Authority of Lawyer to Appear | LEGAL ETHICS: CANON III. Fidelity

COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION ON THE AUTHORITY OF A LAWYER TO APPEAR (UNDER CANON III. FIDELITY OF LEGAL ETHICS IN THE PHILIPPINES)

I. INTRODUCTION

The authority of a lawyer to appear in behalf of a litigant or client is fundamental to the administration of justice. It is intertwined with the lawyer’s professional obligations of fidelity, loyalty, and competence as outlined in the Philippine Code of Professional Responsibility (and now further clarified in the 2023 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability), applicable laws, rules of procedure, and jurisprudential pronouncements.

When a lawyer stands before a court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial body, the assumption is that such appearance is grounded on a valid lawyer-client relationship. Ensuring that the appearance is duly authorized safeguards the integrity of the proceedings and protects the client’s rights.

This discussion comprehensively presents the legal framework governing a lawyer’s authority to appear, including the nature and scope of such authority, the conditions for valid representation, relevant jurisprudence, and professional responsibilities under the canon of fidelity.

II. LEGAL BASES

  1. The Rules of Court

    • Rule 138 of the Rules of Court (Philippines) deals with attorneys and admission to the Bar. It provides the foundational rules on lawyers’ conduct, including the requirement that any attorney who appears in court must be duly authorized to represent a litigant.
    • Section 21, Rule 138: Establishes that an attorney is required to “maintain the respect due to the courts,” but it also touches upon the necessity of recognizing the attorney-client relationship so as not to disrupt court proceedings.

  2. The Civil Code (Relevant Provisions on Agency)

    • Articles 1868 to 1932 of the Civil Code govern the law on agency, which similarly apply to the attorney-client relationship. While a lawyer-client relationship is a special kind of agency, the Civil Code’s basic tenets on authority, scope, and termination of agency help define the authority of counsel to bind or appear for the client.

  3. The 1988 Code of Professional Responsibility (superseded in 2023 but still historically and contextually significant):

    • Canon 19: “A lawyer shall represent his client with zeal within the bounds of the law.”
    • Canon 18: “A lawyer shall serve his client with competence and diligence.”
    • Although not explicitly labeled “Canon III. Fidelity,” the overarching principle of fidelity to client’s cause is scattered in these canons, mandating lawyers not to undertake representation unless properly authorized.

  4. The 2023 Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability:

    • Reinforces lawyers’ duties of honesty, candor, and loyalty to clients, including the duty to ensure that one does not appear without authority.

  5. Pertinent Jurisprudence

    • Sarmiento v. Court of Appeals, 288 SCRA 624 (1998): Reiterated that a counsel’s appearance for a party must be supported by authority, and the absence of such authority may justify the court’s refusal to recognize the appearance.
    • Del Rosario v. Court of Appeals, 248 SCRA 213 (1995): Emphasized that a counsel is presumed to be properly authorized unless the adverse party timely challenges that authority.
    • Apex Mining v. NLRC, G.R. No. 94951 (1992): Highlighted that the appearance of counsel in quasi-judicial bodies also requires proof of authority or a proper retainer.

III. NATURE AND SCOPE OF A LAWYER’S AUTHORITY TO APPEAR

  1. General Authority vs. Special Authority

    • A lawyer generally has the authority to perform acts necessary or incidental to the representation of a client’s cause (e.g., file pleadings, present evidence, argue motions).
    • Certain acts may require special authority from the client, such as:
      • Entering into a compromise or settlement.
      • Entering a confession of judgment.
      • Executing binding agreements that effectively dispose of the client’s claims or defenses.
    • Rationale: These acts can dramatically affect the substantive rights of the client, thus the law mandates explicit authorization.

  2. Scope of Representation

    • The authority to appear extends only to the case or matter for which the lawyer is retained or engaged.
    • A lawyer cannot, without express or implied consent, represent the client in unrelated matters or exercise dominion over the client’s broader legal affairs unless so authorized.

  3. Presumption of Authority

    • Courts often extend a presumption of proper authority in favor of the appearing counsel. The onus is on the opposing party (or on someone else disputing counsel’s authority) to timely raise objections.
    • If the adverse party challenges the lawyer’s authority, the lawyer may be required to produce a written retainer agreement, a duly signed pleading by the client, or a formal entry of appearance acknowledging such representation.

IV. REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR ENTERING AN APPEARANCE

  1. Formal Entry of Appearance

    • A lawyer who begins to act as counsel in a case typically files a formal entry of appearance with the court. This document indicates:
      • The name of the counsel and law firm (if any).
      • The name of the party represented.
      • The counsel’s address on record.
    • The entry of appearance often includes a professional statement that the lawyer is duly authorized to represent the client.

  2. Verification and Certification Requirements

    • Certain pleadings (e.g., Complaints, Petitions) require verification or certifications (such as the Certification against Forum Shopping). The client, or the counsel who has personal knowledge and explicit authority, must sign these certifications.
    • A lawyer appearing without the proper verification or certification from the client may prompt a court inquiry regarding the validity of the representation.

  3. Retainer Agreement and Proof of Authority

    • In practice, lawyers secure a retainer agreement or a written contract of legal services to formally establish the lawyer-client relationship. Though not strictly required to be presented in every case, it serves as documentary proof when the authority is disputed.
    • If a lawyer appears based on an implied retainer (e.g., a longstanding counsel-client relationship), the court typically respects such appearance unless credibly challenged.

V. LIMITATIONS ON AUTHORITY

  1. Acts Requiring the Client’s Explicit Consent

    • Settling the entire case or waiving substantial rights (e.g., right to appeal) without the client’s knowledge and approval may invalidate the settlement or waiver.
    • A voluntary withdrawal of pleadings, admissions, or major procedural rights typically demands the client’s explicit instruction.

  2. Ethical Boundaries and Good Faith Representation

    • Even where a client grants broad authority, a lawyer must still observe ethical constraints: no frivolous claims, no falsehood, no malicious prosecution, etc.
    • A lawyer must always act with the client’s best interest in mind. If the client instructs the lawyer to commit unethical acts or engage in fraud, the lawyer must refuse and, if necessary, withdraw from representation.

  3. Unauthorized Practice of Law

    • Non-members of the Philippine Bar are prohibited from appearing as counsel.
    • A lawyer must not lend his or her name for appearances by unqualified individuals.

VI. CHALLENGES TO AND TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY

  1. Challenge to Authority

    • The adverse party or the court may, sua sponte or upon motion, question the authority of counsel.
    • Common grounds:
      • The alleged client denies the engagement.
      • The lawyer lacks a valid retainer or special power of attorney for certain actions.
      • The client is a juridical entity, and the person who engaged the lawyer did not have the requisite corporate authority.

  2. Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel

    • Rule 138, Section 26 of the Rules of Court provides that withdrawal or substitution of counsel requires:
      • A written application filed with the court.
      • The consent of the client (and the new counsel, if any).
      • Adequate notice to the adverse party to avoid prejudice.
    • Once the court approves withdrawal or substitution, the outgoing lawyer ceases to have authority to appear in that case.

  3. Automatic Termination of Authority

    • The authority of a lawyer may end upon the final termination of the case, the death of the client (subject to certain exceptions in criminal proceedings or where the action survives), or the lawyer’s disbarment/suspension.

VII. CONSEQUENCES OF LACK OF AUTHORITY

  1. Invalidity of Proceedings and Orders

    • If a lawyer who lacks proper authority files pleadings or makes representations, those actions and any resulting court orders may be declared null and void.
    • Courts tend to be lenient if the unauthorized appearance caused no prejudice or if promptly ratified by the client; otherwise, serious repercussions may ensue.

  2. Disciplinary Sanctions

    • Lawyers who appear without proper authority risk disciplinary action for violating the canons of professional responsibility:
      • Suspension, disbarment, or censure can be imposed by the Supreme Court.
      • Administrative sanctions such as warnings or fines could also result from unauthorized appearances before quasi-judicial agencies.

  3. Liability for Damages

    • If the lawyer’s unauthorized appearance or negligent act in representation causes damage to the supposed client or to other parties, the lawyer may be held civilly liable under tort or quasi-delict principles.

VIII. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FIDELITY

  1. Fidelity as the Bedrock of Representation

    • Canon III (Fidelity) in many legal ethics references underscores the paramount duty of loyalty and faithfulness to the client’s cause. Part of this fidelity is ensuring that one’s appearance is grounded on genuine authority, so as not to compromise the client’s interests or mislead the court.

  2. Duty to Maintain Client’s Trust and Confidence

    • A lawyer must keep the client’s confidences, vigorously advocate for the client, and refrain from taking positions contrary to the client’s instructions. Unauthorized representation undermines these fundamental duties and erodes the trust that is essential to the lawyer-client relationship.

  3. Obligation to the Court and the Administration of Justice

    • While loyalty to the client is paramount, the lawyer also owes a duty of candor to the tribunal. Appearing without authority or misrepresenting one’s authority violates the lawyer’s duty of honesty and may constitute contempt of court.

IX. BEST PRACTICES

  1. Secure a Written Retainer or Proof of Authority Early

    • Minimizes future disputes over whether the lawyer is properly engaged and clarifies the extent of permissible actions.

  2. File a Formal Entry of Appearance

    • Immediately inform the court of counsel’s representation and contact details; ensures that official notices are properly served.

  3. Obtain Specific Consent for Settlements and Waivers

    • Avoid disclaimers of authority later; require explicit, preferably written, client instructions for compromises and similar substantial actions.

  4. Maintain Clear Communication with the Client

    • Regularly update the client on developments and consult on significant decisions to avoid any implied unauthorized act.

  5. Observe Strict Ethical Standards

    • Uphold all canons of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability. Lack of diligence in verifying authority can expose a lawyer to disciplinary sanctions.

X. CONCLUSION

A lawyer’s authority to appear in the Philippines is not merely a procedural formality but a critical legal requirement aimed at safeguarding both the client’s rights and the integrity of judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings. Under the overarching principle of fidelity, lawyers must ensure that their representation is properly grounded on valid authorization, remain vigilant about the scope of their authority, and observe professional ethics at all times.

By faithfully adhering to these rules, lawyers uphold the dignity of the legal profession, protect the interests of their clients, and contribute to the proper and expeditious administration of justice.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login