Provisional Remedies in Criminal Cases (RULE 127) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

RULE 127 – PROVISIONAL REMEDIES IN CRIMINAL CASES
(Under the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure, Rules of Court of the Philippines)

I. OVERVIEW

Under Philippine criminal procedure, provisional remedies allow an offended party (or the prosecution in representation of the offended party’s interest in the civil aspect) to secure or protect potential rights to indemnification or damages while the criminal action is ongoing. Although these remedies are more commonly associated with civil actions, Rule 127 specifically provides that certain provisional remedies from the Rules of Civil Procedure are also applicable in criminal actions—but only if a civil action for the recovery of civil liability is properly instituted with the criminal action.

These remedies serve to:

  1. Prevent the accused (or any liable party) from disposing of or concealing property that could satisfy a judgment on the civil aspect of the offense.
  2. Ensure the availability of such property to satisfy any eventual civil liability that may be adjudged.

II. TEXT OF RULE 127 (AS CURRENTLY IN FORCE)

Section 1. Availability of provisional remedies. – The provisional remedies under the Rules of Civil Procedure shall be available in criminal actions but only when the civil action for the recovery of civil liability is instituted in the criminal action pursuant to Rule 111.

From this section, the following key points emerge:

  1. Same Provisional Remedies as in Civil Cases
    The recognized provisional remedies in civil cases (such as attachment, garnishment, replevin, and support pendente lite) can be availed of in criminal proceedings, provided that the offended party’s claim for civil indemnity (or other forms of damages) is included in the same criminal action.

  2. Condition: Civil Action Must Be Instituted in the Criminal Case
    If the offended party reserves the right to file a separate civil action or if the civil action has been waived or already instituted separately, Rule 127 remedies are no longer available in the criminal proceeding. Provisional remedies can only be invoked within the criminal case if the civil aspect (the claim for damages, restitution, or indemnification) remains joined.

  3. Governing Rules
    The procedures and grounds for these provisional remedies still follow the pertinent provisions in the Rules of Civil Procedure—specifically Rule 57 (Preliminary Attachment), Rule 58 (Preliminary Injunction), Rule 59 (Receivership), Rule 60 (Replevin), and Rule 61 (Support Pendente Lite)—to the extent that they are not inconsistent with criminal procedure.

III. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES AVAILABLE

1. Preliminary Attachment (Rule 57, Rules of Civil Procedure)

  • Purpose in Criminal Cases: To secure the property of the accused (or any party liable for the offense) in order to satisfy the civil liability that may be awarded.

  • Grounds (analogous to civil actions, adapted for criminal cases):

    • That the accused is about to abscond or has absconded;
    • That the accused is removing or concealing property with intent to defraud creditors or the offended party;
    • Other grounds that show fraud, intent to evade liability, or necessity to secure the eventual satisfaction of judgment on the civil aspect.

  • Procedure:

    1. The offended party (or the prosecution on behalf of the offended party) files a Verified Application and an Affidavit showing factual grounds.
    2. The court may issue an Order of Attachment, requiring the sheriff to attach sufficient property of the accused to cover the amount of the claim for civil liability.
    3. The applicant may be required to post a bond to answer for damages in case it appears that the attachment was improper or unjustified.

  • Effect:

    • It preserves the property so that, if the accused is convicted and civil damages are awarded, there is property from which the judgment can be satisfied.
    • The accused may discharge or lift the attachment by posting a counterbond or by showing that the attachment is improper.

2. Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58, Rules of Civil Procedure)

  • Purpose in Criminal Cases: To enjoin (stop or require) certain acts by the accused or third persons related to property or evidence, if it directly affects the recovery of civil liability or the preservation of rights of the offended party.
  • Scope:
    • Most commonly, a preliminary injunction may not be as frequently sought in a criminal case for the simple reason that the main interest is typically securing property or the presence of the accused. However, if there are specific acts to be restrained (e.g., transferring property out of jurisdiction, continuing a pattern of fraudulent dispositions), an injunction might be relevant.

3. Receivership (Rule 59, Rules of Civil Procedure)

  • Purpose: The appointment of a receiver to preserve and administer property in litigation if it is in danger of being lost, wasted, or materially injured.
  • Application in Criminal Cases:
    • Rarely invoked in criminal proceedings, but it can be applied in situations where the property subject to potential restitution (or forming part of the res involved in the offense) requires management or administration—e.g., a business enterprise or real property that needs to be preserved for eventual satisfaction of civil liability.

4. Replevin (Rule 60, Rules of Civil Procedure)

  • Purpose: Recovery of personal property that the offended party owns, claims to own, or has a right to possess.
  • Application in Criminal Cases:
    • If the crime involves personal property belonging to the offended party (e.g., theft, estafa, or robbery) and said property is in the possession of the accused, the offended party may seek replevin to recover it pendente lite (while the case is ongoing), provided the civil aspect for such recovery is included in the same criminal action.
  • Requirements:
    1. Verified Complaint (or Affidavit) with an application for replevin, stating the facts and the right of the offended party to possession.
    2. A bond is posted to protect the accused in the event that the seizure is found to be wrongful.

5. Support Pendente Lite (Rule 61, Rules of Civil Procedure)

  • Purpose: To secure temporary support (financial or otherwise) during the pendency of the action.
  • Application in Criminal Cases:
    • Potentially, in cases where the offended party is entitled by law to support from the accused (e.g., in criminal offenses involving violation of parental obligations, such as in some forms of child abuse or the criminal offense of failing to provide child support if it also implicates a civil aspect).
    • This is rare in typical criminal cases but may apply if the relationship of the parties and the cause of action so warrant.

IV. REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

  1. Civil Action Must Be Deemed Instituted

    • Under Rule 111, the civil liability arising from the crime is impliedly instituted with the criminal action unless the offended party:
      (a) Waives the civil action;
      (b) Reserves the right to file it separately; or
      (c) Has already instituted the civil action prior to the criminal action.

  2. Verified Application and Affidavit

    • For each provisional remedy, the offended party (or the public prosecutor representing the offended party’s civil interest) must file a verified motion or petition showing facts entitling the party to the remedy.

  3. Bond Requirement

    • Except in certain instances (such as receivership upon court initiative), the party requesting the remedy often needs to post a bond to answer for damages if the provisional remedy is later shown to be wrongful or improvidently issued.

  4. Court Hearing / Ex Parte Application

    • Some remedies (e.g., attachment, replevin) may be granted ex parte (without hearing the adverse party first) if the delay could defeat the purpose. However, the court, in its discretion, may require a hearing or call the parties to show cause.
    • If granted ex parte, the accused can later move to dissolve or quash the writ or order upon showing that the remedy was improperly or irregularly issued.

  5. Enforcement

    • The court issues the appropriate writ (e.g., Writ of Preliminary Attachment, Writ of Replevin).
    • Court sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, or other authorized officers carry out the enforcement according to the rules.

  6. Remedies Against an Improperly Issued Provisional Remedy

    • The accused (or the person whose property has been attached or seized) can file a motion to discharge or quash the writ or, if applicable, post a counterbond to lift the provisional remedy.
    • Damages may be claimed against the bond posted by the offended party if it is proven that the provisional remedy was wrongful, malicious, or without sufficient basis.

V. JURISPRUDENCE AND DOCTRINAL POINTS

  1. Joinder of Civil and Criminal Liability

    • The Supreme Court has consistently held that the civil liability is deemed instituted with the criminal action unless expressly waived or reserved. Therefore, the offended party may avail of provisional remedies in the same criminal action without needing a separate civil complaint.
    • Relevant Case: People v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 144159 (though dealing with special laws, it reiterates the principle of implied institution of the civil action unless specifically waived or reserved).

  2. Nature of Provisional Remedies

    • Provisional remedies in criminal cases are ancillary to the main action for the criminal offense, focusing on the protection of the civil interest. The issuance or lifting of these remedies does not affect the prosecution of the criminal aspect per se. They are strictly to secure the potential civil liability.

  3. Due Process Considerations

    • The Supreme Court emphasizes the necessity of balancing the offended party’s right to secure property and the accused’s right to due process.
    • Relevant Case: Philippine Commercial International Bank v. Alejo, G.R. No. 181035, where the Court discussed the need for careful scrutiny of the grounds in issuing or lifting attachments in the context of protecting parties from unwarranted deprivation of property.

  4. Provisional Remedies Not a Mode of Punishment

    • Courts reiterate that provisional remedies are not meant to punish or intimidate the accused but to ensure that if and when they are held liable for civil damages, the victim’s right to recover is adequately protected.

VI. LEGAL ETHICS IMPLICATIONS

  1. Duty of Candor and Good Faith

    • Lawyers applying for provisional remedies on behalf of offended parties must ensure good faith and compliance with procedural requirements. Factual allegations in the verified application must be accurate and not meant to harass or oppress the accused. False representations may subject counsel to administrative sanctions.

  2. Avoidance of Forum Shopping

    • Counsel must ensure that the civil claims relating to the criminal action have not been filed in another court or proceeding. Improper multiple filings can lead to forum shopping violations.

  3. Bond Requirements

    • Ethically, counsel must advise clients about bond obligations, the possible financial consequences, and the seriousness of posting a bond, ensuring the client is fully informed of the potential liabilities for damages.

VII. STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Why Use Provisional Remedies in a Criminal Case?

    • To prevent the dissipation or concealment of assets, ensuring that a favorable judgment on the civil liability can be satisfied.

  2. When Might You Forego Provisional Remedies?

    • If the accused is unlikely to dissipate assets or if the expense and complexity of securing these remedies outweigh their benefits.
    • If the offended party or their counsel believes a separate civil action (or a direct claim in civil court with more flexible remedies) might be more strategic.

  3. Timing

    • Provisional remedies are best sought early in the criminal proceedings (e.g., upon the filing of the Information or soon thereafter). Delay in applying for them may give the accused time to dispose of assets.

  4. Risk Management

    • Because the applicant must post a bond, a thorough cost-benefit analysis should be done. If the criminal case fails or the remedy is deemed improvidently issued, the offended party (and the sureties on the bond) could be exposed to a claim for damages by the accused.

VIII. SUMMARY

  • Rule 127 allows the use of provisional remedies (e.g., attachment, injunction, receivership, replevin, support pendente lite) in criminal proceedings only if the civil liability arising from the offense is instituted together with the criminal action (i.e., no reservation or waiver, and no prior separate civil suit).
  • The same grounds, procedures, and requirements under the Rules of Civil Procedure apply, including the requirement of a verified application and, in most instances, the posting of a bond.
  • These remedies safeguard the offended party’s interest in securing monetary restitution, damages, or recovery of property in anticipation of a future judgment of conviction and civil liability.
  • They do not affect the determination of guilt or the criminal prosecution itself but operate as an ancillary measure to protect the possibility of civil recovery.
  • Courts require strict compliance with due process and procedural safeguards, mindful that property rights of the accused may be curtailed by these remedies before final judgment.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. Timely Filing: File for provisional remedies early and properly to secure assets or property.
  2. Good Faith Requirement: Applications and supporting affidavits must be honest, factual, and done in good faith.
  3. Bond Posting: Be prepared to post a bond and understand possible liabilities for damages if the remedy is found to be wrongful.
  4. No Separate Civil Action: Availment of provisional remedies depends on the civil action being joined with the criminal case; once the civil aspect is waived or reserved separately, these remedies cannot be pursued under Rule 127 in the criminal case.
  5. Court Discretion: The issuance or denial of a provisional remedy is subject to the court’s sound discretion, guided by the interests of justice and protection of rights for both parties.

In sum, Rule 127 ensures that an offended party in a criminal proceeding can protect the likelihood of recovering damages or restitution by using the arsenal of provisional remedies typically found in civil litigation. Meticulous compliance with procedural and ethical requirements is critical to avoid sanctions, ensure due process, and uphold the integrity of the judicial process.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login