Kinds of Partnership | General Provisions | Partnerships | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Kinds of Partnership: An In-Depth Analysis

In the context of Philippine mercantile and taxation laws, partnerships are a fundamental business structure. Various types of partnerships exist, each governed by specific provisions under the Civil Code of the Philippines, primarily Articles 1767 to 1827. The distinctions among these partnerships impact their legal, tax, and financial obligations, making it essential for business owners and legal professionals to understand their nuances.

Here is a meticulous breakdown of the kinds of partnerships in Philippine law:

---

1. As to Duration

Partnerships may vary in terms of their intended period of existence:

• Partnership at Will: This type of partnership exists for an indefinite period, continuing until any partner decides to dissolve it. Partners in a partnership at will do not have a specified end date for the partnership’s activities, giving them flexibility to manage and dissolve the partnership as they wish.

• Partnership with a Fixed Term: In contrast, a partnership with a fixed term is established with a predetermined period or for the accomplishment of a specific undertaking. Once the specified term expires or the goal is achieved, the partnership dissolves automatically unless the partners decide to extend it.

2. As to Object

The object or purpose of the partnership also categorizes it into the following types:

• Universal Partnership: This partnership type can be further divided into:

  • Universal Partnership of All Present Property: Partners contribute all properties they currently own to the partnership. Profits and losses generated from these properties are shared among partners. However, property acquired after the formation of the partnership is not included unless expressly agreed upon.
  • Universal Partnership of Profits: Partners pool only the income or profits from their properties, while the actual ownership of these assets remains individual to each partner. In this arrangement, only the profits are shared among the partners.

• Particular Partnership: This partnership is formed for a specific purpose or project. It typically exists only until the completion of the specific undertaking for which it was formed. For example, a construction partnership formed solely for the purpose of building a single structure would fall under this category.

3. As to Liability of Partners

Liability refers to the extent of personal responsibility that partners bear for the debts and obligations of the partnership:

• General Partnership: In a general partnership, all partners have unlimited liability. This means that each partner’s personal assets may be used to cover the partnership’s debts if the partnership’s assets are insufficient. In general partnerships, all partners also have equal rights to participate in the management of the business.

• Limited Partnership: A limited partnership consists of one or more general partners, who assume full liability, and one or more limited partners, whose liability is restricted to their capital contributions. Limited partners are usually passive investors and do not participate in management. This structure allows passive investors to mitigate personal financial risk while allowing active partners to manage the enterprise.

4. As to Legality of Existence

Legality of existence dictates the recognition and enforceability of the partnership under the law:

• De Jure Partnership: This partnership has fully complied with all legal requirements for formation and is recognized as a legal entity. A de jure partnership can enforce its rights and conduct business as a lawful entity.

• De Facto Partnership: In contrast, a de facto partnership has not completed all formal requirements, yet it operates in practice as a partnership. While such a partnership may still be recognized by courts for certain purposes, it lacks the same legal protection and authority as a de jure partnership.

5. As to Representation to Others

This classification is based on whether the partnership is known to the public:

• Ordinary or Open Partnership: An ordinary partnership is publicly acknowledged and conducts business openly under its partnership name. All partners are known to the public.

• Secret Partnership: In a secret partnership, one or more partners’ involvement is not disclosed to the public. Such partnerships may arise for various strategic reasons, often related to confidentiality or competitive advantage.

6. As to the Form of Contribution

The contribution form can also define a partnership:

• Capital Partnership: In this type, partners primarily contribute money or property, emphasizing the capital investment aspect.

• Industrial Partnership: Here, one or more partners contribute labor or services instead of capital. Industrial partners contribute their skills or expertise to the partnership rather than financial assets.

7. As to Ownership of Partnership Property

This classification addresses the ownership and use of property within the partnership:

• Ordinary Partnership: Property contributed or acquired by the partnership is commonly owned by all partners in proportion to their shares.

• Joint Venture: This is a specific form of partnership aimed at a particular project or transaction, often without a permanent or continuous business arrangement. Joint ventures are typically dissolved upon completion of the venture or specific project, and ownership of assets is often on a project-specific basis rather than shared.

8. Tax Implications Based on Partnership Type

Under Philippine law, partnerships are generally classified as corporations for tax purposes, except for certain joint ventures or consortia specifically excluded under Section 22 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC). The types of partnerships discussed above may vary in tax treatment, particularly when involving foreign entities or capital partnerships, depending on the revenue generated and activities conducted.

• Ordinary Partnerships: These partnerships are subject to the regular corporate income tax rate of 30%, and withholding taxes apply to certain transactions.
• Joint Ventures and Consortia: As long as a joint venture or consortium qualifies for an exemption under Section 22(B) of the NIRC, it is not classified as a corporation and is thus exempt from income tax.

---

Conclusion

The classification of partnerships in the Philippines is integral to understanding the rights, obligations, liabilities, and tax treatments of each type. Entrepreneurs and legal practitioners should carefully consider these classifications to select the most appropriate partnership type for their objectives and compliance requirements. Each type has distinct implications, especially concerning liability, control, tax treatment, and the partnership's eventual dissolution.

Partnership by Estoppel | General Provisions | Partnerships | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Partnership by Estoppel under Philippine Law: Detailed Overview

1. Concept and Legal Basis

Partnership by estoppel arises when a person represents themselves as a partner, or consents to others doing so, without having formalized an actual partnership. Under Philippine law, this doctrine prevents such a person from denying the existence of a partnership if third parties have relied on this representation. The principle is embedded in Article 1825 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, which establishes the following conditions for a partnership by estoppel:

"When a person, by words spoken or written or by conduct, represents himself, or consents to another representing him to anyone, as a partner in an existing partnership or with one or more persons not actually partners, he is liable to any such person to whom such representation has been made, who has, on the faith of such representation, given credit to the actual or apparent partnership."

2. Elements of Partnership by Estoppel

For a partnership by estoppel to apply, several key elements must be present:

• Representation: There must be an explicit or implicit representation that a partnership exists. This can be through verbal statements, written documents, or conduct implying partnership status.
• Consent: The person claimed to be a partner must have either represented themselves as such or consented to others representing them as a partner.
• Reliance by Third Parties: A third party must rely on this representation when extending credit or entering into a business transaction, believing the represented partnership status to be genuine.
• Detrimental Reliance: The third party should have acted on the belief of the partnership’s existence and faced potential or actual harm due to this reliance.

3. Legal Effects and Liability

Partnership by estoppel imposes certain liabilities on the person who misrepresented themselves as a partner. These effects include:

• Joint and Several Liability: When third parties extend credit based on the representation of partnership, those represented as partners, including the person who gave consent, become liable for debts and obligations as if they were actual partners.
• Extent of Liability: Liability is limited to the scope of the representation. For example, if a person represented themselves as a partner in a specific transaction, their liability may be limited to that transaction.
• Reimbursement Rights: If a person incurs liability due to another’s representation, they may have the right to seek reimbursement from the person who misrepresented the partnership.

4. Types of Partnership by Estoppel

Partnership by estoppel may arise in two general contexts:

• Estoppel of a Non-Partner: A person falsely claims partnership or consents to such a claim by another. This form applies when an individual is not a partner but represents themselves, or allows representation, as one.
• Estoppel within an Existing Partnership: When an existing partnership permits someone who is not an actual partner to be represented as one. Here, liability extends to both the partnership and the individual who represented the third party as a partner.

5. Illustrative Cases in Philippine Jurisprudence

Philippine jurisprudence has clarified the scope and application of partnership by estoppel in various decisions:

• Third-Party Reliance as Crucial Element: Courts often underscore that third-party reliance on the partnership representation is essential. Without reliance, a claim of estoppel typically fails.
• Protection of Innocent Third Parties: The doctrine of partnership by estoppel aims to protect third parties who reasonably believe in the partnership’s existence, ensuring they can claim damages or enforce obligations against the represented “partners.”
• Joint and Several Liability in Representations: In cases where the represented partnership status leads to liability, courts have ruled on joint liability, emphasizing the equitable principle that “partners” by estoppel cannot evade obligations.

6. Defenses Against Partnership by Estoppel Claims

Persons accused of holding themselves out as partners or consenting to such representation can argue against claims of partnership by estoppel by proving:

• Lack of Representation: Demonstrating that no express or implied representation of partnership status was made.
• Absence of Consent: Showing they did not consent to any representations made by others.
• Lack of Reliance by Third Parties: Establishing that third parties did not actually rely on any partnership representations when conducting transactions.

7. Conclusion and Practical Implications

Partnership by estoppel plays a vital role in safeguarding transactional integrity and holding individuals accountable for their representations in business relationships. It reinforces the importance of clear, honest representations in commercial dealings and protects third parties who engage in transactions based on such representations.

Separate Juridical Personality | General Provisions | Partnerships | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Separate Juridical Personality of Partnerships in the Philippines

Overview

In Philippine law, a partnership is recognized as a separate juridical entity distinct from the individuals who compose it. This concept, known as "separate juridical personality," is fundamental in determining a partnership's capacity to enter contracts, own property, incur obligations, and be sued or sue in its own name. The legal foundation for the separate juridical personality of partnerships is enshrined in the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386), specifically in Articles 1767–1829.

---

Legal Basis: Civil Code of the Philippines

Article 1768 of the Civil Code expressly provides that a partnership "has a juridical personality separate and distinct from that of each of the partners." This distinction is crucial because it allows the partnership to act as a separate "legal person," having rights, obligations, and responsibilities distinct from those of its individual partners. This separate personality becomes operative upon the establishment of the partnership, which occurs when there is an agreement to contribute money, property, or industry to a common fund with the intention of dividing profits among the partners (Article 1767).

---

Key Implications of Separate Juridical Personality

The concept of separate juridical personality affects various aspects of the partnership, including liability, ownership, legal standing, and taxation.

1. Ownership of Property

   • As a separate legal entity, a partnership can acquire and own property under its name. Article 1811 of the Civil Code states that property contributed by partners to the partnership becomes the property of the partnership itself, not of the individual partners. This means that partners do not own specific partnership property in their individual capacities but rather share in the profits and losses arising from such property.

2. Liability of the Partnership vs. Liability of Partners

   • With a separate juridical personality, the partnership itself can incur liabilities, which are enforceable against its assets rather than against the personal assets of the partners. However, under Article 1816, partners are jointly and severally liable with the partnership for obligations arising from its conduct or representation. In practical terms, creditors must first exhaust partnership assets before pursuing individual partners.

3. Capacity to Enter into Contracts and Legal Actions

   • A partnership, as a juridical person, can sue and be sued in its own name. This capacity allows the partnership to enforce its rights and defend its interests independently of its partners. For instance, under Article 1822, a partnership can bring legal action in its own capacity for breaches of contracts or tortious acts committed against it.

4. Dissolution and Continuity of the Partnership

   • The separate juridical personality of a partnership also provides continuity to its business operations, as the existence of the partnership does not automatically cease upon the withdrawal or death of a partner. Article 1828 of the Civil Code specifies that dissolution occurs upon specific events, such as a partner’s withdrawal or the express will of the partners, but the partnership may continue under certain conditions if the remaining partners agree to carry on the business.

5. Tax Implications

   • From a taxation perspective, the recognition of a partnership as a separate entity affects how it is taxed under the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC). General partnerships are treated as corporations for income tax purposes under Section 22(B) of the NIRC, which states that "a partnership, no matter how created or organized" is taxable as a corporation. As a result, the partnership must file income tax returns and pay corporate income tax on its net income.
   • However, unlike corporations, which are taxed at the corporate level and on dividends paid to shareholders, partners are taxed on their distributive shares of income from the partnership, even if such income is not actually distributed. This "pass-through" tax treatment prevents double taxation but recognizes the partnership as a taxpayer entity with obligations to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).

---

Special Rules on Partnerships and Separate Juridical Personality

1. Limited Partnerships

   • In a limited partnership, only the general partners have management rights, while limited partners are merely investors and are only liable up to their capital contributions. However, the limited partnership itself retains a separate juridical personality from both the general and limited partners.

2. Joint Ventures

   • While joint ventures in the Philippines are similar to partnerships, they are sometimes treated differently, especially in taxation and regulation. Nonetheless, joint ventures that satisfy the requirements under the Civil Code may be deemed partnerships, thus assuming a separate juridical personality.

3. General Professional Partnerships

   • General professional partnerships (GPPs) are a unique exception under the NIRC. While they are treated as partnerships for civil law purposes, they are not subject to income tax at the partnership level. Instead, income tax is imposed on the partners themselves. This unique treatment is due to the specific nature of professional services, where the primary income-earning activity relies heavily on individual partners' expertise and personal labor.

---

Case Law on Separate Juridical Personality of Partnerships

Philippine jurisprudence has repeatedly upheld the separate juridical personality of partnerships in various legal and financial contexts.

1. Nava v. Peers Marketing Corporation (G.R. No. 160422)

   • In this case, the Supreme Court reiterated that a partnership has a juridical personality separate from its partners. This decision highlighted the distinct rights of partnerships in contractual relations, where obligations are enforceable against the partnership rather than the partners individually.

2. Heirs of Tan Eng Kee v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 126881)

   • The Supreme Court clarified the definition and characteristics of a partnership and emphasized that the existence of a partnership is distinct from the personal capacities of the individuals involved, underscoring the juridical personality concept.

3. Testate Estate of Mota v. Serra (G.R. No. L-20241)

   • This case emphasized the separateness of partnership assets from those of its partners, particularly in estate proceedings, where the heirs of a deceased partner could not claim specific partnership property as part of the estate. Instead, the deceased partner's interest in the partnership became part of the estate, reinforcing the separate legal personality principle.

---

Practical Implications for Partners and Partnerships

1. Liability Protection

   • The separate juridical personality provides a measure of liability protection to individual partners, especially in the context of debt repayment and contract enforcement. Creditors of the partnership cannot directly attach personal properties of the partners without first exhausting partnership assets.

2. Asset Management and Transfer

   • Because the partnership owns its assets independently of the partners, asset management is more streamlined, especially during changes in partnership composition. When partners withdraw or new partners join, the partnership’s assets do not automatically revert to or become the property of individual partners but remain with the partnership.

3. Continuity of Business Operations

   • The juridical personality of a partnership enables it to operate continuously even when individual partners come and go, ensuring stability and continuity for ongoing business relationships and contracts.

---

Conclusion

The separate juridical personality of partnerships is a well-established legal doctrine in Philippine law, with significant implications on the ownership of property, liability, taxation, and operational continuity of business organizations. This doctrine underscores the partnership’s capacity to act and exist independently from its individual members, fostering a structured approach to business and liability management. Recognizing a partnership as a separate juridical entity aligns with the policy of the Civil Code and tax laws, which view partnerships as distinct legal entities capable of holding rights, fulfilling obligations, and assuming responsibilities in their own right.

Rules to Determine Existence | General Provisions | Partnerships | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Under Philippine law, partnerships are governed by the Civil Code of the Philippines (Articles 1767-1867), and specific provisions related to the existence of a partnership are delineated under these articles, along with case law and interpretations. Determining the existence of a partnership is critical, as it affects both the rights and liabilities of individuals involved, as well as tax implications and legal responsibilities. Below is a detailed explanation of the general provisions and rules used to determine the existence of a partnership under Philippine law:

1. Definition and Nature of a Partnership

• Article 1767 of the Civil Code defines a partnership as a contract where "two or more persons bind themselves to contribute money, property, or industry to a common fund, with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves."
• This contract creates a distinct legal personality separate from that of the partners, with the partnership entity capable of owning property, incurring obligations, and enjoying certain rights.
• A partnership can exist independently of the formalities usually required for a corporation or similar business organization and is based on the intent and actions of the parties.

2. Determining the Existence of a Partnership

Determining whether a partnership exists is not solely dependent on a written agreement but can be established based on circumstances and conduct. The courts rely on certain rules to determine the existence of a partnership, even in the absence of formal documentation.

a. Intent to Form a Partnership

• Intent is fundamental in establishing a partnership. Courts examine whether the parties intended to enter into a partnership, as evidenced by contributions, mutual control, and the sharing of profits and losses.
• The law does not require that the agreement be in writing unless it involves the partnership property, contributions exceeding PHP 3,000, or partnership duration exceeding one year. However, the lack of a written agreement does not preclude the existence of a partnership if the intention can be inferred from the parties' conduct.

b. Contribution of Money, Property, or Industry

• Partners must contribute money, property, or industry to a common fund. The contribution could be in the form of capital, assets, skills, or labor, demonstrating a commitment to the business.
• Contributions differentiate partnerships from other forms of business agreements where parties might collaborate without pooling resources or sharing control.

c. Division of Profits and Losses

• The division of profits (and losses, unless agreed otherwise) among parties is a hallmark of a partnership. Article 1769(4) provides that the receipt of a share of profits is prima facie evidence of partnership.
• An agreement to divide profits without a corresponding responsibility to share losses, or a lack of agreement on profit-sharing, does not establish a partnership.

d. Existence of Mutual Agency

• One of the most important characteristics of a partnership is mutual agency, where each partner acts as both a principal and an agent of the partnership and other partners. This agency relationship gives each partner the authority to bind the partnership within the scope of the business.
• Article 1818 states that partners may bind the partnership, making mutual agency a crucial indicator. If mutual agency exists, it strongly supports the presence of a partnership.

e. Common Fund or Joint Property

• The pooling of resources to create a "common fund" is a strong indicator. Partners must contribute to this fund, which is then used for the benefit of the business.
• This aspect distinguishes partnerships from co-ownership arrangements where resources are not pooled or do not serve a collective commercial purpose.

f. Formalities and Documentary Evidence

• The partnership agreement should ideally be in writing, especially when certain legal or practical factors, such as tax registration, arise.
• Articles of partnership must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) if the capital exceeds PHP 3,000. However, non-registration does not invalidate a partnership; it merely impacts its legality for tax and regulatory compliance purposes.

3. Prima Facie Evidence of Partnership

• Article 1769 lays out scenarios where the presence of certain indicators can establish prima facie evidence of a partnership.
• A partnership is presumed if a person receives a share of profits unless it can be shown that the profits were received in another capacity (e.g., as a loan repayment, wages, annuity, interest on a loan, or payment for the sale of goodwill).

4. Partnership by Estoppel

• If parties act in such a way that they represent themselves as partners to third parties, they may be estopped from denying the existence of a partnership.
• Article 1825 explains that when a person, by conduct or representation, induces others to believe in the existence of a partnership, they can be held liable as if a partnership existed, even if no formal partnership agreement is in place.

5. Legal Effects and Implications of Partnership Existence

• The existence of a partnership affects liability, taxation, and the rights of the parties. Partners are jointly and severally liable for obligations incurred in the course of the partnership's business, meaning personal assets may be at risk.
• Partnerships are subject to specific taxation rules under the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) and must register with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), file tax returns, and pay applicable taxes.
• The partnership’s separate legal personality provides distinct legal standing in matters of property ownership, contracts, and liabilities.

6. Case Law Interpretations

• Philippine courts have further clarified the factors indicative of a partnership. Key cases illustrate that even without a formal document, consistent profit-sharing, pooled resources, and the conduct of business with a unified purpose can establish a de facto partnership.
• Courts often consider the existence of mutual agency, contributions to a common fund, and profit-sharing as decisive indicators of partnership, emphasizing substance over form.

7. Differentiation from Co-ownership

• Co-ownership, as described under Article 484 of the Civil Code, differs from a partnership in that co-owners do not necessarily share profits and losses and are not mutual agents.
• Partners have a legal duty to advance the partnership's interests, while co-owners are only bound to respect each other's ownership rights.
• In co-ownership, each owner has an independent right to sell their interest, whereas in a partnership, a partner cannot sell their interest without the consent of other partners unless otherwise agreed.

Summary

In summary, the existence of a partnership under Philippine law is determined by assessing the intention of the parties, their contributions, profit-sharing arrangement, mutual agency, and establishment of a common fund. Philippine law adopts a broad interpretation that considers both formal agreements and circumstantial evidence to establish a partnership, with the courts emphasizing the actual conduct of the parties over strict formalities. Partnerships are thus recognized if the essential characteristics are present, impacting both their legal and tax obligations.

Definition and Separate Juridical Personality | General Provisions | Partnerships | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

I. Business Organizations > B. Partnerships > 1. General Provisions > a. Definition and Separate Juridical Personality

In Philippine law, partnerships are governed by the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386), specifically under Title IX of Book IV, which provides the definition, essential elements, and rights attached to partnerships. Partnerships are also considered business organizations with unique legal characteristics distinct from other business entities. Here’s an in-depth analysis of each pertinent provision and principle related to partnerships under Philippine law, with emphasis on their definition and separate juridical personality.

---

1. Definition of a Partnership

Under Article 1767 of the Civil Code, a partnership is defined as a contract where two or more persons bind themselves to contribute money, property, or industry to a common fund, with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves. The essential characteristics of a partnership, as specified in this provision, are:

• Contractual Nature: A partnership arises from a mutual agreement between the partners. There must be a valid consent, object, and cause (as in any contract) for it to be enforceable.
• Contribution to Common Fund: Each partner contributes either money, property, or industry (labor) to a common fund.
• Purpose of Sharing Profits: The primary purpose of a partnership is to generate profits, which must be divided among the partners. Notably, if the purpose does not involve profit (e.g., for a charity), it is not considered a partnership under the Civil Code.

It’s worth noting that the partnership agreement does not need to be in writing, except in cases where real property is contributed, per Article 1771.

---

2. Separate Juridical Personality of Partnerships

A partnership has a separate juridical personality distinct from its individual partners, according to Article 1768 of the Civil Code. This separate personality means that the partnership is treated as a distinct legal entity, allowing it to:

• Enter into contracts
• Own and acquire property independently from its partners
• Sue and be sued in its own name

The separate personality of the partnership also implies that any obligations or liabilities incurred by the partnership belong to the partnership itself, rather than directly to the partners. This separate identity serves as a safeguard, protecting individual partners from personal liability beyond their respective contributions, except in cases of general partners in general partnerships, where liability can be more direct.

---

3. Essential Elements of a Partnership

To be considered a valid partnership, it must satisfy the following elements:

• Legality of the Object: The partnership’s objective must be lawful. Any partnership established for an illegal purpose is void ab initio.
• Consent: All parties must agree to form a partnership, binding themselves to fulfill its obligations.
• Division of Profits: A critical feature of the partnership structure is the intent to share profits. This distinguishes it from other contractual relationships such as joint ventures, corporations, and other business organizations.

Failure to meet these criteria disqualifies a relationship from being classified as a partnership.

---

4. Types of Partnerships in Terms of Personality and Liability

Partnerships can vary based on their liability structures:

• General Partnership: All partners have unlimited liability and are jointly responsible for the partnership’s debts. This structure affects each partner’s personal assets and requires a high level of trust.
• Limited Partnership: Under Articles 1843-1867 of the Civil Code, limited partnerships include general partners (with unlimited liability) and limited partners (whose liability is confined to their capital contribution). Limited partners cannot participate in management, as doing so would expose them to unlimited liability.

The separate juridical personality of both types enables them to engage in legal activities and own assets, creating a buffer for limited partners in a limited partnership.

---

5. Effects of Separate Juridical Personality on Partnership Obligations

The Civil Code outlines how the partnership’s separate personality impacts its obligations and legal rights:

• Ownership of Partnership Property: Article 1770 specifies that the partnership itself, not the partners individually, owns property contributed to or acquired by the partnership. This aligns with the principle of separate juridical personality.
• Liability for Obligations: Article 1816 clarifies that the partnership bears liability for its obligations primarily. Partners in a general partnership are subsidiarily liable, while partners in a limited partnership are liable only to the extent of their contribution unless otherwise agreed.
• Right to Bring Suit: Because it is a separate juridical person, a partnership can sue or be sued independently of its partners. Any legal action involving the partnership, however, may still impact the personal interests of the general partners due to the nature of their liability.

---

6. Partnership Registration and Formation

While a partnership can exist without formal registration, Article 1772 requires registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when the contribution amounts to or exceeds PHP 3,000. However, a partnership's juridical personality is not dependent upon SEC registration; rather, it exists upon the establishment of the partnership contract (mutual consent and agreement).

Registration of the partnership primarily aids in gaining public recognition, safeguarding the rights of partners, and providing transparency to third parties regarding the partnership’s terms and conditions.

---

7. Dissolution, Winding Up, and Termination of Partnership

When a partnership dissolves, its separate juridical personality persists solely for purposes of liquidation. Article 1828 of the Civil Code states that the dissolution marks the cessation of partnership activities but does not immediately dissolve its separate juridical identity until its affairs are fully settled. Only upon full liquidation does the partnership’s separate personality cease, enabling the equitable distribution of its remaining assets.

---

8. Tax Implications of Partnership’s Separate Personality

Under Philippine law, a partnership is taxed as a corporation and required to file corporate income tax returns, pursuant to Section 27 of the Tax Code (NIRC). However, General Professional Partnerships (GPPs), such as law firms and accounting firms, are not subjected to corporate income tax but are instead taxed through the individual partners, who declare their share in the partnership’s income on their personal tax returns. This unique tax treatment stems from the professional nature of their services, distinguishing GPPs from other partnerships in terms of tax liabilities.

---

Conclusion

The partnership structure in the Philippines, as defined under the Civil Code, relies heavily on its separate juridical personality as a core feature that protects and distinguishes it from the partners’ individual liabilities and interests. Through legal recognition as a distinct entity, partnerships enjoy flexibility in owning property, entering into contracts, and shouldering liability, creating a robust framework for business operations where partners can contribute resources collectively while sharing profits and minimizing direct personal risk, particularly for limited partners.

General Provisions | Partnerships | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

I. BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

B. Partnerships

1. General Provisions

The legal framework governing partnerships in the Philippines falls under the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386), specifically in Articles 1767 to 1867. These provisions detail the formation, existence, rights, obligations, and dissolution of partnerships, providing a basis for understanding partnerships’ nature, structure, and legal implications within Philippine law.

---

A. Definition of Partnership

Article 1767 defines a partnership as a contract where two or more persons bind themselves to contribute money, property, or industry to a common fund, with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves. The partnership is distinguished from other types of business organizations by its mutual contributions, sharing of profits, and collective management.

Key aspects include:

1. Contribution Requirement: Partners must contribute either money, property, or industry. The nature of these contributions impacts their rights and obligations within the partnership.
2. Profit Motive: The partnership exists primarily to earn and divide profits, distinguishing it from organizations or entities formed solely for charitable or non-profit purposes.
3. Legal Entity: Once a partnership is formed, it is considered a separate legal entity. It can own property, enter contracts, and sue or be sued under its name.

---

B. Types of Partnerships

1. Based on Object

• Universal Partnership: Consists of a universal partnership of all present property or a universal partnership of profits.
• Particular Partnership: Formed for a specific purpose or to undertake a specific venture.

2. Based on Duration

• Partnership at Will: Exists until terminated by any of the partners.
• Partnership with a Fixed Term: Exists for a period agreed upon by the partners.

3. Based on Liability

• General Partnership: All partners have unlimited liability for partnership debts.
• Limited Partnership: There are general partners with unlimited liability and limited partners whose liability is restricted to their capital contributions.

---

C. Formalities and Registration of Partnership

Article 1771 states that a partnership may exist even if no specific formalities are observed, though certain types of partnerships require specific documentation.

1. Partnerships with Capital Exceeding P3,000:

   • Partnerships with a capital exceeding PHP 3,000 must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as mandated under Article 1772. Failure to register does not invalidate the partnership but limits certain legal rights and protections, such as pursuing certain legal actions.

2. Partnership Agreement:

   • While not mandatory, it is recommended for partners to execute a formal partnership agreement detailing rights, duties, and provisions for the operation of the partnership.

---

D. Rights and Obligations of Partners

The rights and obligations of partners vary depending on their contributions, roles, and the specific terms of the partnership agreement.

1. Mutual Agency

• Each partner acts as an agent of the partnership and can bind the partnership within the scope of the partnership business (Article 1818). Limitations on this agency must be expressly agreed upon.

2. Right to Participate in Management

• General partners typically have the right to participate in management, unless otherwise stated in the partnership agreement. In a limited partnership, limited partners have no management rights.

3. Right to Share in Profits and Losses

• Partners share in the profits and losses as per the partnership agreement or, in its absence, equally. If one partner contributes only industry (labor/skills), that partner does not share in the losses.

4. Fiduciary Duty

• Partners owe a fiduciary duty to each other and must act with the utmost good faith and loyalty. Partners cannot benefit at the expense of the partnership.

---

E. Capital Contributions

Partners may contribute:

1. Money: This is a monetary contribution to the partnership fund.
2. Property: Assets such as land, equipment, or intellectual property may be contributed, with ownership transferred to the partnership.
3. Industry: Skills, knowledge, or services may be contributed; however, partners contributing only industry do not bear losses unless agreed otherwise.

F. Partnership Property

The property of the partnership is separate from the personal assets of the partners. Under Article 1811, partnership property cannot be used for personal transactions of partners, reinforcing the concept of the partnership as a separate entity.

---

G. Liability of Partners

1. Unlimited Liability in General Partnerships

• Partners in a general partnership have joint and unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, meaning personal assets can be used to satisfy partnership debts.

2. Limited Liability for Limited Partners

• In a limited partnership, limited partners are only liable up to their contribution, while general partners retain unlimited liability.

3. Partnership’s Liability

• The partnership itself is liable first for debts and obligations before partners’ individual assets are reached.

H. Dissolution and Winding Up

1. Causes of Dissolution

• Article 1830 provides several causes for partnership dissolution, including the expiration of the term, achievement of the partnership’s specific purpose, mutual agreement, or insolvency of any partner.

2. Winding Up

• After dissolution, the partnership must “wind up” its affairs, settling debts, and distributing any remaining assets among partners. The priority of distribution follows the Civil Code’s prescribed order: payment of creditors, reimbursement of partners’ contributions, and distribution of remaining assets as profits.

I. Taxation of Partnerships

Partnerships are generally treated as corporations for tax purposes, following Section 27 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC), and thus subject to corporate income tax.

1. Income Tax

   • Partnerships are taxed as corporations on their income. Distributions to partners are treated as dividends and subject to the applicable withholding tax.

2. Exempt Partnerships

   • Certain partnerships are exempt from corporate income tax, such as General Professional Partnerships (GPPs) where income is attributed directly to the partners.

3. Withholding Taxes

   • Partnerships are also subject to withholding taxes on payments made to employees and other entities.

---

J. Limited Liability Partnerships (LLP)

While traditional partnerships are the norm, the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines has introduced concepts allowing limited liability for certain professional partnerships. Such provisions are aligned with international standards, permitting LLP structures for professional firms in particular industries. However, Philippine law maintains a distinction by limiting LLP applications to specific professions or under certain conditions.

---

This overview of the General Provisions on Partnerships under Philippine law provides a comprehensive guide to understanding the formation, operation, and dissolution of partnerships. Legal counsel is advisable for compliance, especially in registration, tax matters, and drafting partnership agreements.