Court of Tax Appeals | Jurisdiction of Courts | JURISDICTION

Below is a comprehensive discussion of the jurisdiction of the Philippine Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). This overview is based on the pertinent laws (primarily Republic Act No. 1125, as amended by Republic Act Nos. 9282 and 9503) and relevant rules and jurisprudence. Although this exposition is detailed and meticulous, please remember that it is for general reference only and does not substitute for formal legal advice.

1. Creation and Composition of the Court of Tax Appeals

  1. Statutory Basis

    • The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) was originally created under Republic Act (R.A.) No. 1125 (1954).
    • Subsequently, R.A. No. 9282 (2004) expanded the CTA’s jurisdiction and elevated its rank to a collegiate court of the same level as the Court of Appeals.
    • R.A. No. 9503 (2008) further increased the number of CTA justices and refined certain procedural aspects.

  2. Composition

    • The CTA is composed of a Presiding Justice and eight (8) Associate Justices, for a total of nine (9).
    • The Court sits en banc or in three (3) Divisions, with each Division composed of three (3) justices.

  3. Hierarchy of Decisions

    • A case may initially be heard and decided by a Division of the CTA.
    • Decisions or resolutions of a Division may be elevated by motion for reconsideration or new trial to the CTA en banc.
    • Decisions or resolutions of the CTA en banc may be appealed by petition for review on certiorari to the Supreme Court.

2. General Overview of Jurisdiction

The CTA is a specialized court that exercises exclusive appellate jurisdiction over tax-related cases, as well as original jurisdiction in certain tax, customs, and related cases. The CTA’s jurisdiction can be broken down into:

  1. Appellate Jurisdiction (both exclusive and, in some instances, concurrent)
  2. Original Jurisdiction (including criminal jurisdiction in certain cases)

3. Appellate Jurisdiction of the CTA

3.1. Decisions of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR)

  • Scope
    The CTA has exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal:

    1. Decisions of the CIR in cases involving:
      • Internal revenue taxes
      • Tax assessments
      • Tax refunds or tax credits
      • Fees, charges, and penalties imposed in relation to the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC)
    2. Inaction of the CIR on a disputed assessment, claim for refund, or other taxable matter within the prescribed period.

  • Relevant Timeframes

    • If the CIR issues a final decision on a disputed assessment or refund claim, the taxpayer has 30 days from receipt of the decision to file a Petition for Review with the CTA.
    • If the CIR fails to act on a protest or refund claim within 180 days from submission of documents, the taxpayer has 30 days from the expiration of the 180-day period to file with the CTA, treating the inaction as a deemed denial.

3.2. Decisions of the Commissioner of Customs (COC)

  • Scope
    The CTA has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over decisions of the Commissioner of Customs in cases involving:

    • Customs duties, fees, or charges
    • Seizure, detention, or release of property affected by the customs laws, or other matters arising under the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (CMTA, formerly Tariff and Customs Code).

  • Procedural Path
    A party typically appeals the Commissioner of Customs’ decision to the Secretary of Finance before it may reach the CTA, unless the law provides direct recourse to the CTA (e.g., in seizure and forfeiture cases). Careful attention must be given to which agency’s decision is made “in the exercise of its original or appellate jurisdiction,” as this determines whether the CTA may assume jurisdiction directly or only after review by the Secretary of Finance.

3.3. Decisions of the Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA)

  • Scope
    The CTA also has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over final decisions, resolutions, or orders of the Central Board of Assessment Appeals in cases involving real property taxation (e.g., assessments and refunds under local government tax ordinances on real property).

3.4. Decisions of the Secretary of Finance, Secretary of Trade and Industry, or Secretary of Agriculture

  • Scope
    The CTA may also review, on appeal, decisions of:
    • The Secretary of Finance in cases involving customs, tariff, and related laws.
    • The Secretary of Trade and Industry or the Secretary of Agriculture in cases involving dumping duties, countervailing duties, and safeguard measures (i.e., trade remedies under relevant statutes).

3.5. Decisions of the Regional Trial Courts (RTC) in Local Tax Cases

  • Scope
    The CTA has exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal the decisions of the Regional Trial Courts in local tax cases originally decided by the RTC in the exercise of its original jurisdiction under Section 196 of the Local Government Code (or under special laws governing local taxation).

    This covers, for instance, disputes over:

    • Local business taxes
    • License fees
    • Real property taxes (when not covered by the local boards of assessment appeals)
    • Other impositions by local government units

4. Original Jurisdiction of the CTA

4.1. In Tax Collection Cases

  • Scope
    The CTA exercises exclusive original jurisdiction in tax collection cases involving final and executory assessments if:

    1. The principal amount of taxes and penalties claimed is exceeding ₱1 million, and
    2. The case arises within the jurisdiction of the CTA, i.e., national internal revenue taxes, customs duties, or other taxes administered by the BIR or BOC.

    If the amount is ₱1 million or less, original jurisdiction lies with the Metropolitan Trial Courts (MeTC), Municipal Trial Courts (MTC), or RTC, depending on existing procedural law. However, once decided by those courts, and the case is appealed, it generally goes up to the CTA (rather than the Court of Appeals) because it is still a tax matter.

4.2. Criminal Cases Involving Violations of Tax and Customs Laws

  • Scope
    R.A. 9282 expressly granted the CTA original jurisdiction over criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) and the Tariff and Customs Code (now CMTA), among others. This includes:

    • Tax evasion cases
    • Failure to supply correct information
    • Other criminal tax offenses under the NIRC, CMTA, or related laws administered by the BIR or the BOC.

  • Procedure
    Criminal actions are commenced by the filing of an Information in the CTA. The CTA in Division tries these criminal cases in the same manner as the regular courts. Conviction or acquittal by a CTA Division may be subject to a motion for reconsideration or new trial before the CTA en banc, and thereafter to a petition for review before the Supreme Court.

5. CTA in Divisions vs. CTA En Banc

  1. CTA in Divisions

    • Most cases begin at the Division level.
    • A Division is composed of three justices; the concurrence of at least two justices is needed for a decision.

  2. CTA En Banc

    • Acts on motions for reconsideration or new trial of Division decisions.
    • Composed of all nine justices.
    • Concurrence of a majority of the justices (i.e., at least five) is required for a valid en banc decision.
    • Its decisions may be appealed via a petition for review on certiorari to the Supreme Court.

6. Appeals from the CTA to the Supreme Court

  • Mode of Appeal

    • Decisions or rulings of the CTA en banc are appealable to the Supreme Court via a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.
    • The standard of review generally pertains to questions of law, although the Supreme Court has discretionary power to review factual findings when warranted by certain exceptions.

  • Period to Appeal

    • The party must file the petition for review on certiorari within the period provided in the Rules of Court (typically 15 days from notice of judgment or denial of motion for reconsideration, extendible in meritorious cases).

7. Notable Procedural Nuances

  1. Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

    • Generally, a taxpayer must first file a protest or administrative claim for refund before the CIR or BOC, and wait for a decision or the lapse of the period for the agency to act. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies might result in dismissal of the Petition for Review for lack of jurisdiction or prematurity.

  2. Non-Forum Shopping and Certification Requirements

    • Petitions filed before the CTA must include a certification of non-forum shopping and compliance with other formal requirements under the Rules of the CTA and the Rules of Court.

  3. Injunctive Relief

    • The CTA has the power to issue injunctions, such as restraining the collection of taxes or enforcement of warrants of distraint and levy, under specific conditions. However, a higher bond requirement and a demonstration of irreparable injury are typically required.

  4. Procedures in Criminal Cases

    • The CTA follows a procedure akin to that of the Regional Trial Courts in criminal proceedings, with the CTA in Division hearing evidence and rendering judgment, and the CTA en banc entertaining post-judgment motions.

  5. Continuous Trial System and Judicial Affidavit Rule

    • Like other courts, the CTA may adopt the continuous trial system and implement the judicial affidavit rule to expedite proceedings.

8. Legal Ethics and Practice Before the CTA

  1. Professional Responsibility

    • Lawyers appearing before the CTA must observe the same ethical standards mandated by the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Rules of Court.
    • They must be mindful of strict compliance with the CTA’s Rules, particularly with respect to pleadings, motions, and documentary evidence.

  2. Representation of Taxpayers and Government

    • The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) represents the government in appeals involving the Commissioner of Internal Revenue or the Commissioner of Customs when the case reaches the CTA or is elevated there.
    • Private practitioners representing taxpayers should ensure that all administrative prerequisites (e.g., filing of protest, submission of complete documents) are properly fulfilled, as jurisdictional and procedural defects can lead to dismissal.

  3. Observance of Deadlines and Filing Requirements

    • Timely filing of the Petition for Review (i.e., within 30 days from receipt of the final decision or inaction) is jurisdictional. An appeal filed out of time generally cannot be entertained.

9. Summary of Key Points

  1. Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction

    • Over decisions by the CIR, COC, CBAA, Secretary of Finance (and in trade remedy cases, Secretary of Trade and Industry or Agriculture), and over local tax decisions of the RTC.

  2. Original Jurisdiction

    • Over tax collection cases involving amounts exceeding ₱1 million that have become final and executory, and
    • Over criminal offenses under the NIRC, the Tariff and Customs Code (now CMTA), and other related tax laws.

  3. Structure

    • The CTA sits in Divisions (three justices each) and en banc (all nine justices). Division decisions may be reconsidered en banc; en banc decisions are reviewed by the Supreme Court.

  4. Procedural Requirements

    • Strict compliance with filing periods and administrative remedies is necessary.

  5. Appeals to Supreme Court

    • Via petition for review on certiorari (Rule 45), focusing on questions of law unless exceptional circumstances warrant review of factual issues.

  6. Legal Ethics and Forms

    • Practitioners must adhere to all the requirements of the CTA’s Rules, the Rules of Court, and the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Final Note

The Court of Tax Appeals serves as the primary forum for litigating complex tax and customs disputes in the Philippines. It upholds the principle that the collection of taxes is a lifeblood of the government but tempers this with due process rights of taxpayers. Given the specialized rules and strict deadlines, parties are strongly advised to consult with counsel well-versed in tax litigation and CTA procedures.

This exhaustive outline should provide a solid overview of the CTA’s jurisdiction and its core procedural nuances. However, any party contemplating or currently engaged in CTA litigation should seek professional legal advice tailored to their specific case.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login