Responsible Use of Social Media | LEGAL ETHICS: CANON II. Propriety

Below is a comprehensive discussion of the ethical principles, considerations, and best practices for Filipino lawyers concerning responsible use of social media, viewed under the lens of “Propriety”—as recognized by legal ethics doctrines, the (old) Code of Professional Responsibility, the 2023 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), and relevant guidance from Philippine jurisprudence and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). Although older ethical rules did not explicitly address social media (given its then non-existence), the Supreme Court and the IBP have since recognized the need for clear directives. This write-up endeavors to be as meticulous as possible on the topic.

1. Foundational Principles from the Code of Professional Responsibility (Old) and the CPRA (New)

  1. Lawyer’s Oath and Duty of Candor

    • Even if not explicitly stated in older rules, a lawyer’s oath and the general principles of integrity, candor, and fairness extend to all communication platforms, including social media.
    • Under the old Code of Professional Responsibility, lawyers were called to “uphold the dignity and integrity of the profession” in Canons 1 and 7.
    • Under the 2023 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), there are expanded provisions emphasizing responsible and ethical use of digital platforms. The Supreme Court underscored that lawyers must act with prudence, decorum, and circumspection in all forms of communication, including social media.

  2. Canon on Propriety / Decorum

    • Propriety has consistently been an ethical bedrock: lawyers must avoid impropriety and even the appearance of impropriety.
    • Under the new CPRA, provisions (sometimes styled as “Canons” and “Rules”) remind lawyers that public or semi-public online behavior has a direct bearing on the reputation of the individual lawyer and the legal profession.

  3. General Principle of Accountability for Social Media Conduct

    • The Supreme Court of the Philippines, through judicial pronouncements, has stressed that social media postings—even on personal accounts—reflect on the lawyer’s professional standing. A lawyer remains accountable for unprofessional conduct in cyberspace to the same extent as in traditional media or face-to-face interactions.

2. Specific Ethical Concerns on Social Media Usage

  1. Confidentiality

    • Attorney-client privilege extends to all communications, whether online or offline. Lawyers must ensure no inadvertent or intentional disclosure of client information through posts, comments, or direct messages.
    • Avoid discussing ongoing cases, strategies, or privileged communications in social media forums. Even anonymized discussions can risk revealing client identity or case details.

  2. Sub Judice Rule and Non-Disclosure of Pending Matters

    • Lawyers must comply with the sub judice rule, which bars public comment on pending litigation that may influence public opinion or the outcome of a case.
    • Social media, with its instantaneous and broad reach, poses a heightened risk of sub judice violations. Improper comments or “updates” about an active case can subject the lawyer to sanctions for contempt or ethical discipline.

  3. No Misleading Advertising or Improper Solicitation

    • The old Code of Professional Responsibility (Rule 2.03, Canon 2) and the CPRA both prohibit lawyers from soliciting clients through false, misleading, or overly promotional advertising.
    • Social media pages, websites, or profiles must present factual, dignified, and truthful information. Overly boastful claims, unverifiable successes, or direct client-targeting posts may violate ethical standards.
    • “Pay-to-play” advertising on social media, if not done with proper disclaimers and in compliance with ethical canons, can be deemed improper solicitation.

  4. Maintenance of Professional Decorum and Civility

    • Lawyers must adhere to civility and courtesy in social media interactions. Name-calling, insults, or derogatory remarks—particularly toward judges, opposing counsel, or other parties—breach ethical norms.
    • Professional courtesy requires that even in disagreements, lawyers maintain dignity and politeness. Flame wars, ad hominem attacks, or personal feuds on social media are grounds for discipline.

  5. Conflict of Interest and Client Contact

    • Lawyers must avoid inadvertently creating attorney-client relationships over social media. For example, answering specific legal inquiries from strangers via comments or direct messages may trigger ethical obligations.
    • Screen your posts and interactions for potential conflicts or inadvertent commitments, especially if these are made under the lawyer’s name or professional profile.

  6. Respect for the Judiciary

    • Lawyers must not use social media to undermine public confidence in the judiciary or to degrade the administration of justice.
    • Posting or sharing scandalous or false accusations against judges or court personnel can constitute contempt of court and ethical misconduct.
    • Maintaining “friend” or “follow” relationships with judges and court staff is not outright forbidden, but lawyers must be cautious to avoid any perception of impropriety, partiality, or undue influence.

  7. Privacy and Security Measures

    • Lawyers should employ robust data protection and privacy settings on social media to safeguard both personal and client-related information.
    • Failure to secure accounts can result in unauthorized disclosures, hacking, or misuse of lawyer profiles, leading to ethical and professional liability.

  8. Upholding the Honor of the Profession

    • The overarching principle remains: lawyers should not engage in any conduct—online or offline—that brings discredit upon the legal profession. This includes posting content that is unlawful, unethical, or that may encourage disrespect for the law.

3. Illustrative Jurisprudence and IBP Guidance

  1. Domestic Case Law and Memoranda

    • Although there is no single, landmark Supreme Court case solely on “social media misuse by lawyers,” disciplinary cases have increasingly cited social media posts as evidence of impropriety or unprofessional behavior.
    • In various administrative matters involving judges (some of which are publicly reported), the Court has emphasized the need for caution and restraint in posting on social media. The same rationale extends to lawyers by analogy.
    • The Supreme Court has, in bar matters and circulars, encouraged lawyers to maintain professional courtesy, confidentiality, and avoid conduct unbecoming a member of the Bar.

  2. IBP Circulars and Advisories

    • The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has issued reminders to lawyers to use social media responsibly. While these reminders are not full-blown regulations, they provide interpretative guidance consistent with the Code of Professional Responsibility.

  3. Foreign Guidance (Persuasive, Not Binding)

    • Some Filipino lawyers look to the American Bar Association (ABA) and other foreign bar associations for best practices, given the universal nature of ethical challenges online. However, such sources are only persuasive and must align with Philippine ethical rules.

4. Best Practices and Practical Guidelines

  1. Establish Clear Online Boundaries

    • Use separate personal and professional accounts if possible. Even personal accounts must abide by ethical constraints; however, separating them helps reduce confusion about professional responsibilities.

  2. Implement Strong Privacy and Security Settings

    • Activate two-factor authentication (2FA).
    • Regularly update passwords.
    • Restrict the audience of posts containing sensitive or personal information.
    • Ensure your devices and cloud accounts are equally secure.

  3. Avoid Giving Specific Legal Advice in Public Forums

    • Provide only general legal information or commentary on legal news.
    • If someone seeks specific advice, recommend a formal consultation; do not render detailed instructions via comments or messages, which could inadvertently create an attorney-client relationship.

  4. Maintain Civility and Professional Tone

    • Refrain from engaging in arguments or personal attacks.
    • Even if provoked, respond with calm professionalism or consider not responding at all.

  5. Seek Guidance When in Doubt

    • If uncertain about whether a particular social media post may breach confidentiality or any ethical rule, consult senior colleagues or the IBP’s Ethics Committee.
    • Adopt a “when in doubt, leave it out” rule.

  6. Use Disclaimers Where Appropriate

    • If you regularly post on legal issues or analyses, include disclaimers such as: “This post is for general informational purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship.”

  7. Regularly Review Updates to Ethical Rules

    • Given that technology evolves quickly, the Supreme Court or the IBP may issue additional guidelines. Keep abreast of updates to ensure compliance.

5. Potential Sanctions for Violations

  1. Administrative Penalties by the Supreme Court

    • Lawyers can be warned, reprimanded, suspended, or even disbarred for serious or repeated violations related to social media misconduct.
    • These sanctions are decided in administrative proceedings (A.C. or A.M. cases) after due notice and hearing.

  2. Contempt of Court

    • If a lawyer’s social media posts violate the sub judice rule or constitute disrespect towards the court, the lawyer may face contempt charges, which can entail fines or jail time.

  3. Civil and Criminal Liability

    • Beyond ethics violations, a lawyer’s defamatory or malicious social media statements can expose them to civil suits (e.g., libel) or even criminal liability under the Cybercrime Prevention Act if the posts are libelous or otherwise criminally violative.

6. Key Takeaways

  • Continuity of Ethical Conduct: A lawyer’s ethical obligations do not stop at the courthouse door; they extend to every tweet, Facebook post, Instagram story, or LinkedIn update.
  • Holistic Compliance: Responsible use of social media involves respect for confidentiality, avoidance of improper solicitation, adherence to sub judice, and preservation of civility.
  • Enhanced Scrutiny: Because social media posts can become viral or rapidly disseminated, mistakes or lapses in judgment can have severe professional ramifications.
  • Professional Image Matters: Any public or semi-public communication by a lawyer can directly affect the public’s perception of the legal profession and the administration of justice. Lawyers must therefore remain vigilant in preserving the dignity of their role.

Final Word

Responsible Use of Social Media for Filipino lawyers is not merely a suggestion but a professional and ethical mandate. Guided by canons of propriety, confidentiality, and the sub judice rule, attorneys are expected to use social media with the same circumspection, courtesy, and discipline they exhibit in court and in their law offices. As the Supreme Court and the IBP continue to shape and refine these standards, it remains crucial for legal practitioners to stay informed, exercise caution, and uphold the honor and integrity of the profession—both online and offline.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login