Petition for Relief from Judgment (Rule 38) | Post-judgment Remedies | CIVIL PROCEDURE

PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 38 (PHILIPPINE RULES OF COURT)

A Petition for Relief from Judgment (or order, or other proceeding) under Rule 38 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure is an equitable remedy of last resort. It allows a party to seek the setting aside of a final and executory judgment or order when no other adequate or available remedy exists and when the party has been unjustly deprived of its day in court due to fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence. Below is a comprehensive discussion of its salient features, procedural requisites, grounds, limitations, and relevant jurisprudential doctrines.

1. NATURE AND PURPOSE

  1. Equitable Remedy of Last Recourse

    • A petition for relief from judgment is not a matter of right but is granted only under exceptional circumstances.
    • It is designed to provide substantial justice by allowing a party who has been prevented from protecting its rights through the ordinary remedies (such as a motion for new trial or an appeal) to obtain relief from a final judgment.
    • It is not a substitute for a lost appeal or for failure to file a motion for reconsideration or new trial on time, except when such failure was itself attributable to fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence.

  2. Primary Purpose

    • To prevent grave injustice and promote justice by affording a party—who, through no fault of his or her own, failed to avail of the usual remedies—an opportunity to present his or her meritorious defenses or claims.

2. GROUNDS FOR A PETITION FOR RELIEF (RULE 38, SECTION 1 AND 2)

Under Rule 38, Sections 1 and 2, the grounds for a petition for relief are limited to:

  1. Fraud

    • Must be extrinsic or collateral in nature—i.e., the kind of fraud that prevented the party from having a fair and reasonable opportunity to defend or present his/her side.
    • Example: A party’s opponent deliberately misled the trial court into believing that the adverse party had been duly served with notice, causing the latter to be unable to appear and defend.

  2. Accident

    • An unforeseen event (not attributable to the fault or negligence of the litigant) that prevented the party from taking the necessary steps at the proper time.

  3. Mistake

    • A mistake of fact (and in rare instances, a mistake of law if the error was so palpable and excusable) that prevented the party from prosecuting or defending in due time.
    • Must be an honest, bona fide mistake, and not merely a tactical error in judgment by counsel that is binding upon the client.

  4. Excusable Negligence

    • The negligence must be excusable; that is, it is not so gross that the party is itself at fault in failing to diligently protect his or her interests.
    • The negligence of counsel is generally binding on the client, except when such negligence is so gross, reckless, or wanton as to prevent the client’s participation in the proceedings (amounting to “abandonment” or a denial of due process).

3. PERIODS FOR FILING (RULE 38, SECTION 3)

A petition for relief must be filed strictly within these two limitations:

  1. Within 60 days from knowledge of the judgment, order, or other proceeding

    • The 60-day period begins to run from the time the petitioner learns of the judgment, order, or proceeding sought to be set aside.
    • “Knowledge” ordinarily means actual knowledge, but jurisprudence has recognized that a party may be charged with “constructive knowledge” if surrounding circumstances show that he or she should have known of the judgment sooner.

  2. Not more than 6 months from the entry of the judgment or final order

    • Independently of the 60-day period, there is a hard cap of six (6) months from the date the judgment, order, or proceeding becomes final and executory (i.e., date of entry).
    • Failure to meet either deadline is fatal to the petition.

4. REQUISITES OF THE PETITION (RULE 38, SECTIONS 1–5)

A party seeking relief under Rule 38 must comply with the following requirements:

  1. Verification and Affidavit of Merit

    • The petition must be verified, meaning the petitioner must swear to the truth of the allegations.
    • It must be accompanied by affidavits of merit, setting forth the facts and circumstances constituting the petitioner’s valid claim or defense. The affidavits must explain the reasons why the petitioner failed to take timely measures (motion for new trial, appeal, etc.) and must demonstrate the meritorious defense or cause of action.

  2. Factual Basis for the Grounds Invoked

    • The petition must establish clearly and convincingly that the ground cited (fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence) actually exists and caused the petitioner’s failure to appear, defend, or otherwise protect his or her rights.

  3. Service of Copies and Payment of Docket Fees

    • As in all other initiatory pleadings, copies of the petition must be served upon the adverse parties.
    • The petitioner must also pay the prescribed docket and other lawful fees upon filing.

  4. Due Diligence

    • Courts require proof that the petitioner did not sleep on his or her rights and attempted diligently, under the circumstances, to protect or defend his or her interests.

5. EFFECTS AND PROCEDURE AFTER FILING (RULE 38, SECTIONS 4 AND 5)

  1. Issuance of an Order

    • If the trial court (the same court that rendered the judgment) finds the petition sufficient in form and substance, it will issue an order requiring the adverse parties to file their comment/opposition within a given period.
    • The court may also issue preliminary orders—such as a temporary restraining order (TRO) or status quo order—if warranted, to preserve the rights of the parties while the petition is pending.

  2. Court Ruling on the Petition

    • After due hearing, if the court is satisfied that the petition is meritorious, it may set aside the questioned judgment, order, or other proceeding.
    • The court typically orders the case reopened and allows the petitioner to file an appropriate pleading or to present evidence on the merits of his or her claim or defense.

  3. Grant or Denial of the Petition

    • If the petition is granted, the proceeding in question (e.g., default judgment) is nullified, and the case returns to active litigation status.
    • If the petition is denied, the original judgment, order, or proceeding stands, and the petitioner’s remedy is generally limited to appealing the denial of the petition for relief itself (assuming the order of denial is appealable under the rules).

6. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

  1. Not a Substitute for Lost Appeal

    • Rule 38 cannot be used simply because the party failed to appeal or file a motion for reconsideration/new trial through negligence that is not excusable.
    • Courts have consistently held that where the loss of the remedy was due to the party’s own fault or inexcusable neglect, a petition for relief does not lie.

  2. Strictly Construed

    • Because this remedy upsets the finality of judgments, courts strictly construe the rules for its application.
    • Any doubt is usually resolved against the petitioner to protect the stability of judicial decisions.

  3. Meritorious Defense or Cause of Action Required

    • Even when the delay or absence is justified, a petition for relief must show that there is an actual and substantial defense or cause of action that would materially alter the outcome if heard on the merits.
    • Conclusory statements or mere general denials are insufficient.

  4. Affidavit of Merit Requirement

    • Failure to attach affidavits of merit or to specify in detail the facts constituting the valid defense or claim will ordinarily result in the outright dismissal of the petition.

  5. Jurisdictional Issues

    • The petition for relief should be filed before the same court that issued the judgment or order.
    • Filing it in the Court of Appeals or any other forum is generally impermissible unless the rules specifically provide otherwise.

7. RELEVANT JURISPRUDENCE

  1. Pacquing v. Co

    • Reiterates that a petition for relief is not a substitute for a lost appeal, and the remedy is available only under exceptional circumstances where the failure to appeal was due to fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence.

  2. PNB v. Manila Oil Refining & By-Products Co.

    • Establishes the necessity of an affidavit of merit showing not just the reasons for failure to appear but also the facts demonstrating the petitioner’s valid defense.

  3. Regalado v. Go

    • Discusses what constitutes excusable negligence of counsel and holds that gross negligence of counsel may be a ground to grant a petition for relief if it amounts to a violation of due process.

  4. Aquino v. ISAP

    • Emphasizes the importance of timely filing within 60 days from knowledge of the judgment and within six months from its entry, noting that these periods are mandatory and jurisdictional.

8. PROCEDURAL STEPS IN FILING A PETITION FOR RELIEF (SUMMARY)

  1. Check Timeline

    • Confirm that you are within 60 days from knowledge and within 6 months from entry of judgment.

  2. Prepare the Petition

    • Draft a verified petition, including:
      • Allegations of facts establishing fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence;
      • Explanation of how these caused the party’s failure to file a timely motion or appeal;
      • Demonstration of a meritorious claim or defense.

  3. Attach Affidavit(s) of Merit

    • Affiants must have personal knowledge of the relevant facts, detailing the cause of action or defense.

  4. File and Serve

    • File the petition with the same court that rendered the judgment, with full payment of docket fees.
    • Serve copies on all adverse parties.

  5. Await the Court’s Order

    • If the petition is in due form, the court issues an order requiring the respondent to comment/oppose.
    • The court sets hearing if needed.

  6. Court Disposition

    • If granted, the judgment or order is set aside; the case is reopened for further proceedings.
    • If denied, the petitioner may appeal the order of denial if the rules on appeal permit.

9. STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS AND TIPS

  1. Act with Urgency

    • The short and strict deadlines demand immediate action once the party discovers the adverse judgment.

  2. Ensure Exhaustion of Other Remedies

    • Demonstrate that you were not remiss in availing of the usual remedies and that your failure was genuinely due to the ground alleged.

  3. Substantial Compliance with Affidavits

    • The affidavit of merit must show clear facts of excusable negligence, fraud, etc., and a credible defense. Vague statements risk dismissal.

  4. Document Efforts to Protect Rights

    • Keep records to prove that any negligence was not imputable to you personally (especially in counsel-client relationships).

  5. Beware of Collateral Attacks

    • A petition for relief is not an opportunity to re-litigate issues that could have been raised in a timely appeal or motion for new trial.
    • Focus on the ground (Rule 38) and keep arguments within the scope of the remedy’s purpose: to show you were deprived of your day in court due to reasons beyond your control or that are legally excusable.

10. CONCLUSION

A Petition for Relief from Judgment under Rule 38 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure is a critical, though strictly regulated, post-judgment remedy intended to prevent outright injustice. It is not a backdoor for failed appeals or untimely motions. Instead, it is an extraordinary mechanism which protects a party’s right to due process when fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence prevents the party from fully and fairly litigating its cause.

Key takeaways:

  • Timeliness: File within 60 days of knowledge and within 6 months from entry of judgment.
  • Grounds: Fraud, accident, mistake, excusable negligence.
  • Affidavit of Merit: Must thoroughly show a meritorious defense or cause of action.
  • Not a Substitute for Appeal: Must demonstrate inability to resort to ordinary remedies due to the stated grounds.

By meticulously following the procedural requisites, thoroughly substantiating the grounds, and demonstrating a genuine and meritorious claim or defense, a party may successfully invoke the equitable powers of the court to set aside a final judgment and secure relief from an otherwise unjust outcome.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login