Bar Examinations | Supervision and Control of the Legal Profession | Practice of Law | LEGAL ETHICS

ALL THERE IS TO KNOW ABOUT THE PHILIPPINE BAR EXAMINATIONS
(From the Perspective of Remedial Law, Legal Ethics & Legal Forms > Legal Ethics > A. Practice of Law > 2. Supervision and Control of the Legal Profession > d. Bar Examinations)

I. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL BASIS

  1. Constitutional Authority

    • Article VIII, Section 5(5) of the 1987 Philippine Constitution vests the Supreme Court with the power to promulgate rules concerning the admission to the practice of law. This constitutional mandate underpins the entire bar examination process and grants the Supreme Court exclusive authority over:
      • Qualifications for admission.
      • The administration of the bar examinations.
      • The requirement of good moral character.

  2. Rule-Making Power of the Supreme Court

    • Rule 138 of the Rules of Court provides the specific guidelines for the admission of individuals to the bar, laying down procedural and substantive requirements such as qualifications, filing procedures, documentary requirements, and other prerequisites.

  3. Nature of the Practice of Law

    • The Supreme Court has consistently held that the practice of law is a privilege, not a right. The bar examinations serve as the principal mechanism by which the Court ensures that only those who demonstrate the requisite competence and moral fitness are admitted to this privilege.

II. ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT AND THE BAR CHAIRPERSON

  1. Supreme Court En Banc

    • The entire Supreme Court, sitting en banc, has the final say on all policies governing the bar exams, including the determination of subjects, the selection of examiners, and the release of results.
    • The Supreme Court also decides on questions of policy—e.g., whether to lower or raise the passing percentage, or to modify the format (from traditional pen-and-paper to digital modalities).

  2. Committee on Bar Examinations (Bar Chairperson and Examiners)

    • Appointed annually by the Supreme Court, the Committee on Bar Examinations is headed by a Bar Chairperson, typically a sitting Justice of the Supreme Court.
    • The Committee designates Examiners for each subject tested in the bar. These examiners draft questions, grade examination papers (or digital equivalents), and submit the results to the Committee for final approval.

  3. Office of the Bar Confidant

    • The Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC), operating directly under the Supreme Court, oversees the logistical and administrative details of the bar examinations. It also evaluates the candidates’ moral character and compliance with other requirements.

III. COVERAGE AND FORMAT OF THE BAR EXAMINATIONS

  1. Traditional Subjects

    • Historically, the bar examinations cover eight (8) core subjects, typically grouped as follows:
      1. Political Law (including Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Election Laws, Public International Law)
      2. Labor Law (including Social Legislation)
      3. Civil Law (including Persons and Family Relations, Obligations and Contracts, Property, Torts and Damages, etc.)
      4. Taxation Law
      5. Mercantile (Commercial) Law
      6. Criminal Law
      7. Remedial Law (including Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Special Proceedings, Evidence)
      8. Legal and Judicial Ethics & Practical Exercises

  2. Recent Reforms in Format

    • In recent years, the Supreme Court has introduced significant reforms:
      • Digital Bar Examinations: Several bar cycles have shifted to a computerized format to expedite corrections and enhance security.
      • Compression of Examination Days: Instead of the traditional four (4) Sundays over a month, some bar exams are administered on fewer days but with longer hours per day.
      • Specific Focus on Fundamentals: Question drafting now tends to emphasize a more problem-based, practice-oriented approach rather than rote memorization.

  3. Language and Structure

    • The bar exam questions are in English, though some local provisions or terminologies may appear in the vernacular (e.g., references to local laws).
    • The exam typically involves a mixed format of essay-type questions (problem solving, short discussions) and multiple-choice questions (MCQs).

IV. QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR BAR APPLICANTS

  1. Academic Requirements

    • A bar applicant must hold:
      1. A Bachelor’s Degree in Arts or Sciences.
      2. A Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) or Juris Doctor (J.D.) from a law school recognized by the Philippine government (through the Legal Education Board).

  2. Good Moral Character

    • Applicants must submit clearances and certifications (e.g., from law school, municipality of residence, NBI, police clearance, etc.) to establish that they possess good moral character.
    • The Supreme Court, through the Office of the Bar Confidant, may refuse admission to the bar or disqualify candidates during or after the exam if they are found wanting in moral character.

  3. Filing of Petition to Take the Bar

    • Prospective examinees must file a verified petition to take the bar, attaching the required documentary proof. Deadlines and filing fees are set each year by the Supreme Court.

  4. No Limitation on Number of Attempts

    • As of current jurisprudence and rules, there is no fixed limit on how many times one can retake the bar. However, each retake requires compliance with the same filing and documentary requirements.

V. ETHICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE BAR EXAMINATIONS

  1. Integrity in the Examination Process

    • Because the practice of law is anchored on integrity, any form of cheating, plagiarism, or dishonesty in the bar examinations is taken extremely seriously.
    • The Supreme Court has the power to disqualify an examinee outright, or even annul an applicant’s prior admission if proven guilty of fraud.

  2. Strict Confidentiality

    • The identity of bar examiners is traditionally confidential until after the release of results, to safeguard the objectivity and impartiality of grading.
    • Bar exam answers (anonymous booklets or digital equivalents) are coded to avoid examiner bias.

  3. Fiduciary Responsibility of the Supreme Court

    • The Supreme Court ensures that each bar examination is administered in a manner that protects the public interest, preserving the legal profession’s stature and ensuring only competent, ethical individuals gain admission.

  4. Protection of the Public

    • The bar exam’s overarching ethical rationale is to protect the public from unfit practitioners. By maintaining high standards, the Supreme Court ensures that those who pass are properly equipped, both intellectually and ethically.

VI. PASSING RATE, RELEASE OF RESULTS, AND EFFECT OF ADMISSION

  1. Determination of Passing Rate

    • The Supreme Court may fix the passing grade at 75% (traditional standard) or adjust this depending on the difficulty of the exam and the overall performance of the examinees.
    • The Justices sitting en banc vote on whether to modify the passing grade or apply certain “bar exam equations,” such as subject weight adjustments.

  2. Release of Results

    • Typically announced a few months after the conduct of the exams, the list of successful bar passers is posted on the Supreme Court’s official website and publicized in major media outlets.
    • Bar passers are assigned roll numbers and included in the “Roll of Attorneys,” signifying their official recognition as members of the Philippine Bar.

  3. Lawyers’ Oath and Signing of the Roll

    • After passing, examinees must take the Lawyers’ Oath in a ceremony administered by the Supreme Court En Banc.
    • They then sign the Roll of Attorneys, which completes the process of admission to the bar and grants them the privilege to practice law in the Philippines.

  4. Mandatory Membership in the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)

    • Upon admission, new lawyers automatically become members of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), the official national organization of all Philippine lawyers.
    • Payment of the corresponding IBP dues and compliance with other IBP requirements (such as MCLE—Mandatory Continuing Legal Education—when applicable) become obligatory.

VII. DISCIPLINARY POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT

  1. Continuing Jurisdiction

    • The Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over lawyers is continuing. Admission via the bar exam does not immunize a lawyer from disciplinary action if they later breach ethical or professional obligations.
    • Violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility can lead to disbarment, suspension, or other sanctions, underscoring the Supreme Court’s comprehensive supervision over the legal profession.

  2. Grounds for Disbarment or Suspension

    • Acts of dishonesty, gross misconduct, moral turpitude, or violation of the oath of office may lead to disbarment or suspension.
    • The Supreme Court has the final say in disciplinary cases, further underscoring its role in maintaining the integrity of the profession.

VIII. LANDMARK PRINCIPLES AND JURISPRUDENCE

  1. Admission to the Bar as a Privilege

    • Reiterated in several cases (e.g., In re: Edillon, In re: Argosino), the Supreme Court underscores that membership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions.
    • Applicants must continuously prove that they have the character and competence to practice law, both prior to admission and throughout their legal career.

  2. Moral Character as Paramount Consideration

    • The Supreme Court has repeatedly denied or revoked admission for lack of moral character. Even after passing the bar, a lawyer’s moral character can be challenged in disciplinary proceedings.

  3. Supreme Court’s Plenary Discretion

    • In matters of bar admission and discipline, jurisprudence emphasizes that the Court exercises plenary discretion. This includes the authority to adopt new formats, reschedule examinations in extraordinary circumstances (e.g., pandemic adjustments), and set or modify passing criteria.

  4. Legal Ethics as an Integral Subject

    • The emphasis on Legal Ethics and Practical Exercises in the bar exam reflects the Supreme Court’s recognition that knowledge of substantive and remedial law must be complemented by a strong ethical foundation.

IX. PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR BAR CANDIDATES

  1. Preparatory Courses and Review Schools

    • Bar candidates often enroll in bar review centers or online review programs to comprehensively cover the bar subjects and obtain guidance in answering techniques.

  2. Filing and Documentary Requirements

    • Early compliance with OBC deadlines, submission of transcripts, NSO/PSA birth certificates, clearances, and certificates of no derogatory record is crucial to avoid delays or disqualification.

  3. Mental and Physical Preparedness

    • The bar exam is traditionally recognized as the most grueling licensure exam in the Philippines, requiring months of intense study and discipline.
    • Recent changes in format, especially digital exams, require familiarity with laptops, typing speed, and basic computer literacy.

  4. Post-Bar Procedures

    • Wait for Results: After the exam, candidates must patiently wait for the Supreme Court to deliberate and release the official list of passers.
    • Oath-Taking and Roll Signing: Passing candidates must participate in the oath-taking ceremony scheduled by the Supreme Court and sign the Roll of Attorneys to become bona fide lawyers.

X. CONCLUSION

The Philippine Bar Examinations stand as the ultimate gateway to the practice of law in the Philippines. Rooted firmly in the constitutional power of the Supreme Court to regulate admissions, the bar exam ensures that only those who possess the requisite academic training, good moral character, and legal acumen are entrusted with the privilege to practice law.

Beyond the mere conferral of a title, passing the bar signifies a solemn commitment to uphold the highest standards of legal ethics, to protect the public, and to maintain the dignity of the legal profession. The Supreme Court’s continuous supervision and control over the bar—through the administration of examinations, the screening of applicants, and the enforcement of disciplinary action—reinforces that lawyers serve not only their clients but also the broader cause of justice and the rule of law.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login