Public corporations | Service upon | Summons (RULE 14) | CIVIL PROCEDURE

Below is a focused, meticulous discussion of service of summons upon public corporations under Philippine civil procedure, particularly under Rule 14 of the 2019 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure (A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC). This includes relevant principles, distinctions, and pertinent jurisprudential points. While this overview is extensive, always consult the latest rules, statutes, and jurisprudence for any updates or nuances.

I. Statutory and Regulatory Framework

  1. Governing Provision: Rule 14, Section 13 (2019 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure).
    Under the revised rules, service of summons upon the State and upon public corporations is governed by Section 13 of Rule 14.

  2. What Constitutes a “Public Corporation”?

    • Local Government Units (LGUs): Provinces, cities, municipalities, and barangays, considered as “public or municipal corporations.”
    • Government-Owned or Controlled Corporations (GOCCs): Those created by special law or organized under the Corporation Code/ Revised Corporation Code, either wholly or partially owned by the government, performing governmental or proprietary functions.
    • Government Instrumentalities with Corporate Powers (GICPs): Entities vested with corporate powers under special charters (e.g., MIAA, PPA, GSIS, SSS).
    • Other Public Corporations: Any entity—distinct from the national government—which exercises governmental functions and possesses juridical personality.

  3. Purpose of Service of Summons:

    • Summons notifies the defendant of the action filed.
    • It vests the court with jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, provided the method of service is proper and in accordance with the rules.

II. Rule 14, Section 13: Service of Summons Upon Public Corporations

The 2019 Revised Rules generally require service of summons as follows (summarized from the pertinent rule on public corporations):

  1. Republic of the Philippines

    • Summons is served upon the Solicitor General when the defendant is the Republic itself.
    • If the suit is directed against a specific unincorporated government agency or instrumentality without its own legal officer designated by law, service may still be had through the Solicitor General or upon the agency head if so allowed by law or regulation.

  2. Local Government Units (LGUs)

    • Provinces: Serve upon the Governor.
    • Cities: Serve upon the City Mayor.
    • Municipalities: Serve upon the Municipal Mayor.
    • Barangays: Serve upon the Punong Barangay (or upon the official designated by law to receive court processes, if there is one).

  3. Government-Owned or Controlled Corporations (GOCCs) and Government Instrumentalities with Corporate Powers

    • Serve upon their “executive head,” i.e., the President, General Manager, Administrator, or the duly authorized officer designated by law or by the entity’s charter to receive summons.
    • Examples:
      • GSIS: Summons is served upon its President/General Manager or their designated officer.
      • SSS: Summons is served upon the SSS President/Commissioner or designated officer.
      • PhilHealth, Pag-IBIG Fund, etc.: Similarly, upon the top executive or designated legal officer.

  4. Autonomous Region (e.g., BARMM)

    • Serve upon the Chief Executive of the autonomous region, e.g., the Regional Governor (or equivalent executive official).

  5. Other Public Corporations

    • Serve upon their chief executive officer or any official designated by law or by the corporate charter to receive summons.

III. Key Points and Nuances

  1. Strict Compliance is the General Rule

    • Courts acquire jurisdiction over the person of a defendant (including public corporations) only upon valid service of summons.
    • Defects in service may lead to the dismissal of the case or a challenge to jurisdiction.

  2. No Substituted Service Without Express Authorization

    • For public corporations, substituted service (e.g., leaving copies with a clerk or security guard) is generally not allowed unless the rules or jurisprudence explicitly permit it under extraordinary circumstances.
    • The usual route is direct, personal service upon the officer designated by law (the “executive head”).

  3. When the Laws or Charter Provide a Different Method

    • Some GOCCs or public entities have special charters with explicit provisions on how summons and legal processes are to be served. In such cases, the specific statutory method prevails over the general rule.

  4. Effect of Non-Compliance

    • If summons is improperly served (e.g., on an officer not designated to receive it), the defendant can file a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person.
    • However, if the public corporation voluntarily appears and participates in the proceedings (without questioning service), that defect may be deemed waived.

  5. Immunity from Suit vs. Proper Service

    • Even if a public corporation is properly served, questions of sovereign immunity or non-suability might still arise if the entity is an alter ego of the State performing strictly governmental functions.
    • Proper service addresses jurisdiction over the person, while immunity pertains to jurisdiction over the subject matter (i.e., whether the entity can be sued at all). These concepts, though related, are distinct defenses.

  6. Role of the Solicitor General

    • In suits against the Republic or its unincorporated agencies, the Solicitor General often represents the government in court.
    • However, certain government agencies or GOCCs have their own legal departments or statutory counsels (e.g., the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel) which may represent them.
    • Ensure compliance with the rule on who exactly must receive summons to confer jurisdiction properly.

  7. Service on the Wrong Officer

    • Jurisprudence holds that service on employees of the public corporation other than those enumerated (the “executive head” or a specifically authorized legal officer) is not valid.
    • The Supreme Court has consistently required that service on government entities be accomplished strictly in accordance with the Rules to prevent confusion and to ensure official notice.

  8. Proof of Service

    • The sheriff or process server must execute a Sheriff’s Return or Officer’s Return detailing the date, time, place, and manner of service and identifying the person served (and their official capacity).
    • This return is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.

IV. Illustrative Examples

  1. Summons Upon a Province

    • The complaint is filed against the Province of Batangas (e.g., for a claim involving a breached contract by the provincial government).
    • Proper service: Summons must be handed to the Governor of Batangas or to an authorized officer with a written authorization from the Governor to receive summons.

  2. Summons Upon a City

    • A case is filed against the City of Manila.
    • Proper service: Summons is delivered to the Mayor of Manila or a duly authorized representative.

  3. Summons Upon SSS

    • If the SSS is sued, service is made upon its President or the duly designated SSS officer authorized to receive court processes.

  4. Summons Upon the Autonomous Region

    • A civil suit against the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM).
    • Proper service: Summons is served on the Chief Minister (Regional Governor) or any officer designated by the regional charter/law.

V. Practical and Ethical Considerations

  1. Diligence and Verification

    • Counsel must verify the correct identity and position of the public official who has the authority to receive summons.
    • Inaccurate or sloppy service can waste time and risk dismissal of the case for lack of jurisdiction.

  2. Coordination with Court Personnel

    • Lawyers often guide the court sheriff or process server as to the correct official to serve.
    • Court personnel rely on the information provided in the complaint or from the counsel as to who is the appropriate recipient of summons in a public corporation.

  3. Ethical Duty to Ensure Proper Service

    • A lawyer filing suit against a public corporation must not mislead or direct service to an improper recipient to gain a tactical advantage.
    • Conversely, a defense lawyer representing a public corporation must ensure they do not unduly refuse or avoid valid service.

  4. Documentation and Record-Keeping

    • Retain proof of receipt or any official acknowledgment.
    • If a specific officer was absent, note if someone officially authorized accepted the summons.

  5. Authority to Receive Summons

    • Some offices issue memoranda delegating authority to certain officials (e.g., Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary) to receive summons.
    • Make sure a board resolution, written delegation, or explicit legal provision supports that official’s authority.

VI. Sample Form: Summons for Service Upon a Public Corporation

Below is a simplified (generic) form for reference. (Always adapt to local judicial region formatting and the current Supreme Court prescribed forms.)

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Judicial Region], Branch [Number]
[City/Municipality]

[Case Title / Caption]
[Plaintiff]
       - versus -
[Defendant Public Corporation],
[Case No. ________]

                                   SUMMONS

TO:     [Name and Official Title of the Executive Head]
        [Public Corporation / Address]

GREETINGS:

        You are hereby required, within the reglementary period as provided
        under the Rules of Court, to file with this Court and serve on the
        plaintiff(s) a verified Answer to the attached Complaint.

        WITNESS the Honorable [Judge’s Name], Presiding Judge of this Court,
        this __ day of __________ 20__ at [City/Municipality], Philippines.

(SEAL)
                                     [Name of Clerk of Court]
                                     Clerk of Court
  • Note on Addressee: Make sure the summons is addressed to the correct official: Governor, Mayor, President/General Manager, or the equivalent position if required by law.
  • Attachment: The complaint must be attached.
  • Return of Service: The sheriff/process server must return an accomplished proof of service, indicating the name of the official who received it and the time/date of service.

VII. Selected Jurisprudence

  1. Acosta v. Court of Appeals

    • Reiterated that service upon an officer not authorized to receive summons is invalid and does not vest jurisdiction.

  2. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corp. v. Court of Appeals

    • PNOC subsidiaries, though GOCCs, have separate juridical personalities; summons must be served upon their proper executive head.

  3. Heirs of Calingasan v. Republic

    • Clarified that if the Republic is named defendant, the Solicitor General must be served.

  4. City of Naga v. Asuncion

    • Service was held invalid because the official receiving the summons was not properly designated by the city mayor.

VIII. Conclusion

Service of summons upon public corporations is a critical step that demands strict compliance with Rule 14, Section 13 of the 2019 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure. The requirement to serve the correct “executive head” or “designated officer” is not merely technical—it is a jurisdictional prerequisite. Failing to comply can result in the court’s lack of jurisdiction over the defendant, potentially derailing the suit.

For practitioners:

  • Always identify the nature of the governmental entity (Republic, unincorporated agency, GOCC, GICP, or LGU).
  • Verify the appropriate person or office authorized by law or charter to receive summons.
  • In case of doubt, consult the entity’s charter, internal regulations, or relevant statutes.
  • Document all steps meticulously to ensure a valid service that cannot be challenged for non-compliance.

Such diligence upholds both remedial efficiency and the demands of legal ethics, ensuring orderly proceedings and respect for the due process rights of public corporations and governmental entities.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login