Grounds to Impugn Filiation | Illegitimate Children | Paternity and Filiation | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

Grounds to Impugn Filiation for Illegitimate Children Under Philippine Law

In Philippine Civil Law, under the Family Code, the matter of paternity and filiation encompasses the legal rules and procedures related to the parentage of children. For illegitimate children, specific grounds exist by which a putative relationship between the father and child may be contested. This guide discusses the grounds to impugn filiation of illegitimate children in the Philippines, providing comprehensive insights.

1. Understanding Filiation of Illegitimate Children

Filiation pertains to the legal status of a child in relation to his or her parents, including rights, duties, and inheritance. A child is considered illegitimate when he or she is born out of wedlock, except when subsequently legitimated by the marriage of the parents (Article 177, Family Code of the Philippines).

For illegitimate children, the Family Code grants certain rights but delineates these rights differently from those of legitimate children. Notably, an illegitimate child has the right to use the surname of the mother, receive support, and inherit in accordance with the law.

2. Establishment and Impugnation of Filiation for Illegitimate Children

Filiation of illegitimate children can be established through:

• Voluntary recognition by the father or mother
• Evidence (such as records or acts that indicate acknowledgment)

However, filiation may also be challenged, primarily through judicial means, to dispute the paternity of the child.

3. Legal Grounds for Impugning Filiation of Illegitimate Children

To contest the paternity of an illegitimate child, specific legal grounds are available. These grounds are narrowly construed and must be substantiated through evidence due to the impact of paternity challenges on the child’s legal status and rights. The grounds typically include the following:

• Impossibility of Physical Access: If the alleged father can demonstrate that it was physically impossible for him to have had access to the mother during the time of conception (such as due to geographic separation, detention, or hospitalization), the presumption of paternity may be impugned.

• Proof of Non-Paternity: The use of DNA evidence or other scientific means to establish non-paternity is a recognized ground. In cases where the alleged father presents DNA evidence indicating that he is not biologically related to the child, this may suffice to impugn paternity.

• Other Evidentiary Grounds: Evidence demonstrating fraudulent or mistaken acknowledgment of paternity may be presented. This includes situations where acknowledgment was based on coercion, misrepresentation, or significant factual error.

4. Judicial Proceedings to Impugn Filiation

In the Philippines, challenging the filiation of an illegitimate child requires a formal judicial proceeding. The individual seeking to impugn the filiation must file a petition with the appropriate Regional Trial Court, presenting the grounds and evidence to support the claim. The court will then assess the evidence, including any scientific tests, witness testimony, and documentary proof.

• Burden of Proof: The petitioner, typically the putative father or his legal representatives, carries the burden of proof. This requires clear, convincing, and admissible evidence to overcome the presumption of paternity if such a presumption exists.

• Standard of Evidence: Courts generally require a high standard of evidence to disturb an established or presumed relationship, particularly where the child’s rights and interests are at stake.

5. Statutory and Jurisprudential Limitations

While grounds exist to impugn filiation, there are limitations:

• Time Limits for Impugning Filiation: Generally, there is a period within which paternity may be challenged. This period depends on factors such as whether paternity was established voluntarily or by presumption.
• Estoppel and Laches: If the alleged father has acted in a manner consistent with the recognition of paternity over a significant period, he may be estopped from denying it later. For instance, the continuous provision of support or public acknowledgment of the child may prevent subsequent impugnation of filiation.
• Best Interest of the Child: Courts in the Philippines are mandated to prioritize the child’s welfare. Even where grounds for impugning filiation are present, if the court finds that such a determination would not serve the child’s best interests, it may weigh heavily on the decision.

6. Effects of Impugning Filiation

If the court grants a petition to impugn the filiation of an illegitimate child:

• Loss of Rights: The child may lose certain rights related to the putative father, including the right to use his surname, receive support, and inherit property.
• Amendment of Civil Records: Civil registry documents may need to be amended to reflect the ruling, particularly if the child's birth certificate lists the impugned father.
• Psychological Impact: Courts recognize the emotional and psychological implications of an impugned filiation, especially for the child. Therefore, careful consideration is given to the welfare of the child.

7. Recent Developments and Jurisprudence on Impugnation of Filiation

The Supreme Court has addressed cases of impugning filiation, balancing the constitutional rights of individuals, parental rights, and the welfare of the child. Philippine jurisprudence increasingly acknowledges DNA testing as a valid basis to challenge filiation, consistent with the aim of ensuring that legal determinations of paternity reflect biological truth while considering procedural fairness.

8. Conclusion

The grounds to impugn filiation of illegitimate children in the Philippines are defined under the Family Code and clarified by judicial decisions. Those seeking to challenge filiation must meet the strict evidentiary and procedural requirements laid down by law to protect the rights and welfare of the child involved.

Rights of Illegitimate Children – R.A. No. 9255 | Illegitimate Children | Paternity and Filiation | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

Under Philippine law, specifically under Republic Act No. 9255, illegitimate children possess particular rights, especially regarding their relationships with and entitlements from their biological parents. Here’s a meticulous breakdown of the law as it applies to paternity and filiation, specifically in relation to illegitimate children and their rights:

1. Background of R.A. No. 9255

Republic Act No. 9255 was enacted to amend Article 176 of the Family Code of the Philippines. Before R.A. No. 9255, an illegitimate child could only use the surname of their mother, thus creating a distinction between legitimate and illegitimate children based on surname usage. This amendment, signed into law on February 24, 2004, allows illegitimate children to use the surname of their biological father under specific conditions.

2. Key Provisions of R.A. No. 9255 on the Rights of Illegitimate Children

a. Right to Use the Father’s Surname

• Article 176, as Amended by R.A. No. 9255: Under this law, an illegitimate child can now use the surname of the father if he/she is expressly recognized by the father.
• Conditions for the Use of the Father’s Surname: The father must acknowledge the child through a public document (such as an affidavit of acknowledgment or recognition) or a private handwritten instrument that the father personally signed.

b. Legal Procedure for Registering the Father’s Surname

• If the father acknowledges the child after the child’s birth has been registered, the change of the child’s surname must follow the process established by the Office of the Civil Registrar-General under the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of R.A. No. 9255.
• Administrative Requirements: The child’s birth certificate must be annotated to reflect the change of surname, and supporting documents such as the father’s affidavit of acknowledgment are required.

c. Parental Authority

• Parental Authority over Illegitimate Children: In accordance with Article 176, even if an illegitimate child uses the father’s surname, the mother remains the sole authority over the child. She has full custodial rights unless the court decides otherwise.
• Exceptions: If the child’s welfare is at risk, the court may award custody to the father or another suitable guardian.

d. Support Obligations

• Right to Support: Illegitimate children are entitled to financial support from their biological father, in line with Articles 195 and 196 of the Family Code. This includes essential needs such as food, shelter, clothing, and medical care, based on the father’s financial capacity.
• Legal Remedy: Should the father neglect his duty to support the child, the mother or legal guardian may file a case for child support to compel compliance.
• Equity of Support: Although legitimate children may be given preference in support, illegitimate children are legally entitled to a fair portion of support.

3. Inheritance Rights of Illegitimate Children

Illegitimate children are recognized as compulsory heirs under the Civil Code, and they have the right to inherit from their biological parents, although their share is generally less than that of legitimate children.

• One-Half Share of a Legitimate Child’s Inheritance: An illegitimate child is entitled to one-half of what a legitimate child would inherit.
• No Right to Inherit from the Father’s Family: Illegitimate children do not have inheritance rights over the father’s legitimate family members, unless otherwise provided for in a will.

4. Birth Certificate Annotation and Legal Documentation Requirements

a. Annotation of the Birth Certificate

• Original Registration Requirements: When an illegitimate child is registered at birth, the child’s surname generally defaults to the mother’s. Should the father later recognize the child, the Civil Registrar must annotate the birth certificate to reflect the father’s surname.
• Court Involvement Not Required: This procedure is administrative in nature and does not require a court order if all documents are complete and valid.

b. Implementation Rules and Regulations (IRR) of R.A. No. 9255

• Compliance with IRR: The rules require that the process be completed through affidavits and documented acknowledgment forms to ensure clarity and reduce any procedural delays or disputes.

5. Additional Rights of Illegitimate Children

a. Rights to Identity and Name

• Recognition of Family Ties: Even if classified as “illegitimate,” children have the right to be acknowledged as offspring of their biological father, affecting their psychological and social well-being.

b. Non-Discrimination Clause

• Right Against Discrimination: Although there are differences in terms of parental authority and inheritance, illegitimate children are afforded protection against discrimination under various Philippine laws, including the Anti-Child Abuse Act.

c. Civil Status and Social Recognition

• The law recognizes the unique civil status of illegitimate children, and amendments like R.A. No. 9255 help align with modern views, aiming to lessen the stigma associated with illegitimacy.

6. Challenges in Implementation and Legal Recourse

a. Legal Recourse for Recognition

• Judicial Declaration: If a father refuses to recognize his illegitimate child, the child (or the mother on the child’s behalf) may seek a judicial declaration of paternity through a paternity case, which may involve evidence such as DNA testing.

b. Enforcement of Support and Inheritance Rights

• Filing for Support: Mothers of illegitimate children can file for child support through a court action if the father fails to voluntarily provide.
• Inheritance Disputes: In case of inheritance disputes, illegitimate children may file a claim as compulsory heirs to receive their rightful share under the Civil Code.

7. Summary of Practical Applications

• Acknowledgment Requirement: Fathers must formally acknowledge their illegitimate children through a written, notarized document or public acknowledgment.
• Support and Inheritance Rights: Despite the classification, illegitimate children have enforceable rights to support and inheritance.
• Procedure for Using the Father’s Surname: Administrative process through the Civil Registrar, not requiring a court order if documentation is compliant.

R.A. No. 9255 was a significant step in protecting the rights of illegitimate children by recognizing their social identity and legal rights while balancing parental obligations. It highlights the progression towards inclusivity and recognition of all children’s rights in Philippine society.

Proof of Filiation of Illegitimate Children | Illegitimate Children | Paternity and Filiation | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

In Philippine civil law, the topic of paternity and filiation, particularly regarding illegitimate children and the proof required to establish their filiation, is a critical area under the Family Code. This area is governed by both substantive and procedural guidelines. Here’s a thorough outline of the principles, legal standards, and evidentiary requirements concerning the proof of filiation of illegitimate children.

---

I. Overview of Illegitimate Filiation under Philippine Family Code

Legal Context: Illegitimate children are those born to parents who were not legally married at the time of the child’s conception or birth, or those born out of a void marriage. Their rights and duties are primarily outlined in the Family Code of the Philippines (Executive Order No. 209, as amended). The legitimacy or illegitimacy of a child is a status that affects inheritance rights, legitimacy presumptions, and other family entitlements.

---

II. Rights of Illegitimate Children

Key Rights of Illegitimate Children under the Family Code:

1. Right to Bear the Mother’s Surname: Unless recognized by the father, illegitimate children customarily bear their mother’s surname (Art. 176).
2. Right to Support and Inheritance: Illegitimate children are entitled to receive support from their parents, primarily the mother, and may inherit from both parents, although their share in inheritance is generally limited to half of what a legitimate child would receive (Art. 176).
3. Right to Recognition: The process of recognizing and proving filiation is crucial for an illegitimate child to secure rights to support and inheritance from the father.

---

III. Modes of Proving Filiation of Illegitimate Children

In Philippine law, filiation may be established by voluntary acknowledgment or through court proceedings. Article 175 of the Family Code provides guidelines for proving the filiation of illegitimate children, emphasizing that it must be established by clear and convincing evidence.

A. Voluntary Recognition by the Father

Modes of Voluntary Recognition:

1. Record of Birth: If the father’s name appears on the child’s birth certificate with his consent, this constitutes a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity.
2. Admission in a Public Document or Private Handwritten Instrument: An acknowledgment of paternity, when recorded in a public document or private handwritten document signed by the father, is sufficient to establish filiation.

---

B. Other Means of Proof in the Absence of Voluntary Recognition

If the father did not voluntarily recognize the child, the Family Code allows other methods to prove paternity and filiation:

1. Open and Continuous Possession of Status as an Illegitimate Child:

   • This is a factual showing that the father treated the child as his own in public and private life. Evidence of shared family activities, public acknowledgment of the child as a son or daughter, and consistent financial or parental support are indicators.

2. Other Means Allowed by the Rules of Evidence and Special Laws:

   • This provision allows for the admissibility of DNA testing and other scientific evidence that may conclusively establish a biological relationship between the alleged father and the child.
   • Additional indirect or circumstantial evidence, such as photographs, written communications, or testimonies from relatives, may also support claims of filiation.

---

IV. Judicial Action to Compel Recognition

If voluntary recognition is not forthcoming, an illegitimate child or the child’s mother may file an action for compulsory recognition against the putative father. Here are the key aspects to consider:

1. Proof Requirement:

   • The standard of evidence for establishing paternity in court is clear and convincing evidence. Mere suspicions or uncorroborated claims are insufficient.
   • Courts often require DNA testing when feasible, as it is the most reliable evidence of biological paternity.

2. Time Limitation:

   • Actions for the recognition of illegitimate children must be brought within a specific time frame, typically during the lifetime of the alleged father or during the child’s minority.

---

V. DNA Testing as Evidence in Filiation Cases

Importance of DNA Testing:

• DNA testing has become a significant tool for establishing paternity, particularly in cases where other forms of evidence are insufficient. Philippine courts recognize DNA evidence as highly reliable and often dispositive in determining biological relationships.
• The Supreme Court has issued guidelines that clarify the admissibility of DNA evidence in cases involving paternity disputes.

Procedural Aspects of DNA Testing:

• DNA testing may be ordered by the court either upon motion by a party or upon its initiative, where the interests of justice demand it.
• In cases where the alleged father refuses DNA testing, the court may draw an adverse inference from this refusal, depending on the surrounding circumstances.

---

VI. Effects of Recognition on Rights and Obligations

Once filiation is established, the illegitimate child gains specific rights, including:

1. Right to Use the Father’s Surname: If recognized by the father, the child may legally adopt his surname.
2. Right to Financial Support: The recognized illegitimate child can claim support proportional to the financial capacity of the father, akin to legitimate children.
3. Right to Inherit: The child is entitled to an inheritance from the father’s estate, albeit limited to half of the share that would go to a legitimate child.

---

VII. Jurisprudential Developments on Illegitimate Filiation

The Supreme Court has issued significant rulings regarding the rights of illegitimate children and the standard of proof for establishing filiation. Key rulings have emphasized:

1. The Importance of DNA Evidence: Several rulings uphold that DNA testing, when available, must be prioritized to establish paternity definitively.
2. Inferences from Refusal of Testing: In cases where a putative father refuses DNA testing without a valid reason, courts have often ruled this as indicative of paternity, aligning with the principle of justice for the child.
3. Protection of the Best Interests of the Child: Courts generally err on the side of protecting the rights of the child, allowing for all possible modes of evidence to prove filiation.

---

VIII. Conclusion

In the Philippine context, the proof of filiation of illegitimate children requires a clear and comprehensive approach. Whether through voluntary recognition, DNA testing, or continuous evidence of open and public acknowledgment, the child’s right to secure their place in the family structure is legally protected. The Family Code and subsequent jurisprudence have evolved to ensure that the child’s rights are balanced with the evidentiary requirements for establishing filiation, reflecting both the technological advancements in proving paternity and the ethical considerations for the child’s welfare.

Who are Illegitimate Children | Illegitimate Children | Paternity and Filiation | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

In Philippine law, the rules governing the status of illegitimate children are outlined primarily in the Family Code of the Philippines and Civil Code provisions that relate to family relations. This includes classifications of who are considered illegitimate children, their rights, and their legal standing in terms of family relations, particularly in the areas of paternity and filiation. Here’s a detailed exposition on this topic.

I. Definition of Illegitimate Children

Under Article 165 of the Family Code of the Philippines, illegitimate children are defined as those who are conceived and born outside a valid marriage. This encompasses children born of the following unions:

1. Non-Marital Relationships – Children born of parents who never married.
2. Bigamous or Adulterous Marriages – Children born from unions where one or both parents were already legally married to someone else at the time of conception.
3. Void Marriages – Children conceived or born of marriages that are void from the beginning, such as those involving psychological incapacity, incestuous marriages, or marriages solemnized without a license.
4. Common-Law Marriages – Children born from couples who are cohabitating without the benefit of a legally binding marriage.

II. Presumptions of Illegitimacy

The Family Code establishes certain presumptions and rules regarding legitimacy and illegitimacy:

• Article 167 states that the child shall be presumed to be legitimate unless there is evidence to the contrary, but in cases where the child’s parents are not legally married, the child is presumptively illegitimate.
• If the marriage is annulled, children conceived before the finality of the annulment are deemed legitimate, whereas those conceived or born after the annulment are considered illegitimate.

III. Rights and Obligations of Illegitimate Children

While the Family Code does not discriminate between legitimate and illegitimate children in terms of basic rights to support and inheritance, distinctions still exist:

• Right to Support: Illegitimate children are entitled to receive support from their parents and, in certain cases, from their grandparents. Support is based on Article 195 and Article 196 of the Family Code.
• Right to Inherit: Under Article 887 of the Civil Code, illegitimate children are compulsory heirs but are entitled to only half of the share of a legitimate child. This distinction in inheritance rights is significant in cases of intestate succession.
• Right to Use Surname: According to Republic Act No. 9255, an illegitimate child may use the surname of his or her biological father provided that the father recognizes the child in the manner provided by law.

IV. Modes of Establishing Filiation for Illegitimate Children

Under the Family Code, filiation (the recognition of a child as the offspring of a particular parent) can be established by:

1. Voluntary Recognition: Under Article 175 of the Family Code, a father may voluntarily recognize his illegitimate child through acts such as executing a notarized affidavit or indicating recognition in the child’s birth certificate or other public document.
2. Proof through Evidence: If voluntary recognition does not occur, Article 172 provides that filiation may be established through:
   • Public documents or written proof that expressly acknowledges the child as offspring.
   • Testimonial and other substantial evidence that shows open and continuous possession of the status of an illegitimate child.

V. Paternity and Filiation Proceedings

If paternity is contested or if a father refuses to recognize his illegitimate child, a paternity suit may be filed by the child or the mother in accordance with Article 172 and Article 175. Courts will consider evidence such as written acknowledgments, admission by the putative father, DNA evidence, and other relevant factors to determine the relationship.

VI. Rights and Privileges of Illegitimate Children under the Revised Civil Code and Family Code

Republic Act No. 9255, enacted in 2004, amended Article 176 of the Family Code, allowing illegitimate children to bear the surname of their father if the father expressly recognizes the child. In the absence of such recognition, the illegitimate child generally bears the mother’s surname.

VII. Custody and Parental Authority

Under Article 176, the mother of an illegitimate child has sole parental authority, except if the court grants parental authority to the father or if the parents agree otherwise. The mother’s parental authority includes the right to care, support, and make legal decisions on behalf of the child.

VIII. Implications of Illegitimacy in Philippine Law

1. Inheritance Rights: Although the rights of illegitimate children to inherit have been protected, there are distinctions in the amount they can inherit compared to legitimate children.
2. Survivorship Rights in the Absence of Other Heirs: In some cases, the illegitimate child may be able to inherit the full estate if there are no other compulsory heirs.

IX. Case Law and Jurisprudence

The Philippine Supreme Court has continually upheld the constitutional principle of equal protection, affirming in several decisions that the rights of illegitimate children to support, inheritance, and parental recognition should be upheld as essential rights.

Notable Cases:

• Briones v. Miguel, G.R. No. 156343 (2007): The Supreme Court upheld the right of illegitimate children to use their father’s surname, reiterating the guidelines under RA 9255.
• Estate of Uy v. Perez, G.R. No. 129406 (1999): The Court reaffirmed the right of illegitimate children to inherit from their deceased parents, though at half the share of legitimate children.

X. Recent Legislative Developments

Lawmakers have proposed bills aimed at increasing the inheritance rights of illegitimate children to be on par with those of legitimate children. These proposals reflect evolving views on the rights of children, regardless of the marital status of their parents.

XI. Conclusion

In Philippine family law, illegitimate children are afforded specific rights that protect their status and welfare. These include rights to support, inheritance, recognition, and custody primarily through the mother. The distinction between legitimate and illegitimate children remains, especially in inheritance matters, though recent trends indicate a gradual shift toward equity for all children, irrespective of their parents’ marital status.

Illegitimate Children | Paternity and Filiation | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

In the context of Philippine law, particularly under the Civil Code and the Family Code of the Philippines, the topic of Illegitimate Children under the chapter of Paternity and Filiation covers the legal standing, rights, and status of children born outside of wedlock. Here is an in-depth examination of the pertinent laws, rights, and regulations concerning illegitimate children, following the Family Code of the Philippines, jurisprudence, and relevant administrative rules.

Definition and Determination of Illegitimate Children

1. Definition: An illegitimate child is one born to parents who are not legally married to each other at the time of the child’s birth or whose marriage is void under Philippine law. Illegitimacy is generally determined at birth, based on the parents' marital status or the validity of their marriage.

2. Recognition of Illegitimate Children:

   • According to Article 175 of the Family Code, illegitimate children can establish their filiation by voluntary recognition by their biological father or through an action in court for the purpose of proving paternity or filiation.
   • Voluntary recognition may be made in the birth certificate, a public document, or a private handwritten instrument signed by the father. Recognition is irrevocable once made, conferring specific rights upon the child.

Rights of Illegitimate Children

1. Right to Support:

   • Under Article 195 of the Family Code, illegitimate children are entitled to receive support from both parents, though generally, the burden of support falls more on the father. Support includes sustenance, education, clothing, and healthcare in line with the financial capacity of the parents.
   • Article 176 provides that illegitimate children are entitled to support in proportion to the financial resources of the family.

2. Right to Inheritance:

   • According to Article 887 of the Civil Code, illegitimate children are considered compulsory heirs. However, their inheritance rights are limited compared to legitimate children.
   • Legitime for Illegitimate Children: An illegitimate child receives half of the legitime of a legitimate child. This rule ensures that illegitimate children have inheritance rights while recognizing their diminished status compared to legitimate children.
   • An illegitimate child can inherit from both biological parents, but the share is limited and based on the law's concept of proportional inheritance.

3. Right to Bear the Surname of the Father:

   • Initially, Article 176 of the Family Code provided that an illegitimate child shall use the surname of the mother. However, Republic Act No. 9255 amended this provision, allowing illegitimate children to bear the surname of the father if the latter acknowledges paternity, giving children the right to carry either surname as per the father’s acknowledgment.
   • This amendment recognizes the identity rights of illegitimate children, allowing them access to their paternal lineage and potentially alleviating social stigma.

Custody and Parental Authority

1. Maternal Custody by Default:

   • Under Article 176 of the Family Code, custody of an illegitimate child generally resides with the mother. This is consistent with the law's stance that the mother has primary authority over an illegitimate child, reflecting the law’s recognition of her as the default parent and custodian.
   • The father has visitation rights but cannot exercise full parental authority or custody without the mother’s consent or a compelling reason, which must be established in court.

2. Parental Authority:

   • The mother primarily exercises parental authority over illegitimate children. However, the father can also have a limited role in decision-making if he has acknowledged the child. This shared parental authority, however, is conditional and limited compared to legitimate families.

3. Limitations on Custody by the Father:

   • For an illegitimate child, the mother’s custody rights are considered paramount, and the father cannot claim custodial rights unless he can demonstrate the mother’s incapacity or unfitness. Courts may intervene to decide custody if the mother is shown to be unable to fulfill her responsibilities.

Legal Processes Involving Illegitimate Children

1. Proof of Paternity:

   • An illegitimate child or the mother may file a case to establish paternity, generally using any of the following types of evidence:
     • Public or private documents where the father recognizes the child.
     • DNA Testing, which is increasingly recognized in Philippine courts, can provide conclusive evidence in cases involving contested paternity.
   • In addition, jurisprudence has evolved to allow for paternity actions under the rule of preponderance of evidence, meaning that the evidence of the father’s paternity only needs to be more convincing than the opposing evidence.

2. Legal Benefits and Social Welfare:

   • Illegitimate children may also be entitled to benefits such as Social Security System (SSS) survivor benefits, PhilHealth coverage, and other statutory benefits, provided that the father has recognized the child or made relevant contributions for their benefit.

Special Provisions and Limitations

1. Distinction from Legitimate Children:

   • Illegitimate children are, by default, subject to certain legal distinctions compared to legitimate children. They cannot claim certain rights reserved exclusively for legitimate children, particularly regarding full inheritance rights and family privileges under the law.
   • However, judicial reforms and social changes aim to reduce the stigmatization of illegitimacy, providing these children with broader access to legal remedies and protections.

2. Bar to Adoption:

   • An illegitimate child who is recognized by the father cannot be adopted by another individual without the father’s consent, as the recognition already establishes a form of legal acknowledgment. This provision safeguards the child’s paternal connection unless compelling grounds for adoption are presented.

Relevant Jurisprudence and Developments

1. Supreme Court Rulings:

   • The Supreme Court of the Philippines has repeatedly affirmed the right of illegitimate children to support, filiation, and inheritance in various cases, ensuring that illegitimate children are not discriminated against solely due to their birth circumstances.
   • Doctrine of Parental Support: Numerous cases have upheld that both parents, regardless of marital status, are required to provide financial and emotional support to their illegitimate offspring.

2. Expanded Rights Through Amendments and Interpretation:

   • Laws like Republic Act No. 9255 reflect a legislative intent to progressively extend rights to illegitimate children, such as the right to bear the father’s surname.
   • The courts have also been moving toward recognizing the constitutional guarantee of equal protection by granting broader rights to illegitimate children where practicable.

In summary, while illegitimate children in the Philippines are afforded numerous protections and rights under the Family Code, certain distinctions from legitimate children remain, especially concerning inheritance and parental authority. Legal frameworks continue to evolve, aiming to address and protect the best interests of illegitimate children, balancing traditional family structures with the realities of modern Philippine society.