SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

Below is a comprehensive, structured discussion of Special Civil Actions under Philippine Remedial Law (Rules of Court), integrating key procedural rules, practical pointers, relevant ethical considerations, and typical legal forms. The goal is to present, as meticulously as possible, the essentials and finer points that every practitioner should know. Citations to the Rules of Court refer to the Revised Rules of Court of the Philippines, unless otherwise indicated.

I. OVERVIEW OF SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

A. Definition and Purpose

  1. Nature of Special Civil Actions
    Special Civil Actions are specific proceedings governed by particular rules under the Rules of Court. They differ from ordinary civil actions primarily because each special civil action has distinct procedural requirements, jurisdictional considerations, and reliefs available.

  2. Sources of Law

    • Rules of Court: Primarily Rules 62 to 71.
    • Statutes: Certain special civil actions also rely on substantive laws (e.g., Expropriation in relation to Republic Act No. 10752 for right-of-way, etc.).
    • Supreme Court Decisions (Jurisprudence): Clarify procedural nuances and interpret statutory provisions.

  3. General Rule
    Unless otherwise provided, the Rules on Ordinary Civil Actions (Rules 1 to 56) apply suppletorily to Special Civil Actions. However, if a particular rule on Special Civil Actions conflicts with the general rules, the special rule prevails.

II. DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

  1. Separate Rules & Requirements
    Each special civil action is governed by its own rule detailing specific prerequisites, allegations in the pleadings, and modes of procedure.

  2. Designation in the Caption
    Pleadings initiating special civil actions are usually styled as “Petitions” (not complaints). It must be clear from the caption and allegations that the action is brought under the correct rule.

  3. Relief Sought
    Special civil actions often seek extraordinary or special remedies (e.g., Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus, Interpleader, Declaratory Relief). Failure to indicate the correct special civil action may lead to dismissal.

  4. Summary in Nature (Some) / Expedited Process
    Certain special civil actions (e.g., Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer) are designed to provide swift remedial relief and have strict timelines.

  5. Jurisdictional Requirements
    Some special civil actions have special jurisdictional rules (e.g., Petitions under Rule 64 are filed directly with the Supreme Court, or with the Court of Appeals depending on the case).

III. ENUMERATION AND DISCUSSION OF EACH SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION

1. Interpleader (Rule 62)

  1. Concept

    • An action filed by a person who claims no interest in the subject matter (or whose interest is not disputed) and who is in possession of property or money subject to conflicting claims.
    • Purpose is to compel the claimants to litigate among themselves to determine who is entitled.

  2. When Proper

    • There are two or more conflicting claimants over the same subject matter.
    • The plaintiff (or stakeholder) stands indifferent and does not know to whom to deliver or pay.

  3. Venue

    • If it involves personal property or money, venue is based on the residence of any claimant (or in case of a real property, the place where the property is located).

  4. Procedural Requirements

    • The complaint (styled as a petition) must show the conflicting claims.
    • Upon filing, the court issues summons to claimants requiring them to interplead.

  5. Judgment

    • Determines which claimant has a right to the property or money.
    • The stakeholder may be discharged from liability upon depositing the subject property or money with the court.

2. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies (Rule 63)

  1. Declaratory Relief

    • An action to determine any question of construction or validity arising from a deed, will, contract, or other written instrument, statute, executive order, regulation, ordinance, or any other governmental regulation.
    • Objective is to secure an authoritative statement of the rights and obligations of parties before a breach or violation occurs.

  2. Reformation of Instrument, Quieting of Title, and Consolidation of Ownership

    • Though not strictly labeled “declaratory relief,” they are governed by the same rule by analogy if no other specific rule is applicable.

  3. When Proper

    • There must be an actual justiciable controversy involving the construction or validity of an instrument or statute.
    • The issue must be ripe for judicial determination.

  4. Jurisdiction

    • Filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) having jurisdiction over the area where the petitioner or respondent resides, or where the real property is located if it concerns real property.

  5. Effect of Judgment

    • Once final, it settles the controversy or question.
    • If actual breach or violation has already occurred, declaratory relief is no longer available; ordinary action or other remedy must be filed.

3. Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the Commission on Elections and the Commission on Audit (Rule 64)

  1. Nature

    • This provides a mechanism to challenge decisions of the COMELEC and COA via a petition for certiorari under Rule 64, in relation to Rule 65.

  2. Period to File

    • Within 30 days from notice of the judgment or final order or resolution. Non-extendible except on the most compelling reasons.

  3. Venue / Court

    • Filed exclusively with the Supreme Court. (This is jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution.)

  4. Ground

    • The challenge must be based on grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction.

  5. Effect of Filing

    • Generally does not stay the execution of the questioned judgment or order unless a restraining order or writ of preliminary injunction is issued by the Supreme Court.

4. Certiorari, Prohibition, and Mandamus (Rule 65)

  1. Certiorari

    • Nature and Purpose: Corrects acts without or in excess of jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion by a tribunal, board, or officer exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions.
    • Requirements:
      • No appeal or any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.
      • The tribunal, board, or officer acted without or in excess of jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion.

  2. Prohibition

    • Nature and Purpose: A preventive remedy to stop a tribunal, corporation, board, or person from usurping or exercising jurisdiction not vested in it.
    • Requirements:
      • The act to be restrained is judicial, quasi-judicial, or ministerial.
      • No other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy.

  3. Mandamus

    • Nature and Purpose: Compels the performance of a ministerial duty.
    • Requirements:
      • There is a clear legal right to the act demanded.
      • The defendant is duty-bound to perform the ministerial act.
      • No other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy.

  4. Venue / Court

    • Generally filed in the Court of Appeals or the RTC having jurisdiction over the territory where the respondent exercises official functions.
    • If it involves acts or omissions of the Commission on Elections or the Commission on Audit, follow Rule 64.
    • If directed against the Commission on Elections, Commission on Audit, or the Commission on Human Rights, the petition is filed in the Supreme Court (or other authorized courts as jurisprudence might allow).

  5. Period to File

    • 60 days from notice of the judgment or final order/act complained of.
    • For cases involving the Office of the Ombudsman’s decisions in administrative disciplinary cases, the period is also 60 days.

  6. Effect of Filing

    • Does not suspend the execution of the judgment unless a temporary restraining order or writ of preliminary injunction is issued.

5. Quo Warranto (Rule 66)

  1. Concept

    • A proceeding to determine the right to the use or exercise of a public office, position, or franchise.
    • May be filed against a person who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds a public office.

  2. Who May File

    • The Solicitor General, or a public prosecutor when directed by the President or when upon complaint or otherwise if authorized by law.
    • Individual persons claiming the same office may also file under certain conditions, but the more common usage is by government counsel.

  3. Period to File

    • Within one (1) year from the cause of the ouster, usurpation, or unlawful holding.

  4. Procedure

    • Initiated by petition.
    • Respondent may be required to show cause by what authority they hold the office.

  5. Judgment

    • If the court finds for the petitioner, the respondent is ousted, and the petitioner (if applicable) is declared entitled to the office.
    • The court may also impose damages and costs.

6. Expropriation (Rule 67)

  1. Concept

    • Also known as Eminent Domain. The government (or its instrumentalities or authorized entities) takes private property for public use upon payment of just compensation.

  2. Who May Exercise

    • The Republic of the Philippines and other entities authorized by law (e.g., local government units, certain government-owned or controlled corporations).

  3. Procedure

    • Complaint: Must state the right to expropriate, the purpose, and a description of the property. Must deposit the required amount (in certain cases) with the court to enable taking of possession.
    • Preliminary Determination of Authority & Purpose: The court first resolves if the plaintiff has lawful right to expropriate.
    • Just Compensation: Court appoints commissioners to determine just compensation, or the court itself may do so under certain circumstances.

  4. Judgment

    • Awards the property to the expropriating authority upon payment of just compensation.
    • If defendant raises issues such as the validity of the expropriation, the court resolves these prior to determination of compensation.

7. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (Rule 68)

  1. Nature

    • An action to foreclose a real estate mortgage can be judicial (under Rule 68) or extrajudicial (under Act No. 3135, as amended). Rule 68 governs judicial foreclosure.

  2. Procedure

    • Complaint: Alleges the existence of the mortgage, default in payment, and the mortgagee’s right to foreclose.
    • Order of Foreclosure: Court may issue judgment ordering the mortgagor to pay within a period (not less than 90 nor more than 120 days).
    • Sale at Public Auction: If no payment is made, the property is sold at auction.
    • Equity of Redemption vs. Right of Redemption: In judicial foreclosure, the mortgagor typically has an equity of redemption during the 90- to 120-day period. After the foreclosure sale, only certain mortgages (like those to banking institutions) may have a statutory right of redemption.

  3. Deficiency Judgment

    • If the proceeds of the sale are insufficient, the mortgagee may move for a deficiency judgment.

8. Partition (Rule 69)

  1. Concept

    • An action for the division of property (real or personal) between co-owners or co-heirs.

  2. Procedure

    • Complaint: Must describe the property, the interests of the parties, and the fact that partition is demanded.
    • Order of Partition: If the court finds partition proper, it appoints commissioners to make a fair division.
    • Confirmation of Partition: The court approves the commissioners’ report, and if partition by division is not feasible, the property may be sold and the proceeds distributed.

  3. Accounting

    • Incidental matters such as rents, profits, and expenses are also settled in the same action.

9. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (Rule 70)

  1. Concept

    • Forcible Entry: One is deprived of possession through force, intimidation, strategy, threats, or stealth.
    • Unlawful Detainer: Possession was initially lawful, but it became illegal upon the expiration or termination of the right to possess.

  2. Jurisdiction

    • Exclusive original jurisdiction with the Municipal Trial Courts (MTC), Metropolitan Trial Courts (MeTC), or Municipal Circuit Trial Courts (MCTC).

  3. Period to File

    • Forcible Entry: Within one (1) year from date of actual forcible dispossession.
    • Unlawful Detainer: Within one (1) year from the date of last demand.

  4. Procedural Highlights

    • Summary Procedure: These cases are covered by the Rules on Summary Procedure, designed for speedy disposition.
    • Preliminary Conference: Required; parties must appear personally or through authorized representatives.

  5. Judgment

    • Only the issue of possession (de facto or physical possession) is resolved; not ownership, except provisionally.
    • Execution of judgment is immediate unless the defendant appeals and posts a supersedeas bond (for rentals/damages).

10. Contempt (Rule 71)

  1. Concept

    • Direct Contempt: Committed in the presence of or near the court; may be punished summarily.
    • Indirect Contempt: Acts done outside the court’s presence that degrade the administration of justice or disobey a court order.

  2. Procedure

    • Direct Contempt: The court may immediately cite and punish the contemnor.
    • Indirect Contempt: Requires the filing of a formal charge or petition, after which a hearing is conducted.

  3. Penalties

    • Vary depending on whether the contempt is direct or indirect, and whether it is imposed by a higher or lower court (e.g., the RTC can impose heavier penalties than the MTC).

  4. Remedies

    • For direct contempt, remedy is usually a motion for reconsideration or an appeal through certiorari.
    • For indirect contempt, the order is appealable in the ordinary course.

IV. DISTINCTIONS FROM ORDINARY CIVIL ACTIONS

  1. Caption and Terminology
    • Ordinary civil actions typically start with a “Complaint,” while many special civil actions start with a “Petition.”
  2. Specific Rules Prevail
    • Each special civil action has unique procedural steps. These take precedence over the general rules if in conflict.
  3. Remedies Available
    • Reliefs are more specialized (e.g., annulling an action of a tribunal in certiorari, expelling an occupant in forcible entry).
  4. Shorter Periods / Strict Compliance
    • Some special civil actions (Rule 65, Forcible Entry/Unlawful Detainer) have short prescriptive or reglementary periods.

V. DISTINCTIONS FROM SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS

  1. Special Civil Actions vs. Special Proceedings

    • Special Proceedings (governed by Rules 72 to 109) involve settlement of estates, guardianship, adoption, etc.
    • Special Civil Actions maintain the adversarial nature and typically result in judgments (e.g., awarding possession, annulling an action, etc.).

  2. Purpose

    • Special Civil Actions: Usually to resolve disputes between parties with a specific remedy not covered by ordinary actions.
    • Special Proceedings: Often administrative in character, with the court exercising a supervisory function (e.g., settlement of estate).

VI. PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES AND REMINDERS

  1. Pleadings

    • Ensure the petition explicitly cites the rule invoked (e.g., “Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65”).
    • Factual allegations must be complete and specify compliance with preconditions (e.g., absence of other remedies, existence of grave abuse, etc.).

  2. Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping

    • Most special civil actions require verified petitions.
    • Certification against forum shopping is mandatory under Section 5, Rule 7, with severe consequences for non-compliance or false statements.

  3. Service of Process

    • Strictly observe rules on service of summons, especially if the respondent is a government official (where official addresses must be used).

  4. Interim Reliefs

    • Preliminary Injunction or TRO can be sought in actions for Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus, or even Partition, if warranted.
    • Urgency must be established.

  5. Appeal / Review

    • Know the proper mode of appeal (e.g., in Forcible Entry/Unlawful Detainer, appeal is to the RTC; from RTC to the Court of Appeals via Rule 42 or 65, as appropriate).
    • Time limitations are jurisdictional.

VII. LEGAL ETHICS CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Candor and Good Faith

    • In seeking extraordinary remedies like certiorari or prohibition, lawyers must ensure that the petition is not dilatory or frivolous.
    • Grave abuse of discretion must be clearly and truthfully alleged.

  2. Avoiding Forum Shopping

    • A lawyer must certify under oath that no other action involving the same issues is pending in another court or tribunal.
    • Violations can lead to dismissal of the petition and disciplinary action.

  3. Respect for the Courts and Officers

    • In petitions for Contempt, counsel must ensure that the charge is warranted; otherwise, it may expose counsel to liability for malicious prosecution.

  4. Duty to Client vs. Duty to the Court

    • While zealously advocating for clients, counsel must observe fairness to the court, opposing parties, and third persons.
    • Filing improper or harassing special civil actions can result in sanctions under the Code of Professional Responsibility.

  5. Verification of Pleadings

    • Ensuring that all factual averments are correct and that the petition is properly verified to avoid perjury and other ethical breaches.

VIII. LEGAL FORMS (TYPICAL FORMATS)

Below are general templates or outlines (not official Supreme Court forms). Always adapt to the specific facts, rules, and local court requirements.

A. Caption and Title

Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Name of Branch], [Judicial Region]
[City/Municipality]

[Name of Petitioner],
      Petitioner,

         - versus -                       Special Civil Action
                                          for [e.g., Certiorari / Mandamus]
[Name of Respondent],
      Respondent.
x-------------------------------------x

B. Body of the Petition / Complaint

  1. Prefatory Statement or Introduction

    • Briefly state the nature of the action and the applicable rule (e.g., “This is a petition for certiorari under Rule 65...”).

  2. Jurisdiction and Venue

    • Allege facts showing why the court has jurisdiction and that venue is properly laid.

  3. Material Allegations

    • For Certiorari: State the act or order complained of, the date of receipt, lack of other remedies, and the grounds (grave abuse of discretion, etc.).
    • For Expropriation: Allege authority to expropriate, purpose, description of property, and compliance with deposit requirements.

  4. Prayer

    • Specifically state the relief sought (e.g., “WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that judgment be rendered...”).

  5. Verification and Certification

    • Typically found at the end of the petition. Must be signed by the petitioner or a duly authorized representative with personal knowledge.

C. Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping

VERIFICATION

I, [Name of Affiant], of legal age, [civil status], and a resident of [address], after having been duly sworn to in accordance with law, hereby depose and state that:

1. I am the [position] of Petitioner in the above-entitled case;
2. I have caused the preparation of the foregoing [Petition / Complaint];
3. I have read the same and all the allegations therein are true and correct based on my personal knowledge and/or authentic records.

[Signature over Printed Name of Affiant]

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __ day of _____, 20__, affiant exhibiting to me his/her Government-issued ID No. __________.

[Signature of Administering Officer]
CERTIFICATION AGAINST FORUM SHOPPING

I, [Name of Affiant], of legal age, [civil status], and a resident of [address], after having been duly sworn to in accordance with law, hereby depose and state that:

1. I am the [position/role] of Petitioner in the above-entitled case;
2. I certify that I have not commenced any other action or proceeding involving the same issues in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, or any other tribunal or agency;
3. To the best of my knowledge, no such action or proceeding is pending in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, or any other tribunal or agency;
4. If I should thereafter learn that the same or a similar action or proceeding has been filed or is pending before the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, or any other tribunal or agency, I undertake to report such fact within five (5) days therefrom to this Honorable Court.

[Signature over Printed Name of Affiant]

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __ day of _____, 20__, affiant exhibiting to me his/her Government-issued ID No. __________.

[Signature of Administering Officer]

IX. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE TIPS

  1. Strict Compliance is Key

    • Each special civil action has unique procedural demands (periods, jurisdiction, form of pleading). Non-compliance often leads to outright dismissal.

  2. Know the Proper Remedy

    • Mislabeling or confusion among special civil actions (e.g., Certiorari vs. Mandamus) can result in denial of the petition. Carefully evaluate the factual context and the relief desired.

  3. Time is of the Essence

    • Most special civil actions have strict and non-extendible periods (e.g., 60 days for Rule 65, 30 days for Rule 64, one year for forcible entry, etc.). Diligent monitoring of deadlines is crucial.

  4. Ethical Advocacy

    • Uphold honesty and fairness in all pleadings. Special civil actions, particularly extraordinary remedies, should never be used for harassment or to delay proceedings.

  5. Stay Updated

    • Always check the latest jurisprudence and amendments to the Rules of Court. The Supreme Court regularly issues circulars and decisions that affect practice and procedure in special civil actions.

Final Note

This discussion provides an extensive but necessarily condensed view of Special Civil Actions under Philippine law. Always reconcile specific facts with updated rules and recent Supreme Court rulings, as procedural developments may refine or alter established practices. When in doubt, consult the text of the Revised Rules of Court, the latest jurisprudential guidelines, and, if necessary, seek professional advice or clarification through formal legal research.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login