Barangay conciliation

Barangay conciliation | JURISDICTION

BARANGAY CONCILIATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
(A Comprehensive Discussion on Jurisdiction and Procedure under the Katarungang Pambarangay System)

I. LEGAL BASIS

Barangay Conciliation in the Philippines finds its legal anchor primarily in Republic Act No. 7160 (the Local Government Code of 1991), specifically in Sections 399-422, which institutionalize the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP) system. The KP system is essentially a framework for the amicable settlement of disputes at the barangay level. This legislation replaced and supplemented Presidential Decree No. 1508, which originally established the barangay conciliation system.

II. RATIONALE

The Katarungang Pambarangay aims to:

  1. Decongest the regular courts by requiring certain disputes to be settled first in the barangay.
  2. Promote the speedy and inexpensive administration of justice by involving community leaders (the Lupon Tagapamayapa) in dispute resolution.
  3. Foster neighborhood harmony by encouraging amicable settlement of disputes within the community.

III. THE LUPON TAGAPAMAYAPA

  1. Composition

    • Each barangay organizes a Lupon headed by the Punong Barangay (Barangay Captain).
    • The Punong Barangay appoints not fewer than 10 nor more than 20 members who are considered “of known integrity, impartiality, independence of mind, and sense of fairness.”

  2. Lupon Chairman

    • The Punong Barangay automatically serves as Chairman of the Lupon.

  3. Lupon Secretary

    • The Lupon Secretary is chosen from among the Lupon members or the barangay secretary, who keeps and maintains the records and minutes of the Lupon proceedings.

  4. Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo

    • When a dispute arises, the Pangkat (conciliation panel) is formed from the Lupon members (usually three) to mediate and conciliate disputes.
    • The disputing parties may choose who among the Lupon members will sit in the Pangkat. In the absence of mutual choice, the Punong Barangay will appoint the Pangkat members.

IV. KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY JURISDICTION

A. Disputes Covered

  1. General Coverage

    • The system covers disputes between parties who reside in the same city or municipality and where the parties’ personal confrontation (i.e., face-to-face mediation/conciliation) is feasible.

  2. Nature of Disputes

    • Civil disputes such as property disputes, collection of sums of money, and similar controversies, so long as the issue is not beyond the barangay’s authority and monetary or subject-matter limitations are not exceeded by law.
    • Criminal offenses punishable by imprisonment not exceeding one (1) year or a fine not exceeding Five Thousand Pesos (Php5,000.00) (or such amounts as adjusted by law).

B. Exclusions

Certain disputes are excluded from the mandatory requirement of barangay conciliation:

  1. Where one party is the government (or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof).
  2. Where the dispute involves real properties located in different cities/municipalities, unless the parties actually reside in the same city/municipality.
  3. Where urgent legal action is necessary to prevent injustice or irreparable injury, such as petitions for injunction, temporary restraining orders, habeas corpus, and other extraordinary remedies.
  4. Where the dispute arises from incidents requiring immediate police action in order to restore public order or protect life and property, e.g., riot, breach of peace.
  5. Where the dispute involves parties who reside in different municipalities or cities, except when both parties voluntarily agree to submit their dispute to the Lupon.
  6. Offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year or a fine exceeding Five Thousand Pesos, unless the parties voluntarily submit their dispute for barangay conciliation.
  7. Labor disputes, as they fall under the jurisdiction of labor arbiters or the Department of Labor and Employment.
  8. Disputes involving real properties located in different barangays, unless the parties actually reside in the same barangay and voluntarily agree to conciliation.
  9. Where there is no personal confrontation possible between parties (e.g., the respondent is a transient, or unknown).

C. Mandatory Nature of the Process

  • Except for the excluded disputes above, parties must first undergo Barangay conciliation before filing an action or proceeding in any court or government office.
  • If a complaint is filed in court without prior referral to the Barangay, the case may be dismissed for lack of cause of action or for prematurity.

V. INITIATING THE PROCEEDINGS

  1. Filing of the Complaint

    • The aggrieved party (complainant) files an oral or written complaint with the Office of the Punong Barangay in the barangay where either the complainant or the respondent resides.
    • The Punong Barangay, upon receipt of the complaint, sets a date for mediation.

  2. Summons and Notice

    • The Punong Barangay or the Lupon Secretary issues summons (written notice) to the respondent and sends notice of the mediation meeting.
    • Both parties must appear personally; no representation by counsel or agents is generally allowed during the mediation or conciliation stage.

VI. MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION

  1. Mediation by the Punong Barangay

    • The Punong Barangay first attempts to mediate between the parties.
    • If the mediation is successful, an amicable settlement is drafted and signed by both parties. The settlement is then submitted to the Lupon Secretary for recording.

  2. Conciliation by the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo

    • If the Punong Barangay fails to secure a settlement or if any party objects to the mediation, the case is elevated to the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo.
    • The Pangkat convenes and conducts conciliation proceedings.
    • Again, personal appearances of the parties are required.

  3. Period of Settlement

    • The Lupon or Pangkat must arrive at a settlement, dismissal, or resolution within 15 days from the referral of the dispute, extendible by mutual agreement of the parties for another 15 days.
    • This short timeframe aims at speedy resolution at the barangay level.

VII. AMICABLE SETTLEMENT

  1. Form and Substance

    • The settlement must be in writing, signed by the parties and attested by the Lupon Chairman or Pangkat Chairman.
    • It should contain clear terms and conditions agreed upon, including payment schedules (if monetary), obligations to do or not to do, etc.

  2. Effect and Approval

    • Once signed, the amicable settlement has the force and effect of a final judgment of a court after ten (10) days from filing with the Lupon Secretary, unless repudiated by a party for a valid ground.
    • Grounds for repudiation include fraud, violence, or intimidation allegedly used to secure the agreement.
    • If the settlement is not repudiated within the said period, the agreement becomes final.

  3. Execution of the Settlement

    • If a party fails or refuses to comply with the terms of the amicable settlement, the other party can move for its execution before the Lupon Chairman.
    • If the settlement still proves unenforceable at the barangay level or the refusing party persists in non-compliance, the aggrieved party may file a civil action in court to enforce the settlement. The settlement is treated like a final judgment.

VIII. CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION (CFA)

  1. Issuance

    • If settlement is not reached after mediation and conciliation, or if a party unjustifiably fails to appear at the hearings, or if the dispute is otherwise not resolved within the prescribed period, the Lupon Secretary or Pangkat Secretary issues a Certificate to File Action. This certificate is signed by the Punong Barangay or Pangkat Chairman.
    • The certificate is essentially permission from the barangay that the parties can proceed to court or the appropriate government agency to litigate or act on the dispute.

  2. Prerequisite to Court Action

    • Courts or other government offices will normally require the Certificate to File Action as proof that the barangay conciliation process was complied with.
    • Absence of this Certificate, when the dispute is not otherwise exempted, is a ground for the dismissal of the complaint in court.

IX. PRESCRIPTIVE PERIODS AND TOLLING

  • The filing of a case under the Katarungang Pambarangay tolls the running of the prescriptive period for the offense (in criminal cases) or the cause of action (in civil cases).
  • The period is suspended during the mediation, conciliation, and arbitration process at the barangay level.

X. LEGAL ETHICS INVOLVED

  1. No Lawyers in the Barangay Hearings

    • The law and the rules discourage active participation of lawyers during the conciliation proceedings to maintain simplicity and avoid technicality.
    • Canon of Professional Responsibility: A lawyer must respect the authority of the Barangay Lupon and avoid frustrating its processes.

  2. Duty of Candor and Good Faith

    • Parties must appear in good faith to negotiate and possibly settle their disputes. Frivolous and malicious invocation of the barangay process is considered unethical and could prejudice the fair and speedy resolution of disputes.

  3. Confidentiality

    • Lupon members are expected to maintain confidentiality of matters discussed during mediation and conciliation. This fosters openness and candor on the part of the disputants.

XI. RELEVANT JURISPRUDENCE

  1. Dismissal for Lack of Compliance

    • The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that failure to go through the mandatory barangay conciliation procedure (when required) results in a ground for the dismissal of the complaint (e.g., Crossing v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. ___, though older jurisprudence from PD 1508 remains instructive).
    • The Courts emphasize the importance of the Barangay Justice System in de-clogging dockets and promoting community-based dispute resolution.

  2. Finality and Enforcement of Settlement

    • Jurisprudence affirms that an amicable settlement attested by the Lupon and not seasonably repudiated acquires the force of a final judgment (e.g., Spouses Lontoc v. Molina, G.R. No. ___). Thus, courts generally respect the terms of a validly concluded settlement.

  3. Exceptions Strictly Construed

    • The Supreme Court also underscores that the exemptions from barangay conciliation must be strictly construed, to preserve the legislative intent of requiring amicable settlement at the local level whenever possible.

XII. COMMON LEGAL FORMS

  1. Complaint Form / Request for Assistance

    • A simple statement of the cause of action or grievance.

  2. Summons / Notice of Hearing

    • Issued by the Punong Barangay or the Lupon Secretary to summon the respondent(s) and notify them of the hearing date.

  3. Amicable Settlement Agreement

    • A written agreement signed by the disputing parties and attested by the Lupon Chair or Pangkat Chair, containing the terms and conditions of the settlement.

  4. Certification to File Action (CFA)

    • Issued when no settlement is reached, or a party fails to appear without valid cause, or the dispute falls outside the Lupon’s authority.

  5. Minutes / Record of Proceedings

    • The Lupon Secretary records all relevant details of the mediation or conciliation sessions.

XIII. PRACTICAL TIPS FOR PARTIES

  1. Appear Personally and Punctually

    • Failure to appear (without valid reason) not only delays the proceedings but can also result in a Certificate to File Action in favor of the appearing party, and possible adverse implications if the case goes to court.

  2. Prepare Documentation

    • Even though the process is informal, having relevant documents (e.g., contracts, receipts, photos for boundary disputes) will help clarify the dispute and facilitate settlement.

  3. Explore Amicable Settlement Early

    • Settlement at the barangay level saves time, costs, and preserves community harmony.

  4. Ensure Proper Drafting of the Settlement

    • If both parties come to an agreement, they should carefully draft the terms—be clear and specific on obligations (amounts, timelines, deliverables).

XIV. KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER

  • Mandatory for covered disputes: You cannot bypass barangay conciliation for disputes covered by the law.
  • Exemptions: If a dispute falls under the recognized exceptions, you may proceed directly to court or other forums.
  • Personal Appearance: Lawyers generally do not represent clients during the conciliation stage to maintain the informal and amicable spirit of the proceedings.
  • Binding Force of Settlement: A duly executed and non-repudiated settlement is enforceable as a final judgment.
  • Certificate to File Action: This is the crucial “gate pass” to judicial or quasi-judicial bodies for disputes otherwise covered by the barangay process.

CONCLUSION

Barangay conciliation under the Katarungang Pambarangay system is a cornerstone of Philippine remedial law and alternative dispute resolution. By mandating an accessible, neighborhood-based resolution mechanism, the law aims to promote harmony, expedite settlement of minor disputes, and lighten the caseload of the regular courts. Mastery of its jurisdiction, procedure, and exceptions ensures proper compliance with legal requirements and avoids the pitfalls of premature court filings. Above all, effective use of barangay conciliation fosters a culture of community-driven conflict resolution, a fundamental aspiration of Philippine society.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login