Replevin RULE 59

Replevin (RULE 59) | PROVISIONAL REMEDIES

Below is a comprehensive discussion of Replevin under Philippine law, particularly referencing the Rules of Court (historically under Rule 60, though sometimes referenced as Rule 59 in certain outlines). The discussion covers its nature, purpose, requirements, procedure, bonds, legal and ethical considerations, and sample forms or templates that may guide its application. This write-up is intended for general information and does not constitute formal legal advice.

I. OVERVIEW AND NATURE OF REPLEVIN

  1. Definition

    • Replevin (also known as “claim and delivery”) is a provisional remedy in a civil action for the recovery of possession of personal property. It enables the plaintiff (or party seeking relief) to obtain possession of the personal property in dispute before the final judgment, upon posting the required bond and fulfilling other statutory requirements.

  2. Dual Character

    • As a Principal Action: A party may file a complaint primarily seeking the recovery of specific personal property as the ultimate relief.
    • As a Provisional Remedy: In the same action for recovery of property, the plaintiff may apply for the immediate seizure and delivery of the property to the plaintiff, pending final determination of the case.

  3. Governing Rule

    • Under the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (and the 2019 amendments), Replevin is governed by Rule 60. Some outlines or references may label it as “Rule 59(D)” under a broader heading of “Provisional Remedies,” but the specific rule is Rule 60.

II. PURPOSE AND WHEN AVAILABLE

  1. Purpose

    • To prevent the defendant from using, hiding, destroying, or disposing of the personal property in question during the pendency of the case.
    • To protect the plaintiff’s interest by allowing provisional possession if it appears the plaintiff has the immediate right to possess the chattel.

  2. When Available

    • The property to be seized must be personal property (movables), capable of manual delivery.
    • The property must be wrongfully detained or possessed by the defendant such that the plaintiff has a prima facie right of possession.
    • The application must be filed at the commencement of the action or at any time before the defendant files an answer.

  3. Distinguishing Features

    • Unlike “preliminary attachment” (Rule 57), which aims to secure property to satisfy a future judgment, replevin primarily focuses on the provisional recovery of specific personal property belonging in specie to the plaintiff.
    • The defendant may reclaim possession during the pendency of the action by filing a redelivery bond.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. Jurisdiction

    • The court that has jurisdiction over the main action for recovery of property (based on either its assessed value or the nature of the case) likewise has jurisdiction to act on the replevin aspect.
    • For instance, if the amount or value of the personal property places the case within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) or Regional Trial Court (RTC), that same court can grant replevin.

  2. Venue

    • As a rule, the action for recovery of personal property is filed either where the plaintiff or defendant resides or, if the rules permit, where the property is located. The same venue applies to the provisional remedy of replevin.

IV. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE WRIT OF REPLEVIN

To secure a writ of replevin, the following conditions must be satisfied:

  1. Verified Complaint or Affidavit

    • The plaintiff or some person on the plaintiff’s behalf must file a duly verified complaint (or affidavit) specifically stating:
      a) That the plaintiff is the owner of the property claimed or is entitled to its possession;
      b) That the property is wrongfully detained by the defendant;
      c) The alleged cause or reason for the wrongful detention;
      d) That the property has not been taken for a tax assessment or a fine pursuant to law, or if so taken, that it is exempt from such taking; and
      e) The actual market value of the property.

  2. Replevin Bond

    • The plaintiff must post a bond executed to the defendant, double the value of the property as stated in the affidavit, for the return of the property if the court so adjudges and for the payment of such sum as the court may recover against the plaintiff if the seizure is found wrongful.
    • The bond must be approved by the court.

  3. Application Timing

    • The application for replevin can be filed at the commencement of the main action or at any time before the defendant answers.

  4. Court Order

    • The judge must carefully evaluate the verified affidavit and the bond. If everything is in order, the court issues an order (or a writ of replevin) directing the sheriff to seize the described personal property and deliver it to the plaintiff.

V. PROCEDURE FOR SEIZURE AND DELIVERY

  1. Issuance of the Order (Writ of Replevin)

    • Upon approval of the bond and the affidavit, the court issues an order or writ commanding the sheriff or other proper officer to seize the property described and deliver it to the plaintiff.

  2. Sheriff’s Duty

    • The sheriff must:
      a) Serve a copy of the writ of replevin, the complaint, the application, affidavits, and the replevin bond on the defendant.
      b) Seize the personal property described in the writ if it is found within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.
      c) Keep the property in custody, then deliver it to the plaintiff as soon as practicable (often upon confirmation that the bond is valid).

  3. Defendant’s Redelivery Bond

    • If the defendant wishes to retain or regain possession of the property, the defendant may, within the time fixed by law or by the court, post a “redelivery bond” in an amount double the value of the property, executed to the plaintiff.
    • Once the defendant’s bond is approved by the court, the property is either retained by or returned to the defendant, pending resolution of the main action.

  4. Third-Party Claims

    • If a third person claims ownership or right of possession adverse to the plaintiff and/or defendant, that person may file a separate claim, or may intervene if the rules allow.
    • The sheriff must not proceed with the seizure if the property clearly belongs to a third party who has a better right.

  5. Return of the Writ

    • The sheriff files a return to the court detailing how the writ was executed, describing any property seized, any claims from third parties, and any bonds filed by the parties.

VI. POST-SEIZURE PHASE AND FINAL DETERMINATION

  1. Answer and Trial

    • The defendant must answer the main complaint within the prescribed period from service of summons.
    • The case then proceeds through the normal course of litigation (pre-trial, trial, etc.).

  2. Final Judgment

    • After trial on the merits, the court decides who is entitled to possession of the personal property and rules on any damages (including losses sustained due to wrongful seizure).

  3. Damages

    • If the court determines that the plaintiff wrongfully secured the writ of replevin (e.g., the property did not belong to the plaintiff, or the plaintiff was not entitled to immediate possession), the defendant may recover damages on the plaintiff’s bond.
    • Conversely, if the defendant wrongfully detained the property, the plaintiff may recover damages from any bond filed by the defendant for redelivery.

  4. Disposal of the Property

    • If final judgment favors the plaintiff and the property is already in plaintiff’s possession, the court may simply confirm plaintiff’s right.
    • If final judgment favors the defendant and the property is in plaintiff’s possession, the court orders its return to the defendant or grants monetary damages.

VII. GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTION OR QUASHAL OF THE WRIT

  1. Defective Affidavit or Bond

    • If the affidavit supporting the application is found insufficient or contains false allegations, the defendant may file a motion to dissolve or quash the writ.
    • If the plaintiff fails to file a bond in the correct form or amount, or fails to have it approved by the court, the writ may be dissolved.

  2. No Right of Possession

    • If the defendant shows convincingly that the plaintiff does not have the immediate right to possession, the writ can be set aside.

  3. Failure to Prosecute

    • If the plaintiff fails to prosecute the main action or otherwise abandons the action, the writ may be dissolved, and the property restored to the defendant.

VIII. LEGAL ETHICS CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Good Faith Requirement

    • Lawyers applying for replevin on behalf of clients must ensure they have a solid legal and factual basis for claiming ownership or right of possession. Filing a frivolous replevin or misstating the property’s value may subject counsel to disciplinary action.

  2. Candor Toward the Tribunal

    • The affidavits and verified pleadings must be truthful; any misleading statement intended to secure the writ prematurely is unethical and can result in sanctions.

  3. Diligence in Handling Bonds and Service

    • Counsel must ensure that the replevin bond and all supporting documents are properly executed and promptly served on the defendant to avoid procedural irregularities.

  4. Avoiding Abuse of Process

    • Replevin should not be used as a harassment tool. Attorneys must counsel clients on the seriousness of replevin and the potential exposure to damages and costs if it is done maliciously or without basis.

IX. SAMPLE BASIC FORMS

Below are abridged, simplified forms illustrating the structure of replevin documents. Always adapt them to the specific facts of each case and current rules or circulars of the Supreme Court.

A. Verified Complaint with Prayer for Replevin

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch, City/Province]

[Name of Plaintiff],
       Plaintiff,

              -versus-                     Civil Case No. __________

[Name of Defendant],
       Defendant.
____________________________________________

              COMPLAINT WITH PRAYER FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF REPLEVIN

Plaintiff, by counsel, respectfully alleges:

1. Plaintiff is of legal age, Filipino, with address at [complete address].
2. Defendant is of legal age, Filipino, with address at [complete address].
3. The personal property subject of this case is [describe property thoroughly: kind, make, model, serial number, etc.], with an estimated value of [amount].
4. Plaintiff is the lawful owner (or entitled to the possession) of the said property, as evidenced by [documents, circumstances].
5. Defendant wrongfully withholds or detains the property from plaintiff, without just cause, despite repeated demands.
6. The property has not been taken for a tax assessment or a fine pursuant to law, or if so, it is exempt.
7. Plaintiff prays for the issuance of a writ of replevin, allowing immediate seizure and delivery of said property to plaintiff.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed that:
1. A writ of replevin be issued directing the sheriff to seize and deliver to plaintiff the property described above, upon plaintiff’s filing of a bond in accordance with the Rules of Court.
2. After trial on the merits, that judgment be rendered:
   a) Declaring plaintiff to have the right of possession (and ownership, if applicable) over the subject property;
   b) Ordering defendant to pay damages, attorney’s fees, and costs of suit.

Other relief just and equitable are likewise prayed for.

[Signature of Counsel]
[Name, PTR No., IBP No., MCLE Compliance, Address, etc.]

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION

I, [Name of Plaintiff], after being duly sworn, depose and state that:
1. I am the plaintiff in the above-captioned case;
2. I have read the foregoing complaint and attest that all the allegations therein are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records;
3. I further certify that I have not commenced any other action involving the same issues in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency; if I learn of the pendency of another case, I shall notify the court within five (5) days from notice thereof.

[Signature of Plaintiff]

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __ day of _____ 20__, in the City/Province of ______, affiant exhibiting to me his/her government-issued ID No. __________.

[Signature of Notary Public]
Notary Public
Doc. No. __; Page No. __; Book No. __; Series of 20__.

B. Affidavit and Bond for Replevin

AFFIDAVIT SUPPORTING REPLEVIN

I, [Name of Affiant], Filipino, of legal age, and with address at [address], after being duly sworn, depose and say:

1. I am the [plaintiff / representative duly authorized by the plaintiff] in the above-captioned case for replevin.
2. The plaintiff is the owner / lawfully entitled to the possession of the following personal property: [describe property].
3. The said property is wrongfully detained by the defendant, and the cause of detention is: [brief statement of facts].
4. The property has not been taken for a tax assessment or fine pursuant to law, or if taken, it is exempt from such taking or detention.
5. The actual market value of the property is [amount, in pesos].

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this __ day of _____ 20__, at [place].

[Signature of Affiant]

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __ day of _____ 20__, affiant exhibiting [government ID details].

[Signature of Notary Public]
Notary Public
Doc. No. __; Page No. __; Book No. __; Series of 20__.

REPLEVIN BOND

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

We, [Name of Plaintiff] as Principal, and [Name of Surety / Bonding Company], as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto [Name of Defendant], in the sum of [double the value of the property], Philippine currency, for the payment of which we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, and administrators, jointly and severally.

The condition of this obligation is that if the plaintiff shall prosecute this action without delay and shall return the property to the defendant, if such return be adjudged, and shall pay any damages the defendant may recover from the plaintiff in this action, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect.

Signed this __ day of _____ 20__, at [place].

[Signature of Plaintiff]
Principal

[Signature of Representative of Surety]
Surety

With our conformity and responsibility:

[Signature of Authorized Signatory of Surety / Witnesses]

X. KEY JURISPRUDENCE

While not exhaustive, below are guiding principles from notable Supreme Court rulings:

  1. Responsibility for Wrongful Seizure

    • Courts often stress that the plaintiff must act in good faith and with diligence when applying for replevin. Any abuse or misrepresentation that leads to wrongful seizure can subject the plaintiff and/or counsel to liability.
    • Sps. Bautista v. Auto Plus Traders, Inc., G.R. No. 174936 (2009): The Court underscored that replevin cannot issue without a valid bond and affidavit, and that the plaintiff’s allegations must be specific and truthful.

  2. Right of Possession vs. Ownership

    • Even if the plaintiff is the absolute owner, the immediate question is whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession. However, ownership is often intertwined in replevin cases.
    • Heirs of Pabiling v. Siton, G.R. No. 193289 (2012): Emphasized that rightful possession is key to replevin.

  3. Valuation of the Property

    • The requirement of stating the actual market value is crucial because it determines the amount of the required bond. Material misstatements here can lead to dissolution of the writ.

XI. PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL TIPS

  1. Pre-Filing Diligence

    • Verify client’s ownership or right of possession with official documents (bills of sale, deeds of assignment, receipts, etc.).
    • Clarify the property’s value realistically to avoid understating (possible penalty) or overstating (inflated bond requirement).

  2. Proper Service of Documents

    • Ensure that the sheriff promptly serves the summons, complaint, application for replevin, affidavits, and the approved bond to avoid claims of invalid seizure.

  3. Handling Third-Party Claims

    • If a third-party claim arises, examine if an interpleader or an intervention might be required. Missteps can complicate the entire proceeding.

  4. Bond Surety

    • Work only with reputable bonding companies. In case the court finds the bond insufficient or the surety unauthorized, your client may have to scramble to substitute or secure a new bond.

XII. CONCLUSION

Replevin is a powerful provisional remedy in Philippine civil procedure, allowing the plaintiff to immediately recover possession of personal property pending litigation. Its use, however, is strictly regulated. A successful application requires strict compliance with the Rules of Court—particularly regarding verified allegations, proper valuation, and the execution of a sufficient bond. From a legal ethics perspective, lawyers must ensure utmost good faith and candor in seeking this remedy, as unfounded or abusive use of replevin can result in liability for damages and professional sanctions.

When proceeding with replevin, always confirm the current procedural rules, updated jurisprudence, and any relevant Supreme Court circulars. Should any complex issues arise—particularly those involving disputes of ownership, third-party claims, or contested valuations—professional advice and judicious handling are imperative to avoid costly missteps.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login