Demurrer to Evidence (RULE 33) | CIVIL PROCEDURE

Below is a comprehensive discussion of Demurrer to Evidence under Rule 33 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (as amended) in the Philippines, along with practical points, relevant jurisprudence, ethical considerations, and procedural nuances. This aims to be as meticulous and direct as possible—an overview befitting “the best lawyer in the Philippines.”


1. Definition and Purpose

A demurrer to evidence is a procedural device in civil litigation that allows the defendant (or any party against whom a claim is asserted) to challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s (or claimant’s) evidence after the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his or her evidence but before the defendant presents any evidence. By filing a demurrer, the defendant, in effect, asks the court to rule on whether the plaintiff’s evidence is insufficient to prove the claim or cause of action.

Legal Basis: Rule 33 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (as amended).

Purpose:

  • To avoid unnecessary presentation of defense evidence if the plaintiff’s evidence is already insufficient as a matter of law.
  • To expedite the resolution of cases by preventing futile litigation where no prima facie case is established.

2. When to File

  • Timing: A demurrer to evidence is filed after the plaintiff has rested (i.e., completed the presentation of all its evidence).
  • At this juncture, the court declares the plaintiff’s evidence “closed,” and the defendant must move promptly—within the timeframe the rules or the court may impose—to file the demurrer.
  • In practice, courts often set a specific period (e.g., 10 or 15 days) from the date the plaintiff rests its case or from receipt of the formal offer of evidence.

3. Grounds for Demurrer to Evidence

A demurrer to evidence essentially alleges that plaintiff’s evidence is insufficient in law to prove the material allegations of the complaint. The grounds typically include:

  1. Failure to prove a prima facie case. If after assessing all the plaintiff’s evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the court still finds it wanting to prove the essential elements of the cause of action, the demurrer should be granted.
  2. Lack of competent evidence. The evidence presented is incompetent, immaterial, hearsay without exception, or otherwise inadmissible, leaving the cause of action unsubstantiated.
  3. Failure to prove damages or remedy. Even if there is evidence as to the fact of liability, the plaintiff’s failure to prove the damages or relief sought with a reasonable degree of certainty might lead to a successful demurrer with respect to that relief.

Key Note: In civil cases, the standard of proof is preponderance of evidence. If plaintiff’s proof does not meet that threshold (even at the prima facie level, i.e., enough to withstand a motion for dismissal), granting the demurrer is proper.


4. Procedure Under Rule 33

  1. Plaintiff Presents Evidence

    • The plaintiff (or claimant) formally offers and rests its case.
  2. Defendant Files Demurrer

    • The defendant files a demurrer to evidence in writing, setting forth the reasons why the evidence is insufficient.
  3. Leave of Court (Important Distinction)

    • With Leave of Court: If the defendant obtains leave of court to file the demurrer and it is denied, the defendant may still proceed to present its own evidence.
    • Without Leave of Court: If the defendant files a demurrer to evidence without first securing leave of court and the demurrer is denied, the defendant waives the right to present evidence. In effect, the case is deemed submitted for judgment on the plaintiff’s evidence alone. This is a strategic consideration.
  4. Court Ruling

    • The court then rules on the demurrer:
      • If granted, the complaint is dismissed on the merits (with prejudice).
      • If denied, the case proceeds; the defendant may present evidence only if it filed its demurrer with leave of court.

5. Effects of Court’s Ruling

A. If the Court Grants the Demurrer

  • Dismissal with Prejudice. The order granting the demurrer operates as an adjudication on the merits, akin to a judgment of dismissal.
  • Appeal. The plaintiff can appeal from the order of dismissal within the prescribed period (generally 15 days from receipt of notice of the order/judgment, or 30 days if a record on appeal is required).
  • Res Judicata. If the dismissal is affirmed on appeal (or no appeal is taken), the case is barred by res judicata.

B. If the Court Denies the Demurrer

  1. With Leave of Court:

    • The defendant is then allowed to present evidence. The trial resumes, and the defendant can attempt to refute plaintiff’s claims or prove affirmative defenses.
  2. Without Leave of Court:

    • The defendant loses the right to present evidence. The case is submitted for decision on the basis of plaintiff’s evidence alone. Often, this is highly risky unless defendant is extremely confident in the insufficiency of plaintiff’s case.

6. Demurrer to Evidence vs. Motion to Dismiss

  • A motion to dismiss (under Rule 16) is generally filed before the defendant files an answer, addressing grounds such as improper venue, lack of jurisdiction, etc.
  • A demurrer to evidence (under Rule 33) is filed after the plaintiff rests its case, challenging the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence to prove the cause of action.
  • Both result in dismissal if granted; however, the timing and legal grounds differ markedly.

7. Demurrer to Evidence vs. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Summary Judgment

  1. Judgment on the Pleadings (Rule 34)

    • Based solely on the pleadings, where the answer does not tender an issue or admits material allegations of the complaint.
  2. Summary Judgment (Rule 35)

    • Filed when there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
    • Typically resolved without a full-blown trial, but based on affidavits, depositions, admissions, etc.
  3. Demurrer to Evidence (Rule 33)

    • Filed after the plaintiff’s presentation of evidence in a full trial on the merits, testing the sufficiency (or insufficiency) of that evidence.

8. Demurrer to Evidence in Criminal Cases vs. Civil Cases

While the user specifically asked about civil procedure, it is worth briefly distinguishing:

  • Demurrer to Evidence in Criminal Cases is governed by Rule 119, Section 23 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
  • In criminal cases, a demurrer to evidence may be filed if the prosecution’s evidence is insufficient to support a verdict of guilt. If the demurrer is granted, it is tantamount to an acquittal (which cannot be appealed by the prosecution due to double jeopardy constraints).
  • In civil cases, if the demurrer is granted, it is an adjudication on the merits in favor of the defendant; however, the plaintiff may appeal.

9. Tactical and Strategic Considerations

  1. With vs. Without Leave of Court

    • Generally, prudent counsel secures leave of court to preserve the chance to present defense evidence if the demurrer is denied.
    • Filing without leave is only advisable if one is extremely confident that the plaintiff’s evidence does not meet the required threshold.
  2. Risk Management

    • If the demurrer is denied and no leave was secured, the defendant forfeits the chance to present evidence, significantly reducing the chance to defend.
    • If the demurrer is granted, it leads to an outright dismissal in favor of defendant.
  3. Costs and Efficiency

    • A successful demurrer saves time and expense by avoiding the entire defense presentation.
    • A denied demurrer without leave of court can result in a near-certain adverse judgment and an appeal, prolonging the litigation and potentially increasing costs.

10. Relevant Jurisprudence

  1. Ortigas & Company Limited Partnership vs. Herrera, G.R. No. 109645 (September 1, 1994)

    • Clarifies that in resolving a demurrer, the court must consider the evidence of the plaintiff in the light most favorable to him and if it still fails to establish a prima facie case, the demurrer should be granted.
  2. Heirs of Domingo Hernandez, Sr. vs. Mingoa, G.R. No. 140954 (May 3, 2006)

    • Emphasizes that once the defendant presents evidence after denial of demurrer to evidence (with leave), any error in the denial of the demurrer is deemed cured by the defendant’s subsequent presentation of evidence.
  3. Meliton vs. CA, G.R. No. L-43954 (September 15, 1987)

    • An older case highlighting the concept that if the evidence of the plaintiff is insufficient, the defendant need not even present evidence.
  4. Peregrina vs. Panis, G.R. No. 206728 (January 21, 2015)

    • A relatively recent reaffirmation that a demurrer to evidence in a civil case is not a matter of right and that leave of court is crucial if the defendant desires to preserve the right to present evidence.

11. Ethical Considerations

  1. Candor to the Court: A lawyer must file a demurrer based on genuine insufficiency of evidence, not for delay.
  2. Diligence and Competence: Counsel should thoroughly assess the plaintiff’s evidence before filing, ensuring the arguments are well-grounded in fact and law.
  3. Avoiding Frivolous Pleadings: The Code of Professional Responsibility prohibits filing baseless motions; thus, a demurrer must have a valid basis in law and fact.

12. Sample Outline of a Demurrer to Evidence (Legal Form)

Below is a simplified schematic form. Specific formalities and exact phrasing may vary depending on local practice and the judge’s preferences, but the essential components are:

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch Number], [City/Province]

[Case Title: Plaintiff vs. Defendant]
[Case No.: _______]

x-------------------------------------x

DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE

Defendant [Name], through counsel, and unto this Honorable Court, respectfully states:

1. That Plaintiff has rested its case, and all evidence for Plaintiff has been admitted subject to the Court’s rulings.

2. That upon a careful examination, Plaintiff’s evidence fails to establish a prima facie case against Defendant for the following reasons:

   (a) [Discussion of insufficiency – e.g., elements of the cause of action not proved];
   (b) [Any contradictions or inadmissible portions of the evidence];
   (c) [Case law / statutes supporting the insufficiency];

3. That in light of the foregoing, the evidence adduced by the Plaintiff is insufficient to warrant a finding of liability against Defendant, and there is no need for Defendant to present evidence in rebuttal.

4. [If with leave of court, explicitly pray for leave and preserve the right to present evidence if denied].

WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed that this Honorable Court:

1. Grant this Demurrer to Evidence;
2. Dismiss the Complaint with prejudice; and
3. Grant such other and further relief as may be just and equitable.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

[Date, Place]

[Signature of Counsel]
[Name of Counsel]
[IBP No., Roll No., MCLE Compliance, etc.]

Note: If you intend to file it with leave of court, you typically file a “Motion for Leave to File Demurrer to Evidence” first. If leave is granted, then you attach or file the “Demurrer to Evidence” proper within the period provided by the court.


13. Conclusion

A demurrer to evidence under Rule 33 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (as amended) is a powerful tool in Philippine civil litigation. It enables the defendant to seek a dismissal of the case if the plaintiff has failed to make out a prima facie case. The key points to remember include:

  • Proper Timing: Filed after the plaintiff rests.
  • Ground: Plaintiff’s evidence is insufficient as a matter of law.
  • With or Without Leave of Court: A strategic choice affecting the defendant’s ability to present evidence if the demurrer is denied.
  • Effect if Granted: Dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, subject to appeal by the plaintiff.
  • Effect if Denied: If with leave, the defendant may proceed with evidence; if without leave, the defendant waives the right to present evidence.

Handled correctly, a demurrer to evidence can bring an early, favorable end to litigation. Handled incorrectly, it can deprive a defendant of the opportunity to present a defense. The best practice is to meticulously analyze the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence, understand the legal standards and jurisprudence, and consider the significant strategic ramifications of the choice to file with or without leave of court.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.