Appeal RULE 122

Appeal (RULE 122) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

RULE 122: APPEAL IN CRIMINAL CASES (PHILIPPINES)

Below is a comprehensive discussion of Rule 122 of the Rules of Court (Criminal Procedure) in the Philippines, focusing on appeal in criminal cases. The discussion will be as thorough as possible, integrating relevant procedures, jurisprudential nuances, ethical considerations, and practical legal forms. All references are based on the 2000 Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure (as subsequently amended), along with key doctrines from the Supreme Court.

I. WHO MAY APPEAL

  1. Accused/Defendant

    • The accused may appeal from:
      • The judgment of conviction, or
      • Any adverse judgment or final order that prejudicially affects him or her.

  2. People/Prosecution

    • The prosecution (represented by the Office of the Prosecutor or the Office of the Solicitor General, depending on the stage and type of crime) may appeal from:
      • An order of dismissal of the case (if it does not place the accused in double jeopardy),
      • A final judgment of acquittal (when there is no violation of the constitutional right against double jeopardy),
      • An order granting a motion to quash (when it does not amount to double jeopardy),
      • A judgment that prejudicially modifies the civil aspect of the offense (e.g., awarding insufficient damages to the offended party).
    • In practice, the prosecution’s appeal is limited because of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Generally, no appeal is allowed from a judgment of acquittal on the merits.

  3. Offended Party

    • The private complainant may appeal only as to the civil aspect of the judgment.
    • If the State (through the prosecution) fails to appeal the civil aspect, the offended party can pursue a separate civil appeal, subject to compliance with procedural requirements.

II. JUDGMENTS OR ORDERS SUBJECT TO APPEAL

  1. Judgment of Conviction – The accused may appeal the conviction in whole or in part.
  2. Judgment of Acquittal or Order of Dismissal – Generally not appealable if it places the accused in jeopardy for the same offense. Exception: If the dismissal or acquittal is made without a valid trial or is otherwise void for lack of jurisdiction or serious procedural errors (e.g., a grant of demurrer to evidence without addressing the merits or an “unjustified” dismissal under circumstances that do not bar further prosecution).
  3. Civil Liability Only – If the trial court only decided the civil liability (e.g., in cases where the criminal liability is extinguished but civil liability is reserved or limited), it can be appealed under Rule 122.

III. PERFECTION OF APPEAL

  1. Notice of Appeal

    • Filed with the court that rendered the judgment or final order appealed from.
    • The notice must clearly indicate the judgment or final order appealed from and the court to which the appeal is being taken (Court of Appeals or Supreme Court, depending on the applicable law).

  2. Period to Appeal

    • Fifteen (15) days from receipt of the judgment or final order appealed from.
    • The accused, prosecution, or offended party (insofar as the civil aspect is concerned) must perfect the appeal within this period.
    • Motion for Extension of time to file a notice of appeal is not generally allowed in criminal cases.
    • Filing a motion for new trial or reconsideration within the 15-day reglementary period tolls (suspends) the running of the period. After the denial of such motion, the accused has the remaining balance of the 15-day period (reckoned from notice of denial) to perfect an appeal.

  3. Modes of Appeal

    • Ordinary Appeal (also called a regular appeal) to the Court of Appeals, by filing a notice of appeal in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) or lower court.
    • Petition for Review on Certiorari (Rule 45) – Filed directly with the Supreme Court from judgments of the Court of Appeals or the Sandiganbayan, but only on questions of law.
    • Automatic Review / Direct Appeal to the Supreme Court – Previously, for cases where the penalty imposed was death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment, direct appeal or automatic review to the Supreme Court was provided. Presently, the death penalty is suspended, but for life imprisonment or reclusion perpetua, the appeal is taken to the Court of Appeals unless the law specifically directs otherwise (the Court of Appeals usually reviews the factual findings and then may opt to certify the case to the Supreme Court if it imposes the penalty of reclusion perpetua).

IV. EFFECTS OF APPEAL

  1. Effect on the Accused

    • Once the accused perfects the appeal, the entire case is thrown open for review. This means the appellate court can review both favorable and unfavorable issues to the accused.
    • However, the accused’s right against double jeopardy generally prevents an increase of penalty upon appeal taken solely by the accused, unless the prosecution or offended party also appeals.
    • If only the accused appealed and the prosecution did not, the appellate court cannot impose a more severe penalty than that imposed by the trial court (the exception is if the trial court committed an evident oversight or if the law mandates a higher penalty).

  2. Effect on the Prosecution’s Appeal

    • If the prosecution validly appeals (i.e., no jeopardy attached), the appellate court may reverse or modify the judgment.
    • If the appeal is solely on the civil aspect of the case, the appellate court’s disposition would be limited to the civil liability.

  3. Withdrawal of Appeal

    • The appellant (whether accused or prosecution, if allowed) may withdraw the appeal at any time before the judgment of the appellate court is rendered.
    • The effect of withdrawal is that the lower court judgment becomes final and executory.

V. PROCEDURAL STEPS (SUMMARY)

  1. Filing of Notice of Appeal

    • File with the trial court that rendered the decision.
    • Copy furnished to the Office of the Prosecutor (for the State) or the accused, as the case may be.

  2. Transmittal of Records

    • Once the notice of appeal is given due course, the clerk of court of the trial court will transmit the original record or the record on appeal (when appropriate) to the appellate court.

  3. Docketing of the Case in the Appellate Court

    • Upon receipt of the records, the appellate court dockets the case and notifies the parties to file briefs or memoranda.

  4. Filing of Briefs

    • Appellant’s Brief is filed within the period set by the Rules of Court or by the appellate court (usually 30 days from receipt of notice).
    • Appellee’s Brief is filed within the same or a shorter period after receipt of the appellant’s brief (usually 30 days).
    • Reply Brief (optional) may be filed within 20 days after receipt of the appellee’s brief.

  5. Oral Arguments (if allowed)

    • The appellate court may set the case for oral argument or decide the case based on the briefs.

  6. Judgment of the Appellate Court

    • The appellate court renders a decision, which might affirm, modify, or reverse the lower court’s judgment (subject to constraints imposed by double jeopardy rules).
    • The losing party may then file a motion for reconsideration or, if proper, a petition for review on certiorari with the Supreme Court under Rule 45.

VI. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Double Jeopardy Concerns

    • Once the accused is acquitted, an appeal by the prosecution that would reverse such acquittal and convict the accused is almost always prohibited.
    • The Supreme Court, however, has recognized certain exceptions (e.g., if the court had no jurisdiction, or if the dismissal was granted without the express consent of the accused on questionable grounds, or the dismissal was based on a demurrer to evidence that was illegally granted).

  2. Modification of Judgment

    • If the appellate court finds an error in the imposition of the penalty or in the computation of civil liability, it may correct it even if the accused is the appellant (since the entire case is open for review). However, such an increase in penalty is done with caution because it may run afoul of the constitutional protection against double jeopardy if the prosecution did not appeal.

  3. Provisional Remedies Pending Appeal

    • Bail: Accused may apply for bail pending appeal if not disqualified (e.g., not a flight risk, penalty not reclusion perpetua, or if the evidence of guilt is not strong).
    • Stay of Execution: In criminal cases where the penalty is imprisonment, an appeal typically stays execution; however, if the accused has been convicted, they are generally placed under custody unless allowed to post bail on appeal.

  4. Appeal of the Civil Aspect by the Private Complainant

    • If the prosecution does not appeal the civil aspect, the private complainant can do so independently to pursue proper damages or compensation.
    • The Rules on Civil Procedure may supplement the procedure, but the main governance is under Rule 122 for the criminal proceedings and its civil incidents.

VII. LEGAL ETHICS CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Duty of Candor and Competence

    • A lawyer must evaluate whether there are valid grounds for appeal and must inform the client (accused or private offended party) of the possible outcomes, including the risk of a higher penalty if the prosecution also appeals or the risk of paying costs.

  2. Confidentiality

    • Counsel must preserve client confidences and secrets while preparing for an appeal, especially in drafting appellate briefs.

  3. Avoiding Frivolous Appeals

    • Lawyers should not file appeals solely to delay proceedings. The Code of Professional Responsibility requires lawyers to file appeals in good faith with legitimate grounds (factual or legal) for reversal or modification.

  4. Withdrawal from Representation

    • If the lawyer wishes to withdraw, proper notice must be given to the client and the court, ensuring the client is not left unrepresented.

  5. Duty to Communicate

    • Counsel must keep the client informed on the status and progress of the appeal, timelines, and potential resolutions.

VIII. FORMS & SAMPLE CLAUSES

Below are simplified examples of forms used in appealing a criminal case. These are illustrative only; actual practice may vary.

  1. NOTICE OF APPEAL
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch Number], [City/Province]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,         CRIM. CASE NO. [xxx]
   Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
[NAME OF ACCUSED],
   Accused-Appellant.

x--------------------------------------x

                           NOTICE OF APPEAL

Accused-Appellant, through undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice that he is appealing the Decision dated [date of decision] and received by undersigned counsel on [date of receipt] to the [Court of Appeals / Supreme Court], pursuant to Rule 122 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Respectfully submitted this ___ day of __________, 20__ at [City].

                                                       [Signature]
                                             [Name of Counsel & PTR No.]
                                             [IBP No. & Roll No.]
                                             [Address & Contact]
  1. APPELLANT’S BRIEF (Basic Outline)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
COURT OF APPEALS
[CA-G.R. CR NO. ______]

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
  Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
[NAME OF ACCUSED],
  Accused-Appellant.
x--------------------------------------x

                           APPELLANT’S BRIEF

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

   - Brief statement of the nature of the case, the proceedings in the lower court, etc.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

   - Fair and accurate statement of the facts relevant to the appeal.

III. ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS

   - Enumerate the specific errors allegedly committed by the trial court.

IV. ARGUMENTS

   - Discuss each assigned error with supporting authorities (case law, statutes, rules).  
   - Cite page references to the Record, Transcript, or Exhibits as required by appellate rules.

V. PRAYER

   - State the precise relief sought (e.g., reversal of conviction, modification of penalty, or acquittal).

VI. SIGNATURE, COUNSEL DETAILS, & VERIFICATION (if required)

   - Complete counsel information and a statement verifying the brief if mandated by local rules.

Respectfully submitted this ___ day of __________, 20__ at [City].

                                                       [Signature]
                                             [Name of Counsel & PTR No.]
                                             [IBP No. & Roll No.]
                                             [Address & Contact]

  1. APPELLEE’S BRIEF

    • Contains a counter-statement of the case and facts, counter-arguments, and a prayer for affirmance or modification.

  2. PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI (Rule 45) TO THE SUPREME COURT

    • In strictly legal questions; must comply with the formal requirements under Rule 45, including verification and certification of non-forum shopping, statement of the issues, and concise statement of the case, among others.

IX. RELEVANT JURISPRUDENCE (ILLUSTRATIVE)

  1. People v. Sandiganbayan – Discussed the availability of appeal by the prosecution in certain cases and the limitations imposed by double jeopardy.
  2. People v. Court of Appeals – Clarified the effect of the accused’s appeal and opened the entire case to review.
  3. Salazar v. People – Explained that an appeal in a criminal case throws the entire case wide open for review, and the appellate court may evaluate whether the penalty should be increased or decreased.
  4. People v. Mateo – Modified the procedure of direct appeals in cases involving reclusion perpetua, transferring initial review jurisdiction to the Court of Appeals before elevating to the Supreme Court if warranted.

(These citations are only representative of major rulings. There are many other relevant cases that further refine the principles under Rule 122.)

X. CONCLUSION

Rule 122 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure governs the intricacies of appeal in criminal cases in the Philippines. The rule’s main features include:

  • The right of the accused, the prosecution (within constitutional limits), and the offended party (for the civil aspect) to appeal.
  • Strict time frames for filing appeals (15 days from receipt of judgment or final order).
  • The opening of the entire case for review upon appeal by the accused, tempered by constitutional protections against double jeopardy.
  • The transmittal of records and the process of filing briefs or memoranda in the appellate court.
  • Ethical duties of lawyers to avoid frivolous appeals and to keep clients informed.

These procedures ensure that parties to a criminal case can seek a higher court’s review, providing checks and balances in the criminal justice system. Lawyers practicing in the field must be intimately familiar with these provisions and the corresponding jurisprudence to effectively safeguard their client’s rights and comply with ethical standards.

This discussion is a general overview and does not constitute legal advice. Legal practitioners must consult the updated Rules of Court, relevant statutes, recent Supreme Court rulings, and local practice rules for precise guidance.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login