Term Limits | LAW ON PUBLIC OFFICERS

Law on Public Officers: Term Limits (Political Law and Public International Law)

1. Introduction to Term Limits

Term limits refer to the constitutional or statutory restrictions imposed on public officers, preventing them from serving in a particular office beyond a specified number of terms or years. This principle aims to prevent the monopolization of public power, ensure democratic rotation of leadership, and promote accountability.

In the context of Philippine political law, term limits are primarily governed by the 1987 Constitution, various statutes, and case law that interpret these provisions.

2. Constitutional Basis for Term Limits

The 1987 Philippine Constitution explicitly provides for term limits in various elective offices. The objective of these term limits is to prevent the perpetuation of individuals in power and to promote a more dynamic political environment.

Key provisions in the Constitution related to term limits include:

  • Article VI, Section 4 (Members of the House of Representatives):

    "No member of the House of Representatives shall serve for more than three consecutive terms."

  • Article VI, Section 7 (Senators):

    "No Senator shall serve for more than two consecutive terms."

  • Article VII, Section 4 (President and Vice President):

    "The President shall not be eligible for any re-election. No person who has succeeded as President and has served as such for more than four years shall be qualified for election to the same office at any time." "The Vice President shall not serve for more than two consecutive terms."

  • Article X, Section 8 (Local Government Officials):

    "The term of office of elective local officials, except barangay officials, which shall be determined by law, shall be three years, and no such official shall serve for more than three consecutive terms."

3. Elective Officials and Their Term Limits

A. President
  • The President has a six-year term and is not eligible for re-election.
  • A person who has served as President for more than four years due to succession is ineligible for election as President.
B. Vice President
  • The Vice President serves a six-year term and can be re-elected, but cannot serve more than two consecutive terms.
C. Senators
  • Senators have a six-year term, with a maximum of two consecutive terms.
  • After serving two consecutive terms, a Senator must sit out for at least one term before being eligible for election again.
D. Members of the House of Representatives
  • Members of the House of Representatives serve for three years and are limited to three consecutive terms.
  • Like Senators, after serving the maximum number of consecutive terms, they must sit out for at least one term before they can run for the same office again.
E. Local Government Officials
  • Local officials (i.e., governors, mayors, members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, Sangguniang Bayan, Sangguniang Panlungsod) serve for a three-year term and are limited to three consecutive terms in the same position.

4. Interpretation of "Consecutive Terms"

The Supreme Court has clarified that a "term" refers to the official tenure of a public officer, and "consecutive terms" means serving in a position without any break or interruption. Key jurisprudence includes:

  • Aldovino, Jr. v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 184836, December 23, 2009):

    The Court held that an elective official can run for the same office again if there is an interruption in their service or if they sit out one term. The term limit resets once the official is out of office for a full term.

  • Borja, Jr. v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 133495, September 3, 1998):

    It was ruled that a public official who has served three consecutive terms may run for a higher position or for a different elective office, without violating the term limit rule.

5. Computation of Term Limits

The following principles are relevant in the computation of term limits:

  1. Full Term Requirement: Only full terms are counted toward the term limit. If an official assumes office due to succession or other circumstances and serves less than the full term, it does not count as a "term" for purposes of the term limit.

    Example: A Vice President who assumes the presidency for less than four years may still run for the presidency in the next election.

  2. Interruptions and Non-Consecutive Terms: The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that term limits only apply to consecutive terms. If an official skips an election or is not re-elected, they are free to run again in future elections.

  3. Succession and Term Limit Application: An official who succeeds to a position by law, such as when a Vice President succeeds the President, may still be eligible for re-election under specific conditions, depending on the length of the term they served. For example, a Vice President who assumes the presidency and serves for less than four years may run for a full six-year term.

6. Remedies for Violations of Term Limits

The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) has the authority to enforce term limits in the Philippines. An official who files a certificate of candidacy despite being ineligible due to term limits can be disqualified by COMELEC.

  • Disqualification Cases: Violations of term limits can lead to disqualification proceedings. An interested party may file a petition before COMELEC seeking to disqualify a candidate who has violated term limit provisions.

  • Judicial Review: Disqualification decisions by COMELEC may be appealed to the Supreme Court under its power of judicial review.

7. Exceptions and Special Considerations

A. Barangay Officials
  • The term limits for barangay officials are not specifically provided in the Constitution but are subject to legislation by Congress. This means that the law governing the term limits of barangay officials is flexible and can be amended by the legislative body.
B. Recall Elections
  • In recall elections, officials can be removed from office before the expiration of their term. However, if they are recalled and re-elected, the subsequent term is still counted for purposes of term limits.
C. Appointed Officials and Term Limits
  • Appointed officials are not subject to term limits since their tenure is at the discretion of the appointing authority. However, if an appointed official runs for elective office, the term limit provisions applicable to that position will apply.

8. Public International Law and Term Limits

While public international law does not directly mandate term limits for public officials, international conventions such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) emphasize democratic governance, periodic elections, and accountability of leaders. Term limits can be viewed as part of ensuring that democratic processes are upheld and that no individual monopolizes power, which aligns with international human rights standards.

In regional contexts, international bodies such as the Organization of American States (OAS) and the African Union (AU) have spoken against attempts by leaders to extend their term limits, viewing such actions as a threat to democratic stability.

9. Conclusion

Term limits are a fundamental feature of Philippine political law, aimed at ensuring a healthy rotation of leaders, preventing the concentration of power, and upholding democratic principles. The Philippine Constitution provides explicit term limits for various national and local offices, which are strictly interpreted by the courts. Violations of these term limits result in disqualification from candidacy, with remedies available through COMELEC and judicial review. In a broader sense, term limits reflect the nation's commitment to democratic governance, in line with both constitutional mandates and international democratic norms.