Penalties and remedies against direct and indirect contempt | Contempt (RULE 71) | SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

Below is a comprehensive discussion of penalties and remedies for direct and indirect contempt under Rule 71 of the Rules of Court in the Philippines. This write-up is organized for clarity and thoroughness, focusing on what every legal practitioner should know about the nature, penalties, and remedies of these two categories of contempt.

I. INTRODUCTION

Contempt of court is a special civil action under Rule 71 of the Rules of Court. It consists of conduct that tends to bring the authority and administration of the law into disrespect or disregard, or otherwise interferes with or prejudices the parties or their witnesses during litigation.

Contempt is broadly classified into:

  1. Direct Contempt – committed in the presence of or so near the court or judge as to obstruct or interrupt the proceedings.
  2. Indirect Contempt – committed not in the immediate presence of the court and requires formal proceedings for its imposition.

II. DIRECT CONTEMPT

A. Definition and Nature

Under Section 1, Rule 71 of the Rules of Court, the following acts, if committed in the presence of or so near a court or judge, constitute direct contempt:

  1. Misbehavior in the presence of or so near the court or judge as to interrupt the court proceedings or impair the court’s respect.
  2. Disrespect toward the court or judge.
  3. Offensive personalities toward others.
  4. Refusal to be sworn or to answer as a witness.
  5. Any act that obstructs, degrades, or tends to embarrass the authority of the court.

It is punished summarily by the presiding judge who directly witnessed or has personal knowledge of the offensive conduct, precisely because the contemptuous act happened in facie curiae (in the face of the court).

B. Penalties for Direct Contempt

The penalty for direct contempt varies depending on whether it is imposed by a superior court or an inferior court, as stated in Section 1, Rule 71:

  1. If imposed by a Regional Trial Court (RTC), Court of Appeals, Sandiganbayan, or Supreme Court (superior court):

    • A fine not exceeding Two Thousand Pesos (₱2,000), or
    • Imprisonment not exceeding ten (10) days, or
    • Both fine and imprisonment.

  2. If imposed by a Municipal Trial Court (MTC), Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC), or Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) (inferior court):

    • A fine not exceeding Two Hundred Pesos (₱200), or
    • Imprisonment not exceeding one (1) day, or
    • Both fine and imprisonment.

C. Remedies Against Direct Contempt

  1. If the direct contempt is imposed by a superior court (RTC, CA, Sandiganbayan, or Supreme Court):

    • The judgment of contempt is immediately executory.
    • The remedy is generally not appeal, but the contemner may file a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 if there is a claim of grave abuse of discretion or lack of jurisdiction on the part of the court.

  2. If the direct contempt is imposed by a lower (inferior) court (MTC, MeTC, MTCC, MCTC):

    • The person adjudged in contempt may appeal to the Regional Trial Court.
    • Pending such appeal, the execution of the judgment shall be suspended, provided the contemner files a bond fixed by the lower court.
    • Alternatively, if the lower court is alleged to have gravely abused its discretion, a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 may likewise be pursued.

Note that while direct contempt is generally “summary” in nature, the contemner still has the right to be heard at least briefly before the penalty is imposed—though the hearing may be quite abbreviated, given that the judge has personally witnessed the act of contempt.

III. INDIRECT CONTEMPT

A. Definition and Nature

Indirect contempt (sometimes called constructive contempt) is contempt committed not in the immediate presence of the court. Because it occurs outside the presence of the judge, indirect contempt is not punished summarily; instead, it requires the initiation of a separate proceeding where the respondent is given an opportunity to explain or defend against the charges.

B. Grounds for Indirect Contempt

Under Section 3, Rule 71, a person may be cited for indirect contempt for any of the following acts:

  1. Misbehavior of an officer of a court in the performance of his official duties or in his official transactions;
  2. Disobedience or resistance to a lawful writ, process, order, judgment, or command of a court, or injunction granted by a court or judge;
  3. Any abuse of or any unlawful interference with the processes or proceedings of a court, not constituting direct contempt;
  4. Any improper conduct tending, directly or indirectly, to impede, obstruct, or degrade the administration of justice;
  5. Assuming to act as an attorney or an officer of a court without authority;
  6. Failure to obey a subpoena duly served; or
  7. Rescue or attempted rescue of a person or property in the custody of an officer by virtue of an order or process of a court.

C. Procedure in Indirect Contempt

Because indirect contempt is not witnessed personally by the judge, the Rules require due process before punishment can be imposed:

  1. Initiation of Charges:

    • The court may motu proprio (on its own) initiate indirect contempt proceedings by an order or other formal charge.
    • Alternatively, an aggrieved party (including the offended court official, or a litigant) may initiate proceedings by verified petition.

  2. Order to Show Cause or Notice:

    • The alleged contemner is issued an order to show cause or a notice requiring him/her to explain why he/she should not be punished for contempt.

  3. Opportunity to be Heard:

    • A hearing is conducted, affording the respondent the right to due process—i.e., to present evidence, produce witnesses, and be heard.

  4. Judgment / Order:

    • After the hearing, the court issues a decision either acquitting or punishing the respondent for contempt. This decision must clearly set out the basis for the finding of contempt and the penalty imposed.

D. Penalties for Indirect Contempt

Section 7, Rule 71 prescribes the penalty for indirect contempt, which differs based on whether the contempt consists of disobedience of a court’s order or involves other forms of indirect contempt:

  1. When the contempt consists in violating an injunction, or disobeying a judgment or order:

    • The court may impose a fine not exceeding Thirty Thousand Pesos (₱30,000), or
    • Imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or
    • Both fine and imprisonment.
    • If the contempt consists in the refusal or omission to perform an act which is yet within the power of the respondent to perform, the respondent may be imprisoned by order of the court until he performs it (this is a coercive measure to compel compliance).

  2. In all other cases of indirect contempt:

    • A fine not exceeding Five Thousand Pesos (₱5,000), or
    • Imprisonment not exceeding one (1) month, or
    • Both fine and imprisonment.

Note: Some references to amounts of fines have varied through amendments or jurisprudence, but the main rule is that the court exercises judicial discretion in imposing a proportionate penalty, subject to the above-stated ceilings.

E. Remedies Against Indirect Contempt

  1. Appeal:

    • A judgment in indirect contempt is appealable, and the appeal is taken in the same manner as criminal appeals (e.g., to the Court of Appeals, or ultimately to the Supreme Court, depending on which court rendered the decision).
    • The perfection of an appeal stays the execution of the judgment, except when the contempt is based on disobedience of a court order or judgment where the court orders the respondent to be committed pending compliance.

  2. Certiorari (Rule 65):

    • Where there is grave abuse of discretion or lack of jurisdiction in the proceedings, the contemner may file a petition for certiorari to question the validity of the contempt order.

  3. Motion for Reconsideration:

    • Like other judgments, the contemner may file a motion for reconsideration before resorting to appeal or other remedies, if appropriate under the Rules.

  4. Bail:

    • The Rules generally allow the court to grant bail to a person charged with indirect contempt pending the hearing and determination of the case.

IV. OTHER RELEVANT POINTS

  1. Civil vs. Criminal Contempt:

    • Criminal contempt is an act directed against the authority and dignity of the court. It is punitive in nature.
    • Civil contempt is typically intended to compel compliance with a court order for the benefit of a litigant. Punishment is coercive or remedial, not merely punitive.

  2. Contempt as a Special Civil Action:

    • The filing of a petition for indirect contempt is treated as a special civil action, thus requiring verified pleadings, compliance with jurisdictional requirements, and other formalities under the Rules of Court.

  3. Effect on Lawyers:

    • Lawyers found guilty of contempt (direct or indirect) may also be subject to administrative disciplinary proceedings by the Supreme Court or Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). Repeated or serious acts of contempt can be grounds for suspension or disbarment under the Code of Professional Responsibility.

  4. Limitations on Courts’ Power of Contempt:

    • While courts have inherent powers to punish for contempt, they must exercise such power sparingly and judiciously. Contempt citations must be based on clear, specific, and explicit acts.
    • Judges are urged by jurisprudence to use their contempt powers with caution, always observing due process and ensuring proportionality of penalties.

  5. Importance of Proper Procedure:

    • Because contempt involves possible loss of liberty or imposition of fines, courts must follow the procedure rigorously to avoid reversal on appeal or nullification via certiorari for denial of due process.

V. SUMMARY

  1. Direct Contempt (Sec. 1, Rule 71):

    • Nature: Act committed in the presence of or so near the court that it disrupts proceedings.
    • Penalty:
      • Superior courts: Fine ≤ ₱2,000 or imprisonment ≤ 10 days, or both.
      • Lower courts: Fine ≤ ₱200 or imprisonment ≤ 1 day, or both.
    • Remedy:
      • From superior courts: Generally certiorari (no appeal).
      • From lower courts: Appeal to the RTC (execution suspended upon filing a bond) or certiorari if there is grave abuse of discretion.

  2. Indirect Contempt (Sec. 3, Rule 71):

    • Nature: Act committed outside the court’s presence; requires formal charges and hearing.
    • Penalty (Sec. 7):
      • If it involves disobedience of a court order/judgment or injunction: Fine ≤ ₱30,000 or imprisonment ≤ 6 months (or both). Possible continuing imprisonment until compliance if the act can still be performed.
      • Other cases: Fine ≤ ₱5,000 or imprisonment ≤ 1 month (or both).
    • Remedy:
      • Appeal (in the same manner as criminal appeals), which generally stays execution unless otherwise ordered.
      • Certiorari if grave abuse of discretion is alleged.
      • Motion for Reconsideration (depending on the stage).

By understanding the foregoing details—particularly the differences in penalties and remedies for direct and indirect contempt—practitioners can better safeguard their clients’ (and their own) rights in court proceedings and ensure compliance with both the letter and spirit of the Rules of Court.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login