Grounds, Requisites, and Period for Filing a Claim for Refund or… | Recovery of Tax Erroneously or Illegally Collected | Taxpayers Remedies | Tax Remedies | NIRC | TAXATION LAW

Here is a comprehensive and meticulous breakdown on the topic of Taxpayers’ Remedies > Recovery of Tax Erroneously or Illegally Collected > Grounds, Requisites, and Period for Filing a Claim for Refund or Issuance of a Tax Credit Certificate under the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997, as amended by the TRAIN Law (R.A. No. 10963) and the Ease of Paying Taxes Act (R.A. No. 11976):

I. Grounds for Filing a Claim for Refund or Issuance of a Tax Credit Certificate

Under the NIRC of 1997, as amended, a taxpayer may seek the recovery of taxes erroneously or illegally collected by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). The grounds for filing a claim include:

  1. Erroneous or Illegal Payment of Tax:

    • If a tax was collected by mistake, whether due to an error in computation, a misapplication of tax rates, or the misinterpretation of applicable tax provisions, the taxpayer may seek a refund or credit.

  2. Excess Payment of Tax:

    • A taxpayer is entitled to a refund for any excess tax payments made. This could arise from estimated quarterly income tax payments that exceed the actual tax due for the year, resulting in overpayment.

  3. Payment of Unconstitutional or Invalid Taxes:

    • If the taxpayer has paid a tax declared by a court as unconstitutional or invalid, they may be entitled to recover those amounts.

  4. Failure to Apply Tax Exemptions, Deductions, or Preferential Rates:

    • Situations where the BIR failed to apply tax exemptions or deductions to which the taxpayer is entitled, or where an erroneous rate was applied (e.g., the failure to apply treaty benefits for non-resident income), can form a valid basis for claiming a refund or credit.

  5. VAT Input Tax Credits:

    • In cases where a taxpayer has unutilized input VAT credits from zero-rated or effectively zero-rated transactions, they may file for a refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate under Section 112 of the NIRC.

II. Requisites for Filing a Claim for Refund or Issuance of a Tax Credit Certificate

To successfully pursue a claim for a tax refund or tax credit certificate, the taxpayer must meet specific statutory requirements, which include:

  1. Written Claim:

    • The taxpayer must file a formal, written claim with the BIR. The claim should contain a detailed explanation of the grounds for the refund, including the specific tax provisions or regulations applicable.

  2. Supporting Documents:

    • Documentary evidence supporting the claim must be submitted, including tax returns, official receipts, certificates of withholding tax (if applicable), invoices, proof of payment, and computations. This substantiates the overpayment or erroneous collection.

  3. Proof of Non-Transfer:

    • The taxpayer must demonstrate that they did not transfer the tax burden to another party. For example, VAT refund claims require proof that the tax burden was not passed on to the buyer or end consumer.

  4. Submission to Appropriate Authority:

    • Claims for refund or tax credit should be filed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) or the authorized BIR office. For customs-related refunds, the claim should be directed to the Bureau of Customs.

  5. Compliance with Jurisdictional Requirements:

    • In cases where judicial recourse is sought (e.g., appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals or CTA), procedural requirements, including prior exhaustion of administrative remedies, must be strictly complied with.

III. Period for Filing a Claim for Refund or Issuance of a Tax Credit Certificate

The timing of the claim is critical, as the NIRC prescribes specific periods for filing claims for refunds and tax credits. These deadlines must be strictly adhered to, as failure to file within the prescribed period results in the automatic denial of the claim. The periods are as follows:

  1. Two-Year Period for General Tax Refund Claims (Sec. 229, NIRC):

    • Refunds for erroneously or illegally collected taxes must be filed within two years from the date of payment. This rule applies to income taxes, estate and donor’s taxes, excise taxes, and documentary stamp taxes, among others.

  2. Two-Year Period for VAT Refund Claims (Sec. 112(A), NIRC):

    • In cases of unutilized input VAT for zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales, the taxpayer has two years from the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made to file the claim.

  3. 120-Day Waiting Period for VAT Refund Claims (Sec. 112(C), NIRC):

    • For VAT refund claims, after filing the administrative claim with the CIR, the BIR has 120 days to act on the claim. If the BIR denies the claim or fails to act within this period, the taxpayer has 30 days from the receipt of the decision or from the expiration of the 120-day period to appeal to the CTA.

  4. Application of the 30-Day Period to Appeal to CTA (Sec. 112(C), NIRC):

    • If the taxpayer is not satisfied with the CIR’s decision or inaction within the 120-day period, they must appeal to the CTA within 30 days. Failure to adhere to this period precludes the taxpayer from pursuing the claim judicially.

  5. Special Provisions under R.A. No. 10963 (TRAIN Law):

    • The TRAIN Law reinforced the statutory periods for refund claims, particularly for VAT refunds, emphasizing strict compliance with the 120-day and 30-day periods and aiming to streamline the refund process for VAT-registered taxpayers with zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales.

IV. Important Jurisprudential Doctrines

Several landmark Supreme Court decisions interpret the provisions of the NIRC on tax refunds and credits, such as:

  1. Doctrine of Strict Compliance:

    • The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that taxpayers must strictly adhere to the statutory requirements for claiming refunds or credits, particularly with respect to deadlines and documentation (e.g., Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Mirant Pagbilao Corporation).

  2. Inalienability of Deadlines:

    • The two-year period under Section 229 and the 120+30-day periods under Section 112 are considered jurisdictional and mandatory, meaning that they cannot be extended or waived by the CIR or the courts.

  3. Substantial Compliance Not Accepted in Documentary Evidence:

    • The courts have held that the taxpayer must present complete and accurate supporting documents to substantiate the claim, and mere substantial compliance is generally insufficient.

  4. Doctrine of Non-Transferability of Tax Burden in VAT Claims:

    • For VAT refund claims, the taxpayer must prove that the burden of the VAT was not transferred to any other party. This is to avoid unjust enrichment and prevent refunds for taxes ultimately borne by consumers.

V. Process After Filing the Claim

Upon filing a claim for a refund or tax credit certificate, the BIR examines the submitted documents and may:

  1. Approve and Issue the Refund/Tax Credit Certificate:

    • If the claim is valid, the BIR may issue a tax credit certificate or a cash refund, depending on the taxpayer’s preference and eligibility.

  2. Deny the Claim:

    • A denial may be based on insufficient documentation, failure to meet jurisdictional requirements, or other grounds. A taxpayer may appeal a denial to the CTA within 30 days.

  3. Inaction by the BIR:

    • In cases where the BIR does not act on the claim within the prescribed period (120 days for VAT), the taxpayer may seek recourse with the CTA.

VI. Procedural and Administrative Improvements under R.A. No. 11976 (Ease of Paying Taxes Act)

The Ease of Paying Taxes Act introduced reforms to simplify compliance, expedite the refund process, and reduce administrative burdens, including:

  1. Simplified Documentation Requirements:

    • R.A. No. 11976 mandates the BIR to simplify documentary requirements, especially for VAT refunds, with the goal of easing the process for claimants.

  2. Streamlined Processing Periods:

    • The Act requires the BIR to adhere to stricter timelines in the processing of refunds, especially for VAT-related refunds, aiming for consistency in meeting the statutory 120-day review period.

  3. Enhanced Appeals Process:

    • It also streamlines the appellate process, aiming for expedited resolution of disputes involving denied claims before the CTA.

This comprehensive overview outlines the statutory and procedural requirements for taxpayers seeking recovery of taxes erroneously or illegally collected under Philippine tax law, as well as recent legislative enhancements aimed at facilitating compliance and expediting the refund process.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login