Nature and purpose of summons in relation to actions in personam, in rem, and quasi-in rem | Summons (RULE 14) | CIVIL PROCEDURE

COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION ON THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF SUMMONS IN RELATION TO ACTIONS IN PERSONAM, IN REM, AND QUASI-IN-REM UNDER PHILIPPINE LAW

I. OVERVIEW

Summons is the judicial process by which the court acquires jurisdiction over the person of the defendant (in actions in personam) or, at the very least, notifies the defendant of the pendency of the action (in actions in rem and quasi-in-rem) so that they may have the opportunity to present their defenses.

Under the Rules of Court (particularly Rule 14), the manner of service and the purpose to be achieved by the summons vary depending on the nature of the action—whether it is in personam, in rem, or quasi-in-rem.

II. DEFINITIONS AND DISTINCTIONS

A. Action in Personam

  1. Definition

    • An action in personam is directed against a specific person (or persons) to enforce a personal right, to demand personal liability, or to impose a personal obligation.
    • Examples include actions for damages, breach of contract, or collection of a sum of money.

  2. Jurisdictional Implications

    • For the court to validly bind the defendant, it must acquire jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.
    • This is effected by valid service of summons within the forum (i.e., within the Philippines) or by voluntary appearance of the defendant.

  3. Purpose of Summons in an Action in Personam

    • Primarily, to vest the trial court with jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.
    • Summons in an in personam action ensures that the resulting judgment can be personally binding and enforceable against the defendant.

  4. Modes of Service

    • Personal Service: Delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the defendant in person.
    • Substituted Service: Allowed if personal service cannot be made within a reasonable time, subject to strict conditions (e.g., leaving copies at the defendant’s residence with a person of suitable age and discretion).
    • Constructive/Extraterritorial Service: Only allowed in certain instances (e.g., if the defendant is a non-resident and the action is in rem or quasi-in-rem, or if the defendant is a resident temporarily out of the Philippines—but with special statutory requirements), though extraterritorial service is typically linked to in rem or quasi-in-rem actions.
    • Other Modes Introduced by the 2019 Amendments: Service by courier, by email (in certain instances), or by publication (with prior leave of court)—but these new methods are still subject to strict compliance with the Rules.

B. Action in Rem

  1. Definition

    • An action in rem is directed against the “thing” or “res” itself rather than against a particular person.
    • The object of the suit is to affect the interests of all persons in the thing, hence a judgment in rem binds the whole world as to the status of the property or the res involved.

  2. Common Examples

    • Petitions for the probate of a will.
    • Petitions for adoption (with respect to status).
    • Forfeiture proceedings or land registration proceedings.
    • Judicial foreclosure of real or personal property (often also classified as quasi-in-rem, depending on the nature of the claims and the relief sought).

  3. Purpose of Summons in an Action in Rem

    • Strictly speaking, in an action purely in rem, the court’s jurisdiction is predicated on its control over the res itself.
    • The primary purpose of summons (or notice, including publication) is to comply with constitutional due process by informing all interested parties that an action concerning the res is pending.

  4. Service of Summons

    • Because an in rem action is directed not so much against a person but against the property or status, actual jurisdiction over the person of the defendant is not essential.
    • Service of summons or notice by publication (or other modes) generally suffices to bind the interest of the defendant in the property.
    • Nonetheless, if the identity and whereabouts of the party are known, personal or substituted service remains preferable to meet due process requirements.
    • If the party’s whereabouts are unknown, service by publication and/or posting is often ordered.

C. Action Quasi-in-Rem

  1. Definition

    • An action quasi-in-rem resembles an in rem proceeding in that it is directed primarily against the property of a named defendant, but it differs because the plaintiff seeks a personal claim to be satisfied by the res.
    • However, unlike an action in personam, the judgment in an action quasi-in-rem is enforceable only to the extent of the value of the property subject to the court’s jurisdiction.

  2. Examples

    • Actions for attachment or garnishment of property.
    • Mortgage foreclosure where the relief demanded is limited to the sale of the mortgaged property (and not necessarily for personal liability beyond such property).
    • Actions to enforce a lien or claim against specific property (e.g., real property, bank accounts, or other assets).

  3. Purpose of Summons in an Action Quasi-in-Rem

    • The court acquires jurisdiction over the defendant’s property (the res).
    • Summons is still required not for the court to acquire jurisdiction over the res (which is acquired via attachment, levy, or other methods), but to provide notice and opportunity to be heard so as to comply with due process.
    • The resulting judgment affects only the property and does not create a personal obligation or personal liability beyond that property’s value.

  4. Service of Summons

    • As with actions in rem, personal jurisdiction over the defendant is not strictly necessary for the judgment to be valid insofar as the property is concerned.
    • Constructive or extraterritorial service is permissible and adequate to satisfy due process if the defendant is outside the Philippines or cannot be located.
    • If defendant’s whereabouts are known and the property is within the Philippines, personal or substituted service on the defendant is ideal; otherwise, service by publication or other modes (as authorized by the Rules) is allowed.

III. SPECIFIC RULES OF COURT PROVISIONS (RULE 14, AS AMENDED)

  1. Rule 14, Section 1 (Clarity of Purpose)

    • Summons is issued for the purpose of acquiring jurisdiction over the person of the defendant in an action in personam.
    • In in rem or quasi-in-rem actions, summons is for the purpose of complying with due process requirements rather than for vesting personal jurisdiction.

  2. Rule 14, Section 6 & 7 (Personal and Substituted Service)

    • Emphasizes that personal service is the preferred mode.
    • Substituted service is valid only when personal service cannot be made despite diligent efforts.

  3. Rule 14, Section 14 (Service upon Foreign Private Juridical Entities)

    • Governs how summons may be served on foreign corporations doing business in the Philippines or not doing business but with certain presence or designated agents.

  4. Rule 14, Section 15 & 16 (Extrajudicial/Extraterritorial Service)

    • Enumerates when extraterritorial service is allowed, typically in actions in rem or quasi-in-rem (e.g., when the defendant is non-resident or the action involves personal status, property in the Philippines, or property in which a non-resident has an interest).
    • Requires a court order for extraterritorial service.
    • Summons by publication or other modes may be ordered by the court to ensure due process.

  5. 2019 Amendments to Rule 14

    • Introduced alternative electronic means (e.g., service by email, service by accredited courier, or even social media with prior court approval in exceptional circumstances).
    • These are permissible only after a showing of impossibility or impracticability of personal or substituted service, and typically after seeking leave of court.

IV. LEGAL EFFECTS OF PROPER VERSUS IMPROPER SERVICE

  1. Actions in Personam

    • Proper Service: The court acquires jurisdiction over the defendant, and the judgment binds the defendant personally (i.e., can be enforced against their person and all their assets).
    • Improper Service: A judgment rendered without valid service (or voluntary submission to the court’s jurisdiction) is void as to that defendant.

  2. Actions in Rem and Quasi-in-Rem

    • Proper Service (including constructive or extraterritorial, as the case may be): The court acquires jurisdiction over the res, and any judgment or decree affects only the property involved.
    • Improper Service: The defendant may raise lack of notice/due process. The judgment may be assailed for lack of jurisdiction or for violation of due process, potentially rendering it void. However, if the court otherwise had custody or control over the property (e.g., attachment, publication properly done, etc.), the judgment may still be binding on the res, subject to the defendant’s showing of denial of due process.

V. ETHICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Due Diligence in Service of Summons

    • Lawyers are ethically bound to ensure that the summons is served in strict accordance with the Rules.
    • Attempts at service must be properly documented (e.g., sheriff’s return or proof of service).

  2. Candor to the Court

    • When seeking substituted or extraterritorial service, counsel must make full disclosure to the court of the defendant’s whereabouts and the efforts undertaken to effect personal service.

  3. Observance of Due Process

    • Even in in rem or quasi-in-rem actions, the fundamental principle of due process must be observed.
    • If the defendant’s identity or location is known, the court generally requires personal or substituted service; if unknown, then the party should show that publication or another alternative mode of service is warranted.

  4. Proper Documentation

    • It is essential to keep official records (e.g., sheriff’s return, affidavits of attempted service, affidavits of publication, registry receipts) to demonstrate compliance with the Rules and to avoid later challenges on jurisdictional grounds.

VI. KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. Actions in Personam

    • Summons is indispensable for acquiring jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.
    • Valid personal or substituted service (or voluntary appearance) is crucial; otherwise, the resulting judgment is void with respect to that defendant.

  2. Actions in Rem

    • The court’s power is primarily over the res or status, not over the personal liability of the defendant.
    • Summons or notice is required to satisfy due process, but personal jurisdiction over the defendant is not essential.
    • Publication or other forms of notice are common.

  3. Actions Quasi-in-Rem

    • The action is directed against a named defendant but is primarily limited to the extent of the defendant’s interest in the specific property.
    • Jurisdiction over the res is acquired by attachment, garnishment, or some similar proceeding, but due process still requires proper summons/notice to the defendant.
    • Judgment affects only the property, not the defendant’s other assets.

  4. Overall Purpose and Effect

    • Summons ensures that parties are informed of the action and given an opportunity to be heard.
    • For in personam actions, it vests the court with authority to bind the defendant personally.
    • For in rem or quasi-in-rem actions, it ensures that affected parties can contest the proceedings, even though jurisdiction primarily lies with the court’s power over the property or res.

  5. Strict Compliance

    • Courts strictly enforce the rules on service of summons because it is a jurisdictional matter.
    • Any procedural misstep in serving summons may lead to dismissal of the case or voiding of the judgment for lack of jurisdiction or denial of due process.

VII. CONCLUSION

Summons is a bedrock procedural tool in Philippine civil procedure, governed largely by Rule 14 of the Rules of Court. Its nature and purpose vary depending on whether the action is in personam, in rem, or quasi-in-rem:

  • In Personam: Summons vests the court with jurisdiction over the defendant, enabling a personal judgment.
  • In Rem: Summons or notice is a due process requirement, but the court’s authority arises from its power over the property or status; the judgment binds the world as to the res.
  • Quasi-in-Rem: Summons ensures due process, and while the court’s control is over the property, the defendant’s personal liability is limited to the property in question.

Adherence to the correct mode of service (personal, substituted, extraterritorial, by publication, or by the alternative electronic means introduced by the 2019 Amendments) is imperative. Failure to comply with these requirements invalidates the court’s jurisdiction over the person (in in personam actions) or may undermine the validity of the proceedings (even in in rem or quasi-in-rem actions) if due process is not observed.

The ultimate guiding principle is due process—that everyone whose rights or interests may be affected by judicial proceedings must be afforded a fair opportunity to defend or assert their claims, consistent with constitutional and procedural safeguards.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login