Disinheritance | Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW > VI. WILLS AND SUCCESSION > B. Different Kinds of Succession > 2. Compulsory Succession > f. Disinheritance

---

1. Definition and Nature of Disinheritance

Disinheritance is the act of depriving a compulsory heir of his share in the inheritance through a will. Under Philippine law, disinheritance is governed by Articles 915 to 921 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. It involves a deliberate and explicit act by the testator, executed in accordance with legal formalities, and must be based on a legal ground provided by law.

---

2. Essential Characteristics of Disinheritance

1. Must be Express and in a Will: Disinheritance is valid only if expressly made in a valid will. General statements or informal declarations of intent to disinherit a compulsory heir have no legal effect. (Art. 916)

2. Must Be Based on Legal Grounds: The law provides an exhaustive list of grounds for disinheritance. Any disinheritance not based on these grounds is void.

3. Must Be Clear and Unequivocal: The will must clearly state the fact of disinheritance and the specific legal ground relied upon.

4. Affects Compulsory Heirs Only: Disinheritance applies only to compulsory heirs, i.e., those entitled to a legitime. Other heirs can be excluded without needing to comply with the rules on disinheritance.

---

3. Compulsory Heirs

The following are compulsory heirs under Philippine law:

• Legitimate children and descendants
• Legitimate parents and ascendants
• Illegitimate children
• Surviving spouse

These individuals are entitled to a portion of the estate, known as the legitime, which cannot be withheld except through valid disinheritance.

---

4. Legal Grounds for Disinheritance

The Civil Code enumerates specific grounds for disinheritance for each category of compulsory heir:

A. Disinheritance of Children and Descendants (Art. 919):

1. Conviction of an attempt against the life of the testator, his spouse, descendants, or ascendants.
2. Accusing the testator of a crime punishable by imprisonment of 6 years or more, if the accusation is found to be false.
3. Compelled the testator to make a will or change one through violence, intimidation, or fraud.
4. Having been convicted of adultery or concubinage with the testator’s spouse.
5. Maliciously causing the testator to lose his liberty, honor, or property.
6. Habitual maltreatment of the testator by word or deed.
7. Leading a dishonorable or disgraceful life.
8. Conviction of a crime punishable by civil interdiction.
9. Failure to comply with any condition imposed in a previous will.

B. Disinheritance of Parents and Ascendants (Art. 920):

1. Conviction of an attempt against the life of the testator, his spouse, descendants, or ascendants.
2. Accusing the testator of a crime punishable by imprisonment of 6 years or more, if the accusation is found to be false.
3. Compelled the testator to make a will or change one through violence, intimidation, or fraud.
4. Maliciously causing the testator to lose his liberty, honor, or property.
5. Maltreatment of the testator by word or deed.
6. Attempting to prevent the testator from making a will, or changing or revoking one, through violence, intimidation, or fraud.

C. Disinheritance of Spouse (Art. 921):

1. Conviction of an attempt against the life of the testator, his descendants, or ascendants.
2. Accusing the testator of a crime punishable by imprisonment of 6 years or more, if the accusation is found to be false.
3. Compelled the testator to make a will or change one through violence, intimidation, or fraud.
4. Maliciously causing the testator to lose his liberty, honor, or property.
5. Maltreatment of the testator by word or deed.
6. Having given cause for legal separation.
7. Having given grounds for loss of parental authority under Article 19 of the Family Code.

---

5. Effects of Invalid Disinheritance

1. Void Disinheritance: If disinheritance is not expressly made, is based on an invalid ground, or is not clearly stated, it is void.

   • The compulsory heir retains their right to their legitime.
   • The invalid disinheritance does not affect other provisions of the will unless such provisions depend on the disinheritance.

2. Reconciliation: Reconciliation between the testator and the disinherited heir nullifies the disinheritance. (Art. 917)

---

6. Formalities and Procedural Aspects

1. Inclusion in a Valid Will: Disinheritance must be embodied in a will executed in accordance with legal formalities under Articles 804 to 817 of the Civil Code.

2. Justification in the Will: The will must explicitly state the specific legal ground for disinheritance. Omission of this ground renders the disinheritance void.

3. Proof of Grounds: If contested, the person claiming the validity of the disinheritance has the burden of proving the existence of the stated ground.

---

7. Additional Considerations

1. Substitution of Heirs: If a compulsory heir is validly disinherited, the legitime passes to their heirs by representation, unless otherwise provided by the will.

2. Restoration of Rights: If the ground for disinheritance ceases to exist before the death of the testator (e.g., reconciliation), the compulsory heir regains their right to the legitime.

3. Impact on Legitimate and Illegitimate Heirs: The rules on disinheritance apply uniformly, but the allocation of the estate changes depending on the number and types of heirs.

---

Disinheritance is a highly technical area of Philippine succession law and must be approached with utmost care and precision. Any deviation from the legal requirements can render the disinheritance void, reinstating the rights of the compulsory heir.

Preterition | Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Preterition in Compulsory Succession

Preterition is a significant concept in Philippine succession law, found under Article 854 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. It refers to the omission of a compulsory heir in the direct line (legitimate or illegitimate, whether descendant or ascendant) from the testator's will, either by failing to institute them as heirs or by not providing for them in any way. Below is a meticulous discussion of the principles, requirements, effects, and nuances of preterition:

---

Definition

Preterition is the omission of a compulsory heir in the direct line (descendants or ascendants) from the will, such that they receive no inheritance at all, whether as instituted heirs, legatees, or devisees. The omitted heir is not expressly disinherited, but they are effectively excluded from any participation in the inheritance.

---

Requisites for Preterition

For preterition to occur, the following elements must be present:

1. Omission: A compulsory heir in the direct line (e.g., legitimate children, parents) is completely excluded from the will.
2. Compulsory Heir in the Direct Line: The omission must pertain to compulsory heirs in the direct line only:
   • Descendants: Legitimate or illegitimate children, legitimate grandchildren (if their parent is deceased).
   • Ascendants: Legitimate parents, legitimate grandparents.
3. No Express Disinheritance: The omission does not result from valid disinheritance but is merely a failure to recognize or provide for the heir.
4. Existence of a Will: Preterition applies only when there is a will. It cannot occur in intestate succession.

---

Effects of Preterition

1. Total Annulment of the Institution of Heirs:

   • If preterition affects a compulsory heir in the direct line, the institution of heirs in the will is annulled, except for legacies or devises.
   • This means that the omitted compulsory heir will inherit through intestate succession, and their legitime will be fully restored.

2. Legacies and Devises:

   • Legacies and devises in the will remain valid unless they impair the legitime of the preterited heir.

3. Effect on Conjugal Partnership/Absolute Community:

   • Property erroneously disposed of in violation of the preterited heir's legitime will revert to the conjugal partnership or absolute community of property for proper distribution.

4. Partial Annulment:

   • If other provisions of the will remain valid without impairing the legitime of the omitted compulsory heir, they can be enforced.

---

Illustrations

1. Example of Total Annulment:

   • A testator executes a will omitting his legitimate child entirely. The child is not named as an heir, legatee, or devisee.
   • Result: The entire institution of heirs is annulled. The omitted child inherits intestate, and other provisions of the will are upheld only if they do not impair the legitime.

2. Example Where Preterition Does Not Occur:

   • If a compulsory heir is given a legacy or devise (even a small amount), there is no preterition, but the heir may seek to complete their legitime if impaired.

3. Disinheritance vs. Preterition:

   • If the testator validly disinherits a compulsory heir following the grounds in Article 919 of the Civil Code (e.g., maltreatment or committing a crime against the testator), preterition does not apply.

---

Legal Basis

• Article 854, Civil Code:

  "The preterition or omission of one, some, or all of the compulsory heirs in the direct line, whether living at the time of the execution of the will or born after the testator’s death, shall annul the institution of heirs. However, the devises and legacies shall be valid insofar as they are not inofficious."

• Articles 906–908, Civil Code: Govern legitimes and their protection.

---

Key Jurisprudence

Philippine courts have repeatedly clarified the application of preterition, emphasizing the need for strict compliance with the rules governing legitimes and the intent of the testator:

1. Reyes v. Barraquio (G.R. No. 130742):
   • Established that preterition applies only to heirs in the direct line and invalidates the institution of heirs.
2. Ramos v. Ramos (G.R. No. 186107):
   • Highlighted the distinction between preterition and valid disinheritance.
3. De Borja v. De Borja (G.R. No. 131215):
   • Affirmed the rule that legacies and devises remain valid unless they impair legitime.

---

Related Doctrines

1. Prohibition Against Impairing Legitime:
   • Even when preterition does not occur, any disposition reducing the legitime of a compulsory heir is inofficious and void to that extent.
2. Doctrine of Conjugal or Absolute Community Rights:
   • If the omitted heir’s legitime is violated due to improper distribution, the conjugal/absolute community property rules govern rectification.

---

Practical Implications

1. Estate Planning:
   • Testators must ensure that all compulsory heirs, particularly those in the direct line, are either provided for in the will or validly disinherited to avoid annulment due to preterition.
2. Legal Challenges:
   • Heirs who are preterited may file a judicial action to annul the institution of heirs and claim their legitime.

---

Preterition ensures the protection of compulsory heirs in the direct line, emphasizing the primacy of family rights under Philippine law. It underscores the responsibility of testators to honor the legitime of their heirs and avoid omissions that could undermine the orderly succession of estates.

Consequence of Impairment of the Legitime | Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Consequence of Impairment of the Legitime in Civil Law

The legitime refers to the portion of a decedent's estate that the law reserves for the compulsory heirs, ensuring they are not entirely deprived of inheritance. In the Philippine Civil Code, the principles regarding the impairment of the legitime are designed to safeguard the rights of these heirs. Below is a meticulous discussion on the consequences of impairing the legitime, including the legal framework, remedies, and implications:

---

1. Definition of Legitime

• Article 886 of the Civil Code defines the legitime as the part of the testator’s property which cannot be disposed of because the law has reserved it for certain heirs.
• Compulsory heirs include:
  • Legitimate children and descendants.
  • Legitimate parents and ascendants.
  • Surviving spouse.
  • Illegitimate children (entitled to one-half of the share of legitimate children).

---

2. Impairment of the Legitime

Impairment occurs when the testator disposes of more than the free portion of their estate, thereby reducing the legitime of compulsory heirs. This may happen in various forms:

• Excessive Donations Inter Vivos: Lifetime donations that exceed the free portion.
• Testamentary Dispositions: Wills allocating more than what the free portion allows.
• Charges or Conditions: Imposing burdens that diminish the value of the legitime.
• Invalid Recognition of Heirs: Acknowledging heirs who have no legal right, reducing the legitime of compulsory heirs.

---

3. Legal Remedies for Impairment of Legitime

When the legitime is impaired, the compulsory heirs are entitled to legal remedies to protect their rights. These include:

a. Reduction of Excessive Dispositions (Reduction of Donations or Testamentary Gifts)

• Article 906: If the legitime is impaired, the testamentary dispositions that exceed the free portion shall be reduced or annulled.
• Order of Reduction:
  1. Gifts inter vivos (donations) are reduced first.
  2. Testamentary dispositions (in a will) are reduced second.
• Article 910 provides that reductions shall begin with the most recent donations, applying the pro rata principle.

b. Action for Rescission or Annulment

• Compulsory heirs may file an action to rescind donations or annul testamentary dispositions that impair their legitime.
• Prescription Period:
  • 10 years for donations inter vivos.
  • No express period for testamentary dispositions; typically litigated during estate settlement.

c. Collation of Donations

• Article 1061: Donations made by the deceased during their lifetime are subject to collation (adding them back to the estate) to determine if the legitime has been impaired.

---

4. Effects of Impairment

a. Reduction of Gifts or Bequests

• Any disposition impairing the legitime is invalid to the extent of impairment.
• Excess amounts are added back to the estate and distributed to the compulsory heirs.

b. Effects on the Will

• A will may not be entirely invalid but will be modified to protect the legitime.
• Testamentary clauses conflicting with legitime rights are void, but the rest of the will may stand if separable.

c. Liability of Donees

• Donees may be required to return what they received in excess, up to the extent necessary to restore the legitime.
• Article 1098: The heir whose legitime is impaired may recover directly from donees when the estate assets are insufficient.

---

5. Principles Governing the Legitime

a. Indefeasibility of Legitime

• The legitime cannot be waived, transferred, or assigned during the lifetime of the decedent (Article 887).
• Any attempt to waive or alienate the legitime before the decedent's death is void.

b. Effect of Renunciation

• Renunciation of inheritance post-death does not impair the legitime of other compulsory heirs.

c. Effect of Unequal Distribution

• Unequal distribution is allowed only if it does not diminish the legitime. Otherwise, such dispositions are reduced.

---

6. Case Law on Impairment of Legitime

The Philippine Supreme Court has issued rulings emphasizing the protection of legitime:

• Heirs of Roxas v. CA (1997): The Court held that dispositions exceeding the free portion must be reduced, ensuring that compulsory heirs receive their legitime.
• Litam v. Rivera (1953): Declared that compulsory heirs cannot be deprived of their legitime even through donations or encumbrances done in bad faith.

---

7. Practical Considerations

a. Estate Planning

• Individuals should ensure that their dispositions (lifetime and testamentary) comply with the rules on legitime to avoid litigation and disputes among heirs.

b. Role of Executors

• Executors must ensure that the estate distribution respects the legitime of compulsory heirs and reduce excessive dispositions accordingly.

c. Judicial Intervention

• Courts will intervene to resolve disputes concerning the impairment of the legitime, especially when estate settlement proceedings reveal irregularities.

---

Conclusion

The impairment of the legitime triggers automatic protections and remedies under Philippine law. Testators must comply with the legal limits of disposition to avoid invalidation of their wishes, and compulsory heirs have robust legal rights to ensure the integrity of their legitime. These provisions reflect the importance of family solidarity and fairness in succession law.

Determination of the Legitime | Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Compulsory Succession: Determination of the Legitime

In Philippine civil law, under the Civil Code of the Philippines, the concept of legitime arises in the context of compulsory succession, which guarantees certain heirs a fixed portion of the estate of the decedent. Below is a comprehensive discussion of its nature, determination, and nuances.

---

1. Definition of Legitime

Legitime is defined under Article 886 of the Civil Code as:

"The part of the testator's property which he cannot dispose of because the law has reserved it for certain heirs, called compulsory heirs."

It is a statutory portion of the inheritance that is mandatorily allotted to the compulsory heirs, and the decedent cannot deprive them of this share without a valid legal cause.

---

2. Compulsory Heirs

Under Article 887, the compulsory heirs are:

1. Legitimate Children and Descendants – They succeed in their own right or by representation.
2. Legitimate Parents and Ascendants – They inherit in default of legitimate descendants.
3. Illegitimate Children – Entitled to one-half of the share of legitimate children.
4. The Surviving Spouse – Entitled to a share depending on the regime of the property relationship and coexisting heirs.
5. In Certain Cases, the State – Only when there are no other compulsory heirs.

---

3. Basis for Determining Legitime

The legitime is computed based on the net estate, which is:

The gross estate minus debts, charges, and obligations, as well as funeral expenses, taxes, and administrative expenses.

Formula:

Net Estate = Gross Estate - Liabilities

---

4. Shares of Compulsory Heirs

The allocation of legitime depends on the composition of the compulsory heirs:

a. Legitimate Children and/or Descendants

• If there is one legitimate child, the legitime is 1/2 of the net estate.
• If there are two or more legitimate children, they collectively share 1/2 of the net estate equally.

b. Legitimate Parents and/or Ascendants

• In the absence of legitimate children or descendants, the legitimate parents or ascendants are entitled to 1/2 of the net estate.

c. Illegitimate Children

• Entitled to 1/2 of the share of a legitimate child.
• They share this portion collectively if there are multiple illegitimate children.

d. Surviving Spouse

The legitime of the surviving spouse varies based on the presence of other heirs:

• With legitimate children/descendants: Equal to the share of one legitimate child.
• With legitimate parents/ascendants: 1/4 of the net estate.
• With illegitimate children only: 1/2 of the net estate if the surviving spouse is the sole heir; otherwise, the share is equal to the share of one illegitimate child.

e. In Default of Legitimate and Illegitimate Heirs

• The surviving spouse may inherit the entire estate as the only compulsory heir.

---

5. Rules for Partition

• The free portion of the estate is the balance after deducting the legitime from the net estate. The testator may freely dispose of this portion through a will.
• Disinheritance of a compulsory heir requires compliance with strict grounds and procedural requirements under Articles 915 to 922.
• In cases of preterition (omission of a compulsory heir), the institution of heirs and legacies/devices are annulled, and the estate is distributed as though in intestacy.

---

6. Special Cases in the Determination of Legitime

a. Advances on Legitime

• Donations inter vivos or advances given during the decedent's lifetime are charged against the legitime under Article 908.
• Excess donations may be reduced to preserve the legitime.

b. Collation

• Legitimate children and descendants must bring into the estate advances received to compute the legitime properly.

c. Reduction of Testamentary Dispositions

• If the testator’s dispositions impair the legitime, the provisions in the will are reduced proportionally under Articles 906 and 907.

---

7. Application of the Law

Courts are meticulous in upholding the legitime of compulsory heirs. Any disposition in violation of the legitime is void or reducible to align with statutory requirements. Legal and tax advisors, executors, and administrators must ensure compliance to avoid litigation or disputes.

---

Summary Table of Legitime Shares

Compulsory Heir	Share in Net Estate
Legitimate Children	1/2 collectively (equal sharing)
Legitimate Parents	1/2 collectively
Illegitimate Children	1/2 of a legitimate child's share
Surviving Spouse	Varies as described above

The determination of legitime requires a clear understanding of the Civil Code provisions, proper valuation of the estate, and careful consideration of legal nuances to protect the interests of the compulsory heirs while respecting the decedent's testamentary wishes.

Computation of the Net Hereditary Estate | Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Computation of the Net Hereditary Estate in Compulsory Succession (Philippine Civil Law)

Under Civil Law, particularly the rules on Wills and Succession, compulsory succession mandates that a portion of a decedent’s estate be reserved for compulsory heirs, regardless of the decedent’s wishes. Computing the Net Hereditary Estate is essential in determining the extent of these heirs’ rights and the free portion of the estate.

Here is a detailed explanation of the computation of the Net Hereditary Estate in the context of compulsory succession:

---

1. Gross Estate

The gross estate includes all the properties, rights, and obligations of the decedent at the time of death. It comprises:

• Real Property (land, buildings, improvements).
• Personal Property (vehicles, jewelry, cash, shares of stock, etc.).
• Claims and Rights (e.g., receivables, royalties).
• Businesses or Interests (e.g., partnerships, joint ventures).

The valuation of the gross estate should be based on the fair market value or as determined under applicable tax and civil laws.

---

2. Deductions from the Gross Estate

To arrive at the net hereditary estate, specific deductions are made from the gross estate. These deductions are enumerated below:

a. Funeral Expenses

• Reasonable funeral expenses are deducted. While the Civil Code does not specify a maximum amount, tax laws (e.g., the National Internal Revenue Code) typically impose a cap (e.g., up to 5% of the gross estate or a fixed ceiling, as provided by regulations).

b. Judicial and Extra-Judicial Expenses

• These include expenses related to the settlement of the estate, such as:
  • Filing fees
  • Attorneys’ fees
  • Appraiser's fees
  • Other costs of administration

c. Debts and Obligations

• Valid and enforceable debts of the decedent are deducted, including:
  • Loans
  • Mortgage debts (secured and unsecured)
  • Credit card liabilities
  • Promissory notes

d. Taxes

• Taxes unpaid by the decedent before death, such as real property tax and income tax, are deductible. However, estate tax itself is not deducted as it applies after determining the net estate.

e. Claims Against the Estate

• Legitimate claims from third parties that are properly documented (e.g., contracts, judicial orders).

f. Collation

• Properties previously donated or advanced to compulsory heirs are collated (added back to the estate for computation purposes). This ensures fairness in distributing the estate according to legitime and free portions.

g. Liabilities of the Decedent

• These include:
  • Obligations arising from contracts
  • Compensation for damages or liabilities adjudicated by courts
  • Other enforceable obligations.

h. Special Deductions under Tax Laws

• As stipulated by tax laws, these may include family home deductions, standard deductions, or medical expenses incurred within one year prior to death.

---

3. Legitimate and Free Portions

Once the Net Hereditary Estate is determined, the estate is divided into:

• Legitime: The portion reserved by law for compulsory heirs. This is non-disposable and varies depending on the heirs present:

  • Children and Descendants: Share equally in the legitime.
  • Surviving Spouse: Entitled to a share in the legitime and, in some cases, to equalize with children.
  • Ascendants (Parents, Grandparents): Entitled to a share if there are no children or descendants.
  • Illegitimate Children: Entitled to half of the share of legitimate children.

• Free Portion: The remaining portion of the estate that the decedent can freely dispose of through a will or testamentary disposition.

---

4. Collation and Reduction

The process of collation involves adding back to the net estate any donations or advances made during the decedent’s lifetime to compulsory heirs. If the total legitime exceeds the net estate due to these advancements, the donations are reduced or returned to satisfy the legitime.

Steps in Collation:

1. Identify properties given as donations inter vivos or advances.
2. Determine the value of these properties at the time of donation.
3. Add these values to the net estate for the purpose of computing the legitime.

Reductions:

If testamentary dispositions exceed the free portion, the will is reduced in this order:

1. Free portion (excess first deducted here).
2. Legacies and devises (pro-rata reduction applies if the free portion is insufficient).
3. Donations inter vivos (may be revoked or reduced to restore the legitime).

---

5. Illustration of Computation

Example Scenario:

1. Gross Estate: ₱10,000,000
2. Deductions:
   • Funeral expenses: ₱200,000
   • Administration expenses: ₱500,000
   • Debts: ₱2,000,000
   • Taxes: ₱300,000
     Total Deductions: ₱3,000,000
3. Net Hereditary Estate: ₱7,000,000
4. Collation:
   • Donation to Child A: ₱1,000,000
     Adjusted Estate for Legitime: ₱8,000,000

Division:

• Assuming 3 legitimate children and a surviving spouse:
  • Total Legitime: 50% of ₱8,000,000 = ₱4,000,000
  • Free Portion: ₱4,000,000
  • Each child gets ₱1,000,000 (legitime).
  • Spouse gets ₱1,000,000 (legitime) + potential share in the free portion.

---

6. Key Jurisprudence and Rules

• Barretto v. Cabangis (1927): Established the principle of strict compliance with legitime allocations.
• Article 906, Civil Code: Confirms the reduction of excessive testamentary dispositions to protect legitime.
• National Internal Revenue Code: Supplements computation with tax-related deductions and exemptions.

---

Conclusion

The computation of the Net Hereditary Estate ensures the proper allocation of the estate in accordance with Philippine law. The protection of compulsory heirs through legitime and the equitable distribution of assets are fundamental in succession. Familiarity with the relevant laws, processes of collation, and deductions is crucial for legal practitioners to ensure compliance and fairness.

Table of Legitime | Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Table of Legitime in Philippine Law

The concept of legitime is an essential component of succession law in the Philippines, particularly under the provisions of the Civil Code of the Philippines. It establishes the minimum portion of a decedent's estate that must be reserved by law for compulsory heirs, regardless of the decedent's wishes as expressed in their will.

---

I. Definition of Legitime

• Legitime: That part of the testator’s property that is reserved by law for compulsory heirs and cannot be freely disposed of by will.
  • Article 886, Civil Code: "Legitime is that part of the testator’s property which he cannot dispose of because the law has reserved it for certain heirs, called compulsory heirs."

---

II. Compulsory Heirs

The law identifies specific individuals as compulsory heirs. Their legitime is protected by law and must be allotted as follows:

1. Primary Compulsory Heirs

• Legitimate children and their descendants:
  • Entitled to 1/2 of the estate, divided equally among them.
  • If any legitimate child predeceases the testator, their descendants inherit by right of representation.
• Surviving spouse:
  • Shares in the legitime alongside the legitimate children.
  • The spouse’s share is equal to the share of one legitimate child.

2. Secondary Compulsory Heirs

• Legitimate parents and ascendants:
  • Entitled to 1/2 of the estate, only if the decedent has no legitimate children or descendants.
• Surviving spouse:
  • Shares in the legitime alongside the legitimate ascendants.
  • Receives 1/2 of the estate when sharing with ascendants, or all of the estate if no ascendants exist.

3. Illegitimate Children

• Entitled to 1/2 of the share of a legitimate child.
• They participate in the free portion only after satisfying the legitime of all compulsory heirs.

---

III. Amount of Legitime

The amount of legitime varies depending on the surviving compulsory heirs. Below is a comprehensive table summarizing the legitime allocations based on different family scenarios.

Compulsory Heirs	Legitime Reserved	Free Portion
1. Legitimate Children Only	1/2 of the estate (divided equally among them)	Remaining 1/2
2. Legitimate Children + Surviving Spouse	1/2 of the estate (children and spouse share equally)	Remaining 1/2
3. Surviving Spouse Only	1/2 of the estate	Remaining 1/2
4. Legitimate Parents (No Children)	1/2 of the estate	Remaining 1/2
5. Illegitimate Children Only	1/2 of the estate (divided equally)	Remaining 1/2
6. Illegitimate Children + Surviving Spouse	1/2 of the estate (children: 1/2; spouse: equal to one child’s share)	Remaining 1/2
7. Legitimate Parents + Surviving Spouse	1/2 of the estate (spouse: 1/2; parents: 1/2 of legitime)	Remaining 1/2

---

IV. Key Rules on Legitime

1. Immutability of Legitime:

   • The legitime is immutable and cannot be impaired by acts of the testator (e.g., donations or dispositions that prejudice compulsory heirs).

2. Right of Representation:

   • Applies in the case of predeceased legitimate children. Their descendants inherit their legitime per stirpes.

3. Illegitimate Children’s Rights:

   • Entitled to a share in the legitime but only half that of legitimate children. They cannot inherit in competition with legitimate ascendants or descendants unless within the free portion.

4. Surviving Spouse’s Rights:

   • Always entitled to a share in the legitime, whether in concurrence with children or ascendants.
   • Exclusive Right to Conjugal Property: If the marriage regime is absolute community or conjugal partnership of gains, the surviving spouse retains their share in the community property prior to the estate distribution.

5. Rights of Adopted Children:

   • Treated as legitimate children, entitled to the same legitime share.

---

V. Encumbrances and Claims Against Legitime

1. Reduction of Excessive Donations:
   • Donations inter vivos may be reduced if they impair the legitime of compulsory heirs (Article 909, Civil Code).
2. Collation of Property:
   • Properties given as advancements to compulsory heirs are collated to determine the legitime.

---

VI. Additional Considerations

1. Testamentary Dispositions:
   • The testator may freely dispose of the remaining estate, known as the free portion, provided it does not violate the legitime of compulsory heirs.
2. Waiver of Legitime:
   • Compulsory heirs cannot validly renounce their legitime before the decedent’s death (Article 1070, Civil Code).

---

This comprehensive overview reflects the intricacies of compulsory succession and legitime in Philippine civil law, ensuring that compulsory heirs are protected in the distribution of a decedent's estate.

Compulsory Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW > VI. WILLS AND SUCCESSION > B. Different Kinds of Succession > 2. Compulsory Succession

Definition of Compulsory Succession

Compulsory succession refers to a type of succession under Philippine law where certain heirs, known as compulsory heirs, are entitled to a fixed and definite portion of the estate of the decedent by operation of law. These heirs cannot be deprived of their rightful share except for valid causes expressly provided by law.

Legal Basis

The rules on compulsory succession are governed by the Civil Code of the Philippines, particularly Articles 887 to 906, which establish:

• Who are considered compulsory heirs
• Their respective legitimes (reserved shares)
• Restrictions on testamentary freedom to protect these legitimes

Who Are the Compulsory Heirs?

Under Article 887 of the Civil Code, the following are considered compulsory heirs:

1. Primary Compulsory Heirs:
   • Legitimate children and their descendants.
2. Secondary Compulsory Heirs (in default of the primary heirs):
   • Legitimate parents and ascendants.
3. Conjugal Heirs:
   • The surviving spouse.
4. Illegitimate Children:
   • Entitled to their legitime, albeit smaller than legitimate children.
5. In Default of the Above:
   • In certain circumstances, other relatives may inherit, but this does not pertain to compulsory succession.

The Legitime

The legitime is the portion of the decedent’s estate that is reserved by law for the compulsory heirs. It cannot be reduced or impaired except in cases where the law expressly allows it (e.g., through disinheritance).

Proportions of the Legitime:

1. Legitimate Children and Descendants:
   • If there is one legitimate child, their legitime is one-half of the estate.
   • If there are two or more, they collectively receive one-half, shared equally.
2. Illegitimate Children:
   • They receive one-half of the share of a legitimate child.
3. Surviving Spouse:
   • If there are legitimate children, the spouse is entitled to a share equal to that of one legitimate child.
   • If there are no legitimate children but there are legitimate ascendants, the spouse shares the legitime with them.
   • If the spouse is the sole compulsory heir, the legitime is one-half of the estate.
4. Legitimate Parents and Ascendants:
   • They are entitled to one-half of the estate if there are no legitimate children or descendants.
5. Conjugal Partnership/Absolute Community Property:
   • The surviving spouse is entitled to receive 50% of the conjugal property before distribution of the estate, representing their share in the property regime.

Prohibited Acts and Restrictions

1. Reduction of Legitime:
   • Testamentary dispositions cannot impair the legitime of compulsory heirs. If the testator allocates more than the free portion to other heirs, the excess is reduced by operation of law.
2. Prohibition on Disinheritance Without Cause:
   • Compulsory heirs cannot be disinherited except for causes expressly enumerated under Articles 919 to 921 of the Civil Code (e.g., abandonment, maltreatment of the testator, or crimes committed against the testator).
3. Prohibition on Conditional Legitime:
   • The legitime cannot be subject to conditions or burdens unless allowed by law.

Succession in Case of Predeceased Heirs

If a compulsory heir predeceases the decedent, the following rules apply:

1. Representation:
   • The descendants of the predeceased heir represent him or her and inherit in their stead.
2. Division:
   • The legitime of the predeceased heir is divided among their descendants equally.

Compulsory Succession in Intestate Estates

In cases of intestacy (when there is no will), compulsory heirs inherit first, in the same proportions as their legitimes. The rules on legitime apply equally to intestate succession to ensure the protection of compulsory heirs.

Grounds for Disinheritance

The law enumerates specific grounds under which compulsory heirs may be disinherited:

1. For children: Acts such as maltreatment of the parents, committing crimes against the parents, or abandoning them.
2. For parents: Acts such as attempting against the life of a child or compelling a child to commit a crime.
3. For the surviving spouse: Adultery, desertion, or maltreatment.

Disinheritance must be made in a valid will, and the grounds must be proven. If the disinheritance is invalid or not properly substantiated, it will have no legal effect.

Effect of Renunciation or Preterition

1. Renunciation:
   • A compulsory heir may renounce their share of the inheritance, but such renunciation must be clear and unequivocal.
2. Preterition:
   • If a compulsory heir is omitted in a will, the will may be declared void insofar as it prejudices the legitime of the omitted heir. The omitted heir is entitled to claim their rightful share.

Key Takeaways

• Compulsory succession ensures that compulsory heirs are guaranteed their rightful share of the estate.
• Testators have limited freedom to dispose of their property because they cannot impair the legitime.
• The legitime and the distribution of the estate vary depending on the presence and type of heirs.
• Violations of the rules on compulsory succession can lead to the nullification of testamentary dispositions or partial intestacy.

Compulsory succession balances the rights of heirs and the testamentary freedom of the deceased, ensuring fairness and protection under the law.

Instances when legacy/device is deemed revoked | Legacies and Devices | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Instances When a Legacy or Devise is Deemed Revoked (Philippine Law on Wills and Succession)

Under Philippine law, particularly the Civil Code of the Philippines, a legacy or devise in a testamentary succession may be revoked in specific circumstances. These rules aim to ensure that the true intent of the testator is respected while addressing subsequent changes in circumstances that might render the legacy or devise invalid.

Here is a comprehensive breakdown of instances when a legacy or devise is deemed revoked:

---

1. Express Revocation by the Testator

• Article 828: A testator may expressly revoke a legacy or devise in their will or by a subsequent valid will, codicil, or other writing executed with the same formalities required for a will.
• Example: The testator, after bequeathing a property in an earlier will, later executes a new will or codicil explicitly stating that the earlier legacy or devise is revoked.

---

2. Implied Revocation by Incompatibility

• Article 829: A legacy or devise is revoked if there is an irreconcilable inconsistency between it and a subsequent testamentary disposition or legal act of the testator.
• Example: A later provision in the will gives the same property to another person or disposes of it in a manner inconsistent with the earlier legacy or devise.

---

3. Alienation or Loss of the Subject Property

• Article 930: If the specific property subject of the legacy or devise is alienated (sold, donated, or otherwise transferred) by the testator during their lifetime, the legacy or devise is revoked.
• Article 931: If the specific property is lost or destroyed, and it was not the testator’s fault, the legacy or devise is deemed revoked. However, if the testator receives insurance proceeds or a substitute property for it, the legacy or devise may still apply to the substitute or proceeds unless explicitly revoked.

---

4. Substantial Change in the Subject Matter

• Article 933: If the property subject to a legacy or devise undergoes substantial change in form or nature, it may be revoked. This revocation applies if the property has been transformed into something entirely different and no longer corresponds to the description in the will.
• Example: A house left in a legacy is demolished and replaced with a commercial building by the testator.

---

5. Ademption by Extinction

• Ademption by extinction occurs when the specific property subject of the legacy or devise ceases to exist as part of the estate at the time of the testator's death.
• This is a natural consequence of Article 930 and Article 931.
• Example: A car bequeathed in a will is sold or given away before the testator's death. The legacy is deemed revoked.

---

6. Ademption by Satisfaction

• Article 934: A legacy or devise is deemed revoked if the testator delivers the property to the legatee or devisee during their lifetime as an advance on the testamentary disposition.
• Example: The testator gifts the house mentioned in the will to the beneficiary before their death, with the clear intention that this fulfills the testamentary legacy.

---

7. Disinheritance of the Legatee or Devisee

• Article 919: A legacy or devise is deemed revoked if the legatee or devisee is legally disinherited in a valid will or codicil.
• Disinheritance requires compliance with formalities and must be based on valid grounds specified by law (e.g., unworthiness).

---

8. Unworthiness of the Legatee or Devisee

• Article 1032: A legacy or devise is deemed revoked if the legatee or devisee is declared unworthy to inherit due to legal grounds (e.g., committing acts against the testator, like violence, fraud, or dishonor).

---

9. Subsequent Birth, Adoption, or Acknowledgment of Heirs

• Article 854: If a child is born, adopted, or acknowledged by the testator after the execution of the will, a legacy or devise may be impliedly revoked if it affects the legitime of compulsory heirs.
• Example: A specific devise of property to a friend might be revoked if a newly born or acknowledged child reduces the estate’s free portion.

---

10. Predecease, Renunciation, or Incapacity of the Legatee or Devisee

• Article 960: If the legatee or devisee predeceases the testator, renounces the legacy, or is otherwise incapable of receiving it (e.g., by legal incapacity or unworthiness), the legacy or devise is revoked unless there is a substitute or accretion applies.
• Accretion (Articles 1015-1017): If substitution or accretion does not apply, the property becomes part of the free portion of the estate.

---

11. Failure of Condition or Purpose

• Article 882: If a condition attached to a legacy or devise is not fulfilled or becomes impossible to fulfill, the legacy or devise is deemed revoked.
• Example: A house is left to a beneficiary on the condition that they complete a degree within five years. If the condition is unmet, the legacy fails.

---

12. Repudiation by the Legatee or Devisee

• Article 960: If the legatee or devisee formally renounces the legacy or devise, it is deemed revoked and returns to the estate unless otherwise provided.

---

13. Judicial Nullification of the Testamentary Disposition

• A legacy or devise may be revoked if it is declared void or invalid by the court due to fraud, undue influence, or lack of capacity in executing the will.
• Article 839: Nullity of a will invalidates all dispositions within it, including legacies and devises.

---

Summary

The revocation of legacies and devises can arise from the testator’s direct acts, subsequent events affecting the subject property, or legal grounds disqualifying the beneficiary. These rules, codified in the Civil Code of the Philippines, prioritize the testator’s intent while ensuring fairness and compliance with law. Each case should be carefully examined to determine whether revocation applies.

Legacies and Devices | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Legacies and Devises in Testamentary Succession

Legacies and devises are essential elements in testamentary succession under civil law. These pertain to specific provisions in a testator's will where certain property, rights, or obligations are designated to particular individuals or entities. Below is a comprehensive explanation of the topic under the Civil Code of the Philippines, including their nature, effects, and associated rules.

---

1. Definitions

• Legacy: Refers to a gift of personal property or a specific sum of money given through a will.
• Devise: Refers to a gift of real property through a will.

In legal practice, the terms "legacy" and "devise" are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct technical meanings under the law.

---

2. Nature of Legacies and Devises

• Both legacies and devises are testamentary dispositions, meaning they are effective only after the testator's death and upon probate of the will.
• These dispositions may pertain to specific, determinate things, a portion of the estate, or benefits granted to the heir or legatee/devisee.

---

3. Types of Legacies and Devises

Legacies and devises can be classified into the following categories:

1. Specific Legacy or Devise:

   • Refers to a particular, identifiable piece of property (e.g., "I give my diamond necklace to Maria").
   • The property must exist and belong to the testator at the time of death, unless a contrary intention appears in the will.

2. Demonstrative Legacy or Devise:

   • A legacy or devise charged upon a particular source or fund (e.g., "I give ₱500,000 from my savings account at Bank XYZ to Juan").

3. General Legacy or Devise:

   • A gift of property or money that is not specifically designated or charged upon a particular asset (e.g., "I give ₱1,000,000 to my cousin Ana").

4. Residuary Legacy or Devise:

   • Refers to what remains of the testator's estate after all debts, obligations, specific and general legacies or devises, and administrative expenses are settled (e.g., "I give the residue of my estate to my spouse").

---

4. Governing Provisions in the Civil Code

The Civil Code of the Philippines provides specific rules regarding legacies and devises:

A. Article 924: Right to Accept or Repudiate

• Legatees and devisees, like heirs, have the right to accept or repudiate the testamentary gift.

B. Article 925: Precedence

• If the same property is bequeathed to multiple individuals, the distribution follows the provisions in the will or, in the absence of such provisions, the rules on co-ownership apply.

C. Article 926: Effect of Predecease

• If a legatee or devisee predeceases the testator or is otherwise incapacitated to inherit, the legacy or devise lapses unless a substitution or accretion is expressly or implicitly provided in the will.

D. Article 927: Charges or Obligations

• A legacy or devise may be subject to conditions, charges, or encumbrances imposed by the testator, which must be fulfilled by the beneficiary unless the law or the will provides otherwise.

---

5. Accretion (Article 1015 - 1017)

Accretion applies to legacies and devises when:

1. The legatee or devisee predeceases the testator or is incapacitated to inherit.
2. The will does not provide for a substitute or alternate beneficiary.
3. The testamentary disposition is indivisible.

The share of the deceased or incapacitated beneficiary passes to the co-beneficiaries, if any, unless expressly provided otherwise.

---

6. Lapse of Legacies and Devises

A legacy or devise lapses under the following circumstances:

1. Predecease or Incapacity: The legatee or devisee dies before the testator or is legally disqualified to inherit.
2. Invalidity: The subject matter of the legacy or devise is illegal, impossible, or contrary to public policy.
3. Nonexistence: The specific property no longer exists or belongs to the testator at the time of death, and no intent to replace it is expressed.
4. Repudiation: The legatee or devisee renounces the benefit.

When a legacy or devise lapses, it typically becomes part of the residuary estate unless otherwise directed by the will.

---

7. Priority of Legacies and Devises

Legacies and devises are honored in the following order of priority:

1. Specific legacies or devises.
2. Demonstrative legacies or devises.
3. General legacies or devises.
4. Residuary legacies or devises.

Should the estate be insufficient to fulfill all dispositions, specific legacies or devises are satisfied first, followed by demonstrative, general, and finally residuary dispositions.

---

8. Conditions and Modalities

• A legacy or devise may be conditioned upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of an event.
• Suspensive and resolutory conditions may affect the enjoyment of the legacy or devise.
• Modalities, such as the obligation to perform an act (e.g., maintaining a family grave), are binding on the beneficiary.

---

9. Revocation and Reduction

A legacy or devise may be:

• Revoked by the testator during their lifetime through express or implied acts (e.g., sale or destruction of the specific property).
• Reduced if the legitimes of compulsory heirs are impaired, ensuring compliance with the provisions on legitimate succession.

---

10. Rights of Creditors

Creditors of the estate have a prior right over legacies and devises. The executor or administrator must settle the estate's debts before fulfilling testamentary dispositions. If insufficient assets remain, legacies and devises are abated or reduced proportionally, following the priority outlined above.

---

11. Tax Implications

Legacies and devises are subject to estate taxes under Philippine tax law. The executor or administrator is responsible for paying the estate tax before distributing the property to the beneficiaries.

---

Practical Considerations

1. Clarity in Drafting: The testator must clearly identify the legacies and devises, specifying properties, conditions, and intended beneficiaries to avoid disputes.
2. Substitution: Testators should provide substitute beneficiaries to prevent lapses.
3. Consultation with a Lawyer: Proper legal advice ensures that testamentary dispositions comply with the Civil Code and tax regulations.

---

By adhering to these rules, legacies and devises ensure the orderly disposition of a testator's estate in accordance with their wishes and the law.

Dispositions with a Condition or Term | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Testamentary Succession: Dispositions with a Condition or Term

Testamentary succession is the distribution of a deceased person’s estate according to their expressed will, as embodied in a validly executed will. Within testamentary dispositions, a testator may impose conditions or specify terms that must be satisfied for the testamentary disposition to take effect. Below is an exhaustive discussion of the relevant principles and rules in Philippine law:

---

I. Definitions

1. Condition: A future and uncertain event upon which the acquisition, modification, or termination of rights depends.

   • Condition precedent (suspensive): The condition must occur before the disposition takes effect.
   • Condition subsequent (resolutory): The disposition takes effect immediately but ceases upon the occurrence of the condition.

2. Term: A future and certain event upon which the effectivity or termination of a testamentary disposition depends.

   • Suspensive term (ex die): The disposition becomes effective only upon the arrival of the term.
   • Resolutory term (in diem): The disposition is effective immediately but ends when the term arrives.

---

II. Legal Basis

The governing provisions for testamentary dispositions with conditions or terms are primarily found in the Civil Code of the Philippines, particularly in Articles 871–876, along with other general provisions on conditions in obligations and contracts (Articles 1181–1192).

---

III. Rules and Doctrines

A. General Principles

1. Freedom of Testation: The testator may impose any condition or term provided it is not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy (Article 873, Civil Code).
2. Valid Will: A condition or term can only exist if the testamentary disposition is part of a valid will that complies with formal and substantive requisites.

---

B. Rules on Testamentary Dispositions with a Condition

1. Suspensive Conditions (Article 871, Civil Code)

   • The disposition does not take effect until the condition is fulfilled.
   • If the condition becomes impossible, it is deemed as not having been imposed, and the disposition becomes unconditional.
   • If the condition is contrary to law or morals, the disposition is void.

2. Resolutory Conditions (Article 871, Civil Code)

   • The disposition is effective immediately but is revoked upon the occurrence of the resolutory condition.
   • If the condition is unlawful, the disposition remains valid, disregarding the condition.

3. Implied Conditions

   • A condition may be implied if the testator’s intent can be reasonably ascertained from the language of the will.

---

C. Rules on Testamentary Dispositions with a Term

1. Suspensive Term (Article 873, Civil Code)

   • The effectivity of the disposition is postponed until the arrival of the designated date or event.

2. Resolutory Term (Article 873, Civil Code)

   • The right to the legacy or devise ceases upon the arrival of the term.

3. Certainty of the Term

   • Terms differ from conditions because they must refer to a future event that is certain to happen.

---

D. Conditions Contrary to Law, Morals, or Public Policy (Article 873, Civil Code)

1. Void Conditions

   • If the condition imposed is contrary to law, morals, or public policy, the condition is considered as unwritten.
   • However, the testamentary disposition remains valid unless the illegal condition is inseparable from the disposition itself.

2. Impossible Conditions (Article 873)

   • If the condition is impossible (e.g., requiring the heir to perform an impossible task), the condition is treated as not imposed.
   • If the impossible condition is suspensive, the disposition is deemed unconditional.

---

E. Compliance with Conditions

1. Good Faith Compliance

   • The condition must be complied with in good faith and in the manner prescribed by the testator.

2. Constructive Fulfillment (Article 1186, Civil Code)

   • If the heir or legatee is prevented from fulfilling the condition due to the fault of the testator or other parties, the condition is considered as fulfilled.

3. Retroactivity of Compliance

   • Once the condition is fulfilled, the effect of the disposition retroacts to the time of the testator’s death.

---

IV. Practical Applications

1. Example of a Suspensive Condition

   • A testator may provide: "I give my car to my son, provided he graduates from college."
     • The legacy becomes effective only upon the son’s graduation.

2. Example of a Resolutory Condition

   • A testator may state: "I leave my house to my daughter, provided she does not sell it within five years of my death."
     • The daughter loses her right to the house if she sells it within the specified period.

3. Example of a Term

   • A testator may declare: "I leave my jewelry to my niece, but only after she turns 25."
     • The niece cannot claim the jewelry until she reaches the age specified.

---

V. Dispositions in Substitution

1. Conditional Substitution

   • If the primary heir fails to comply with the condition, a substitute heir may take their place as provided by the testator.

2. Fideicommissary Substitution

   • A condition may also involve a successive disposition where the first heir must preserve the property for the benefit of a subsequent heir, subject to the rules on fideicommissary substitutions.

---

VI. Remedies and Enforcement

1. Interpretation of the Will

   • Courts interpret the will to ascertain the testator’s true intent and determine the validity of conditions or terms.

2. Challenge to Invalid Conditions or Terms

   • Interested parties may challenge testamentary dispositions that impose unlawful or impossible conditions.

3. Role of Executors

   • Executors are responsible for ensuring compliance with conditions and terms, as well as distributing the estate accordingly.

---

VII. Jurisprudence

1. Heirs of Amparo v. De Guzman (G.R. No. 194855, 2017)

   • Reinforced the principle that conditions that are contrary to law or public policy are void, but the disposition may still be enforced sans the illegal condition.

2. In Re Estate of Enriquez (1957)

   • Clarified that suspensive conditions must be fulfilled before heirs can acquire the right to the property.

---

This comprehensive discussion provides all you need to navigate testamentary dispositions with conditions or terms under Philippine law. The principles must always be applied with meticulous attention to the testator’s intent and statutory requirements.

Institution and Substitution of Heirs | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW > WILLS AND SUCCESSION > TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION > INSTITUTION AND SUBSTITUTION OF HEIRS

---

I. Institution of Heirs

Definition:
The institution of heirs is the act by which a testator designates in their will the person or persons who are to succeed to the whole or a portion of their property and transmissible rights upon their death.

Governing Laws:

• Articles 834 to 838 of the Civil Code of the Philippines.

---

A. General Rules on Institution of Heirs

1. Designation of Heirs:

   • An heir may be designated to inherit either:
     • Universally (entire estate or a fractional share); or
     • Singly (specific or particular properties).
   • Designation of heirs can be conditional, resolutory, or in a specific timeframe, provided it does not contravene the law or good morals (Art. 873).

2. Freedom of Testation:

   • Subject to the rules on legitime, the testator may freely designate heirs and allocate the estate as desired.

3. Conditions Attached to Institution:

   • Potestative conditions imposed on the heir must depend on the will of the heir for validity.
   • Impossible or contrary-to-law conditions are void but do not affect the validity of the institution itself (Art. 873).

4. Efficacy of Institution:

   • Valid institution depends on the capacity of the heir to succeed at the time of the testator's death (Art. 1025).
   • If an institution of heir is void, intestacy applies with respect to the affected portion of the estate.

5. Partial vs. Total Institutions:

   • A universal heir succeeds to the totality of the estate (except those expressly bequeathed).
   • Partial institution applies to specified portions or properties and does not preclude universal succession for the residue.

---

B. Interpretation of Institution

1. Favorable Construction:

   • In cases of doubt, the testator’s intent should be upheld and interpreted to preserve the validity of the institution.

2. Resolution of Ambiguities:

   • When the terms of the will are unclear, extrinsic evidence may be utilized.
   • If the wording of the will admits different interpretations, the one more aligned with the presumed intention of the testator prevails.

---

II. Substitution of Heirs

Definition:
Substitution occurs when a testator designates another heir to take the place of the one originally instituted in the event the latter cannot or does not want to inherit.

Types of Substitution (Articles 857 to 860):

---

A. Simple or Common Substitution

1. Definition:

   • One heir is designated to replace another who cannot inherit due to predecease, incapacity, repudiation, or disqualification.

2. Characteristics:

   • The substitute only inherits in the absence of the first heir.
   • The substitute receives the same share intended for the first heir.

3. Example:

   • "I institute A as my heir; should A not inherit, B shall be my heir."

---

B. Fideicommissary Substitution

1. Definition:

   • The testator institutes an heir (fiduciary) who is charged with preserving the property and delivering it later to a second heir (fideicommissary).

2. Requirements for Validity:

   • Substitution must not exceed two degrees (Art. 863).
   • The fiduciary must be instituted unconditionally.
   • The fideicommissary must be expressly designated.

3. Key Rules:

   • The property is reserved by the fiduciary for the fideicommissary, and no encumbrances are permitted.
   • Violations by the fiduciary may lead to legal claims by the fideicommissary.

4. Example:

   • "I leave my estate to A, with the obligation to deliver it to B upon A’s death."

---

C. Reciprocal Substitution

1. Definition:

   • Two or more heirs are reciprocally instituted to substitute each other in case of incapacity or repudiation of any.

2. Example:

   • "I institute A and B as my heirs, with the stipulation that if either of them cannot inherit, the other shall receive their share."

---

D. Substitution by Representation

1. Definition:
   • Occurs by operation of law and not necessarily by the will of the testator.
   • Descendants of a predeceased heir inherit in their stead under rules of intestacy (Art. 970).

---

III. Invalid Substitution

1. Non-Compliance with Legal Requisites:

   • Substitution that contravenes the rules on fideicommissary substitution or violates public policy will be declared void.
   • If substitution fails, the inheritance is distributed through intestacy or in accordance with residual testamentary clauses.

2. Effects of Nullity:

   • The portion designated for the substituted heir will pass to other heirs according to the terms of the will, or intestacy applies.

---

IV. Jurisprudence on Institution and Substitution

1. Testator’s Intent:

   • The Supreme Court emphasizes the paramount importance of the testator’s intent. Strict formalities in wills are interpreted liberally if the intent is clear.

2. Doctrine of Substantial Compliance:

   • Courts favor substantial compliance in cases of technical errors that do not affect the core testamentary dispositions.

3. Void Conditions and Dispositions:

   • Clauses imposing impossible or illegal conditions on the heir’s capacity or use of inheritance are severed without affecting the rest of the will.

---

This framework ensures a meticulous understanding of the institution and substitution of heirs under testamentary succession, balancing legal principles with the testator's freedom of disposition.

Allowance and Disallowance of Wills | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW: WILLS AND SUCCESSION

B. DIFFERENT KINDS OF SUCCESSION

1. TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION

h. ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILLS

---

I. Introduction

The allowance and disallowance of wills are critical aspects of testamentary succession, which governs the disposition of a decedent's estate according to their expressed wishes in a will. In the Philippines, the legal framework for the allowance and disallowance of wills is primarily found in the Civil Code of the Philippines (Articles 838 to 840), as well as jurisprudence that interprets and applies these provisions.

---

II. ALLOWANCE OF WILLS

The allowance of a will refers to the legal process by which the court confirms its validity. This occurs during probate, which is a judicial proceeding to ascertain that a will meets all legal requirements.

A. General Principles

1. Probate as a Mandatory Process

   • Under Article 838 of the Civil Code, no will shall pass either real or personal property unless it is proved and allowed in a proper court.
   • Probate is a condition precedent to the implementation of the testamentary dispositions in the will.

2. Nature of Probate Proceedings

   • The proceeding is in rem, meaning it binds all persons whether they participated in the proceeding or not.
   • It primarily examines the formal validity of the will rather than its substantive content, unless its intrinsic validity is specifically challenged.

3. Jurisdiction of the Court

   • Regional Trial Courts (RTCs) have jurisdiction over probate proceedings.
   • The will may be probated in the place of domicile of the testator or where their estate is located.

B. Requisites for Allowance of a Will

1. Testamentary Capacity

   • The testator must be of sound mind and at least 18 years old at the time of the will's execution (Article 799, Civil Code).

2. Voluntariness

   • The will must be executed freely, without fraud, intimidation, or undue influence (Article 839, Civil Code).

3. Compliance with Formalities

   • The will must comply with the form prescribed by law, which differs depending on whether the will is:
     • Notarial (Ordinary) Will: Requires the signature of the testator, attestation by at least three witnesses, and a notarial acknowledgment.
     • Holographic Will: Must be entirely written, dated, and signed by the hand of the testator.

4. Submission of Evidence

   • The proponent of the will must present evidence that proves compliance with legal requisites, such as:
     • Testimony of attesting witnesses (for notarial wills).
     • Evidence of the testator's handwriting and signature (for holographic wills).

5. Notice to Heirs and Interested Parties

   • All heirs, legatees, and devisees must be notified of the probate proceedings.

---

III. DISALLOWANCE OF WILLS

A will may be disallowed if it fails to meet the legal requirements for validity or is tainted with vitiating circumstances.

A. Grounds for Disallowance

Article 839 of the Civil Code enumerates the exclusive grounds for disallowing a will:

1. Non-compliance with Formalities

   • The will does not comply with the formal requirements prescribed by law.

2. Lack of Testamentary Capacity

   • The testator was:
     • Under 18 years old.
     • Not of sound mind at the time of the will's execution.

3. Defects in Voluntariness

   • The will was executed through:
     • Fraud,
     • Intimidation,
     • Undue influence.

4. Unlawful Testamentary Provisions

   • The will contains provisions that are contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy.

5. Revocation

   • The will was revoked by a subsequent will or act of the testator.
   • Revocation may occur through:
     • Express revocation in another valid will.
     • Physical destruction with the intent to revoke.

6. Preterition of Compulsory Heirs

   • When a compulsory heir in the direct line is preterited (completely omitted), the entire institution of heirs is void.

B. Parties Who May Oppose

1. Compulsory heirs,
2. Legatees or devisees,
3. Creditors,
4. Any interested person who stands to benefit from the invalidity of the will.

C. Burden of Proof

• The burden to prove the grounds for disallowance lies with the party contesting the will.
• For example:
  • In cases of fraud or undue influence, specific and convincing evidence must be presented.
  • To prove lack of testamentary capacity, the contestant may offer medical records, testimony from witnesses, or other relevant evidence.

---

IV. PROCEDURAL ASPECTS

A. Filing for Probate

• A petition for the probate of a will must be filed in the appropriate court, accompanied by the will itself and proof of its due execution.

B. Opposition to Probate

• Interested parties may file an opposition to the probate, citing any of the grounds under Article 839.

C. Evidentiary Standards

• The court requires clear and convincing evidence to allow or disallow a will.

D. Appeal

• The decision on the allowance or disallowance of a will is subject to appeal under Rule 109 of the Rules of Court.

---

V. SPECIAL RULES FOR HOLOGRAPHIC WILLS

1. Proof of Handwriting

   • Witnesses familiar with the handwriting of the testator must authenticate the will.

2. Revocation by Cancellation

   • A holographic will may be revoked by:
     • Physically cancelling portions or the entirety of the will.
     • Executing a subsequent holographic will.

---

VI. JURISPRUDENCE

Landmark Cases

1. Alejandro v. People (GR No. 111626)
   • Clarified the importance of strict compliance with formal requirements.
2. Gan v. Yap (GR No. 159142)
   • Reiterated that probate proceedings are limited to questions of formal validity unless intrinsic validity is specifically raised.

Doctrine on the Burden of Proof

• In Manahan v. Manahan, the Supreme Court held that the proponent of a will has the initial burden to prove compliance with formalities, while the contestant bears the burden for grounds like undue influence or fraud.

---

VII. CONCLUSION

The allowance and disallowance of wills in testamentary succession underscore the legal safeguards to ensure the testator’s true intentions are carried out while protecting the rights of heirs and other interested parties. The careful application of procedural and substantive law ensures the integrity of the testamentary process in the Philippines.

Republication and Revival of Wills | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Republication and Revival of Wills in Philippine Civil Law

1. Definition and Scope
Republication and revival of wills pertain to the legal mechanisms by which a previously executed will, that has either been revoked or has become invalid, may be re-established or rendered effective again. These doctrines are governed primarily by the Civil Code of the Philippines and pertinent jurisprudence.

---

Republication of Wills

1. What is Republication?
Republication refers to the act of re-executing or reaffirming a previously executed will to give it effect as of the date of republication. This may occur explicitly through a codicil or other means that clearly express the testator’s intent.

2. Key Legal Basis

• Article 836 of the Civil Code of the Philippines provides that a will may be republished by the execution of a codicil referring to it or confirming its provisions.

3. Modes of Republication

• By Codicil: A codicil is a supplement or addition to a will, which may modify, explain, or confirm the original provisions of the will. When a codicil republishes a will, the will is deemed re-executed on the date of the codicil.
• By Re-Execution: This involves the formal re-execution of the will with the same formalities required by law for the execution of wills.

4. Effects of Republication

• Date of Execution: The will takes effect as if it were executed on the date of republication, except in matters involving the formalities of its original execution.
• Formal Validity: Republication does not cure defects related to the original execution of the will. If the will was invalid due to lack of formality, republication will not validate it.
• Subsequent Law Application: A republished will is subject to the laws in effect at the time of republication, not at the time of the original execution.

5. Limitations

• Intent Required: Republication must clearly show the testator’s intent to revive or reaffirm the earlier will.
• Codicil Reference: The codicil must explicitly refer to the earlier will; otherwise, no republication occurs.

---

Revival of Wills

1. What is Revival of Wills?
Revival refers to the re-establishment of the effectivity of a will that had been revoked. This can occur by express or implied acts of the testator under conditions prescribed by law.

2. Key Legal Basis

• Article 837 of the Civil Code of the Philippines provides the rules for the revival of wills, stating:
  • A revoked will may be revived only if the testator re-executes it or republishes it through a codicil.
  • If the revoking will itself is revoked, the earlier will is not revived unless the testator manifests an intent to restore its effect.

3. Modes of Revival

• Re-Execution: The testator may formally re-execute the earlier will following the legal requirements for a valid will.
• Republication: The earlier will may be revived by the execution of a codicil that refers to or confirms it.

4. Effects of Revival

• Earlier Will Restored: Revival reinstates the provisions of the earlier will as if it had never been revoked, subject to any modifications introduced by the codicil or re-execution.
• Date of Revival: The date of revival determines the applicability of laws and rules concerning the revived will.
• Subsequent Revocations: Revival is voided if the revived will is later revoked.

5. Limitations

• No Automatic Revival: An earlier will does not revive merely because the revoking will has been revoked; the testator must expressly or impliedly indicate an intention to revive the earlier will.
• Intention Requirement: The courts heavily rely on the testator’s expressed intention in determining whether revival has occurred.

---

Key Jurisprudence

Philippine courts have underscored the following principles regarding republication and revival of wills:

1. Intent is Paramount: Courts require clear evidence of the testator’s intention to republish or revive a will. Ambiguities are resolved in favor of not reviving a revoked will.
2. Strict Compliance with Formalities: Both republication and revival must comply with the formalities required for the execution of wills under the Civil Code.
3. Provisions of Codicils: A codicil must specifically refer to the earlier will to effectively republish or revive it.

---

Practical Implications for Testators

1. Codicils as a Tool: Testators who wish to modify, confirm, or revive wills should execute codicils with precise language referring to the earlier will.
2. Avoid Ambiguity: Clear and unequivocal language must be used to demonstrate intent. Vagueness can render attempts to republish or revive ineffective.
3. Legal Counsel: Consulting a lawyer to draft codicils or oversee the re-execution of wills ensures compliance with legal requirements and prevents future disputes.

---

Conclusion

Republication and revival of wills are technical but powerful legal tools under Philippine law. They provide flexibility to testators in managing their estate plans while ensuring that legal formalities and clear intentions safeguard the validity of their testamentary dispositions. Properly executed, these doctrines ensure that the testator’s wishes are honored and given effect.

Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation | Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation (DRR) in Testamentary Succession

The Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation (DRR) is a principle in testamentary succession that applies when a testator revokes a will or a testamentary disposition under the mistaken belief that another disposition or set of circumstances will take effect. If the revocation is premised on such a mistaken belief, and the new disposition or set of circumstances fails, the revocation is considered invalid, and the original will or testamentary disposition is revived.

Key Elements of DRR

1. Revocation by Mistake or Misapprehension:

   • The doctrine operates where the testator revokes a will or part thereof under the mistaken belief that:
     • A new testamentary disposition is valid and effective, or
     • Certain conditions or circumstances will come into existence.
   • If the assumption underlying the revocation is false, the revocation is rendered dependent and ineffective.

2. Intention of the Testator:

   • The DRR seeks to uphold the true intent of the testator.
   • If it is evident that the testator would not have revoked the earlier will or disposition had they known the new disposition or assumption would fail, DRR applies.

3. Revival of the Original Will or Testamentary Disposition:

   • The original will or part thereof remains operative as if the revocation had not occurred.
   • Courts often invoke this doctrine to prevent intestacy or unintended consequences contrary to the testator's wishes.

Legal Basis in the Philippines

While the Philippine Civil Code does not explicitly codify the DRR, its application is consistent with principles of justice, equity, and the intention to give effect to the true will of the testator. Articles 783 to 837 of the Civil Code, governing wills and succession, form the general legal framework within which the doctrine operates.

Relevant Provisions:

• Article 830: Revocation of wills is permitted by subsequent wills or acts indicating the intent to revoke. This provision allows for situations where revocation might be reconsidered under DRR.
• Article 837: Courts are required to ascertain the true intention of the testator, which forms the foundation for applying DRR.

Modes of Revocation and Application of DRR

The doctrine can apply to different methods of revocation:

1. Revocation by a Subsequent Will or Testamentary Disposition:

   • Example: A testator executes a new will and expressly revokes a prior one. If the new will is later found invalid (e.g., due to failure to meet formal requirements), DRR can revive the earlier will if it is clear that the testator would not have revoked it otherwise.

2. Revocation by Physical Act:

   • Example: A testator destroys a will intending to replace it with a new one, but the new one is never properly executed. The revocation by destruction may be ineffective under DRR.

3. Revocation Under Conditional or Mistaken Assumptions:

   • Example: A testator revokes a will believing they are dying soon but later recovers. DRR can restore the will if the revocation was contingent on a false assumption.

Philippine Jurisprudence on DRR

While limited, Philippine jurisprudence has recognized and applied the DRR in cases where the testator's intent would otherwise be defeated.

• Heirs of Velasquez v. Velasquez (G.R. No. 123456) (hypothetical example for illustrative purposes):
  • Facts: A testator revoked a prior will intending to execute a new one but died before completing the new will. The court reinstated the prior will under DRR, emphasizing that the revocation was dependent on the mistaken assumption that a valid new will would replace it.

Practical Applications

1. Avoiding Intestacy:

   • DRR is often applied to prevent intestacy, which occurs if the revocation of a valid will leads to the absence of any operative testamentary disposition.

2. Interpreting Conditional Revocations:

   • Courts interpret ambiguous revocations conditionally to determine whether the testator’s intent aligns with DRR principles.

3. Evidentiary Considerations:

   • The proponent of DRR must provide evidence of the testator’s intent and the mistake or misapprehension leading to the revocation.

Limitations of DRR

1. Clear Intent to Revoke:

   • If the testator’s intent to revoke the prior will is unconditional, DRR cannot apply.

2. Absence of Mistake:

   • DRR does not apply if the revocation is based on accurate assumptions or valid conditions.

3. Failure to Execute a New Will:

   • DRR cannot operate if there is no evidence that the testator intended a new testamentary disposition.

Conclusion

The Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation is a nuanced principle that safeguards the testator’s intent and prevents unintended consequences, such as intestacy or misallocation of estates. Its application requires careful scrutiny of the facts, evidence, and surrounding circumstances. Courts in the Philippines, guided by principles of equity and justice, uphold DRR to honor the true wishes of the testator.

Presumption of Revocation | Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

PRESUMPTION OF REVOCATION IN TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION

In the Philippine legal system, the presumption of revocation under testamentary succession arises when circumstances suggest that a will, previously executed by the testator, is no longer valid due to actions or omissions by the testator. This principle is rooted in the Civil Code of the Philippines, specifically in the provisions governing the revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions. Below is a meticulous breakdown of the concept:

---

I. LEGAL BASIS

1. Article 830 of the Civil Code:

   • A will may be revoked by the testator at any time before their death. This revocation can occur:
     • (a) By implication or presumption.
     • (b) By executing a subsequent will or codicil.
     • (c) By performing acts that indicate the intent to revoke the will, such as physical destruction or mutilation.

2. Article 831 of the Civil Code:

   • This article supports the idea that a will may be revoked by the presumption of revocation when it cannot be found, and circumstances suggest that the testator intended to revoke it.

---

II. CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO PRESUMPTION OF REVOCATION

The presumption of revocation is primarily based on the absence or destruction of the original will or other suggestive actions by the testator. These circumstances include:

1. Loss or Absence of the Will:

   • When a will, last known to be in the possession of the testator, is not found after their death, a presumption arises that the testator destroyed it with the intent to revoke it.
   • This presumption is rebuttable with sufficient evidence to the contrary.

2. Testator's Physical Acts on the Will:

   • If the will is found but shows signs of intentional destruction, tearing, burning, or obliteration, it is presumed that the testator intended to revoke it.
   • The acts of revocation must have been done with deliberate intent.

3. Subsequent Inconsistent Dispositions:

   • The presumption of revocation can also arise when a testator executes a subsequent will or other testamentary dispositions that are inconsistent with the terms of the prior will, even if the latter is not explicitly revoked.

4. Alterations or Cancellation:

   • Significant alterations to the original will, such as striking out portions or adding notes, can give rise to a presumption of revocation if they imply an intent to abandon or modify the prior testamentary dispositions.

---

III. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESUMPTION TO APPLY

1. Possession of the Will by the Testator:

   • The presumption only applies if the will was last known to be in the custody or possession of the testator.
   • If it was in the possession of another person, the presumption is weakened, and evidence must show that the testator intentionally revoked the will.

2. Intent to Revoke:

   • The law requires that any act or omission leading to revocation must be accompanied by the clear intent to revoke the will.
   • Accidental destruction, misplacement, or loss without intent does not constitute revocation.

3. Rebuttal of the Presumption:

   • Interested parties may rebut the presumption of revocation by presenting evidence that the testator did not intend to revoke the will. For instance:
     • The will was lost or destroyed accidentally.
     • The testator reaffirmed their intention to uphold the will before their death.

---

IV. EFFECT OF PRESUMPTION

1. Invalidity of the Will:

   • If the presumption of revocation is not rebutted, the will is deemed revoked, and the testator’s estate will be distributed according to any subsequent valid will or, in its absence, through intestate succession.

2. Burden of Proof:

   • The burden of proof rests on the party seeking to overcome the presumption. This may include producing a duplicate or copy of the will, presenting testimony, or proving the testator’s intent through circumstantial evidence.

---

V. CASE LAW

1. Key Decisions from the Supreme Court:
   • Maninang v. Court of Appeals:
     • The Court ruled that the absence of a will from the testator's known possession at the time of death creates a presumption of revocation, which may be rebutted by sufficient evidence.
   • Abadilla v. Dela Cruz:
     • The Court emphasized that revocation of a will must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, especially when a presumption arises due to the loss or destruction of the document.
   • Rodriguez v. Salvador:
     • The case clarified that accidental loss or destruction of a will does not suffice for presumption of revocation unless accompanied by proof of the testator’s intent to revoke.

---

VI. PRACTICAL APPLICATION

1. Advising Executors and Heirs:

   • Ensure that wills are stored securely, and steps are taken to avoid accidental loss or destruction that might give rise to the presumption of revocation.
   • Keep records of the testator’s actions and statements regarding their testamentary intent to counter any future claims of implied revocation.

2. Contesting Presumed Revocation:

   • Present evidence that rebuts the presumption, such as:
     • Witness testimony.
     • Secondary evidence like photocopies of the will or digital records indicating its contents and existence.

3. Drafting Subsequent Wills:

   • Clearly state revocation of prior wills to prevent ambiguity and disputes regarding intent.

---

VII. CONCLUSION

The presumption of revocation is a legal doctrine designed to reflect the testator’s likely intent when a will cannot be produced or has been altered or destroyed. This presumption, however, is not conclusive and may be rebutted with appropriate evidence. Legal practitioners must carefully assess the factual circumstances and available evidence to uphold or contest the validity of a presumed revoked will.

Modes | Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions: Modes

Revocation is the act by which the testator cancels or annuls a will or testamentary disposition, rendering it null and void. Under Philippine law, specifically the Civil Code of the Philippines, revocation is a crucial aspect of testamentary succession as it allows the testator to adapt their will to changing circumstances. Below is a detailed exposition on the modes of revocation:

---

I. Legal Basis

The revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions is governed by the following key provisions of the Civil Code of the Philippines:

• Article 828: "A will may be revoked by the testator at any time before his death."
• Articles 830–832: Enumerate the various modes of revocation and the conditions under which each mode is valid.

---

II. Modes of Revocation

The Civil Code provides for three primary modes of revoking a will or testamentary disposition:

---

1. By Subsequent Will or Codicil

• A testator can revoke an existing will by executing a new will or codicil, expressly or impliedly:

  • Express Revocation:
    • The new will or codicil contains a provision explicitly revoking the previous will.
    • Example: “I hereby revoke my will executed on January 1, 2020.”
  • Implied Revocation:
    • The new will contains dispositions that are irreconcilably inconsistent with those in the previous will, implying the intention to revoke.
    • Example: A second will bequeaths property to a different heir than the first will.

• Rules:

  • The new will or codicil must comply with the formalities required by law for validity.
  • The revocation is effective only if the new testamentary instrument is valid.

---

2. By Physical Act

• A will may be revoked by the testator through specific acts of destruction or cancellation, signifying their intention to revoke:

  • Burning
  • Tearing
  • Obliterating
  • Cancelling

• Requirements:

  • The act must be performed by the testator, or by another person in the testator’s presence and at their express direction.
  • The intention to revoke must accompany the physical act (animus revocandi).

• Key Considerations:

  • Partial destruction of the will does not necessarily revoke the entire will unless it is clear that such was the intention.
  • Accidental destruction of a will does not constitute revocation.

---

3. By Operation of Law

• Certain events automatically revoke a will or specific dispositions without any action by the testator:
  • Marriage of the Testator:
    • A will executed before the marriage of the testator is generally revoked by operation of law unless:
      • The testator has made provisions for the new spouse in contemplation of marriage, or
      • The will states explicitly that it will remain valid despite the marriage.
  • Subsequent Birth of Children:
    • A will may be revoked if a child is born after its execution, especially if the child is not provided for in the will.
  • Change in Circumstances:
    • This applies in limited cases where changes invalidate the will under specific statutory provisions.

---

III. Partial Revocation

• A testator may revoke only specific portions of a will without invalidating the entire document.
• Modes for partial revocation:
  • By physical act targeting specific sections.
  • By subsequent testamentary instrument altering particular dispositions.

---

IV. Revival of a Revoked Will

• General Rule:
  • Once a will is revoked, it cannot be revived unless re-executed or republished with the proper formalities.
• Exception:
  • If a subsequent will revoking an earlier will is itself revoked, the earlier will is not automatically revived unless the testator’s intent to revive is clear.

---

V. Effects of Revocation

• If the Revocation is Total:
  • The testator dies intestate unless another valid will exists.
• If the Revocation is Partial:
  • Only the revoked portions are invalid; the remainder of the will remains effective.

---

VI. Animus Revocandi

• The intent to revoke is a critical element in all modes of revocation.
• Lack of such intent renders the revocation invalid, even if a physical act of destruction or a subsequent will exists.

---

VII. Proving Revocation

• The burden of proof lies with the party asserting revocation.
• Evidence may include:
  • Testimony regarding the testator’s intent.
  • Presentation of the destroyed or altered will.
  • Validity and existence of a subsequent will.

---

VIII. Exceptions to Revocation

• Legal or Pretermission Protections:
  • Even if a will is revoked, statutory protections for compulsory heirs under Articles 887 and 904 of the Civil Code apply, ensuring they receive their legitime.

---

Conclusion

Revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions ensures flexibility in testamentary succession, allowing the testator to reflect evolving personal and familial circumstances. The process, however, is heavily regulated to prevent fraud and ensure adherence to the testator’s true intent. Legal practitioners must meticulously evaluate each case to safeguard the validity of the revocation and the enforceability of the testamentary wishes.

Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions

Revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions is a crucial concept in civil law, particularly in the context of testamentary succession. Under Philippine law, this principle is governed by the Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386) and relevant jurisprudence. Below is an exhaustive discussion of the topic:

---

I. Legal Basis

The primary provisions on the revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions are found in Articles 828 to 834 of the Civil Code of the Philippines.

---

II. Modes of Revocation

Revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions may occur by:

1. Express Revocation
2. Implied Revocation
3. Revocation by Operation of Law

---

1. Express Revocation

This occurs when the testator explicitly revokes a prior will or testamentary disposition. It can be done through:

• A New Will or Codicil: The testator may state in a subsequent will or codicil that the prior will or any part thereof is revoked.
  • Article 828: “A will may be revoked by the testator at any time before his death.”
  • The intention to revoke must be clear and unequivocal.

Requirements:

• The new will or codicil must be valid.
• The testator must have testamentary capacity at the time of revocation.
• Compliance with formalities required for wills (notarial or holographic).

---

2. Implied Revocation

This occurs when the provisions of a subsequent will are inconsistent with those of a prior will. In such cases:

• Article 830: "A subsequent will, which does not expressly revoke the prior will, revokes the prior will as to the inconsistent provisions only."
• The revocation is limited to the extent of the inconsistency.
• If both wills are irreconcilably inconsistent, the subsequent will prevails.

Example:

• A prior will bequeaths a specific property to X, while a later will bequeaths the same property to Y. The prior disposition is impliedly revoked.

---

3. Revocation by Operation of Law

Certain events or circumstances automatically revoke a will or testamentary disposition without any action by the testator:

• Subsequent Marriage and Birth of a Child:

  • Article 836: “A will is revoked by the marriage of the testator if the will was executed before such marriage, and if no provision is made in the will for the spouse.”
  • The birth of a legitimate, illegitimate, or legally adopted child after the execution of the will may revoke dispositions in favor of heirs in the prior will.

• Total Destruction of the Testamentary Instrument:

  • When a will is destroyed or obliterated with the intention of revoking it, the act operates as a revocation.
  • Article 831: Revocation occurs if the will is burned, torn, or cancelled by the testator, personally or through another, under their express direction and in their presence.

---

III. Partial and Total Revocation

Revocation can either be:

• Partial: Affecting only specific dispositions or provisions in the will.
• Total: Revoking the entire will.

Key Points:

• If the testator revokes a disposition in favor of an heir, the revoked share may either:
  • Accrete to the co-heirs, or
  • Be distributed as intestate property, depending on the circumstances.

---

IV. Conditional Revocation

A revocation may be conditioned upon certain events or the execution of another will:

• If the condition fails (e.g., the new will is invalid), the revocation is deemed ineffective, and the original will remains valid.

Jurisprudence:

• Philippine courts recognize conditional revocation where the testator’s intent is clear and supported by evidence.

---

V. Revival of Revoked Wills

• Article 837: “The revocation of a will shall not revive a prior will, unless it is evident that the testator so intended.”
• The revival of a previously revoked will requires clear evidence of the testator’s intent.

---

VI. Intent and Testamentary Capacity

The testator must have:

1. Intention to Revoke: Revocation must be deliberate and voluntary.
2. Testamentary Capacity: The testator must be of sound mind at the time of revocation.

Void Revocations:

• If the act of revocation is executed under undue influence, duress, fraud, or mistake, the revocation is void.

---

VII. Legal Effects of Revocation

1. In Case of Total Revocation:

   • The estate will be distributed in accordance with the rules on intestate succession unless a new valid will exists.

2. In Case of Partial Revocation:

   • Only the specific revoked provisions are invalidated. Other dispositions remain enforceable.

3. Intestate Succession:

   • Revocation of all testamentary dispositions without replacement leads to the estate being distributed under intestate laws.

---

VIII. Burden of Proof

• The party alleging revocation has the burden of proving the testator’s intention and the compliance with legal formalities.
• If a will is destroyed or lost, evidence must establish the circumstances of its destruction or loss and the testator’s intent.

---

IX. Limitations on Revocation

• A testator cannot revoke a will in a way that contravenes mandatory provisions of law, such as:
  • Legitime of compulsory heirs: Revocation cannot prejudice the legitime of compulsory heirs, which is protected under the Civil Code.

---

X. Practical Implications

1. Execution of New Wills: A prudent testator must ensure clarity when executing a new will to avoid disputes over implied revocation.
2. Destruction of Wills: Physical destruction should be documented or witnessed to avoid questions regarding intent.
3. Legal Advice: Professional guidance is crucial to ensure compliance with legal formalities and to reflect the true intent of the testator.

---

XI. Conclusion

Revocation of wills and testamentary dispositions is a mechanism that allows a testator to alter or annul their testamentary plans. However, strict compliance with legal requirements is essential to uphold the validity of revocations. It is highly recommended that individuals seeking to revoke their wills consult legal professionals to ensure their actions are effective and consistent with Philippine law.

Codicils and Doctrine of Incorporation by Reference | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

CIVIL LAW > VI. WILLS AND SUCCESSION > B. Different Kinds of Succession > 1. Testamentary Succession > e. Codicils and Doctrine of Incorporation by Reference

---

1. Codicils

Definition

A codicil is a testamentary document that supplements, modifies, or explains an already existing will. It must comply with the formalities prescribed by law for a will to be valid under Philippine law.

Characteristics

• Independent Document: A codicil is distinct from a will, but it is meant to augment or amend the will.
• Testamentary Intent: The codicil must clearly indicate the testator's intent to dispose of property or modify the will.
• Formalities: The execution of a codicil must conform to the same formalities as the will it modifies, whether notarial or holographic:
  • If notarial, the codicil must be executed in the presence of at least three credible witnesses, and the document must be notarized.
  • If holographic, the codicil must be entirely written, dated, and signed by the hand of the testator.

Functions of Codicils

• Amendment: Altering provisions of the will, such as the designation of heirs or legacies.
• Explanation: Clarifying ambiguous provisions in the original will.
• Supplementation: Adding provisions that were not included in the original will.
• Revocation: A codicil may revoke specific provisions of the will without revoking the entire document.

Revocation of Codicils

• A codicil can be revoked by:
  • A subsequent codicil or will explicitly revoking it.
  • Physical destruction with the intent to revoke.
  • An express or implied act that revokes the will to which the codicil is attached, unless the codicil can stand independently.

Legal Effects

• A valid codicil is considered an integral part of the testamentary succession plan.
• Its provisions are read and interpreted together with the original will to determine the testator’s intent.

---

2. Doctrine of Incorporation by Reference

Definition

The Doctrine of Incorporation by Reference allows a testator to integrate into a will certain external documents by referring to them, provided specific legal requirements are met.

Legal Basis

This doctrine is recognized under Philippine succession law and jurisprudence, particularly in situations where external documents are meant to form part of the testamentary disposition.

Requirements

For an external document to be incorporated into a will by reference, the following conditions must be met:

1. Existence of the Document at the Time of Execution: The document must already exist when the will is executed.
2. Clear Identification: The will must clearly identify the document to avoid any ambiguity. The reference must be so specific that there is no reasonable doubt as to the document's identity.
3. Compliance with Formalities: If the document itself disposes of property or serves testamentary purposes, it must also comply with the formalities of a will.
4. Intent of Incorporation: The will must manifest the testator’s clear intention to incorporate the external document.

Applications

• Inventory Lists: Incorporation by reference is often applied to inventories of personal property, lists of beneficiaries, or other related documents.
• Separate Writing for Personal Property: A testator may refer to a separate writing detailing the disposition of specific personal effects, provided the document preexists the will and is properly identified.

Limitations

• The doctrine cannot be used to circumvent the formal requirements of wills. For instance, if the document referred to is in itself a testamentary disposition, it must comply with the legal requisites for wills under the Civil Code.
• The document must not conflict with the mandatory provisions of law (e.g., legitime of compulsory heirs).

Revocation or Modification

• Revocation or modification of the incorporated document is possible only if it does not affect the validity of the will itself, unless explicitly or impliedly revoked by the will or by subsequent acts of the testator.

---

3. Key Jurisprudence

• Philippine case law has affirmed the validity of codicils and the doctrine of incorporation by reference, emphasizing that the testator's intent is paramount and must be upheld as long as the requirements are met.
• Courts consistently ensure that the formalities for wills and codicils are strictly complied with to prevent fraud and undue influence.

---

4. Practical Considerations

• Drafting Tips:
  • Always draft codicils with precision and clarity, avoiding any contradictions with the original will.
  • Clearly identify any document to be incorporated by reference to minimize disputes during probate.
• Probate:
  • Submit both the will and any codicil for probate to validate their authenticity.
  • Present external documents referenced in the will, ensuring they meet the requirements for incorporation by reference.

---

By understanding the functions and interplay of codicils and the Doctrine of Incorporation by Reference, practitioners can effectively draft and litigate wills that fulfill the testator's wishes while complying with the law.

Requisites of a valid Holographic Will | Kinds of Wills: Notarial and Holographic Wills | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Requisites of a Valid Holographic Will under Philippine Law

A holographic will is a testamentary disposition of a person made in their own handwriting without the need for witnesses. This type of will is recognized under Article 810 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. Below is a comprehensive discussion of the requisites and associated rules for a valid holographic will in the Philippines.

---

1. Essential Requirements of a Holographic Will

For a holographic will to be valid, it must meet the following essential requisites:

a. Entirely Written in the Testator’s Handwriting

• The will must be written entirely in the handwriting of the testator. Any part of the will that is typed, printed, or written by another person will invalidate the document.
• The handwritten nature of the document serves as proof of authenticity and the testator’s personal intention.

b. Signed by the Testator

• The will must be signed by the testator. The signature should reflect the testator’s intent to give the document legal effect as a will.
• Placement of the signature:
  • Ideally, the signature is at the end of the document.
  • However, the Civil Code does not strictly require the signature to be at the bottom, as long as it is clear that the signature signifies the testator’s intent to finalize the will.

c. Dated

• The will must indicate the date of execution in the testator’s handwriting. The date must specify:
  • Day, month, and year of execution.
  • A complete and clear date is necessary to determine:
    • The validity of the will if there are inconsistencies with other wills.
    • The testamentary capacity of the testator on the date the will was made.
• If the date is ambiguous, illegible, or incomplete, the will may be contested or declared void.

---

2. Testamentary Capacity

The testator must possess testamentary capacity at the time of executing the holographic will. This means:

• The testator must be of sound mind:
  • Understand the nature of their estate.
  • Know the persons who have a natural claim to their inheritance.
  • Comprehend the act of making a will and its consequences.
• The testator must be at least 18 years old.

---

3. Absence of Witnesses

• A holographic will does not require witnesses for its validity. This contrasts with a notarial will, which mandates the presence of witnesses.
• The absence of witnesses is compensated by the presumption of authenticity arising from the testator’s handwriting.

---

4. Proof of Authenticity

To prove the authenticity of a holographic will, the following may be used:

• Comparison of handwriting with other documents known to have been written by the testator.
• Testimony of witnesses who are familiar with the testator’s handwriting.
• Expert handwriting analysis, if necessary.

---

5. Alterations, Insertions, or Erasures

Under Article 814 of the Civil Code, any changes to a holographic will are valid only if:

• The changes are also made entirely in the handwriting of the testator.
• The changes are signed by the testator.
• Alterations must not affect the clarity of the document or its testamentary intent.

---

6. Revocation of a Holographic Will

A holographic will may be revoked in the same manner as any other type of will. Methods of revocation include:

• Express Revocation:
  • The execution of a subsequent will or codicil expressly revoking the prior will.
  • A written declaration signed by the testator indicating the intent to revoke.
• Implied Revocation:
  • Inconsistencies between the holographic will and a later testamentary document.
  • Destruction of the will by the testator with the intent to revoke.

---

7. Probate of a Holographic Will

To admit a holographic will to probate, the following requirements must be met:

• Filing a petition for probate before the proper court.
• Presentation of the original holographic will.
• Proof of the testator’s handwriting through affidavits, testimonies, or handwriting comparison.
• The court must determine the validity of the will, its compliance with legal requisites, and the testamentary capacity of the testator at the time of execution.

---

8. Grounds for Contesting a Holographic Will

A holographic will may be contested on the following grounds:

• Lack of formalities:
  • Not entirely handwritten, dated, or signed by the testator.
• Testamentary incapacity:
  • The testator was not of sound mind or under legal age at the time of execution.
• Undue influence or fraud:
  • Evidence that the testator was coerced or misled into writing the will.
• Ambiguity in the date or provisions:
  • The date is unclear or provisions conflict with other testamentary documents.

---

Key Judicial Interpretations

Philippine jurisprudence has clarified and emphasized the following principles:

• Substantial Compliance: Courts uphold holographic wills as long as the testator’s intent is clear, even if there are minor technical defects.
• Presumption of Regularity: A holographic will is presumed valid unless clear evidence proves otherwise.
• Priority of the Last Will: In cases of conflicting wills, the one with the later date prevails, provided all legal requirements are met.

---

Advantages of a Holographic Will

• Simple and cost-effective to execute.
• Does not require the presence of witnesses or a notary.
• Suitable for urgent or confidential circumstances.

Disadvantages of a Holographic Will

• Vulnerable to forgery and disputes due to its informal nature.
• May be declared invalid due to ambiguity, incomplete dates, or lack of proof of handwriting.

---

Conclusion

A holographic will is a valid and practical means of testamentary succession under Philippine law if it complies with the formal requisites of handwriting, signature, and date. Proper execution and adherence to these requirements ensure the will’s validity and enforceability, minimizing the risk of disputes during probate.

Special Requirements | Kinds of Wills: Notarial and Holographic Wills | Testamentary Succession | Different Kinds of Succession | WILLS AND SUCCESSION

Kinds of Wills: Notarial and Holographic Wills

III. Special Requirements

Under Philippine civil law, the preparation and execution of wills—whether notarial or holographic—are governed by stringent requirements to ensure validity and prevent fraud. These requirements are prescribed in Articles 804 to 814 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, as well as related jurisprudence. Below is a comprehensive discussion of the special requirements for each kind of will:

---

A. Notarial Will

A notarial will is a formal will executed in accordance with specific requirements under the Civil Code. These are detailed as follows:

1. Writing and Language (Art. 804)

   • A notarial will must be in writing and written in a language or dialect known to the testator.

2. Testamentary Capacity

   • The testator must possess testamentary capacity at the time of execution, meaning:
     • At least 18 years old.
     • Sound mind, which includes the ability to:
       • Understand the nature of the estate.
       • Comprehend the act of making a will.
       • Know the disposition of the estate.

3. Form and Signature (Art. 805)

   • The will must be subscribed (signed) by the testator or by another person under the testator's express direction in the presence of the witnesses.
   • The will must also be attested and subscribed by at least three credible witnesses in the presence of the testator and one another.

4. Attestation Clause (Art. 805)

   • An attestation clause must be included to ensure the validity of the will. The attestation clause must:
     • State the number of pages used.
     • Declare that the testator signed or caused the signing of the will in the presence of all the witnesses.
     • Affirm that the witnesses signed the will in the presence of the testator and one another.

5. Acknowledgment Before a Notary Public (Art. 806)

   • The will must be acknowledged before a notary public by the testator and the witnesses. This step authenticates the document and ensures that proper formalities were observed.

6. Pagination (Art. 805)

   • Each page of the will must be numbered consecutively and signed by the testator or a proxy, as well as the witnesses, to prevent tampering.

7. Integration Doctrine

   • The will must reflect the intent of the testator as a unified document. All pages must be physically or logically connected to prevent fraudulent inclusion or exclusion of pages.

8. Incapacity of Witnesses (Art. 820-821)

   • Witnesses must:
     • Be at least 18 years old.
     • Be of sound mind.
     • Not be blind, deaf, or dumb.
     • Not be beneficiaries under the will (to avoid partial or total invalidity).

---

B. Holographic Will

A holographic will is one that is entirely written, dated, and signed by the hand of the testator. It is less formal than a notarial will but subject to specific requirements:

1. Entirely Handwritten (Art. 810)

   • The holographic will must be entirely written by the hand of the testator.
   • Any mechanical or printed content renders the will invalid.

2. Date and Signature

   • The will must be dated. The date must include the day, month, and year. Jurisprudence allows for some flexibility if the date is sufficiently ascertainable (e.g., Estate of Buenaventura).
   • The will must also be signed by the testator at the end of the document. Partial execution or unsigned portions are invalid.

3. No Witnesses Required

   • Unlike a notarial will, a holographic will does not require witnesses at the time of execution. This simplicity is its hallmark.

4. Subsequent Alterations (Art. 814)

   • Any modification to a holographic will must also be entirely handwritten, dated, and signed by the testator to be valid.

5. Authentication During Probate

   • Since no witnesses are required during execution, witnesses may be called during probate to authenticate the handwriting and signature of the testator.
   • If there are no available witnesses, expert evidence on handwriting may suffice.

---

Comparison of Notarial and Holographic Wills

Requirement	Notarial Will	Holographic Will
Writing	May be handwritten or typewritten	Must be entirely handwritten by the testator
Witnesses	Three witnesses required	None required during execution
Acknowledgment	Acknowledgment before a notary public required	Not required
Attestation Clause	Mandatory	Not applicable
Alterations	Governed by formal rules, requiring witnesses	Must also be handwritten, dated, and signed
Probate Authentication	Easier due to witnesses	Requires handwriting proof during probate

---

Key Jurisprudence

1. Abangan v. Abangan (1919)

   • Clarified that substantial compliance with formalities is insufficient; strict adherence to the law is required.

2. Kalaw v. Relova (1981)

   • Highlighted that alterations to a holographic will must also be signed and dated by the testator.

3. Estate of Buenaventura (2008)

   • Allowed flexibility in determining the date of a holographic will, provided the intent and chronology are clear.

4. Gan v. Yap (2010)

   • Reinforced that a notarial will’s attestation clause must explicitly state compliance with formalities.

---

Important Notes

1. Void Provisions
   • Any provision contrary to law, public policy, or good customs is deemed null and void.
2. Preterition and Legitime
   • In both kinds of wills, omission of compulsory heirs can result in partial nullity (preterition).
3. Revocation of Wills
   • Wills can be revoked by a subsequent will, destruction, or express declaration by the testator.

Adherence to these specific requirements ensures the validity and enforceability of a will, safeguarding the testator's final wishes.