PROVISIONAL REMEDIES

Below is a comprehensive discussion of Provisional Remedies under Philippine law, with an emphasis on the Rules of Court (particularly Rules 57–61), relevant principles of Remedial Law, ethical considerations, and practical pointers on legal forms and procedure. This write-up is meant for general reference and does not constitute legal advice.

I. OVERVIEW OF PROVISIONAL REMEDIES

Provisional remedies are ancillary or auxiliary remedies granted by courts during the pendency of a principal action. Their primary purpose is to secure the right of a party or to preserve the status quo so that the judgment, once rendered, may be effective.

Under the Revised Rules of Court (as amended, most recently by the 2019 Amendments), the main provisional remedies are:

  1. Preliminary Attachment (Rule 57)
  2. Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58)
  3. Receivership (Rule 59)
  4. Replevin (Rule 60)
  5. Support Pendente Lite (Rule 61)

II. PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT (Rule 57)

A. Nature and Purpose

  • Definition: Preliminary attachment is a provisional remedy by which the property of the defendant is taken into custody by court officers to secure the satisfaction of any judgment that may be recovered by the plaintiff.
  • Purpose: To ensure that the defendant does not dispose of or abscond with property or funds that might later be required to satisfy a judgment.

B. When Available (Grounds)

Under Section 1, Rule 57, a preliminary attachment may be granted upon the plaintiff’s or any proper party’s application, and upon filing of the required affidavit and bond, in the following instances:

  1. Non-resident defendant: The defendant is about to depart from the Philippines, or is a non-resident who has property in the country.
  2. Fraudulent removal or concealment of property: The defendant has hidden or removed property to defraud creditors.
  3. Fraud in contracting debt or incurring obligation: The defendant has committed fraud in contracting an obligation or incurring a debt.
  4. Embezzlement or defalcation: When the action is against a public officer or individual for embezzlement or misappropriation of public or entrusted money/property.
  5. Recovery of possession of property: Where the property is in danger of being lost, or the defendant is guilty of concealing or disposing of property to defraud creditors.
  6. Other cases specified by law (e.g., certain situations under special statutes).

C. Requirements and Procedure

  1. Affidavit: Applicant must show that a cause of action exists; that at least one ground for attachment is present; that there is no other sufficient security; and that the amount claimed is justly due.
  2. Bond: The applicant must post a bond executed to the adverse party in an amount fixed by the court, conditioned for the payment of damages in case the attachment is found wrongful or excessive.
  3. Application and Issuance:
    • The application may be filed ex parte or with notice.
    • If ex parte, the court may order the sheriff to attach the property immediately.
    • Once the writ is issued, the sheriff or proper officer enforces it by taking property into custody or garnishing funds.

D. Dissolution or Discharge of Attachment

  • The defendant may move to dissolve the attachment by:
    1. Posting a counterbond: Equal to the value of the property to secure payment should the applicant eventually prevail.
    2. Showing that the attachment is improperly or irregularly issued, or that the amount is excessive or the grounds are not valid.
  • If dissolved, the court lifts the attachment and returns the property to the defendant.

E. Liability for Wrongful Attachment

  • If a party wrongfully secures an attachment (e.g., no valid ground, or maliciously obtained), the defendant may recover damages—including costs and attorney’s fees—against the bond posted by the plaintiff.

III. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Rule 58)

A. Nature and Purpose

  • Definition: Preliminary injunction is a court order compelling a party to perform a particular act (mandatory injunction) or refrain from performing a particular act (prohibitory injunction) to preserve the status quo until the rights of the parties are finally determined.
  • Purpose: To maintain the situation such that the final judgment will not be rendered moot or ineffectual.

B. Kinds of Injunctions

  1. Temporary Restraining Order (TRO):
    • A TRO is a short-term order, typically issued ex parte (without hearing the other side initially), to prevent immediate or irreparable harm.
    • Under the 2019 Amendments:
      • A TRO issued by a Regional Trial Court (RTC) is effective for 20 days from service on the party affected.
      • A TRO issued by the Court of Appeals lasts for 60 days; from the Supreme Court, it remains effective until further orders.
      • There is a 72-hour TRO which may be issued ex parte in extremely urgent cases, subject to immediate hearing thereafter.
  2. Preliminary Prohibitory Injunction: Prohibits a party from committing or continuing an act that would be injurious to the applicant.
  3. Preliminary Mandatory Injunction: Commands the performance of an act. Courts are more cautious in issuing this because it changes rather than preserves the status quo.

C. Grounds and Requirements

  1. Verified Application/Affidavit showing that:
    • The applicant has a clear and unmistakable right to be protected.
    • There is a violation of that right likely to cause irreparable injury.
    • There is an urgent and paramount necessity for the remedy to prevent serious damage.
  2. Posting of an Injunction Bond: To answer for damages if it is later determined that the applicant is not entitled to the injunction.

D. Hearing and Issuance

  • Except in extremely urgent cases (72-hour TRO), courts generally conduct a summary hearing to determine whether to grant a TRO or a preliminary injunction.
  • If granted, the court issues an Order of Preliminary Injunction or TRO specifying the acts restrained or compelled, and the duration/conditions of the order.

E. Dissolution or Modification

  • The adverse party may move for the dissolution of the injunction by showing that the grounds relied upon by the applicant are not true or are insufficient.
  • The court may require a counterbond from the respondent or decide that no sufficient ground exists, thus dissolving the injunction.

F. Damages

  • A party wrongfully enjoined may recover damages, including attorney’s fees, against the injunction bond.

IV. RECEIVERSHIP (Rule 59)

A. Nature and Purpose

  • Definition: Receivership is a provisional remedy where the court appoints a receiver (a neutral person or entity) to take control, custody, or management of property or funds in litigation to prevent imminent danger, dissipation, or substantial loss.
  • Purpose: To preserve and administer property that is the subject of litigation, especially where neither party is entitled to immediate possession or where there is a risk of property being wasted or destroyed.

B. Grounds for Appointment of a Receiver

Section 1, Rule 59 provides the following common grounds:

  1. Property in danger of being lost or materially injured and the applicant’s right to it is probable.
  2. Foreclosure of mortgage when the property is in danger of waste or misuse.
  3. After judgment, to preserve or dispose of property pending appeal.
  4. Instances allowed by law or agreement.

C. Procedure

  1. Verified Application: Showing the necessity for receivership.
  2. Bond: The applicant may be required to post a receiver’s bond to indemnify the adverse party for possible damages.
  3. Appointment of Receiver: The court carefully selects a receiver who must be sworn to faithfully discharge duties, and may also require the receiver to post a bond for the faithful performance of obligations.
  4. Powers of the Receiver: Subject to the court’s control and instructions. The receiver manages and preserves the property, collects rents or income, and reports to the court.
  5. Compensation: The receiver is entitled to reasonable compensation subject to court approval.

D. Termination of Receivership

  • The court may terminate or discharge a receiver when the conditions justifying the appointment no longer exist or the main case is decided.

V. REPLEVIN (Rule 60)

A. Nature and Purpose

  • Definition: Replevin is a provisional remedy for the recovery of personal property that has been wrongfully detained or taken. It aims to allow the plaintiff immediate possession of the property before final judgment.
  • Purpose: To prevent further damage or dissipation of personal property and place the rightful claimant in possession.

B. Grounds for Replevin

  • The applicant must show ownership or right to possession of the property and that the property was wrongfully detained by the defendant.

C. Procedure

  1. Affidavit and Bond:
    • The applicant files an affidavit describing the property and stating that:
      1. The applicant is the owner or has the right of possession.
      2. The property is wrongfully detained by the defendant.
      3. The cause of detention.
      4. The actual value of the property.
    • A replevin bond must be posted, in an amount double the value of the property, to answer for damages if the applicant is not entitled to possession.
  2. Issuance of the Writ:
    • If the court is satisfied with the affidavit and bond, it orders the sheriff to take the property into custody.
  3. Return of Property to Defendant:
    • The defendant may post a redelivery bond in an amount double the value of the property to retain or regain possession.

D. Final Disposition

  • After trial, if the plaintiff prevails, ownership or possession is confirmed to the plaintiff.
  • If the defendant prevails, the property (or its value) is returned to or remains with the defendant, and the plaintiff may be held liable for damages.

VI. SUPPORT PENDENTE LITE (Rule 61)

A. Nature and Purpose

  • Definition: Support pendente lite is an order for temporary support during the pendency of cases involving family law issues—often in actions for support, nullity of marriage, legal separation, or custody.
  • Purpose: To ensure that the persons entitled to support (spouse, children) are adequately provided for during litigation.

B. Grounds

  • A verified application or motion must show:
    1. The right to support.
    2. Relationship and inability to support oneself (for legitimate or illegitimate children, spouse, etc.).
    3. Necessity for immediate support.

C. Procedure

  1. Petition/Motion: The applicant files a motion supported by affidavits or evidence of entitlement and needs.
  2. Hearing: The court may conduct a summary hearing to determine the amount of support.
  3. Order: The court issues an order specifying the amount of support pendente lite, how it is to be paid, and any conditions or limitations.
  4. Enforcement: Failure to comply may lead to contempt proceedings or other enforcement measures such as garnishment of wages.

VII. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LAWYERS

  1. Candor and Good Faith:
    • Lawyers must ensure that the application for any provisional remedy is grounded on legitimate facts and solid legal bases. Misrepresentations or omission of material facts can subject counsel to disciplinary sanctions.
  2. No Abuse of Provisional Remedies:
    • Provisional remedies are not to be used as tools for harassment or to oppress the opposing party. The Rules of Court are explicit that damages can be awarded for wrongful issuance.
  3. Duty to the Court:
    • Lawyers must observe the highest standards of honesty, fairness, and due diligence when seeking ex parte remedies like a TRO or preliminary attachment. Full disclosure of facts (including adverse facts) is required.
  4. Avoid Conflict of Interest:
    • Attorneys must not represent conflicting interests, especially when dealing with provisional remedies that have consequences for multiple parties or stakeholders.
  5. Prompt Compliance:
    • Should the court require bonds, statements, or additional documents, counsel has the duty to comply timely and accurately. Delays or procedural lapses may compromise the client’s right to the remedy.

VIII. PRACTICAL POINTERS ON LEGAL FORMS

Each provisional remedy generally requires the following legal forms or documents, often as attachments to a principal pleading or filed separately:

  1. Verified Application or Motion
    • Always in written form, verified (i.e., accompanied by the applicant’s affidavit attesting to the truth of the facts stated).
  2. Affidavit of Merit or Supporting Affidavit
    • Outlining the factual basis for the remedy, establishing probable grounds for issuance.
  3. Bond or Undertaking
    • The bond must state the amount, conditions, and surety details. It must be approved by the court.
  4. Proposed Order or Writ
    • Counsel often prepares a draft order/writ for the judge’s consideration to expedite the process.
  5. Sheriff’s Return (where applicable)
    • After enforcement, the sheriff or officer submits a return detailing how the order was carried out.

Sample Skeleton of a Verified Application for Preliminary Attachment (Illustrative Only)

Republic of the Philippines
Regional Trial Court
[Judicial Region], Branch [__]
[City/Municipality]

[Case Title]
[Case No.]

x---------------------------------x

VERIFIED APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, through counsel, and respectfully states:
1. That Plaintiff filed the above-captioned Complaint for [state the nature of the action].
2. That there is a valid cause of action against Defendant, as [briefly explain the underlying cause of action].
3. That one or more of the grounds under Section 1, Rule 57 of the Rules of Court exist, specifically [specify the ground].
4. That unless Defendant’s property is attached, there is a danger that Plaintiff’s claim will be rendered ineffectual because [state reasons].
5. That Plaintiff is willing and able to post the requisite attachment bond in an amount to be fixed by this Honorable Court.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that:
1. A Writ of Preliminary Attachment be issued ex parte against Defendant’s property;
2. Plaintiff be allowed to post a bond in an amount the Court deems just;
3. Other just and equitable reliefs be granted.

[Signature of Counsel]
[Name, Roll No., IBP No., PTR No., MCLE compliance]

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION
[Affidavit verifying the truth of allegations and certifying on forum shopping]
[Signature of Affiant]
[Jurats / Notarial Acknowledgment]

Similar forms exist for Preliminary Injunction (with a TRO), Receivership, Replevin, and Support Pendente Lite, all tailored to the specific grounds and required averments under the Rules of Court.

IX. KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. Provisional Remedies Are Not Automatic
    • They require strict compliance with procedural and substantive requirements.
  2. Bonds and Affidavits
    • These are critical to protect the rights of the adverse party from wrongful or malicious issuance.
  3. Time Sensitivity
    • Provisional remedies, especially TROs, often hinge on the urgency of preventing immediate harm or loss.
  4. Court Discretion
    • Courts have wide discretion to grant or deny provisional remedies based on the sufficiency of evidence.
  5. Ethical Duty of Counsel
    • Lawyers must ensure good faith in seeking or opposing provisional remedies, mindful of professional responsibility rules.
  6. Remedy Against Wrongful Issuance
    • If a provisional remedy is secured without valid grounds, the adversely affected party may claim damages or move for dissolution of that remedy.

Final Note

Provisional remedies in Philippine litigation serve an important function: they protect substantive rights pending final adjudication. However, because they can severely affect a party’s property or liberty in the interim, courts demand strict compliance and expect lawyers to proceed ethically and in good faith. Mastery of these remedies—both their substantive grounds and procedural intricacies—is crucial for effective advocacy in civil (and certain special) actions.

Always consult the most recent versions of the Rules of Court and relevant jurisprudence, as amendments and case law interpretations can modify procedural timelines and requirements. When in doubt, or when handling complex or high-stakes matters, seek guidance from updated legal references and, if necessary, consult with senior practitioners or subject matter experts.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login