Ultimate facts including the evidence | Allegations in a Pleading (RULE 8) | Pleadings | CIVIL PROCEDURE

COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION ON RULE 8 (PHILIPPINE RULES OF COURT): ALLEGATIONS IN A PLEADING—ULTIMATE FACTS VS. EVIDENTIARY FACTS

I. OVERVIEW

Under Rule 8 of the Rules of Court in the Philippines (as amended by the 2019 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure), pleadings are required to set forth ultimate facts on which the party relies for a claim or defense. The general principle is:

  1. Ultimate facts – Must be stated in a pleading.
  2. Evidentiary facts – Generally should not be included in a pleading.
  3. Conclusions of law – Should not be pleaded; the court will deduce the legal conclusions from the ultimate facts alleged.

The purpose of this requirement is to give fair notice to the opposing party of the claims or defenses asserted, and to enable the court to determine whether the facts alleged can potentially support the relief prayed for under existing law.

II. DEFINITIONS AND DISTINCTIONS

  1. Ultimate Facts

    • These are the essential facts (the principal, material facts) which form the basis of a party’s claim or defense.
    • Ultimate facts are the factual elements that must be proven to establish a party’s right to judicial relief (in the case of the claimant) or a valid defense (in the case of the defendant).
    • Example: In a complaint for breach of contract, the ultimate facts would include the existence of a valid contract, the obligation undertaken by the defendant, the defendant’s failure or refusal to perform that obligation, and the resultant damage to the plaintiff.

  2. Evidentiary Facts

    • These are the facts that tend to prove the existence (or non-existence) of an ultimate fact.
    • They are secondary details or the means by which ultimate facts are demonstrated at trial (e.g., witness testimonies, documents, detailed circumstances, and other pieces of proof).
    • Example: In a breach of contract scenario, evidence that shows the date and place of signing, the manner in which the parties negotiated, letters exchanged, or the minute details of the breach are “evidentiary facts.” These need not be pleaded, though they will be presented later during trial or attached as supporting documents where necessary (e.g., in a summary procedure or if relevant to attach for clarity).

  3. Conclusions of Law

    • Statements such as “The plaintiff is entitled to damages,” or “The defendant is guilty of negligence,” are conclusions of law.
    • Pleadings should not merely assert these conclusions; rather, they must allege the factual basis that would support such legal conclusions. The court draws the conclusion of law from the ultimate facts stated.

III. SPECIFIC RULE 8 PROVISIONS

The relevant sections of Rule 8 (2019 Amendments to the Rules of Court) outline how parties must allege facts in their pleadings:

  1. Section 1: In General

    • A pleading must contain a “plain, concise and direct statement of the ultimate facts” on which a party’s claim or defense is based.
    • Avoid repetition and unnecessary details.
    • Evidentiary matters are generally excluded because the rule aims for clarity and brevity.

  2. Section 2: Pleading in the Alternative

    • A party may state alternative or hypothetical facts or claims, provided they are consistent with good faith and do not mislead.
    • This provision allows parties to allege facts in the alternative if there is uncertainty as to which set of ultimate facts the evidence may support.

  3. Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6

    • These discuss special matters that must be alleged with specificity or particularity, such as:
      • Capacity of a party (Sec. 4)
      • Conditions precedent and their performance or occurrence (Sec. 3)
      • Fraud or mistake, which must be stated with particularity (Sec. 5)
      • Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of mind may be alleged generally (Sec. 5)
      • Official document or act must be stated with particularity if it is the basis of the cause of action or defense (Sec. 6).

  4. Section 7: Judgment

    • Where a party relies on a judgment, the substance of the judgment must be set forth. It is enough to allege the basic facts constituting the judgment without detailing the entire text of the decision.

  5. Section 8: Action or Defense Based on Document

    • If a party’s cause of action or defense is founded on a written instrument or document, the substance of such instrument shall be set forth in the pleading, and the original or a copy should be attached as an exhibit or made part of the pleading by reference.

IV. WHY ULTIMATE FACTS ONLY?

  1. Clarity and Fairness

    • The requirement to plead ultimate facts ensures that both the court and the adverse party understand precisely the nature of the claims or defenses.
    • Cluttering a pleading with evidentiary facts can be confusing and can obscure the real issues, prolong litigation, and increase litigation costs.

  2. Avoiding Dismissal for Insufficiency

    • A complaint (or answer) that alleges conclusions of law without the necessary ultimate facts to support them can be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action or for failing to tender an issue.
    • Hence, there is a balance: one must allege enough facts to show a right to relief but not overload with unnecessary detail.

  3. Proper Notice and Preparation

    • By focusing on ultimate facts, each party can properly prepare for trial, knowing exactly what issues are in dispute. Evidentiary details are then fleshed out in discovery (e.g., depositions, interrogatories, requests for admission, and production of documents) and at trial.

V. ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES

  1. Negligence Claim

    • Correct Allegation of Ultimate Facts: “Defendant drove his car along [street] at a high speed and negligently swerved into the lane of oncoming traffic, colliding with Plaintiff’s vehicle, causing serious injuries and property damage.”
    • Incorrect Allegation (Overly Evidentiary): “On August 15, 2023, at exactly 2:03 p.m., Defendant was talking on his phone, looking away from the road, adjusting the car radio, and attempting to remove his seatbelt… [goes on for paragraphs describing each minor detail].”
    • While the latter might all be relevant evidence, they do not need to be spelled out in the complaint. They can be adduced later during trial or discovery.

  2. Breach of Contract

    • Correct Allegation of Ultimate Facts: “On April 10, 2024, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a written contract whereby Defendant agreed to deliver 100 units of [goods] to Plaintiff in exchange for payment of Php 1,000,000. Defendant failed to deliver the goods on the agreed date, causing Plaintiff substantial losses.”
    • Incorrect Allegation (Bare Legal Conclusion): “Defendant breached our contract, so Plaintiff is entitled to damages.” (This fails to specify the ultimate facts about the contract’s existence, the obligation, the breach, and the damages.)

VI. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PROPERLY ALLEGE FACTS

  1. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Cause of Action

    • If the complaint does not adequately allege the essential ultimate facts that would show the plaintiff’s entitlement to relief, the defendant may file a motion to dismiss under Rule 15 (in relation to Rule 8).
    • The test is whether the court, taking all the allegations as true, can determine that there is a basis for relief.

  2. Possible Amendment

    • The court generally allows a party to amend a defective pleading to cure the insufficiency in stating ultimate facts.
    • Under the rules, amendments should be liberally allowed to ensure that controversies are decided on the merits rather than on technicalities.

  3. Striking of Immaterial or Redundant Matter

    • Upon motion or at the court’s own initiative, the court may order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter (Rule 12). Over-pleading of evidentiary facts may fall under this category.

VII. INTERPLAY WITH EVIDENCE AND TRIAL

  • While pleadings must allege ultimate facts, evidence is produced in later stages to prove those ultimate facts. During:

    1. Pre-trial – Parties mark documents, identify witnesses, agree on stipulations, and narrow down the issues.
    2. Trial Proper – Parties present and offer the evidence necessary to establish the ultimate facts alleged in the pleading.
    3. Post-trial – The court evaluates the evidence to determine if the alleged ultimate facts have been sufficiently proved, thus warranting a legal remedy or dismissal.

  • Therefore, the difference between “what must be alleged” (ultimate facts in pleadings) and “how it must be proven” (evidentiary facts at trial) is crucial. The rules on pleading are designed so that each side knows the essential claims or defenses without being buried under the minutiae of proof in the initial complaint or answer.

VIII. RELEVANT JURISPRUDENCE

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has consistently emphasized these principles. While there are numerous cases, the recurring theme is:

  1. Ultimate facts, not legal conclusions, must be alleged.
  2. Failure to state essential factual elements can lead to the dismissal of a claim or defense.
  3. Over-pleading (i.e., setting forth all evidentiary details in the complaint) is not favored. Courts prefer concise statements that highlight the material and substantial averments, leaving the proof for trial.

IX. PRACTICAL POINTS FOR DRAFTING PLEADINGS

  1. Identify the Legal Cause of Action or Defense

    • Know the elements: e.g., for breach of contract, you must allege (i) the existence of a contract, (ii) the obligor’s breach, (iii) the plaintiff’s performance or compliance (if applicable), and (iv) damages.

  2. Convert Elements Into Ultimate Facts

    • For each element, write down a short, plain statement of what happened or what was done/not done—enough to show how the element is satisfied.

  3. Exclude Needless Details

    • Hold back purely evidentiary matters; attach only essential documents if the rule requires (like the written instrument on which the claim or defense is based).

  4. Avoid Mere Conclusions of Law

    • Rather than saying “Defendant is liable under the contract,” specify: “Defendant did not deliver X product on Y date despite demand, in violation of the contract dated Z.”

  5. Observe Special Rules

    • If alleging fraud or mistake, provide particular details about the alleged misrepresentation or error, because the rules demand specificity (Rule 8, Sec. 5).

  6. Check for Formal Requirements

    • Ensure you comply with verification and certification against forum shopping, if required under the relevant rules (Rule 15, Rule 7, or other pertinent regulations).

X. CONCLUSION

When preparing or evaluating pleadings in Philippine civil procedure, it is paramount to understand Rule 8 and the delineation between ultimate facts (which must be stated) and evidentiary facts (which are generally omitted at the pleading stage). A well-drafted pleading:

  • Identifies the essential factual elements of the cause of action or defense,
  • Omits unnecessary details or mere evidentiary averments,
  • Avoids legal conclusions,
  • Conforms with the rules on special matters (capacity, fraud, conditions precedent, etc.), and
  • Gives clear notice to the opposing party and the court of the real issues in controversy.

Mastering this distinction not only ensures technical compliance with the Rules of Court but also enhances the clarity and persuasiveness of any legal claim or defense. This precision in pleading is a cornerstone of effective advocacy and is foundational to securing justice under the Philippine legal system.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login