Pre-trial (RULE 18) | CIVIL PROCEDURE

Below is a comprehensive, meticulous discussion of Pre-trial under Rule 18 of the Rules of Court in the Philippines, incorporating the relevant provisions (including the 2019 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure), jurisprudential guidelines, ethical considerations, and best practices. This discussion assumes familiarity with the Revised Rules of Court but aims to be self-contained for reference purposes.

I. OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE OF PRE-TRIAL

  1. Definition
    Pre-trial is a procedural step in civil litigation mandated by Rule 18 of the Rules of Court. It is a conference held after the filing of the last pleading but prior to trial, wherein the parties and the court take active steps to (a) consider the possibility of amicable settlement or alternative dispute resolution (ADR), (b) define the issues, (c) consider the propriety of the application of the rules on early neutral evaluation, and (d) achieve other objectives such as simplification of issues and expeditious trial.

  2. Nature

    • Mandatory Requirement: Pre-trial is mandatory in civil cases. The court shall set the case for pre-trial after the issues have been joined (i.e., after the filing of the last responsive pleading).
    • Policy Consideration: The underlying purpose is to shorten court proceedings, avoid surprise, promote efficiency, and encourage settlement or the use of ADR mechanisms.

  3. Legal Basis

    • Rule 18, Rules of Court: Governs the procedural aspects of pre-trial in civil cases.
    • A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC (2019 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure): Introduced modifications to accelerate disposition of cases and strengthen the mandatory character of pre-trial and ADR.

II. SETTING AND NOTICE OF PRE-TRIAL

  1. When Set

    • After the last pleading (typically the Answer or Reply, if required) has been filed, the Branch Clerk of Court or the court itself shall issue a notice of pre-trial.
    • Under the 2019 Amendments, the notice of pre-trial is served upon counsel (or the party, if unrepresented) indicating the date and time of the pre-trial conference.

  2. Contents of Notice

    • Must clearly inform the parties of the date, time, and place of the pre-trial.
    • Must require the parties to file a Pre-trial Brief (discussed below).
    • Must notify them of the consequences of non-compliance (e.g., dismissal, waiver of claims or defenses, or being declared as in default).

  3. Effect of Non-service of Notice

    • Proper service of notice is jurisdictional for the conduct of pre-trial.
    • If a party is not served with the pre-trial notice, the entire pre-trial process could be rendered void with respect to that party.
    • If counsel receives notice, it is generally considered as notice to the client (the party-litigant), consistent with the general rule of notice to counsel being notice to the client.

III. OBLIGATIONS AND APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

  1. Who Must Appear

    • Parties themselves: They must be present, or at least represented by an individual fully authorized to enter into agreements regarding settlement and other matters that may arise during the pre-trial.
    • Lead Counsel: The counsel of record, or another lawyer who is fully acquainted with the case and with authority to participate meaningfully in the pre-trial.
    • Corporate Parties: Must send a representative authorized by a board resolution or a Secretary’s Certificate specifically empowering the representative to bind the corporation in matters of settlement or admissions.

  2. Consequences of Failure to Appear

    • Plaintiff’s Failure: May result in the dismissal of the case, with prejudice, unless otherwise ordered by the court.
    • Defendant’s Failure: May cause the defendant to be declared as in default, thereby losing the opportunity to present evidence, and the plaintiff may proceed to ex parte presentation of evidence.
    • Counsel’s Failure: If counsel fails to appear without a valid excuse, the court may impose administrative sanctions, fines, or hold counsel in contempt. The party he represents may also suffer the consequences, depending on the circumstances.

  3. Ethical Considerations

    • Lawyers have the duty to keep the client informed about the date and importance of pre-trial.
    • Must secure proper authority from the client to negotiate settlement terms.
    • Must come prepared to discuss and stipulate upon facts, documentary evidence, issues, and other matters that may aid in the speedy disposition of the case.

IV. PRE-TRIAL BRIEF

  1. Mandatory Filing
    Each party is required to file and serve a Pre-trial Brief at least three (3) calendar days before the date of the Pre-trial (or the period provided by the rules, if different under local practice). Failure to file a pre-trial brief may result in the same consequences as failure to appear.

  2. Contents of the Pre-trial Brief
    Under Rule 18, Section 6 (as amended), the Pre-trial Brief must contain the following:

    1. A statement of willingness to enter into amicable settlement or alternative modes of dispute resolution, indicating the desired terms thereof, if any;
    2. A summary of admitted facts and proposed stipulations of fact;
    3. The issues to be tried or resolved (distinguishing factual from legal issues);
    4. The documents or exhibits intended to be presented, stating their purpose;
    5. A manifestation of their availability for pre-marking of evidence;
    6. The number and names of the witnesses, and the substance of their respective testimonies;
    7. Any special or affirmative defenses;
    8. Such other matters as the court may require, or that would contribute to the speedy disposition of the case.

  3. Significance of the Pre-trial Brief

    • Defines the Boundaries of Trial: The facts, issues, and evidence not included or identified may be excluded at trial, absent good cause shown.
    • Facilitates ADR: Encourages parties to consider settlement or referral to mediation, judicial dispute resolution, or other forms of ADR.

V. PROCEEDINGS AND ISSUES TAKEN UP DURING PRE-TRIAL

  1. Settlement Attempts / ADR

    • The court is mandated to exert its best efforts to encourage amicable settlement or to refer the parties to alternative dispute resolution.
    • Court-Annexed Mediation (CAM) and Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) are common mechanisms utilized. If ADR fails, the case proceeds to trial.

  2. Formulation and Simplification of Issues

    • The court and the parties examine the pleadings, pre-trial briefs, and supporting evidence to determine which facts are admitted and which remain disputed.
    • The court may require additional clarifications or amendments to ensure that all issues are clearly laid out before trial.
    • Any admissions or stipulations during pre-trial are binding and cannot be contradicted later, except for good cause and with the permission of the court.

  3. Marking of Evidence and Limitations on Evidence

    • Parties mark their documentary evidence to expedite trial.
    • Objections to the authenticity or admissibility of documents may already be raised during pre-trial.
    • The court may limit the number of witnesses or the time to be allotted for each party’s presentation of evidence as part of its case management powers under the Revised Rules.

  4. Propriety of Amendments to Pleadings

    • Courts generally allow amendments to pleadings when they do not prejudice the adverse party or cause undue delay.
    • Amendments by Leave of Court: May be allowed if introduced during the pre-trial stage, especially when necessary to better serve the ends of justice and clarify the issues.

  5. Consideration of Pending Motions

    • Any pending incidents that could affect the trial (e.g., motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment) should be resolved or clarified during pre-trial to ensure the streamlined progress of the main case.

VI. PRE-TRIAL ORDER

  1. Definition
    The Pre-trial Order is an order issued by the court after the conclusion of the pre-trial conference, reflecting the agreements, stipulations, admissions, and the defined issues for trial.

  2. Contents

    • Matters taken up: A summary of the matters discussed, including any settlement reached or referral to ADR.
    • Facts admitted and evidence marked: Any facts or evidence admitted or documentary evidence marked during the pre-trial.
    • Issues to be tried: A definitive list of issues (factual or legal) left for trial.
    • Witness and exhibit list: An enumeration of the witnesses and exhibits for the parties, if so determined.

  3. Binding Effect

    • Generally, what is not included in the Pre-trial Order is deemed waived unless the court modifies the pre-trial order to prevent manifest injustice.
    • The order controls the course of the trial, subject only to modification by the court to prevent manifest injustice or upon a showing of compelling reasons.

  4. Motion for Reconsideration of Pre-trial Order

    • Parties who believe that the Pre-trial Order does not accurately reflect the proceedings or is otherwise unjust may move for reconsideration or ask the court to correct or amend it promptly.

VII. REFERRAL TO AND PROCEDURE FOR ADR (MEDIATION, JDR, ETC.)

  1. Court-Annexed Mediation (CAM)

    • Conducted by trained and accredited mediators.
    • Parties are given a timeframe within which to conclude mediation.
    • Non-compliance with the requirement to attend mediation may subject the non-complying party to sanctions.

  2. Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR)

    • If mediation fails, the case may be referred to JDR before another judge (or the same judge, depending on local rules and the level of court) who actively assists in facilitating settlement.
    • Proceedings during JDR are confidential and privileged.

  3. Consequences of Successful ADR

    • If the parties reach a settlement, they reduce it to writing in a Compromise Agreement, which is submitted to the court for approval.
    • Once approved, it has the effect of a judgment on the merits.

VIII. NON-APPEARANCE, WAIVERS, AND SANCTIONS

  1. Plaintiff’s Non-appearance

    • Results in dismissal with prejudice. The plaintiff cannot re-file the same action or cause, except for lawful exceptions such as extraordinary circumstances recognized by jurisprudence.

  2. Defendant’s Non-appearance

    • The defendant is declared in default, and the plaintiff may proceed ex parte.
    • The defendant loses the right to present evidence and to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses.

  3. Failure to File Pre-trial Brief

    • Typically treated in the same manner as non-appearance, as it indicates a lack of preparedness or willingness to participate.
    • May be subject to sanctions, dismissal of the complaint/counterclaim, or a declaration of default, as the case may be.

  4. Lawyer’s Ethical Duty

    • Counsel who fails to appear and provide a pre-trial brief can be fined or cited for contempt.
    • The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) or the Supreme Court can impose disciplinary measures for repeated or grave neglect of duty.

IX. STRATEGIC AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LAWYERS

  1. Preparation is Key

    • Counsel must thoroughly evaluate the case, compile and mark documentary evidence, prepare witness lists, and be ready to discuss possible terms for settlement or ADR.
    • Incomplete or incoherent pre-trial briefs can hamper the client’s ability to present evidence later on.

  2. Good Faith in Settlement Negotiations

    • Lawyers must encourage clients to engage genuinely in settlement discussions if there is a reasonable prospect of resolution.
    • Frivolous or bad faith participation can be sanctioned.

  3. Preserving Client’s Rights

    • Secure specific authority to compromise or settle.
    • Where settlement is not feasible, ensure all crucial factual and legal issues are clearly stated in the pre-trial brief and recorded in the pre-trial order.

  4. Candor to the Tribunal

    • Full disclosure of relevant documents during the marking process.
    • Avoid misleading the court about the existence or authenticity of evidence.

X. FORMS AND SAMPLE CLAUSES

Below is a general outline (not a strict template) of certain forms used in relation to Pre-trial under Rule 18:

  1. Form of Pre-trial Brief 

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch No.], [Judicial Region]
[City/Province]

[Plaintiff],
        Plaintiff,
-versus-                          Civil Case No. ____

[Defendant],
        Defendant.
___________________________/

                             PRE-TRIAL BRIEF
                             (for [Plaintiff/Defendant])

Plaintiff/Defendant, through counsel, respectfully states:

1. A statement of willingness/unwillingness to enter into amicable settlement or use of ADR, specifying possible terms for settlement;
2. A concise statement of admitted facts and proposed stipulations;
3. The issues to be tried or resolved, distinguishing factual from legal;
4. A list of the documents or exhibits intended to be presented, with a statement of their purpose;
5. A confirmation of the parties’ willingness to proceed with pre-marking of evidence;
6. The names of witnesses and the substance of their testimonies;
7. Affirmative defenses or special matters, if any;
8. Other matters relevant for a just and speedy disposition of the case.

[Signature Block of Counsel]
[Counsel’s Name, Roll Number, IBP Receipt, MCLE Compliance]
[Address and Contact Information]

Copy furnished:
- [Opposing Counsel]
- [Branch Clerk of Court]

  2. Form of Pre-trial Order (issued by the Court) 

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch No.], [Judicial Region]
[City/Province]

[Plaintiff],
        Plaintiff,
-versus-                          Civil Case No. ____

[Defendant],
        Defendant.
___________________________/

                             PRE-TRIAL ORDER

This case was called for Pre-trial on [Date], with appearances as follows:
- [Name of Plaintiff’s Counsel], representing Plaintiff, who appeared (with/without) Plaintiff;
- [Name of Defendant’s Counsel], representing Defendant, who appeared (with/without) Defendant.

The parties manifested the following:
1. Settlement / ADR options:
   - ...
2. Admitted Facts:
   - ...
3. Stipulations:
   - ...
4. Issues for Trial:
   - ...
5. Evidence and Witnesses:
   - ...
6. Other Matters:
   - ...

WHEREFORE, the trial shall be conducted strictly in accordance with the terms of this Pre-trial Order, which shall control the course of the proceedings unless modified by the Court to prevent manifest injustice.

SO ORDERED.

[Date and Place]

[Judge’s Name and Signature]
[Branch, RTC]

XI. SALIENT POINTS AND REMINDERS

  1. Pre-trial is neither pro forma nor perfunctory; it is a decisive stage in the litigation process.
  2. Be thorough but concise in the Pre-trial Brief; excessive, irrelevant detail can blur the main issues and waste the court’s time.
  3. Attend personally and promptly, with genuine authority to negotiate, to avoid dismissal, default, or sanctions.
  4. Strict adherence to timelines (filing the Pre-trial Brief, attending ADR sessions) is crucial.
  5. Review the Pre-trial Order carefully; this document becomes the “blueprint” for trial, and omissions can be fatal.

XII. CONCLUSION

Pre-trial under Rule 18 is at the heart of efficient and fair civil litigation in the Philippines. It is designed to simplify the proceedings, promote settlement, delineate the issues, and avoid surprise at trial. Counsel and parties alike must take the pre-trial conference seriously: thorough preparation, good-faith participation, and strict compliance with the Rules are essential to safeguard the client’s interests and to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.

By understanding the mandatory nature of pre-trial, the detailed requirements of the Pre-trial Brief, the binding effect of admissions, the procedures for marking and scrutinizing evidence, and the avenues for amicable settlement, litigants and their counsel can navigate Rule 18 effectively. Ultimately, the pre-trial stage—when conducted properly—saves judicial resources, fosters fair resolutions, and shortens the path toward a just outcome.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login