Sandiganbayan

Sandiganbayan | Jurisdiction of Courts | JURISDICTION

Disclaimer: The following discussion is provided for general informational and educational purposes. It is not legal advice. If you need guidance regarding a specific legal matter, please consult a qualified attorney.

JURISDICTION OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN

The Sandiganbayan is a specialized court in the Philippines mandated to hear and decide criminal and civil cases involving graft and corrupt practices and other offenses committed by public officers and employees in relation to their office. Below is a comprehensive discussion of its legal basis, composition, jurisdiction, and key procedural considerations.

I. LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS

  1. Historical Origin

    • 1973 Constitution: The Sandiganbayan traces its roots to the 1973 Constitution, which provided for the creation of a special court to try offenses committed by public officers and employees, known then as the “Sandiganbayan.”
    • Presidential Decrees:
      • P.D. No. 1486 (1978) created the Sandiganbayan as the principal anti-graft court.
      • P.D. No. 1606 (1979) further defined and expanded its jurisdiction.
    • 1987 Constitution: The current Constitution expressly recognizes the Sandiganbayan as a constitutionally mandated court (Article XI, Section 4).
    • Subsequent Statutes:
      • Republic Act No. 7975 (1995) and Republic Act No. 8249 (1997) further delineated its powers, jurisdiction, and structure.
      • Republic Act No. 10660 (2015) introduced additional amendments to refine its jurisdiction and organizational setup.

  2. Constitutional Status

    • The Sandiganbayan is a collegiate court (like the Court of Appeals) and has the same rank as the Court of Appeals.
    • Its primary function is to serve as an anti-graft court to promote integrity and accountability among public officials.

II. COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION

  1. Membership

    • The Sandiganbayan is composed of a Presiding Justice and Associate Justices, organized into divisions (as of 2023, it operates with seven divisions, each composed of three justices).
    • Justices of the Sandiganbayan are appointed by the President from a shortlist submitted by the Judicial and Bar Council, similar to other appointments to collegial courts.

  2. Seat and Territorial Divisions

    • The principal seat of the Sandiganbayan is in Metro Manila (Quezon City), but it may hold sessions elsewhere in the country as the need arises.
    • It is not subdivided by territorial jurisdictions as the Regional Trial Courts are. Instead, it maintains a single, nationwide jurisdiction.

  3. Quorum and Voting

    • A division may hear and decide cases if a majority of its justices (two out of three) concur. Certain key rulings and administrative matters may require a special majority, depending on the court’s internal rules.

III. JURISDICTION

A. Exclusive Original Jurisdiction

By virtue of P.D. No. 1606, as amended by R.A. No. 7975, R.A. No. 8249, and R.A. No. 10660, the Sandiganbayan has exclusive original jurisdiction over:

  1. Criminal Cases

    • Violations of Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act), Republic Act No. 1379 (forfeiture of ill-gotten wealth), and other offenses or felonies whether simple or complexed with other crimes committed by public officers and employees in relation to their office.
    • Crimes committed by public officers embraced in Title VII (Crimes Committed by Public Officers) of the Revised Penal Code, such as direct bribery, indirect bribery, qualified bribery, corruption of public officials, malversation of public funds, falsification by public officers, etc., when the offense is:
      • Committed by public officials with a Salary Grade (SG) 27 or higher, or
      • When the law specifically provides that the offense falls under the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan regardless of salary grade (e.g., Plunder under R.A. 7080, as amended by R.A. 7659, which has no SG threshold).
    • Offenses under Executive Orders issued in relation to the recovery of ill-gotten wealth from the Marcos regime, if so provided.

  2. Civil Cases

    • Civil suits for restitution or compensation where the cause of action arises from the same transaction or acts constituting the criminal offense under the Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction. These include recovery of civil liabilities, forfeiture of illegally acquired property, etc.

  3. Public Officer Requirement / “In Relation to Office”

    • The key phrase is that the crime or offense must be committed “in relation to the office.” This means that the offense charged is intimately connected with the official’s duties.
    • For lower-ranking public officials (below SG-27), the case ordinarily falls under the jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Courts, unless the offense is legally designated to be within Sandiganbayan jurisdiction (e.g., plunder, or certain complex offenses).
    • Private individuals can be included as co-accused if they conspired with or aided a public officer in the commission of the offense within the Sandiganbayan’s competence.

B. Appellate Jurisdiction

  1. Appellate Jurisdiction Over RTC Decisions

    • The Sandiganbayan also has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments, resolutions, or orders of the Regional Trial Courts in cases involving public officials or employees charged with:
      • Offenses under R.A. No. 3019, R.A. No. 1379, and Title VII of the Revised Penal Code, but
      • Where the accused holds a position below Salary Grade 27 or the penalty does not fall under its exclusive original jurisdiction.

  2. Mode of Appeal

    • Appeals to the Sandiganbayan from the RTC are governed generally by the Rules of Court, particularly the rules on ordinary appeals (Rule 122 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure for criminal matters).
    • The Sandiganbayan’s decisions, in turn, may be taken to the Supreme Court via petition for review on certiorari (Rule 45 of the Rules of Court).

IV. DETERMINING JURISDICTION: KEY FACTORS

  1. Nature of the Offense

    • Jurisdiction hinges primarily on the character of the offense (e.g., graft, corruption, plunder, malversation, bribery, etc.) and whether it is connected to the public officer’s position or functions.

  2. Salary Grade Threshold

    • Generally, for crimes under Title VII of the Revised Penal Code and laws such as R.A. 3019, the Sandiganbayan has original jurisdiction if the public official is of Salary Grade 27 or above.
    • If the official is below SG-27, the jurisdiction is typically with the RTC unless the law explicitly vests the Sandiganbayan with jurisdiction (e.g., plunder).
    • Examples of positions with SG-27 or higher: provincial governors, city mayors of highly urbanized cities, members of constitutional commissions, generals in the AFP, cabinet secretaries, and certain bureau heads.

  3. “In Relation to Office” Requirement

    • The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that the offense must be closely related to the discharge of official duties. Merely holding a public office does not automatically bring the offense under the Sandiganbayan unless there is a clear nexus between the office and the criminal act.

  4. Amount or Extent of Damage

    • In certain offenses (e.g., malversation, plunder), the amount involved may independently determine whether it is under the Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction. For instance, plunder requires that the total value of the ill-gotten wealth be at least Fifty Million Pesos (₱50,000,000).

  5. Private Persons as Co-Accused

    • If a private individual is charged in conspiracy with or as an accomplice/accessory to a public officer, the Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction covers them as well, provided the principal offense is within its jurisdiction.

V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS AND RULES

  1. Filing of Information

    • Cases in the Sandiganbayan typically begin with the filing of an Information by the Office of the Ombudsman (or a special prosecutor under the Ombudsman’s supervision).
    • The preliminary investigation is conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman; once probable cause is found, the Information is filed with the appropriate division of the Sandiganbayan.

  2. Bail

    • Bail applications in non-bailable offenses (like plunder or when the evidence of guilt is strong) must be heard by the Sandiganbayan. The court will hold summary hearings to determine if evidence of guilt is strong.

  3. Trial Procedure

    • Generally follows the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 110-127 of the Rules of Court), supplemented by the Internal Rules of the Sandiganbayan.
    • Trials are typically conducted by a three-justice division, requiring a majority vote for conviction or acquittal.

  4. Appeals from the Sandiganbayan

    • Decisions of the Sandiganbayan are appealed directly to the Supreme Court via petition for review on certiorari (Rule 45), not by a notice of appeal.
    • The Supreme Court may review both questions of law and, in some instances, questions of fact, although the default rule is that only questions of law are reviewable under Rule 45. However, in criminal cases, certain factual issues may be examined if the High Court finds compelling reasons.

  5. Execution of Judgment

    • Once a judgment of conviction attains finality (i.e., no timely and proper appeal is taken or the Supreme Court has affirmed the Sandiganbayan’s ruling), the Sandiganbayan issues a warrant of execution.
    • Civil liabilities, forfeiture orders, and other monetary awards will also be enforced upon finality of judgment.

VI. SIGNIFICANT STATUTES INVOKED

  1. Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act)

    • Foundational law defining corrupt practices (e.g., persuasion, influence-peddling, transactions prejudicial to the government, etc.).
    • Main basis for many graft cases filed before the Sandiganbayan.

  2. Republic Act No. 1379 (Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Property)

    • Allows forfeiture of any property found to be unlawfully acquired by a public officer.

  3. Revised Penal Code, Title VII (Crimes Committed by Public Officers)

    • Incorporates crimes such as direct and indirect bribery, malversation, falsification, etc.

  4. Republic Act No. 7080, as amended by R.A. No. 7659 (Plunder Law)

    • Requires that the total ill-gotten wealth be at least ₱50 million.
    • Plunder is always within the original exclusive jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, regardless of the offender’s salary grade.

  5. Republic Act No. 10660 (2015 Amendments)

    • Introduced reforms on how cases are raffled among divisions.
    • Provided new guidelines on the issuance of writs and procedural rules to expedite trials.

VII. IMPORTANT JURISPRUDENTIAL POINTS

  • Public Office vs. Private Capacity: The Supreme Court has emphasized that the Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction is determined by the allegations in the Information, especially whether the crime was committed in the performance of official functions.
  • Conspiracy with Private Individuals: Private persons can be tried in the Sandiganbayan if they are charged in conspiracy with a public officer who is under the court’s jurisdiction, and the acts are in relation to the officer’s duties.
  • Salary Grade Determination: The civil service law and corresponding issuances (e.g., the Department of Budget and Management index of positions and salary grades) are used to ascertain the public officer’s rank.
  • Direct Resort to the Supreme Court: Parties aggrieved by Sandiganbayan judgments have direct recourse to the Supreme Court only via a Rule 45 petition, not a full-blown appeal on factual matters.

VIII. PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Venue and Case Backlog

    • Despite being a single court with multiple divisions, the Sandiganbayan’s docket can be congested. Litigants must be prepared for the possibility of delayed trial schedules, although reforms continue to improve case flow.

  2. Coordination with the Ombudsman

    • The Ombudsman’s Office serves as the principal prosecutorial body before the Sandiganbayan. Effective case preparation often requires close coordination among investigators, special prosecutors, and complainants.

  3. Special Rules on Plea Bargaining

    • The Sandiganbayan, in coordination with the Ombudsman, may allow plea bargaining in certain instances (e.g., cases of malversation or violation of R.A. No. 3019), subject to guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court and the Ombudsman’s internal rules.

  4. Impact on Public Officials

    • Preventive suspension may be imposed on the accused public officer while the case is pending, as mandated by law in certain offenses (e.g., under R.A. No. 3019).
    • Conviction for offenses under the Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction often carries the accessory penalties of perpetual disqualification from public office and forfeiture of retirement benefits.

IX. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

  1. Sandiganbayan is the specialized anti-graft court with authority derived from the Constitution and various statutes.
  2. It has exclusive original jurisdiction over high-ranking officials (SG-27 and above) for offenses committed “in relation to office,” as well as certain crimes (like plunder) regardless of salary grade.
  3. It exercises appellate jurisdiction over decisions of the Regional Trial Courts in graft and corruption cases involving lower-ranking officials.
  4. Procedures are akin to regular criminal procedure, but prosecution is primarily handled by the Office of the Ombudsman or the Special Prosecutor.
  5. Appeals from Sandiganbayan decisions go directly to the Supreme Court via Rule 45.
  6. Jurisdictional tests hinge on the position’s salary grade, the nature of the offense (whether it is inherently connected to official duties), and specific legislative provisions placing certain crimes under the Sandiganbayan’s domain.
  7. Public trust and accountability are central to the rationale for the Sandiganbayan’s existence, reflecting the constitutional commitment to address graft and corruption effectively.

Final Note

The Sandiganbayan plays a crucial role in the Philippine justice system by ensuring that public officials are held accountable for graft, corruption, and related offenses. Its jurisdiction, carefully defined by the Constitution and subsequent statutes, ensures that higher-ranking public officials and high-stakes cases are subject to direct scrutiny by a specialized court. Understanding the nuances of its jurisdiction—particularly the salary grade thresholds and the requirement that the crime be committed in relation to public office—is vital for any practitioner or party engaged in litigation before this tribunal.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login