Copyright Infringement | Copyrights | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Topic: Mercantile and Taxation Laws – Intellectual Property – Copyrights – Copyright Infringement

---

Overview of Copyright Infringement in the Philippines

Copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is used, copied, or distributed without permission from the copyright owner. Under Philippine law, copyright infringement falls under the provisions of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293, as amended by RA 10372), which protects the rights of creators over their original works. Copyrighted works include literary, artistic, and derivative works, and their protection is vital for maintaining the integrity of intellectual property.

I. Elements of Copyright Infringement

To establish a claim for copyright infringement in the Philippines, the following elements must be proven:

1. Ownership of a Valid Copyright:

   • The complainant must prove that the work is original and falls within the copyrightable subject matter defined in the Intellectual Property Code.
   • The author or creator is presumed to be the copyright owner unless there is evidence to the contrary.
   • For works created within employment or contractual agreements, ownership may vest in the employer or contractor, depending on the contract terms.

2. Infringer's Access to the Copyrighted Work:

   • There must be proof that the infringer had access to the original work, indicating a reasonable possibility that copying could have occurred.

3. Substantial Similarity Between Works:

   • The allegedly infringing work must be substantially similar to the original copyrighted work. Minor or trivial differences do not suffice to negate a finding of substantial similarity.

4. Proof of Unauthorized Use:

   • The infringing party must have reproduced, distributed, displayed, or performed the copyrighted work without permission.

II. Forms of Copyright Infringement

1. Direct Infringement:

   • Involves directly copying, distributing, or displaying the copyrighted work without permission.

2. Secondary or Contributory Infringement:

   • Occurs when an individual or entity knowingly aids or contributes to another's copyright infringement.
   • Examples include hosting a website with infringing content or distributing equipment meant for illegal copying.

3. Vicarious Infringement:

   • Refers to the liability of a party that benefits financially from another's infringement while having the right and ability to control the infringer’s actions.
   • This often applies to business owners or managers who allow infringing activities on their premises.

III. Penalties for Copyright Infringement

Under Philippine law, copyright infringement can result in civil, criminal, and administrative liabilities:

1. Civil Penalties:

   • Damages: The infringer may be liable for actual damages suffered by the copyright owner, including lost profits or unjust enrichment.
   • Injunctions: Courts can issue preliminary or permanent injunctions to cease the infringing activities.
   • Delivery or Destruction of Infringing Goods: Courts may order the delivery, destruction, or disposal of all copies and equipment used in infringement.

2. Criminal Penalties:

   • Fines and Imprisonment: The infringer may face a fine ranging from PHP 50,000 to PHP 1,500,000, and imprisonment from one year to nine years, depending on the extent and nature of the infringement.
   • Repeat offenders are subject to higher penalties, and copyright infringement for commercial gain attracts the maximum penalties.

3. Administrative Penalties:

   • The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) may impose administrative fines or suspend business permits for companies engaged in copyright infringement.

IV. Defenses Against Copyright Infringement Claims

1. Fair Use Doctrine:

   • Philippine copyright law allows for "fair use" of a work without permission, which includes criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, and research.
   • Factors to consider for fair use:
     1. Purpose and character of use (commercial or educational).
     2. Nature of the copyrighted work.
     3. Amount and substantiality of the portion used.
     4. Effect of the use on the market for the original work.

2. License or Authorization:

   • If the alleged infringer can prove that they obtained proper licensing or authorization, they can avoid liability.

3. Independent Creation:

   • If the alleged infringer can demonstrate that their work was independently created without copying the original, it negates the similarity claim.

4. Expiration of Copyright:

   • Copyright protection is limited by time. For instance, copyright protection for literary and artistic works typically lasts for the life of the author plus 50 years after their death. Once expired, works fall into the public domain.

5. De Minimis Doctrine:

   • If the infringement is too trivial, the de minimis doctrine may apply, suggesting that the copying is so insignificant that it doesn't constitute infringement.

V. Procedural Aspects

1. Filing a Copyright Infringement Complaint:

   • The copyright owner or authorized agent can file a civil or criminal complaint in the Regional Trial Court with jurisdiction over the matter.
   • IPO may handle administrative complaints, particularly where the infringement affects public welfare.

2. Temporary Restraining Orders (TRO) and Preliminary Injunctions:

   • Courts may issue a TRO or preliminary injunction upon filing the complaint to immediately stop the infringing acts, especially if continued infringement may cause irreparable harm to the copyright owner.

3. Evidence Gathering and Preservation:

   • Copyright owners are encouraged to gather evidence, such as infringing copies, witnesses, and records of economic loss, which will be crucial for proving infringement.

VI. Recent Developments and Case Law

Philippine courts have increasingly recognized the value of intellectual property rights and the need to enforce these rights robustly. Case law has underscored the importance of protecting copyrighted works, especially in the digital realm, where infringement is rampant. Court decisions have provided guidance on handling complex issues like:

• Determining substantial similarity for digital works and software.
• Considering economic harm in assessing damages.
• Applying the fair use doctrine for cases involving educational and transformative purposes.

The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) has also enhanced its role by collaborating with other agencies to combat online piracy, highlighting the importance of IP enforcement in the digital age.

VII. Conclusion

Copyright infringement in the Philippines is a multifaceted area of law governed by strict procedural requirements, diverse forms of infringement, and complex defenses. Philippine courts and the IPO continue to uphold the protection of copyright holders while balancing the interests of public access, creativity, and technological advancement. Copyright owners should diligently protect their rights through registration, licensing, and vigilant monitoring, while infringers should be aware that the legal consequences of copyright infringement can be severe and far-reaching.