Relevance of the nationality of the parties in relation to the… | Validity of Marriages Celebrated Abroad | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

When discussing the validity of marriages celebrated abroad, particularly in the context of mixed marriages (where one or both parties are foreigners) in the Philippines, it is essential to evaluate the nuances under Philippine law and international private law principles.

1. Fundamental Principles of the Validity of Foreign Marriages

Under the Family Code of the Philippines, specifically Article 26, marriages celebrated outside the Philippines are generally recognized as valid, provided they comply with the laws of the country where they were solemnized. This principle of lex loci celebrationis (law of the place of celebration) allows for a marriage validly contracted abroad to be recognized as valid in the Philippines, regardless of whether the marriage would have been permitted under Philippine law.

Exceptions in Validity:

1. Article 35 of the Family Code outlines several grounds under which marriages are considered void from the beginning. For marriages celebrated abroad, if any of these grounds apply, the marriage may be considered void in the Philippines as well.
2. Under Article 26(2), a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner that is validly celebrated abroad and later dissolved abroad by a divorce obtained by the foreign spouse allows the Filipino spouse to remarry under Philippine law.

2. Relevance of Nationality and Applicability of Grounds for Nullity

Philippine law adheres to the principle of lex patriae (law of nationality) for its citizens, meaning Filipino nationals are generally governed by Philippine laws on family rights and duties, regardless of residence or place of marriage. This has significant implications for mixed marriages and the grounds available for declaring them void or voidable in the Philippines.

Grounds for Nullity or Annulment of Mixed Marriages:

1. For Filipino Citizens:

   • Nullity (Void Marriages): The grounds for nullity of marriage in the Philippines include, but are not limited to, absence of a marriage license, mental incapacity, or psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code.
   • Psychological Incapacity: This provision applies to Filipino nationals and is interpreted to mean a mental or psychological incapacity to perform the essential marital obligations. Psychological incapacity is a frequent ground for nullity petitions in mixed marriages where one spouse is foreign, often due to differing cultural perspectives on marital roles.
   • Foreign Divorce and Subsequent Remarriage: If the foreign spouse in a mixed marriage successfully obtains a divorce abroad, Article 26(2) allows the Filipino spouse to remarry if the divorce effectively dissolves the marriage in the foreign spouse’s jurisdiction.

2. For Foreign Nationals:

   • Philippine law does not generally apply to the foreign spouse, especially in terms of personal capacity and marital obligations. If a foreigner is psychologically incapacitated under Article 36, this ground may still be used in a nullity petition as long as the incapacity directly impacts the Filipino spouse.
   • A mixed marriage may be deemed void in the Philippines based on grounds such as fraud, lack of consent, or mental incapacity of either party if these grounds are present during the union.

3. For Mixed Marriages Involving Specific Nationality Rules:

   • In cases where a foreign party’s national law conflicts with Philippine standards, the foreign national’s governing laws may determine aspects of the marriage’s validity or the spouse’s capacity. For example, some countries prohibit divorce altogether; thus, Philippine law may impose its grounds for annulment or nullity in such cases.
   • In mixed marriages where the foreign spouse's country of origin does not recognize the Filipino spouse's rights to petition for divorce or annulment under Philippine laws, the Filipino spouse may still file for annulment or nullity in the Philippines. The ruling may apply in the Philippines but may not be recognized in the foreign spouse’s country.

3. Jurisdictional Considerations for Declaring Nullity in the Philippines

For the Philippines to assume jurisdiction over a petition for nullity of marriage:

1. Residency of the Filipino Party: The Filipino spouse must generally establish residency within the Philippines for the Family Courts to have jurisdiction.
2. Mixed Nationality and Jurisdiction: If both spouses are residing abroad but one remains a Filipino citizen, Philippine courts may still recognize a petition for nullity on the grounds of psychological incapacity under Article 36, as the lex patriae principle gives jurisdiction over Filipino nationals.

4. Enforceability and Recognition of Foreign Judgments on Marriage in the Philippines

• When a marriage celebrated abroad has been terminated or declared null in the foreign jurisdiction, the Philippines may recognize such a judgment under the doctrine of comity, as long as it does not contravene Philippine public policy.
• If a foreign court grants a divorce or nullity that conflicts with fundamental Filipino values on marriage (such as those based on fraud or lack of jurisdiction), the Philippines may refuse to recognize it.

5. Special Cases: Mixed Marriages with Nationals from Countries with Religious or Cultural Restrictions on Divorce

In mixed marriages involving nationals from countries where divorce or annulment is culturally or religiously prohibited, Philippine courts may face challenges in enforcing a nullity declaration. However, as long as the Filipino spouse has a legitimate ground for nullity under Philippine law and proper jurisdiction is established, the Filipino spouse can pursue a declaration of nullity even if the foreign national's home country does not recognize such a decree.

Conclusion

In summary, the relevance of nationality in mixed marriages celebrated abroad in the Philippines centers around the application of the lex patriae principle for Filipino citizens and the interplay with lex loci celebrationis for foreign marriages. Grounds for nullity are principally governed by Philippine law for Filipino nationals, including psychological incapacity, while respecting international principles of comity and recognizing foreign divorces when applicable. This ensures that Filipino nationals are protected under their domestic laws while allowing a degree of recognition for international marital frameworks.

Grounds available to have marriages celebrated abroad declared null and void in the Philippines; | Validity of Marriages Celebrated Abroad | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

To comprehensively discuss the grounds available in the Philippines to declare null and void marriages celebrated abroad, we must delve into the pertinent laws, jurisprudence, and guidelines that outline the application of Philippine civil law to marriages contracted outside Philippine jurisdiction.

---

Legal Framework

1. Philippine Family Code and Applicability to Foreign Marriages

   • Under Article 26 of the Family Code of the Philippines, a marriage validly celebrated abroad is generally recognized as valid in the Philippines. However, if any of the essential requisites for marriage under Philippine law are not met, the marriage may be challenged as null and void.
   • The general principle is the lex loci celebrationis—the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated governs its validity. Nevertheless, if parties to the marriage are Filipinos, Philippine law follows them even if they contract marriage outside the Philippines.

2. Jurisdiction of Philippine Courts

   • Philippine courts have jurisdiction over a case involving the declaration of nullity of marriage celebrated abroad if at least one party is a Filipino citizen or if residency requirements are met for filing a petition. Article 15 of the Civil Code mandates that laws related to family rights and duties are binding on Filipino citizens even if they are abroad.
   • A Filipino spouse, or in certain cases a foreign spouse, may petition for nullity under the Family Code if they meet the grounds and requirements as stipulated under Philippine law.

---

Grounds to Declare Marriages Celebrated Abroad Null and Void in the Philippines

Marriages contracted abroad by Filipino citizens or involving a Filipino party may be declared null and void based on the grounds specified in Articles 35, 36, 37, and 38 of the Family Code, which apply to all marriages irrespective of the location of the celebration. These grounds include:

1. Absence of Essential and Formal Requisites (Article 35)

   The absence of the essential or formal requisites for marriage under Article 2 of the Family Code renders a marriage void ab initio:

   • Lack of Legal Capacity of the Contracting Parties: Both parties must meet the age requirement (18 years old or older). If either party is underage or otherwise legally disqualified (e.g., already married), the marriage is void.
   • Absence of Mutual Consent: The contracting parties must freely consent to marry, without force, intimidation, or fraud. Any form of coercion or deception that undermines true consent may be grounds for nullity.
   • Non-compliance with Formal Requisites: Under Article 3, a marriage must be solemnized by an authorized officiant and in the presence of at least two witnesses of legal age. If these formalities are disregarded, the marriage may be voided.

2. Psychological Incapacity (Article 36)

   • Article 36 of the Family Code provides that a marriage may be declared void if one or both spouses were psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations. Psychological incapacity is a mental incapacity that renders an individual incapable of understanding or fulfilling marital responsibilities.
   • Jurisprudence such as Republic v. Molina established guidelines for proving psychological incapacity, requiring it to be (a) medically or clinically rooted, (b) existing at the time of marriage, (c) grave in nature, and (d) incurable.

3. Incestuous Marriages (Article 37)

   • Article 37 renders marriages void if they are between parties who are closely related by consanguinity, specifically between:
     • Ascendants and descendants (parent and child).
     • Siblings, whether full or half-blood.
   • Incestuous marriages are void irrespective of the location where the marriage was celebrated.

4. Void Marriages Due to Public Policy (Article 38)

   • Article 38 declares certain marriages void based on public policy:
     • Between collateral relatives up to the fourth civil degree (e.g., first cousins).
     • Between step-parent and step-child.
     • Between step-siblings, among other relationships specified by the law.

5. Bigamous or Polygamous Marriages (Article 35)

   • A subsequent marriage entered into by a person who is already legally married to another party is void, unless the first marriage has been legally annulled or the first spouse is presumed dead under Article 41 of the Family Code.
   • The exception is if a judicial declaration of presumptive death has been obtained in compliance with Article 41.

6. Marriage Celebrated with Fraud, Force, or Intimidation

   • Marriages entered into through fraud or under duress are void if it can be proven that one of the parties lacked genuine consent at the time of marriage due to force, intimidation, or fraud.
   • Examples of fraud include misrepresentation of pregnancy, deception regarding identity, or coercion through physical threats.

---

Special Considerations: Mixed Marriages (Article 26, Paragraph 2)

1. Marriage with a Foreigner and Subsequent Divorce

   • If a Filipino citizen marries a foreigner, and the foreign spouse subsequently obtains a divorce that capacitates them to remarry, the Filipino spouse is also considered free to remarry under Article 26, Paragraph 2.
   • This provision is specifically crafted for Filipino citizens to prevent unfair situations where the foreign spouse, having divorced, can remarry, but the Filipino is left bound by the marriage due to Philippine restrictions on divorce.

2. Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decree

   • Philippine courts may recognize a divorce decree obtained abroad if it grants the foreign spouse the capacity to remarry. This requires a judicial recognition of the foreign divorce through a petition for recognition of foreign judgment.

---

Evidentiary Requirements for Petition for Nullity of Marriage

To succeed in a petition for nullity, the petitioner must present:

• Authenticated copies of marriage and relevant documents from the foreign country.
• Proof of residence if jurisdictional requirements necessitate it.
• Evidence supporting grounds for nullity: psychological evaluations (for Article 36 cases), sworn statements, and other documents or testimonies that substantiate the absence of essential requisites or other grounds.
• Expert testimonies may be necessary, especially for cases involving psychological incapacity.

Conclusion

The validity of marriages celebrated abroad and their nullity in the Philippines hinges on whether the marriage adheres to the essential requisites mandated by Philippine law. Philippine courts have the authority to nullify foreign marriages based on statutory grounds under the Family Code.

Validity of Marriages Celebrated Abroad | Marriage | FAMILY CODE

Validity of Marriages Celebrated Abroad (Philippine Civil Law Context)

Under Philippine law, marriages celebrated abroad involving Filipino citizens or affecting their legal status are governed by the principles outlined in the Family Code of the Philippines, particularly in Articles 26 and 17 of the Civil Code. The legal provisions, relevant cases, and jurisprudential developments provide a framework on how such marriages are recognized and treated. Below is a detailed exposition of the key considerations.

1. General Rule of Recognition of Foreign Marriages

• Article 26, Family Code: Philippine law generally recognizes the validity of marriages celebrated abroad between Filipino citizens and foreigners or between two Filipinos, provided they were validly contracted according to the laws of the country where the marriage was solemnized. This principle follows the lex loci celebrationis doctrine, where the law of the place where the marriage occurred governs its formalities and legality.

2. Formal and Essential Requisites of Marriage (Articles 2 and 3)

• Formal Requisites: Under Philippine law, the formal requisites of marriage include the authority of the solemnizing officer, valid marriage license (except in cases where it is exempted), and marriage ceremony with the couple's personal declaration of consent before the officer and witnesses.
• Essential Requisites: Consent of the parties, freely given and devoid of any legal impediments such as lack of capacity or existing marriage, is essential for a valid marriage. In cases of marriage abroad, the formal and essential requisites are governed by the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated, provided these do not contravene Philippine public policy or fundamental principles of Philippine law.

3. Recognition of Marriages Valid Where Celebrated

• Philippine law will recognize foreign marriages if they are valid in the place where they were performed. Even if these marriages would be invalid if celebrated in the Philippines (e.g., marriage by proxy, same-sex marriage, etc.), they are considered valid for purposes of private international law, as long as they comply with the requirements of the country of celebration.

• Case Law Support: In the landmark case of Republic v. Iyoy (G.R. No. 152577), the Supreme Court upheld a marriage contracted in Hong Kong as valid, recognizing that Filipino citizens are bound to comply with the requisites of the foreign jurisdiction when marrying abroad.

4. Divorce and Marital Dissolution for Marriages Abroad (Article 26, Family Code)

• Article 26, Paragraph 2: If a Filipino is married to a foreigner and the foreign spouse obtains a divorce abroad, the Filipino spouse is considered legally capacitated to remarry under Philippine law. This provision was introduced to prevent inequality where the Filipino spouse would otherwise remain bound by the marriage, even if the foreign spouse is no longer bound due to the divorce. The divorce decree obtained abroad is recognized only to the extent that it capacitated the Filipino spouse to remarry.

• Requirements for Recognition:

  • Judicial Recognition of Foreign Divorce: The Filipino spouse must obtain judicial recognition of the foreign divorce decree from a Philippine court. This judicial recognition is necessary for the remarriage capacity of the Filipino spouse to be legally acknowledged in the Philippines.
  • Proof of Divorce: The divorce must be proven as valid by authenticating the decree and presenting relevant documentation. This process usually includes obtaining a certificate of finality from the jurisdiction where the divorce was issued.

• Case Law on Recognition: Republic v. Manalo (G.R. No. 221029) clarified that the recognition of foreign divorce is not limited to cases where the foreign spouse initiates the divorce. Even if the Filipino spouse initiates the divorce proceedings abroad, the resulting decree will allow the Filipino to remarry, provided that the foreign jurisdiction legally recognizes the divorce.

5. Non-recognition of Void or Bigamous Marriages

• Philippine law does not recognize marriages celebrated abroad if any party is still legally married to another person at the time of the marriage. Even if bigamy is tolerated in the jurisdiction where the marriage occurred, the marriage would be void under Philippine law if it contravenes fundamental policies such as monogamy.
• Bigamy in Jurisprudence: In Garcia v. Recio (G.R. No. 138322), the Philippine Supreme Court ruled that a foreign divorce decree involving Filipinos is not automatically recognized unless judicially proven. This includes cases where bigamy may have been sanctioned by foreign laws.

6. Same-sex Marriages Celebrated Abroad

• Philippine law does not recognize same-sex marriages celebrated abroad, as these are against the legal and public policy stance of the country. Despite the fact that certain foreign jurisdictions allow same-sex marriages, such unions are considered void under Philippine law.
• Jurisprudential Stance: There is currently no binding Philippine Supreme Court decision directly addressing same-sex marriages celebrated abroad for recognition in the Philippines, but legislative and judicial trends suggest that this is unlikely to change unless explicitly amended in Philippine law.

7. Marriage by Proxy

• Philippine law also does not recognize marriages by proxy, even if such marriages are considered valid under the laws of the foreign jurisdiction where they were celebrated. Proxy marriages are viewed as contravening the essential requirement of personal consent and physical presence at the ceremony.

8. Annulment and Declaration of Nullity of Foreign Marriages

• If a marriage celebrated abroad is subsequently found to be defective, Filipino citizens can seek annulment or declaration of nullity through Philippine courts. Grounds include psychological incapacity (Article 36), fraud (Article 45), and lack of consent (Article 35), which apply universally to marriages, irrespective of where they are celebrated.

• Psychological Incapacity: The case of Republic v. Molina sets stringent guidelines for declaring nullity due to psychological incapacity, which can be applied to marriages celebrated abroad. If a marriage involves Filipinos and psychological incapacity is alleged, a Philippine court can still declare nullity under Article 36 if the incapacity meets Molina guidelines.

9. Conflict of Laws and Forum Shopping

• While Philippine courts respect foreign judgments and laws, parties must avoid "forum shopping" to invalidate marriages where Philippine laws or jurisdiction apply. Courts consider whether the Philippines is the appropriate forum based on citizenship, residency, and the fundamental policies of the Family Code.

• Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens: Philippine courts may decline to hear cases involving foreign marriages if another jurisdiction has a more substantial connection to the dispute, thereby minimizing forum shopping or redundant litigation.

10. Public Policy Considerations

• Philippine recognition of marriages celebrated abroad is not absolute; it is subject to overriding public policy. Marriages that contradict fundamental Philippine values or moral principles—such as bigamous, incestuous, or underage marriages—are not recognized, even if valid in the place of celebration.

In summary, the validity of marriages celebrated abroad is generally recognized under Philippine law if compliant with foreign jurisdictional requirements, provided they do not violate Philippine public policy. The most common issues arise in contexts of divorce, remarriage, same-sex unions, bigamous marriages, and proxy marriages. Filipinos marrying abroad must meet local requirements but should be mindful of the Philippine requirements for any legal recognition, especially in cases where they wish to remarry after a foreign divorce or seek judicial remedies in Philippine courts.