandated increases, unions may still exercise the right to strike as a lawful concerted activity, provided legal prerequisites are met.

7. Jurisprudence and Labor Arbitral Practice
   Philippine Supreme Court decisions have consistently underscored the delicate balance between an employer’s property rights and management prerogative, and the workers’ constitutionally recognized rights to free association and concerted activities. Key points from jurisprudence include:

   • Affirming the right to strike as a fundamental labor right, while stressing the importance of compliance with statutory procedures.
   • Recognizing that peaceful conduct is an essential element. Violence, intimidation, or obstruction of lawful business activities can undermine the protection afforded to strikes and picketing.
   • Reinforcing the Department of Labor and Employment’s (DOLE) authority to intervene in national interest cases, ensuring that while the right to strike is respected, it does not paralyze the delivery of essential public services or imperil the national economy.

8. Tripartism and Social Dialogue
   The Labor Code, in conjunction with R.A. No. 6727 and other labor statutes, emphasizes tripartism and social dialogue as tools to minimize recourse to disruptive industrial action. The National Tripartite Industrial Peace Council, regional wage boards, and NCMB mediation services are integral to ensuring that peaceful concerted activities remain a measure of last resort rather than a frequent occurrence.

9. Overall Policy Direction
   The Philippine labor relations policy seeks to maintain industrial peace through a framework that respects workers’ rights to organize and engage in concerted activities while encouraging conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. Peaceful concerted activities serve as a crucial check on employer power, ensuring that labor disputes are not ignored. Simultaneously, statutory safeguards ensure these activities are carried out responsibly, lawfully, and in a manner that respects the public interest and economic stability.

---

In Summary:

• Peaceful concerted activities—including strikes and pickets—are constitutionally enshrined labor rights that enable workers to collectively assert their interests.
• The Labor Code provides stringent procedural and substantive requirements to ensure that these activities are exercised lawfully, peacefully, and only after attempts at negotiation and mediation fail.
• R.A. No. 6727 (Wage Rationalization Act) does not alter the essential nature of concerted activities but changes the wage-setting landscape, potentially reducing some wage-based disputes while still leaving space for strikes on bargaining deadlocks and other issues.
• The law, implementing agencies, and jurisprudence together seek to balance workers’ rights to self-help measures with the broader objectives of industrial peace, economic stability, and adherence to lawful processes.