Remedies and Jurisdiction | ELECTION LAW

Topic: Political Law and Public International Law > XIV. Election Law > D. Remedies and Jurisdiction

In the context of Philippine Election Law, the topic of remedies and jurisdiction is critical to understanding the mechanisms by which election-related disputes are resolved. This discussion is particularly relevant to situations involving contested election results, violations of election laws, and various irregularities during the election process. Below is an exhaustive examination of the remedies and jurisdiction in election law in the Philippines.

I. REMEDIES IN ELECTION LAW

Election-related remedies generally fall into two categories: administrative remedies and judicial remedies. Each provides specific courses of action to address various election law violations or disputes.

A. Pre-Election Remedies

  1. Disqualification Proceedings

    • Definition: This refers to actions taken to disqualify a candidate on grounds such as ineligibility, violation of campaign rules, or failure to meet the qualifications prescribed by the Constitution or the law.
    • Governing Laws:
      • Section 68, Omnibus Election Code (OEC): This provision outlines the grounds for disqualification, including election offenses such as vote-buying, terrorism, and overspending.
      • Section 12, OEC: It specifies permanent disqualifications due to convictions involving moral turpitude or crimes punishable by more than 18 months.
    • Procedure: A verified petition for disqualification must be filed with the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), either en banc or with a Division, depending on the rules.
    • Timing: It must be filed at least five days before the election, though COMELEC may entertain post-election disqualification cases before proclamation of the winning candidate.

  2. Petition to Deny Due Course or Cancel Certificate of Candidacy (CoC)

    • Grounds: Misrepresentation of qualifications (e.g., residency, citizenship) in the CoC.
    • Legal Basis: Section 78 of the OEC.
    • Procedure: File a petition within five days from the last day of the filing of the CoC but not later than 25 days from the filing of the CoC. The petition is filed with COMELEC.
    • Effect: If granted, it nullifies the candidacy, meaning that votes cast for the candidate will be considered stray votes.

B. Post-Election Remedies

  1. Election Protest

    • Definition: A legal remedy available to a candidate who loses in an election but believes that fraud, irregularities, or anomalies affected the election results.
    • Procedure: The aggrieved candidate may file an election protest within ten days from the proclamation of the winning candidate.
    • Jurisdiction:
      • For President and Vice-President: Filed with the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET).
      • For Senators: Filed with the Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET).
      • For House Representatives: Filed with the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET).
      • For local officials (governor, mayor, etc.): Filed with the COMELEC or Regional Trial Courts (RTCs), depending on the level of the office.
    • Recount: The protest may involve a manual or automated recount, depending on the election system used.

  2. Petition for Quo Warranto

    • Definition: A legal remedy challenging the eligibility or right of an individual to hold an elected office.
    • Procedure: The petition must be filed within ten days after the proclamation of the winning candidate, except in the case of members of Congress, where the tribunals (PET, SET, HRET) have exclusive jurisdiction.
    • Grounds: The main ground is ineligibility, such as lack of qualifications or disqualifications after the proclamation.
    • Jurisdiction: Similar to election protests, this depends on the level of office (COMELEC, PET, SET, HRET, or RTC).

  3. Failure of Elections

    • Definition: A scenario in which the election process has been disrupted due to irregularities, violence, or other factors leading to the disenfranchisement of voters.
    • Governing Laws:
      • Section 6, OEC: Provides the grounds for declaring a failure of elections, such as force majeure, terrorism, fraud, and violence.
    • Procedure: A petition may be filed with the COMELEC to declare a failure of elections, and the Commission must determine whether special elections need to be called. The petition must be filed within ten days from the occurrence of the failure of elections or discovery thereof.
    • COMELEC’s Role: COMELEC can declare a failure of elections moto proprio or upon petition. If found valid, COMELEC may call for special elections to address the failure.

II. JURISDICTION IN ELECTION LAW

Jurisdiction refers to the authority of specific bodies to hear and decide election-related disputes. This is categorized by the nature of the case and the level of office involved in the election.

A. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)

  1. Jurisdiction Over Pre-Election Controversies

    • COMELEC Divisions: COMELEC is primarily responsible for pre-election disputes, including issues related to the qualifications of candidates, cancellation of CoCs, and petitions for disqualification.
    • COMELEC En Banc: Decisions of COMELEC divisions may be appealed to the COMELEC en banc. It may also take jurisdiction over cases involving a failure of elections and certain petitions for annulment of elections.

  2. Jurisdiction Over Election Protests and Quo Warranto

    • For Regional, Provincial, and City Officials: COMELEC exercises jurisdiction over election contests for these positions.
    • For Barangay Officials: Election contests involving barangay officials are filed with the Metropolitan Trial Courts or Municipal Trial Courts.

  3. Appellate Jurisdiction Over RTC Decisions

    • COMELEC as Appellate Body: COMELEC has appellate jurisdiction over decisions of the Regional Trial Courts in cases involving municipal officials.

B. Electoral Tribunals

  1. Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET)

    • The PET is an independent body composed of members of the Supreme Court. It exercises exclusive jurisdiction over election contests relating to the President and Vice-President.

  2. Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET)

    • The SET handles election contests involving members of the Senate. It is composed of nine members—three justices of the Supreme Court and six senators.

  3. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET)

    • The HRET has jurisdiction over election contests involving members of the House of Representatives. Similar to SET, it is composed of three justices from the Supreme Court and six members of the House of Representatives.

C. Regional Trial Courts (RTC)

  • Municipal Election Contests: The RTCs exercise jurisdiction over election protests and quo warranto petitions involving municipal officials.
  • Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: Decisions by the RTC may be appealed to the COMELEC, whose final decisions may be reviewed by the Supreme Court via certiorari under Rule 64 of the Rules of Court.

D. Supreme Court

  1. Judicial Review via Certiorari

    • The Supreme Court may review final decisions of COMELEC and electoral tribunals in election-related cases through certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court. However, this is limited to questions of grave abuse of discretion.

  2. Final Arbiter of Election Law Questions

    • The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of questions regarding the constitutionality of election laws, procedures, and issues that arise within the ambit of its jurisdiction.

III. REMEDIES AND JURISDICTION: TIMELINES AND PROCESSES

To provide clarity on timelines and procedures, the following summary outlines key deadlines:

  • Petition to Deny Due Course or Cancel CoC: Filed within five days from the last day of filing of the CoC, but not later than 25 days after the CoC's filing.
  • Disqualification Cases: Filed five days before the election or before the proclamation of the winning candidate.
  • Election Protest/Quo Warranto: Filed within ten days after the proclamation.
  • Failure of Elections Petition: Filed within ten days from the occurrence or discovery of the failure.

IV. CONCLUSION

The remedies and jurisdiction under Philippine Election Law ensure the proper functioning of the electoral process and provide avenues for addressing grievances and irregularities. These mechanisms maintain the integrity of elections, safeguard voters' rights, and uphold the rule of law in the democratic process. Understanding the specific legal remedies and the jurisdictional responsibilities of the COMELEC, RTCs, electoral tribunals, and the Supreme Court is essential for any practitioner navigating election-related disputes in the Philippines.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login