Sworn statement after service of suspension | Nature of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Lawyers | LEGAL ETHICS: CANON VI. Accountability

SWORN STATEMENT AFTER SERVICE OF SUSPENSION
(Under Canon VI [Accountability], A. Nature of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Lawyers, particularly “7. Sworn statement after service of suspension”)

Below is a comprehensive discussion on the requirement for a Sworn Statement After Service of Suspension in disciplinary proceedings against lawyers in the Philippines, with references to relevant rules, jurisprudence, and best practices.

I. CONTEXT AND LEGAL BASIS

  1. Governing Rules and Codal Provisions

    • Constitution: Article VIII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution vests the Supreme Court with the power to promulgate rules on the admission to the practice of law, as well as to discipline members of the bar.
    • Rules of Court (Rule 139-B): This is the principal rule governing the disbarment and disciplinary procedures against lawyers. It grants the Supreme Court and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) authority to investigate and impose sanctions (disbarment, suspension, or reprimand).
    • Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR): While not explicitly enumerating every procedural step in a disciplinary sanction, the CPR lays down general canons of professional responsibility. Under Canon VI on Accountability, lawyers have a duty to abide by final disciplinary orders and to demonstrate compliance when they are suspended.
    • Relevant Supreme Court Issuances and Case Law: The Supreme Court, in implementing sanctions, typically requires suspended lawyers to submit proof of compliance with the terms of suspension. This proof often includes a Sworn Statement attesting to (a) non-engagement in the practice of law during suspension and (b) fulfillment of all conditions required by the Court.

  2. Purpose of the Sworn Statement

    • Verification of Compliance: A suspended lawyer must prove that they have refrained from practicing law and have complied with any other conditions (e.g., payment of costs, restitution, additional training, etc.) during the suspension period.
    • Protection of the Public and Profession: The requirement ensures that those suspended do not circumvent the disciplinary sanction. A lawyer who practices while suspended not only violates the Supreme Court’s order but also risks facing more severe punishment (extended suspension, disbarment, or contempt).
    • Reassurance of Fitness to Resume Practice: The Sworn Statement signals to the Court that the lawyer recognizes the authority of the Supreme Court, respects its disciplinary mechanism, and stands ready to resume legal practice with renewed adherence to professional ethics.

II. REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURE

  1. Who Must Submit the Sworn Statement:

    • Any lawyer who has been suspended by final order of the Supreme Court (or by the IBP Board of Governors confirmed by the Court) and who intends to resume the practice of law at the expiry of the suspension period.
    • If the lawyer does not submit the required Sworn Statement, the Court may withhold acknowledgment of the termination of the suspension, thereby preventing the lawyer from effectively returning to practice.

  2. Contents of the Sworn Statement:

    • Affirmation of Non-Practice During Suspension: The lawyer must declare under oath that they have not appeared in any court, quasi-judicial agency, or regulatory body in a representative capacity for clients during the suspension period.
    • Acknowledgment of the Supreme Court’s Authority: The lawyer typically includes a statement affirming respect for, and submission to, the Court’s disciplinary power.
    • Details of Compliance with Any Additional Conditions: If the lawyer was ordered to comply with other conditions—such as restitution of funds, attendance at legal ethics seminars, submission of certain documents, or payment of fines—the Sworn Statement should reflect adherence to these directives.
    • Date of Compliance and Documentation (if applicable): The lawyer may attach supporting documents showing, for example, receipts for payment of fines or letters evidencing restitution to clients.

  3. Form of the Sworn Statement:

    • Notarized Affidavit: The statement is presented in the form of an affidavit, executed under oath before a notary public, ensuring authenticity and legal accountability.
    • Proper Heading and Case Reference: The statement should reference the Supreme Court’s final order, the docket number (if applicable), and the caption of the disciplinary case.
    • Mandatory Language: Some Court resolutions may provide specific language that must be included, but as a rule, the statement must be unequivocal in disclaiming any unauthorized practice during suspension.

  4. Filing and Service:

    • The lawyer typically files the Sworn Statement with the Office of the Clerk of Court of the Supreme Court or with the IBP Commission on Bar Discipline (depending on the instructions in the final order).
    • A copy is often served on the IBP Board of Governors or the party who initiated the complaint (though the main requirement is ensuring the document reaches the Supreme Court’s record of the case).

  5. Consequences of Non-Compliance:

    • Prolonged Suspension or Non-Reinstatement: If the lawyer does not timely submit the Sworn Statement, the Court may treat the suspension as ongoing. The lawyer remains barred from practice and subject to further sanctions.
    • Contempt or Additional Disciplinary Action: Any act of defiance or concealment (e.g., continuing to practice while suspended) not only violates the suspension order but may also constitute contempt of court, prompting a more severe penalty such as disbarment.

III. RELEVANT CASE LAW AND JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS

  1. Leading Cases and Illustrative Rulings:

    • In Re: Almacen, 31 SCRA 562 (1970): Although primarily focusing on contempt, this seminal case underscores the Supreme Court’s disciplinary power and the necessity for compliance with Court directives. It laid a foundation for the principle that a lawyer’s failure to heed the Supreme Court’s orders may justify severe sanctions.
    • Rayos-Ombac v. Rayos, 460 Phil. 176 (2003): The Court reiterated that the practice of law is a privilege burdened with conditions, one of which is strict adherence to final disciplinary sanctions.
    • Other IBP vs. [Lawyer’s Name] Cases: There are numerous IBP administrative cases where the Supreme Court specifically orders the suspended lawyer to submit a sworn certification attesting to non-practice. Failure to comply is treated as an aggravating circumstance if the lawyer applies for lifting of suspension or reinstatement.

  2. Rationale Reaffirmed:

    • These decisions emphasize public confidence in the legal profession and the dignity of the court. The sworn statement is one of several procedural tools that the judiciary uses to ensure the bar’s integrity.

IV. BEST PRACTICES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Timely Submission

    • A suspended lawyer should calendar the end of the suspension period and prepare the Sworn Statement early, ensuring it is filed promptly so that there is no ambiguity about the lawyer’s status.
    • Delayed submission can create complications in both public records and client relationships.

  2. Full and Honest Disclosure

    • The suspended lawyer must be honest in declaring any activities that might constitute practice of law, such as giving legal advice, signing pleadings, or making court appearances. Any misrepresentation in the Sworn Statement is itself unethical and can be a cause for disciplinary action.
    • If there is a question about what constitutes the practice of law (e.g., teaching law, representing oneself, or preparing documents for a fee), seeking clarification from the Supreme Court or the IBP is advisable.

  3. Maintaining Client Communications

    • Even though a lawyer is suspended, they may have ongoing obligations to former or current clients (e.g., turning over files, ensuring the client finds replacement counsel). The suspended lawyer must clarify that they cannot act in a representative capacity, and all communications must be carefully handled so as not to constitute the unauthorized practice of law during the suspension.

  4. Recordkeeping

    • It is prudent for the suspended lawyer to keep detailed records of activities to demonstrate compliance if any question arises post-suspension. This includes documentation that no court filings bear their signature, no formal appearances were made, and any consultations were purely administrative in nature (if at all).

V. CONSEQUENCES FOR FALSITY OR NON-COMPLIANCE

  1. Extended Suspension or Disbarment

    • Should the Supreme Court discover that a lawyer practiced law under suspension or submitted a false or deceptive Sworn Statement, the penalty can escalate. In several cases, the Supreme Court has not hesitated to impose disbarment for such willful defiance.
    • Even if disbarment is not imposed immediately, the period of suspension can be indefinitely extended, effectively halting the legal career of the erring lawyer.

  2. Impact on Reputation and Client Relations

    • Violations related to the suspension order severely tarnish the lawyer’s professional reputation, potentially leading to the loss of clients and a diminished standing in the legal community.

  3. Possible Criminal Liability for Perjury

    • A Sworn Statement is, by nature, an affidavit. Submitting a false affidavit to the Court can expose the lawyer to criminal prosecution for perjury under the Revised Penal Code. While rare in practice, the possibility exists as an additional deterrent.

VI. SAMPLE OUTLINE OF A SWORN STATEMENT AFTER SERVICE OF SUSPENSION

  1. Title: “Sworn Statement of Compliance and Non-Practice”
  2. Case Caption: Refer to the Supreme Court or IBP case number: e.g., A.C. No. XX-XXXX, In Re: Suspension of Atty. Juan Dela Cruz
  3. Introduction and Personal Details: The affiant states name, roll number, and relevant personal details.
  4. Recital of Facts:
    • Date and duration of suspension.
    • Direct reference to the Supreme Court resolution or IBP order.
  5. Statement of Compliance:
    • A categorical declaration that the affiant has not practiced law from [start date of suspension] to [end date].
    • An affirmation of having complied with all other conditions (if applicable).
  6. Prayer or Statement of Respect for Court Jurisdiction:
    • The affiant states readiness to resume the practice of law upon acknowledgment of the Court (or IBP).
  7. Signature and Oath:
    • Lawyer signs the affidavit.
    • The affidavit is duly notarized with a proper jurat and notarial register entry.

VII. CONCLUSION

The Sworn Statement After Service of Suspension is an integral part of the disciplinary process for lawyers in the Philippines. It manifests accountability (Canon VI) and ensures the legal community and the public at large that sanctioned lawyers respect the Supreme Court’s authority. This mechanism upholds the profession’s integrity by deterring suspended lawyers from unauthorized practice and compelling them to demonstrate genuine compliance with disciplinary orders.

Adherence to this requirement is non-negotiable. Failure to file the Sworn Statement or filing a fraudulent one can precipitate more severe repercussions, including indefinite suspension, contempt, or even disbarment. Thus, suspended lawyers must approach this phase of their disciplinary process with utmost honesty, diligence, and respect for the judiciary’s mandate.

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court’s disciplinary power stems from the Constitution and Rules of Court, specifically Rule 139-B.
  • Suspended lawyers must submit a Sworn Statement verifying full compliance and non-practice during the suspension term.
  • The statement, duly notarized, is typically filed with the Supreme Court (and/or IBP), referencing the case details.
  • Non-compliance or misrepresentation can lead to further sanctions—prolonged suspension, disbarment, or potential criminal liability for perjury.
  • The requirement underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to maintaining the highest ethical standards within the legal profession.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login