Rendered in the Exercise of Administrative Functions | CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

In the context of Political Law and Public International Law, particularly focusing on Constitutional Commissions under the Philippine Constitution, it is crucial to meticulously understand their roles, powers, and functions, especially when Rendered in the Exercise of Administrative Functions.

I. Overview of Constitutional Commissions

Under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the Constitutional Commissions are independent constitutional bodies, created to act as checks on government powers and ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability. These commissions are:

1. Civil Service Commission (CSC) – ensures a merit-based, professional civil service.
2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC) – supervises and enforces election laws.
3. Commission on Audit (COA) – serves as the government’s auditing arm, ensuring transparency and accountability in public expenditures.

These Commissions are explicitly mentioned under Article IX of the 1987 Constitution, which is divided into three parts: A (CSC), B (COMELEC), and C (COA).

Each of these Commissions has quasi-judicial powers and administrative functions, the latter being the focus of this discussion.

II. Constitutional Basis

Article IX of the 1987 Philippine Constitution defines the roles and powers of these Constitutional Commissions, which are independent from the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches. Their powers include both quasi-judicial and administrative functions, though this section zeroes in on their administrative powers.

Relevant Provisions:

1. Section 2, Article IX-A: Independence of the Commissions

   • "The Constitutional Commissions shall be independent."
   • This independence allows them to exercise their administrative functions without undue influence from any branch of government.

2. Section 6, Article IX-A: Nature of Decisions

   • Decisions, orders, or rulings made by these Commissions are final, executory, and reviewable only by the Supreme Court on certiorari.

---

III. Administrative Functions of the Constitutional Commissions

The administrative functions refer to the activities these Commissions engage in to regulate, administer, and enforce laws within their jurisdiction. While they have quasi-judicial functions (i.e., deciding disputes), their administrative role focuses on overseeing the day-to-day management and ensuring compliance with laws and standards.

1. Civil Service Commission (CSC)

The Civil Service Commission is the central human resource agency of the government, responsible for the regulation of all matters involving the civil service. It performs various administrative functions such as:

• Regulating and Administering Civil Service Laws: The CSC enforces the constitutional mandate of merit and fitness in public employment. It oversees appointments, promotions, transfers, and other human resource actions in the government sector.

• Issuance of Regulations: It has the power to issue administrative rules and guidelines governing civil servants, including matters like qualifications, work standards, and ethics.

• Disciplinary Authority: As part of its administrative functions, the CSC can investigate and impose administrative sanctions on civil servants who violate civil service laws.

• Promoting Efficiency: The CSC has the mandate to implement programs that promote efficiency and good governance in the civil service.

• Examining Applicants: The CSC administers civil service examinations to qualify applicants for government positions. It formulates guidelines on the conduct of these exams.

  Example: When the CSC implements a new set of regulations to improve recruitment standards, it is exercising its administrative powers.

2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)

The Commission on Elections is tasked with the administration, supervision, and enforcement of election laws in the Philippines. Its administrative functions include:

• Regulating Election Laws: COMELEC formulates guidelines and regulations to ensure free, fair, and orderly elections. This includes promulgating rules on campaign finance, election propaganda, and the conduct of the elections themselves.

• Conducting Voter Registration: COMELEC oversees the registration of voters, ensuring that the voter’s list is updated and accurate.

• Supervising Elections: COMELEC administers and supervises the entire electoral process, including precinct management, vote counting, and canvassing of election returns.

• Accreditation of Political Parties and Organizations: It has the administrative power to regulate political parties and accredits their participation in elections.

• Promulgating Rules for Electoral Contestation: Although electoral contests fall under its quasi-judicial powers, the administrative issuance of guidelines for the filing of petitions, handling of evidence, and conduct of proceedings are essential administrative functions.

  Example: When COMELEC sets the calendar for election-related activities (e.g., the start of the filing of certificates of candidacy), it is exercising its administrative functions.

3. Commission on Audit (COA)

The Commission on Audit is tasked with the duty of examining, auditing, and settling all accounts pertaining to the revenue and expenditures of the government and its subdivisions. Its primary administrative functions include:

• Formulation of Auditing Rules: COA issues guidelines and regulations on how government funds should be used and accounted for, including the standards for financial reporting and auditing.

• Oversight of Public Funds: COA supervises how government entities use their funds, ensuring compliance with financial and auditing regulations.

• Administrative Control Over Auditors: COA assigns and oversees government auditors tasked with scrutinizing the finances of various government agencies.

• Issuance of Notices of Disallowances: In case of illegal or improper expenditures, COA issues notices of disallowance, mandating government agencies to account for misused funds.

• Conduct of Audits and Investigations: The COA can undertake both regular and special audits, including performance audits and investigations into irregularities.

  Example: When COA implements a circular outlining proper expenditure processes for local government units, it is performing its administrative role.

---

IV. Administrative Functions vs. Quasi-Judicial Functions

While the Constitutional Commissions also have quasi-judicial powers (where they can decide cases or disputes), their administrative functions are distinct in that these involve governance, regulation, and the supervision of compliance, rather than adjudicating disputes.

• Administrative functions involve rule-making, oversight, and enforcement.
• Quasi-judicial functions involve adjudication and resolution of conflicts or disputes (e.g., resolving election protests in COMELEC or disciplining erring civil servants in CSC).

For example, when the COA issues guidelines on how public funds should be audited, this is administrative. However, when COA decides that a certain expenditure is unlawful (after a formal hearing), this is quasi-judicial.

---

V. Finality and Review of Administrative Decisions

Under the Constitution, the administrative decisions of these Commissions are final and executory, but are subject to review by the Supreme Court on questions of law via a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court. This is particularly important in ensuring that while these Commissions are independent, they are still subject to legal scrutiny by the Judiciary, which can void acts tainted with grave abuse of discretion.

---

VI. Importance of Administrative Functions

The administrative functions of the Constitutional Commissions play a critical role in maintaining public order, good governance, and transparency in government operations. Their rule-making and regulatory powers help streamline governmental functions and ensure the ethical conduct of public officers, which is a cornerstone of democratic governance in the Philippines.

These administrative functions ensure that government agencies comply with the Constitution and laws, and provide a framework for ethical governance and professional public service.

---

Conclusion

The administrative functions of the Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines are crucial in upholding the integrity of the government system. Each Commission—CSC, COMELEC, and COA—performs key roles that ensure accountability, transparency, and efficiency within their respective jurisdictions, acting independently but in concert with other branches of government to maintain the rule of law and democratic governance.

Rendered in the Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Functions | CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

In the realm of Philippine Political Law and Public International Law, specifically under the topic of Constitutional Commissions and their powers rendered in the exercise of quasi-judicial functions, there are key concepts to be examined. Here is a detailed analysis of this legal framework:

IV. CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

The Constitutional Commissions are independent bodies created by the 1987 Philippine Constitution to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in various aspects of governance. These Commissions perform vital roles in governmental functions, often balancing the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

There are three Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines:

1. Commission on Audit (COA)
2. Civil Service Commission (CSC)
3. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)

G. Rendered in the Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Functions

The Constitutional Commissions not only have administrative functions but also quasi-judicial powers. Quasi-judicial functions involve the capacity to hear and decide on cases, impose penalties, and settle disputes involving parties under their jurisdiction. This is similar to the judiciary but within a specialized scope of law and jurisdiction.

Let's break this down by discussing the quasi-judicial powers of each Commission:

---

1. Commission on Audit (COA)

The COA is responsible for auditing all government revenues, expenditures, and the use of public funds. It has quasi-judicial functions in the sense that it has the power to:

• Adjudicate audit disallowances: COA can review and resolve controversies regarding the legality of the use of public funds. If a government office is found to have used funds improperly, COA can issue an audit decision that disallows the expenditure.
• Appeals on audit decisions: If a party disagrees with COA’s decision (for instance, a government agency or a private contractor dealing with the government), the party may appeal within COA, and the decision may be elevated to the Supreme Court on certiorari if COA’s final decision is unfavorable.

Relevant Cases and Decisions:

• COA’s decisions are binding unless reversed by a higher judicial authority (such as the Supreme Court). However, COA decisions carry weight in all fiscal matters involving public funds and accountability.

---

2. Civil Service Commission (CSC)

The CSC is tasked with the management of the Philippine bureaucracy, ensuring merit and fitness in government appointments and employment. It exercises quasi-judicial powers in handling:

• Personnel disputes: CSC has the authority to hear administrative cases concerning government employees, including dismissal, suspension, demotion, and other personnel actions.
• Review of administrative decisions: The CSC can review decisions made by appointing authorities in government agencies. It acts as the final arbiter in disputes concerning employment, tenure, and disciplinary actions in the civil service.
• Appeals: Decisions of the CSC in its quasi-judicial capacity may be appealed to the Court of Appeals via a Rule 43 petition or directly to the Supreme Court in cases involving questions of law.

Examples of Quasi-Judicial Decisions:

• Rulings on administrative discipline cases involving government employees accused of misconduct or inefficiency.
• Decisions affecting the appointment, promotion, or discipline of civil servants can be reviewed through a quasi-judicial process, and its final rulings may have the force and effect of law unless overturned by the courts.

---

3. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)

The COMELEC has both administrative and quasi-judicial functions, with the latter relating primarily to the conduct of elections and electoral disputes. COMELEC’s quasi-judicial powers include:

• Resolution of electoral disputes: COMELEC can resolve pre-election disputes (e.g., issues on qualifications of candidates, campaign violations) and post-election controversies (e.g., electoral protests). It exercises original jurisdiction over contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of elective regional, provincial, and city officials.
• Disqualification and cancellation of candidacies: COMELEC has the authority to disqualify candidates for violations of election laws or ineligibility, with its decisions having binding effect unless appealed to the Supreme Court.
• Contempt powers: In its quasi-judicial role, COMELEC can cite parties for contempt if they disobey its orders or disrupt its proceedings.

Judicial Review: Decisions of the COMELEC may be appealed to the Supreme Court in cases involving grave abuse of discretion or questions of law.

Relevant Cases:

• COMELEC's rulings on the validity of election returns or qualifications of candidates are binding and have a direct impact on the election results, but they may be questioned in the Supreme Court.

---

Quasi-Judicial Functions: General Principles

1. Finality of Decisions: Decisions rendered by Constitutional Commissions in the exercise of quasi-judicial functions are final and executory, subject only to judicial review by higher courts (typically the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court).

2. Substantial Evidence Standard: The quasi-judicial decisions of these Commissions are based on a “substantial evidence” standard, which means that the amount of evidence required to justify a decision is less than that required in judicial proceedings (where a "preponderance of evidence" or "proof beyond reasonable doubt" may be needed).

3. Appeals Process: While these bodies have final authority within their specialized fields, their quasi-judicial decisions can be subject to review by higher courts, particularly on grounds of grave abuse of discretion, or if the ruling involves questions of law or constitutionality.

4. Judicial Review: Under Article VIII, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, judicial power includes the duty of the courts to settle actual controversies involving rights that are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the government, including Constitutional Commissions exercising quasi-judicial functions.

---

Conclusion

The Constitutional Commissions of the Philippines, namely COA, CSC, and COMELEC, are vested with significant quasi-judicial powers that allow them to make binding rulings within their respective areas of responsibility. These decisions may only be overturned or modified by the judiciary under specific circumstances, particularly when there is a question of law or when grave abuse of discretion is alleged. Their rulings play a crucial role in maintaining checks and balances in the government and in ensuring that public resources are properly managed, that the civil service is free from political interference, and that elections are fair and just.

Judicial Review of Final Orders, Resolutions, and Decisions | CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

In the context of Political Law and Public International Law in the Philippines, particularly under the subject of Constitutional Commissions, the Judicial Review of Final Orders, Resolutions, and Decisions refers to the judicial power of courts, specifically the Supreme Court, to review decisions made by these Constitutional Commissions.

Overview of Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines

The Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines are independent bodies created by the Constitution itself. These include:

1. Civil Service Commission (CSC)
2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)
3. Commission on Audit (COA)

These commissions are intended to operate independently from other branches of government, ensuring a system of checks and balances. Their decisions, orders, and resolutions carry significant weight as they pertain to critical aspects of governance, such as civil service matters, electoral issues, and government auditing.

Judicial Review of Constitutional Commissions

While the Constitutional Commissions are independent, they are not immune from judicial scrutiny. The 1987 Philippine Constitution provides that final orders, resolutions, and decisions of these commissions can be subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court.

1. Nature of Judicial Review

Judicial review is a mechanism through which the judiciary ensures that the other branches of government or independent bodies do not exceed their powers or violate the Constitution. The judicial review of decisions by Constitutional Commissions is specifically grounded in the Constitution under Article IX-A, Section 7, which states:

“Section 7. Each Commission shall decide by a majority vote of all its Members any case or matter brought before it within sixty days from the date of its submission for decision or resolution. A case or matter is deemed submitted for decision or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading, brief, or memorandum required by the rules of the Commission or by the Commission itself. Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or by law, any decision, order, or ruling of each Commission may be brought to the Supreme Court on certiorari by the aggrieved party within thirty days from receipt of a copy thereof."

2. Certiorari as the Mode of Judicial Review

• Certiorari is the legal procedure by which a higher court (in this case, the Supreme Court) reviews the decisions of a lower court or body (the Constitutional Commissions).
• Under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, certiorari is employed when it is alleged that the lower body acted without or in excess of jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction.
• In the case of Constitutional Commissions, decisions can be questioned before the Supreme Court by filing a petition for certiorari, which challenges the commission’s jurisdiction or claims that the commission committed grave abuse of discretion.

3. Grounds for Judicial Review

The Supreme Court will entertain a petition for judicial review only when it is demonstrated that:

• Grave abuse of discretion was committed by the Constitutional Commission. This occurs when the commission’s decisions are so arbitrary or capricious that it acted outside the bounds of law or reason.
• The commission acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction. If the commission decides on matters outside the scope of its authority, its decision can be challenged.

4. Finality of the Constitutional Commissions' Decisions

Decisions of Constitutional Commissions are final and executory, unless reversed by the Supreme Court upon judicial review. This underscores the importance of these commissions' independence and authority. However, such finality is not absolute, as they are subject to review when errors are committed or constitutional provisions are violated.

5. Examples of Judicial Review

The judicial review of decisions made by Constitutional Commissions has been extensively exercised in Philippine jurisprudence, particularly in:

• COMELEC decisions on election contests, disqualifications, and other electoral matters. An aggrieved candidate or party can elevate these to the Supreme Court through a petition for certiorari.
• COA decisions on government auditing matters, where government agencies or officials can challenge COA rulings on issues such as disallowed or disapproved transactions.
• CSC decisions affecting civil servants, where decisions on employment, promotion, or dismissal can be subject to Supreme Court review if alleged to have been made with grave abuse of discretion.

6. Time Frame for Filing a Petition for Certiorari

• As provided under Article IX-A, Section 7 of the Constitution, a petition for certiorari must be filed within thirty (30) days from receipt of the final order, resolution, or decision of the Constitutional Commission.

Limitations of Judicial Review

While the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, it does not automatically act as a trier of facts. Judicial review of decisions from Constitutional Commissions is typically confined to questions of law, particularly whether the commission acted within its jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion. Factual findings by the commissions, when supported by substantial evidence, are generally respected by the Supreme Court.

The Role of the Supreme Court in Safeguarding Constitutional Principles

The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in ensuring that the actions of Constitutional Commissions adhere to constitutional mandates. By exercising its power of judicial review, the Court provides a remedy to individuals and entities who feel aggrieved by decisions of these independent bodies. This preserves the constitutional order, ensuring that no entity, even those established by the Constitution itself, acts beyond its powers.

Key Points Summary

• Constitutional Commissions (CSC, COMELEC, COA) are independent bodies whose decisions are final and executory, but still subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court.
• The Constitution, particularly Article IX-A, Section 7, allows an aggrieved party to file a petition for certiorari within 30 days from receipt of a final decision, alleging grave abuse of discretion or jurisdictional errors.
• Certiorari is the legal remedy for questioning the decisions of Constitutional Commissions, governed by Rule 65 of the Rules of Court.
• The Supreme Court generally respects factual findings of the commissions but intervenes when there are questions of law, abuse of discretion, or jurisdictional overreach.

This mechanism ensures that the Constitutional Commissions remain accountable to the rule of law while maintaining their functional independence.

Prohibited Offices and Interests | CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

POLITICAL LAW AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

IV. CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

E. Prohibited Offices and Interests

---

The Philippine Constitution, particularly in Article IX (Constitutional Commissions), emphasizes the independence of Constitutional Commissions and sets forth prohibitions to ensure that members of these bodies remain impartial and independent in carrying out their constitutional duties. There are three Constitutional Commissions under the 1987 Constitution:

1. The Civil Service Commission (CSC)
2. The Commission on Elections (COMELEC)
3. The Commission on Audit (COA)

The prohibited offices and interests apply to the chairpersons and commissioners of these bodies.

1. Relevant Constitutional Provisions

The 1987 Philippine Constitution, particularly Article IX, Section 2, places restrictions on the commissioners of these bodies to protect their independence. The pertinent sections are as follows:

Section 2, Article IX-A (Common Provisions for All Constitutional Commissions):

• Prohibition Against Holding Another Office or Employment

  Commissioners are prohibited from holding any other office or employment during their tenure, except as may be provided by law or by the Constitution. This ensures that their loyalty and focus remain solely on their functions as part of a Constitutional Commission.

• Prohibition Against Private Interests

  Commissioners are prohibited from having any private financial interest in any contract with, or franchise or privilege granted by, the government, including its subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, during their tenure. This clause is aimed at avoiding conflicts of interest and maintaining the impartiality of these officials.

• Ineligibility for Any Government Post

  Members of these commissions are ineligible to run for any elective position or to be appointed to any other government office or position during their tenure.

---

2. Specific Prohibitions

A. Prohibition Against Holding Another Office or Employment

• Scope of the prohibition: This means that a commissioner cannot hold another government or private position, whether it is in an executive capacity, legislative office, judiciary, or private employment. They must serve full-time and without any conflicting roles. For example, a commissioner of the COMELEC cannot simultaneously hold a position in a private company or serve in the judiciary.

• Exceptions: The only exceptions allowed are when the law or Constitution itself expressly provides for it. For example, a member of a Constitutional Commission may sit on a board or council if the Constitution specifically mandates such a role, but this is rare.

B. Prohibition Against Financial Interests

• Scope of the prohibition: The commissioner cannot have a financial interest in any contract or privilege granted by the government. This includes holding shares or investments in companies that have dealings with the government.

• Rationale: The purpose of this prohibition is to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure that the commissioners remain impartial in their decisions. They are not to benefit financially from decisions they make or from the organizations they regulate.

C. Prohibition Against Running for Elective Office or Being Appointed to Other Government Positions

• Post-service prohibition: After their term, commissioners are ineligible to run for any elective office or to be appointed to any government office until after one year has passed from the termination of their term. This restriction seeks to prevent members from using their positions to gain political advantage for future electoral ambitions or appointments.

---

3. Key Concepts and Legal Doctrines

A. Doctrine of Incompatibility of Office

This doctrine supports the constitutional provision that prohibits holding multiple offices or employment positions simultaneously. The rationale is that public officers must dedicate their full time and attention to their duties in one office, particularly for members of the Constitutional Commissions.

B. Doctrine of Public Trust

Public office is a public trust. Commissioners of the Constitutional Commissions are expected to be beyond reproach in matters of personal interests. Any financial or political interests could undermine the public’s trust in these institutions. Hence, stringent restrictions are placed on them to avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest.

C. Conflict of Interest Rules

Any potential or actual conflict between personal financial interests and public duties is prohibited. Commissioners must be transparent in all dealings and avoid any scenario where their impartiality may be compromised.

D. One-Year Ban Post-Tenure

This rule serves as a safeguard against commissioners using their position for future political or personal gain. By ensuring they cannot immediately run for elective office or assume other government positions, the rule preserves the sanctity and independence of the office.

---

4. Penalties for Violation

Any violation of the prohibitions laid out in the Constitution can lead to severe consequences, such as:

• Impeachment: Members of the Constitutional Commissions can be impeached for culpable violations of the Constitution, graft and corruption, or betrayal of public trust.
• Administrative or Criminal Sanctions: Violators may also face criminal or administrative cases for violating anti-corruption and good governance laws, including Republic Act No. 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees), and the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.

---

5. Relevant Case Law

There have been various jurisprudential interpretations regarding prohibited offices and interests for Constitutional Commissions. Some key cases include:

• Aning v. COMELEC (2005): This case emphasized the requirement for commissioners to resign from private positions and avoid conflicts of interest to uphold their independence.

• Funa v. Villar (2010): This case examined the doctrine of incompatibility of office and found that holding two government positions simultaneously, even if one is honorary, can violate the Constitution’s prohibitions.

---

Conclusion:

The prohibited offices and interests for members of the Constitutional Commissions reflect the high standards of independence and integrity expected from these key institutions in Philippine governance. By restricting commissioners from holding other positions or engaging in private financial interests, the Constitution ensures that these officials remain impartial and committed solely to their constitutional duties. The prohibitions protect the commissions from external influence, ensuring that their actions remain above reproach and in the public interest.

Composition and Qualifications of Members

Introduction

The Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines are independent bodies established under the 1987 Constitution to perform essential functions in government oversight and administration. These commissions are:

1. Civil Service Commission (CSC)
2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)
3. Commission on Audit (COA)

Understanding the composition and qualifications of the members of these commissions is crucial, as it ensures the integrity, independence, and effectiveness of these bodies in performing their constitutional mandates.

---

Common Provisions for All Constitutional Commissions

Before delving into each commission's specific composition and qualifications, it is essential to note the common provisions applicable to all:

1. Independence: The commissions are independent constitutional bodies (Article IX-A, Section 1).

2. Appointment: Members are appointed by the President with the consent of the Commission on Appointments (Article IX-B, C, D, Section 1(2)).

3. Term of Office: Commissioners serve a term of seven years without reappointment. The terms are staggered to ensure continuity (Article IX-B, C, D, Section 1(2)).

4. Prohibition on Reappointment and Temporary Appointments: Members cannot be reappointed or appointed in a temporary or acting capacity (Article IX-B, C, D, Section 1(2)).

5. Disqualifications During Tenure:

   • Members cannot hold any other office or employment.
   • They cannot engage in the practice of any profession or manage any business that may be affected by their functions.
   • They must not have financial interests in any government contract or franchise (Article IX-A, Section 2).

6. Salary Protection: Salaries are fixed by law and cannot be decreased during their tenure (Article IX-A, Section 3).

---

A. Civil Service Commission (CSC)

Composition:

• One Chairman and Two Commissioners (Article IX-B, Section 1(1)).

Qualifications:

1. Natural-born Citizen: Must be a natural-born citizen of the Philippines.

2. Age Requirement: At least 35 years old at the time of appointment.

3. Proven Capacity for Public Administration:

   • Demonstrated competence and experience in public administration.

4. Non-Candidate in Preceding Election:

   • Must not have been a candidate for any elective position in the elections immediately preceding the appointment.

Term and Appointment:

• Seven-year term without reappointment.
• Initial appointees have staggered terms:
  • Chairman: 7 years
  • One Commissioner: 5 years
  • One Commissioner: 3 years

---

B. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)

Composition:

• One Chairman and Six Commissioners (Article IX-C, Section 1(1)).

Qualifications:

1. Natural-born Citizen.

2. Age Requirement: At least 35 years old.

3. Educational Background:

   • Holder of a college degree.

4. Professional Experience:

   • Majority, including the Chairman, must be members of the Philippine Bar with at least 10 years of law practice.

5. Non-Candidate in Preceding Election.

Term and Appointment:

• Seven-year term without reappointment.
• Initial appointees have staggered terms:
  • Three members: 7 years
  • Two members: 5 years
  • Two members: 3 years

---

C. Commission on Audit (COA)

Composition:

• One Chairman and Two Commissioners (Article IX-D, Section 1(1)).

Qualifications:

1. Natural-born Citizen.

2. Age Requirement: At least 35 years old.

3. Professional Credentials:

   • Must be either:
     • A Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with at least 10 years of auditing experience, or
     • A member of the Philippine Bar with at least 10 years of law practice.

4. Non-Candidate in Preceding Election.

Term and Appointment:

• Seven-year term without reappointment.
• Initial appointees have staggered terms:
  • Chairman: 7 years
  • One Commissioner: 5 years
  • One Commissioner: 3 years

---

Rationale Behind Qualifications and Composition

• Natural-born Citizenship: Ensures allegiance to the Philippines and prevents foreign influence.

• Age Requirement: Guarantees maturity and sufficient experience.

• Professional Qualifications:

  • CSC: Proven capacity in public administration ensures competent management of the civil service.
  • COMELEC: Legal expertise is crucial for interpreting election laws; thus, a majority being lawyers with substantial practice is required.
  • COA: Financial and legal expertise is necessary for auditing government finances, hence the requirement for CPAs or lawyers with significant experience.

• Non-Candidate Provision: Maintains the apolitical nature of the commissions by preventing recent political candidates from influencing independent bodies.

Prohibitions and Restrictions

• No Reappointment: Prevents entrenchment in power and promotes independence.

• No Temporary Appointments: Ensures stability and avoids undue influence from the executive branch.

• Exclusive Service: Members cannot hold other positions or have conflicting interests, preserving the integrity and focus on their constitutional duties.

---

Appointment Process

1. Nomination by the President: The President selects qualified individuals.

2. Confirmation by the Commission on Appointments:

   • A bicameral body composed of members from both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
   • Ensures checks and balances by subjecting appointments to legislative scrutiny.

---

Security of Tenure and Fiscal Autonomy

• Security of Tenure: Members can only be removed through impeachment, safeguarding their independence (Article XI, Section 2).

• Fiscal Autonomy:

  • The commissions' budgets are automatically and regularly released.
  • Prevents financial manipulation that could compromise their functions (Article IX-A, Section 5).

---

Relevant Jurisprudence

• Brillantes v. Commission on Elections (G.R. No. 163193, June 15, 2004):

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the constitutional qualifications and the need for strict adherence to maintain the independence of the COMELEC.

• Funa v. Villar (G.R. No. 192791, April 24, 2012):

  • Addressed the issue of temporary appointments, reinforcing that no member should be appointed in an acting capacity to uphold the commissions' independence.

---

Conclusion

The composition and qualifications of the members of the Constitutional Commissions are meticulously outlined in the 1987 Constitution to ensure that only individuals of utmost integrity, competence, and independence serve in these critical oversight bodies. These provisions are designed to:

• Safeguard Independence: By setting strict qualifications and prohibitions, members are insulated from political pressures.

• Ensure Competence: Professional and experience requirements guarantee that members are capable of performing their duties effectively.

• Promote Continuity and Stability: Staggered terms and prohibitions on reappointment prevent sudden shifts in policies and ensure consistent administration.

Understanding these constitutional mandates is essential for appreciating the role these commissions play in upholding democracy, accountability, and good governance in the Philippines.

Powers, Functions, and Jurisdiction

Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines: Powers, Functions, and Jurisdiction

The 1987 Philippine Constitution creates three independent Constitutional Commissions, each playing a vital role in ensuring good governance, transparency, accountability, and public trust in government institutions. These commissions are constitutionally mandated bodies that have been given specific powers, functions, and jurisdictions to safeguard democracy. They are:

1. Civil Service Commission (CSC)
2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)
3. Commission on Audit (COA)

Each of these bodies enjoys independence from other branches of government and operates under the provisions laid out in Article IX of the 1987 Constitution.

General Provisions

1. Independence

• The Constitutional Commissions are independent entities. This means they are insulated from political pressures or interference from other branches of government. This independence ensures they can carry out their duties impartially.

2. Appointments and Qualifications

• The Chairpersons and Commissioners of these commissions are appointed by the President of the Philippines with the consent of the Commission on Appointments. They hold office for a term of seven years without reappointment and serve staggered terms.
• Members must have the qualifications prescribed by the Constitution, such as a sense of moral integrity and a high level of competence in their respective fields.

3. Prohibitions

• Commissioners cannot be reappointed, hold any other office or employment, or engage in the practice of any profession or business.

4. Rule-Making Power

• Constitutional Commissions have the authority to promulgate their own rules governing their internal functions.

A. Civil Service Commission (CSC)

The CSC is the central human resource agency of the Philippine government. Its mandate focuses on ensuring the integrity of the civil service system by promoting merit and fitness in public employment.

Powers, Functions, and Jurisdiction

1. Jurisdiction Over Public Officials

   • The CSC has the authority to enforce and administer civil service laws and regulations.
   • It exercises jurisdiction over administrative cases involving public officials within the civil service system, except those in the military, judiciary, and constitutional bodies like COMELEC and COA.

2. Personnel Administration

   • It formulates policies and plans for the recruitment, appointment, promotion, and tenure of civil servants.
   • It enforces rules on qualifications, promotions, and discipline in the public sector.

3. Disciplinary Authority

   • The CSC has the power to investigate and decide on complaints regarding personnel actions like appointments, promotions, transfers, and other human resource matters in government service.

4. Appellate Function

   • It serves as the final appellate body for decisions involving government employees, including those rendered by lower administrative bodies.

B. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)

COMELEC is tasked with ensuring the conduct of free, fair, and honest elections. It plays a central role in overseeing and enforcing election laws in the country.

Powers, Functions, and Jurisdiction

1. Supervision Over Elections

   • COMELEC is responsible for enforcing and administering all laws and regulations related to elections. This includes the registration of voters, election proceedings, vote counting, and the proclamation of winners.

2. Control Over Election Officials

   • It has direct control and supervision over all election officers and employees. It appoints election inspectors, canvassers, and other election personnel.

3. Regulation of Political Parties

   • The commission regulates political parties, party-list groups, and their accreditation. It ensures that they adhere to laws regarding campaign contributions, expenditures, and disclosures.

4. Judicial Function

   • The COMELEC has quasi-judicial powers in deciding election contests involving national, regional, and local officials, except for the President, Vice President, and members of the House of Representatives and Senate (which fall under the jurisdiction of electoral tribunals).

5. Rule-Making Power

   • It can create rules and regulations to carry out its mandate, including measures to address election-related fraud and irregularities.

6. Authority Over Election Campaigns

   • COMELEC has the power to regulate election propaganda, campaign finance, and access to media during elections.

C. Commission on Audit (COA)

The COA is the highest auditing body in the Philippines, tasked with ensuring accountability and transparency in government finances. It functions as the watchdog over public funds and properties.

Powers, Functions, and Jurisdiction

1. Examination and Audit

   • COA audits all government agencies, offices, and instrumentalities, including constitutional bodies, GOCCs (Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations), and LGUs (Local Government Units).
   • It examines and audits the use of all public funds and ensures they are used efficiently, effectively, and legally.

2. Disallowances and Recoveries

   • COA has the power to disallow irregular, unnecessary, excessive, or unconscionable expenditures of public funds and resources.
   • It orders the recovery of funds from officials who are liable for such expenditures.

3. Issuance of Guidelines

   • The commission formulates auditing guidelines, rules, and regulations that must be followed by all government agencies to ensure transparency and accountability.

4. Settlement of Accounts

   • COA has the authority to settle all accounts of government agencies and officials involved in the collection or expenditure of public funds.

5. Report to Congress

   • It is mandated to submit an annual report to the President and Congress on the financial operations of the government, including any significant discrepancies or irregularities in the handling of public funds.

D. Common Powers of the Constitutional Commissions

1. Quasi-Judicial Powers

   • Each commission has quasi-judicial powers to hear and decide cases within its jurisdiction, particularly in matters involving its specific mandate. This allows them to resolve disputes, impose sanctions, and issue decisions that can be elevated to the judiciary on appeal.

2. Appellate Jurisdiction

   • Decisions made by the CSC, COMELEC, and COA are appealable to the Supreme Court through a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, which checks for grave abuse of discretion.

3. Budgetary Autonomy

   • These commissions have fiscal autonomy, meaning they enjoy independence in handling their approved budget without interference from the executive or legislative branches of government. Congress cannot reduce their budget but can increase it.

Conclusion

The Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines—Civil Service Commission, Commission on Elections, and Commission on Audit—are fundamental institutions designed to uphold the principles of democracy, transparency, and accountability in government. They are tasked with distinct but complementary functions, ranging from ensuring meritocracy in public service to guaranteeing fair elections and safeguarding the prudent use of public funds. Each commission's independence and unique powers contribute to checks and balances within the government structure, ensuring that abuses are curbed, and public interests are protected.

Common Provisions

Under the Philippine legal framework, the Constitutional Commissions are independent bodies established by the 1987 Constitution, tasked with critical governance functions, ensuring accountability, and promoting transparency. The commissions include the Civil Service Commission (CSC), the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), and the Commission on Audit (COA). These commissions are designed to act as independent checks on the powers of the other branches of government.

IV. CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS

This portion of political law addresses the creation, powers, structure, and operational principles of the Constitutional Commissions. The overarching goal is to maintain these bodies' independence and protect them from undue political influence. The 1987 Constitution establishes and delineates their functions in Article IX.

B. Common Provisions

The Common Provisions apply uniformly to all Constitutional Commissions (CSC, COMELEC, COA), ensuring certain fundamental principles are adhered to across the board. These provisions emphasize the commissions' independence and outline safeguards against political interference.

Here are the key components:

1. Independence

The Constitutional Commissions must be independent. No law or executive order should undermine this independence, which is designed to protect the commissions from political manipulation by other government branches. Their rulings on matters within their jurisdiction are considered final and binding unless otherwise specified by the Constitution.

2. Composition

Each commission is composed of a Chairman and two Commissioners, who must:

• Be natural-born citizens of the Philippines.
• At least 35 years old at the time of appointment.
• Have not served in an election-related office within the year preceding their appointment, in the case of COMELEC.
• Possess the integrity, probity, and experience required for their respective commissions.
• Be appointed by the President, subject to confirmation by the Commission on Appointments.

Their terms of office are fixed at seven years without reappointment, ensuring staggered terms. This prevents a single President from completely overhauling any commission, thus maintaining independence.

3. Security of Tenure

The commissioners cannot be removed except by impeachment. This ensures that they are insulated from arbitrary removal. Grounds for impeachment include culpable violation of the Constitution, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.

4. Fiscal Autonomy

The commissions are granted fiscal autonomy, meaning their budgets cannot be reduced below the amount appropriated the previous year. This provision ensures that budget cuts are not used as a political weapon to impair their operations.

5. Prohibition on Holding Other Offices

Members of the Constitutional Commissions cannot hold any other office or employment, whether in the government or private sector, during their tenure. This prohibition aims to prevent conflicts of interest and safeguard the impartiality of commission members.

6. Salary

The salaries of the Chairmen and Commissioners cannot be decreased during their tenure. This ensures that they are not subjected to financial pressures or punitive measures by those in power.

7. Decisions and Procedures

The commissions must act as collegial bodies, with at least a majority vote needed for decisions on significant matters. These decisions, orders, or rulings should be rendered in writing, clearly stating the facts and laws on which they are based.

Each commission is empowered to create its own rules and procedures to ensure the efficient performance of its functions.

8. Jurisdiction

Each Constitutional Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over matters within its purview:

• The CSC is responsible for overseeing the civil service, ensuring that government employees are selected on the basis of merit and fitness.
• The COMELEC supervises all aspects of elections, from registration to proclamation of winners.
• The COA audits all government accounts and ensures that government funds are spent legally and efficiently.

Their findings and decisions on matters within their jurisdiction are binding unless reversed by the Supreme Court.

9. Enforcement of Decisions

The Constitutional Commissions' decisions are enforceable as law. Parties dissatisfied with their rulings may appeal to the Supreme Court within a specified period through a petition for certiorari if they believe the decision is tainted by grave abuse of discretion.

10. Appointments

Appointments to all positions in the commissions must adhere to principles of meritocracy and fitness, as mandated by the CSC. This ensures that even the internal operations of these commissions maintain high standards of competency and integrity.

Role in Good Governance

The independence and constitutional safeguards for the commissions are part of the checks-and-balances system that aims to ensure government accountability, impartiality, and efficiency. They serve as vital mechanisms for upholding the rule of law and protecting democracy.

• The CSC ensures that government employees are appointed based on merit and ensures ethical conduct within the civil service.
• The COMELEC plays a critical role in conducting free, fair, and credible elections, a cornerstone of the democratic process.
• The COA serves as the government's watchdog for public expenditures, safeguarding the proper use of public funds.

These common provisions across all three commissions establish the framework for their independence, accountability, and operational efficiency in maintaining good governance.

Constitutional Safeguards and Recourse

Citizens, candidates, and public officials affected by the decisions of these commissions have the right to appeal directly to the Supreme Court in cases of grave abuse of discretion, as provided by the Constitution.

Related Legal Doctrines and Principles

1. Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances – The commissions, while independent, interact with the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of the government in a system of checks and balances, helping ensure no single branch oversteps its authority.

2. Judicial Review – The Supreme Court has the power to review decisions made by the commissions, but only in instances of grave abuse of discretion, reinforcing the commissions' independence but providing a safety mechanism for error correction.

3. Impeachment – As a mechanism of accountability, commission heads and members can be impeached, but the grounds and process are clearly defined and require congressional action.

---

In summary, the Constitutional Commissions' Common Provisions serve to protect these bodies' autonomy, insulating them from political influence while allowing them to perform critical oversight and governance functions. Their independence, security of tenure, fiscal autonomy, and exclusive jurisdiction are all designed to uphold good governance and safeguard the integrity of the public service, electoral system, and public funds in the Philippines.

Constitutional Safeguards to Ensure Independence

The Philippine Constitution of 1987 establishes three Constitutional Commissions—the Civil Service Commission (CSC), the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), and the Commission on Audit (COA)—as independent bodies with constitutional safeguards to ensure their independence. These commissions play a crucial role in maintaining checks and balances within the government, promoting transparency, and ensuring accountability. Below is an outline of the safeguards designed to protect the independence of these Constitutional Commissions, as enshrined in the Constitution:

1. Creation and Composition

• Article IX of the 1987 Constitution divides the commissions into three distinct parts:
  • A. Civil Service Commission (CSC) - administers the civil service system and ensures merit-based appointments.
  • B. Commission on Elections (COMELEC) - oversees all matters related to elections.
  • C. Commission on Audit (COA) - audits the financial operations of government agencies and offices.

2. Tenure and Security of Tenure

• The Chairpersons and members of each Constitutional Commission serve a fixed term of seven years without reappointment.
• This fixed term provides stability and reduces vulnerability to external political pressures.
• Commissioners are appointed by the President but cannot be removed except through impeachment. This ensures their independence from the executive branch.

3. Impeachment as the Only Removal Mechanism

• Under the Constitution, members of the Constitutional Commissions can only be removed through impeachment. The grounds for impeachment are limited to:
  • Culpable violation of the Constitution
  • Treason
  • Bribery
  • Graft and corruption
  • Other high crimes
  • Betrayal of public trust
• This impeachment safeguard ensures that commissioners are protected from arbitrary or politically motivated removal.

4. Prohibition on Holding Other Positions

• Members of the Constitutional Commissions are prohibited from holding any other office or employment during their tenure, whether public or private, unless provided by the Constitution. This ensures their full-time focus on their duties and prevents conflicts of interest.
• This prohibition also ensures that members are not beholden to other government branches, enhancing their independence.

5. Fiscal Autonomy

• The Constitutional Commissions enjoy fiscal autonomy, which means they are allocated a separate budget in the General Appropriations Act (GAA).
• Their budgets cannot be reduced below the level of the previous year except when a lower budget is requested by the commission itself.
• This fiscal independence ensures they can perform their functions without undue influence from other branches of government, particularly the executive and legislative branches.

6. Non-Partisanship

• Members of the Constitutional Commissions are required to remain non-partisan. Specifically, the COMELEC commissioners, whose mandate involves electoral oversight, must avoid any association with political parties, ensuring impartiality in election-related matters.
• This non-partisan requirement applies across all three commissions to ensure that their decisions are free from political bias and external influence.

7. Quasi-Judicial Powers

• The Constitutional Commissions have quasi-judicial powers, meaning they can issue rulings or decisions in the areas under their jurisdiction. These decisions are often final and executory, which strengthens their authority and independence from interference by the executive or legislative branches.
• Appeals from the decisions of the Constitutional Commissions may only be made to the Supreme Court.

8. Autonomous Rule-Making Authority

• The Constitutional Commissions have the power to promulgate their own rules governing the practice and procedure in their respective fields. This rule-making authority is integral to their ability to function without interference.
• They are also empowered to issue regulations and guidelines necessary to implement their constitutional mandates.

9. Qualifications of Members

• The Constitution specifies stringent qualifications for members of the Constitutional Commissions, ensuring that only individuals with integrity, competence, and independence hold these critical positions. These qualifications include:
  • Proven probity and independence
  • Expertise in their respective fields (for instance, COA members are required to have experience in auditing and financial management).

10. Powers and Functions

• Each of the Constitutional Commissions has a distinct set of powers and functions enshrined in the Constitution:
  • The CSC ensures that the civil service system is based on merit and fitness, oversees recruitment, and protects civil service employees.
  • The COMELEC administers elections, ensures free and fair elections, and resolves election disputes.
  • The COA audits government agencies and offices, and ensures public funds are spent properly and in accordance with the law.

Conclusion

The Constitutional Safeguards to Ensure Independence of the Constitutional Commissions in the Philippines are deeply embedded in the structure of the Constitution. These safeguards, including security of tenure, fiscal autonomy, quasi-judicial powers, and a strict prohibition on political partisanship, are designed to ensure that the commissions function free from undue influence and political interference. As guardians of merit-based public service, electoral integrity, and proper use of public funds, these Constitutional Commissions play a critical role in upholding democratic governance and public accountability in the Philippines.