Prosecution of Election Offenses [Exclude: Penal Provisions] | ELECTION LAW

Election Law: Prosecution of Election Offenses (Excluding Penal Provisions)

I. Introduction

The prosecution of election offenses in the Philippines is a crucial aspect of election law, ensuring that violations during elections are properly addressed to uphold the integrity of the electoral process. This encompasses a well-structured legal framework, from the identification of offenses to the institutions responsible for prosecuting and adjudicating election-related violations. The Constitution, laws, regulations, and jurisprudence form the core of this framework.

II. Legal Framework Governing Election Offenses

  1. 1987 Constitution of the Philippines:

    • The Constitution mandates the conduct of free, fair, and honest elections. Any attempt to subvert this mandate through illegal acts during the election process is considered an election offense.

  2. Omnibus Election Code (Batas Pambansa Blg. 881):

    • The Omnibus Election Code is the principal law that governs election offenses in the Philippines. It enumerates various election offenses, prescribes penalties, and outlines procedures for prosecution.
    • Election offenses include acts such as vote-buying, voter coercion, terrorism, unlawful electioneering, tampering with election returns, and other violations that directly impact the conduct and results of elections.

  3. Republic Act No. 9369 (Automated Election Law):

    • Amendments to the election law to accommodate automated elections have also introduced new types of election offenses, particularly related to the integrity of automated election systems.

  4. COMELEC Rules of Procedure:

    • The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) has its own procedural rules that govern the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of election offenses. These rules supplement the provisions of the Omnibus Election Code.

  5. Relevant Jurisprudence:

    • Numerous Supreme Court decisions interpret and clarify the provisions on election offenses. These jurisprudential rulings help shape the enforcement and prosecution of election laws.

III. Election Offenses Defined

Election offenses can be broadly categorized as follows:

  1. Vote-buying and Vote-selling:

    • It is illegal to directly or indirectly offer, promise, or give money, material benefits, or anything of value in exchange for a vote.
    • The act of selling one's vote is also an offense.

  2. Coercion, Intimidation, and Terrorism:

    • Any act that forces or intimidates voters into casting their votes for a particular candidate, or dissuades them from voting, constitutes an election offense.

  3. Electioneering:

    • Electioneering is any partisan political activity done within the polling precinct or within prohibited areas on election day.
    • Unauthorized distribution of campaign materials during the prohibited period is considered an election offense.

  4. Tampering with Election Documents:

    • Tampering with election returns, certificates of canvass, or any other election documents is considered a serious election offense.

  5. Illegal Appointment of Election Officials:

    • The appointment of unauthorized individuals to perform election duties or tampering with the list of election officials constitutes an offense.

  6. Interference with Election Machines:

    • Under the Automated Election Law, any unauthorized tampering, interference, or manipulation of automated election equipment or software is an offense.

  7. Unlawful Voting:

    • Multiple voting, using fictitious names, or impersonating another voter are all considered unlawful voting practices.

IV. Who Can Be Prosecuted for Election Offenses?

Any person, whether a candidate, voter, election official, or private individual, can be prosecuted for committing an election offense. This includes:

  1. Candidates:

    • Candidates who engage in unlawful campaign activities, such as vote-buying or coercing voters, can be prosecuted.

  2. Voters:

    • Voters who engage in acts like vote-selling, multiple voting, or impersonating another voter are subject to prosecution.

  3. Election Officials:

    • Public officials, particularly members of the Board of Election Inspectors (BEIs), COMELEC personnel, or other designated officials who violate election rules, are liable for election offenses.

  4. Private Individuals and Groups:

    • Third parties, including political organizations, private groups, or individual actors who interfere with the electoral process, may also be prosecuted.

V. Institutions Involved in the Prosecution of Election Offenses

  1. Commission on Elections (COMELEC):

    • Investigative Function:

      • COMELEC, through its Law Department, is tasked with the investigation and prosecution of election offenses. It has the power to issue subpoenas, require the attendance of witnesses, and conduct investigations into election violations.

    • Prosecution Function:

      • After investigating an election offense, COMELEC may file the appropriate charges before the courts. It has exclusive jurisdiction over the prosecution of election offenses.
      • In some cases, the COMELEC can deputize the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Office of the Ombudsman to assist in prosecuting election-related cases.

    • Enforcement Powers:

      • COMELEC may also call upon law enforcement agencies, such as the Philippine National Police (PNP) or the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), to assist in the enforcement of election laws.

  2. Department of Justice (DOJ):

    • The DOJ assists in the prosecution of election offenses by providing support to COMELEC. It may act as the prosecutorial arm when deputized by COMELEC, particularly in complex or large-scale cases.

  3. Courts:

    • Regional Trial Courts (RTC):
      • The RTCs have jurisdiction over election offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding six years.
    • Municipal Trial Courts (MTC):
      • MTCs handle election offenses punishable by imprisonment of less than six years.
    • COMELEC’s Adjudicatory Powers:
      • In administrative cases involving election offenses committed by election officials, COMELEC itself may render decisions and impose sanctions.

  4. Special Courts:

    • In some instances, special courts or divisions may be designated to handle election offense cases, particularly in situations where an expedited resolution is necessary.

VI. Procedure for the Prosecution of Election Offenses

  1. Filing of Complaints:

    • Any person may file a complaint for an election offense before the COMELEC. The complaint must be under oath and accompanied by supporting documents or evidence.

  2. Preliminary Investigation:

    • The COMELEC Law Department conducts a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is sufficient ground to hold the respondent liable for the election offense.
    • If a prima facie case is established, COMELEC files the necessary information before the appropriate court.

  3. Prosecution in Court:

    • Once a case is filed in court, the normal rules of criminal procedure apply. The prosecutor (whether from COMELEC or the DOJ) presents evidence, and the accused has the right to present a defense.
    • Trial courts are required to resolve election offenses speedily, recognizing the urgency of adjudicating these cases promptly, especially when the offense may affect the outcome of an election.

  4. Appeals:

    • Decisions of the lower courts on election offense cases can be appealed to the higher courts (Court of Appeals or Supreme Court) following the ordinary rules of criminal procedure.

VII. Special Rules and Considerations

  1. Election Period:

    • Election offenses committed during the election period (as determined by COMELEC) are given special attention and higher penalties. The election period typically covers the time from the filing of candidacies to the conclusion of the election and proclamation of winners.

  2. Disqualification:

    • In addition to criminal prosecution, candidates found guilty of election offenses may also be disqualified from holding public office or being proclaimed winners in an election. This can occur even before the election offense case is resolved if COMELEC issues a disqualification order based on sufficient evidence.

  3. Prescription of Election Offenses:

    • Election offenses must be prosecuted within five (5) years from the date of their commission. After this period, the offense may no longer be subject to prosecution due to prescription.

VIII. Conclusion

The prosecution of election offenses in the Philippines plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the sanctity of the electoral process. It involves a detailed legal framework designed to address various forms of election-related violations, supported by key institutions like COMELEC, the DOJ, and the courts. Ensuring prompt investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of election offenses is essential for maintaining public trust in the electoral system and upholding democratic principles.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login