Annulment of Marriage Due to Non-Cohabitation

Below is an extensive discussion of the topic: “Annulment of Marriage Due to Non-Cohabitation” under Philippine law. This write-up draws from statutes (particularly the Family Code of the Philippines) and relevant Philippine jurisprudence. Please note that this information is for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For specific cases, it is always best to consult a qualified lawyer.

1. Overview: Annulment vs. Declaration of Nullity

In the Philippines, there is often confusion between two distinct legal remedies for ending a marriage:

  1. Annulment – This typically refers to a voidable marriage. A voidable marriage remains valid and binding until a judicial decree of annulment is obtained. Grounds for annulment are listed in Articles 45 and 46 of the Family Code of the Philippines.

  2. Declaration of Nullity – This applies when the marriage is void from the beginning. Grounds for declaration of nullity include lack of a valid marriage license, being below the required age (under certain conditions), bigamous marriages, incestuous marriages, psychological incapacity under Article 36, and others.

Despite popular usage, many people say “annulment” to mean both “annulment” and “declaration of nullity.” Strictly speaking, they are different, but in common parlance (and even in casual legal conversation), the term “annulment” might be used broadly to mean any judicial proceeding that invalidates the marriage.

2. Grounds for Annulment Under the Family Code

Article 45 of the Family Code provides the exclusive grounds under which a marriage may be annulled. These are:

  1. Lack of Parental Consent – Where one or both parties was between 18 and 21 years old and the marriage took place without the required parental consent.
  2. Insanity – Either party was of unsound mind at the time of the marriage.
  3. Fraud – Consent was obtained by fraud. Examples include non-disclosure of a previous conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude, concealment of pregnancy by another man, etc.
  4. Force, Intimidation, or Undue Influence – Where consent was obtained by coercive or manipulative means.
  5. Impotence or Physical Incapacity – Inability to consummate the marriage, and such incapacity appears to be incurable.
  6. Sexually Transmissible Disease – One party was afflicted with a sexually transmissible disease found to be serious and incurable at the time of marriage.

Meanwhile, Article 36 of the Family Code allows a marriage to be declared void (not merely voidable) if one or both parties are psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations.

Notably, “non-cohabitation” is not listed as a separate ground under Article 45 for annulment, nor is it recognized on its own under Article 36.

3. Is Non-Cohabitation Itself a Ground for Annulment?

3.1 The Short Answer

No, non-cohabitation by itself is not a direct ground for annulment under Philippine law. Merely failing or refusing to live together—no matter how long—will not, on its own, suffice to have the marriage legally annulled or declared void. The Family Code does not specify prolonged separation or non-cohabitation as a direct ground.

3.2 When Non-Cohabitation Might Become Relevant

Although non-cohabitation alone is insufficient to annul or void a marriage, it can become relevant in the following scenarios:

  1. Psychological Incapacity (Article 36)

    • In certain cases, a spouse’s refusal or inability to live with the other might indicate a deeper psychological or personality disorder—something that fundamentally makes him or her unable to perform the basic obligations of marriage.
    • However, it is not the mere fact of separation that serves as proof. Instead, the court needs evidence of incapacity, existing prior to or at the time of the marriage, that renders the spouse unable to fulfill marital obligations. Proof must be thorough and convincing, often requiring psychological evaluations and expert testimony.

  2. Constructive Abandonment

    • Non-cohabitation may be raised as part of a suit for legal separation on the ground of abandonment. Under the Family Code, abandonment is a recognized basis for legal separation (not annulment).
    • Legal separation, however, does not sever the marital bond; it just allows separation of bed and board (and property management). The marriage bond itself continues to exist, which means neither spouse can remarry while the other is alive without risking criminal bigamy charges.

  3. Presumptive Death Petitions

    • Under Article 41 of the Family Code, if a spouse has been “absent” or “missing” for four consecutive years (or two years if disappearance was under certain extreme circumstances), the present spouse may petition the court to declare the absentee presumably dead.
    • This remedy is not an annulment; rather, it is a petition for a court declaration that the other spouse is presumed dead, allowing the present spouse to remarry in good faith. If the presumed-dead spouse returns, the subsequent marriage can be terminated if found to be bigamous, and other legal effects follow.
    • This process also is distinct from a standard annulment petition and is only applicable under very specific conditions.

4. Why Non-Cohabitation Is Not a Stand-Alone Ground

Under Philippine law, public policy supports the preservation of marriage as an inviolable social institution. Because of the Constitution’s stance on the sanctity of family life, legislators have purposely set strict and narrow grounds for annulment or declaration of nullity. Simply not living with each other—whether by choice, distance, or estrangement—does not itself indicate that the marriage was void from the start or was voidable under any specific ground.

5. Practical Implications and Related Legal Concepts

  1. Spousal Obligations

    • Under Articles 68 to 71 of the Family Code, spouses are obliged to live together, observe mutual love, respect, and fidelity, and render mutual help and support. The law imposes a duty to cohabit (live under one roof) absent a valid reason.
    • If one spouse unilaterally refuses to live with the other without lawful cause, it could form part of an argument of psychological incapacity—but only if the refusal is deeply rooted in an incapacity existing at the time of marriage.

  2. Legal Separation vs. Annulment

    • If the non-cohabitation or separation was due to abandonment, cruelty, or other grounds provided under the Family Code, the injured spouse might file for legal separation.
    • Legal separation does not allow remarriage. It only allows a spouse to separate property regimes and end conjugal living arrangements. Thus, it is not the same legal remedy as annulment or declaration of nullity.

  3. Nullity of Marriage on Other Grounds

    • If a spouse can prove that the marriage is void from the start (e.g., lack of a valid marriage license, incestuous marriage, bigamous marriage, or psychological incapacity), that spouse may file a petition for a declaration of nullity.
    • Again, non-cohabitation may or may not be relevant in such cases, depending on the factual details surrounding the other recognized grounds.

  4. Effect on Children and Property

    • Children conceived or born before the annulment decree are still considered legitimate.
    • Property relations between spouses will be settled according to the Family Code provisions. In annulment cases, the party upon whose petition the marriage is annulled (and who acted in good faith) will not suffer the same property forfeitures as the one found at fault.

6. Procedure and Requirements for Filing an Annulment

Although “non-cohabitation” is not a ground, the procedure for filing an annulment on valid grounds (e.g., fraud, force, psychological incapacity, etc.) generally involves:

  1. Consultation with Counsel

    • A lawyer will assess if valid grounds exist. Psychological incapacity proceedings, for instance, often require a psychological examination or strong documentary evidence to support the petition.

  2. Drafting of the Petition

    • The petition is filed before the Regional Trial Court (Family Court) of the province or city where the petitioner or respondent has resided for at least six months prior to the filing, or in case of a non-resident respondent, where he or she may be found in the Philippines.

  3. Payment of Filing Fees

    • Court fees must be settled upon filing the petition.

  4. Court Proceedings

    • The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), through the Public Prosecutor, participates to ensure there is no collusion between the parties and that evidence is not fabricated.
    • If the ground is psychological incapacity, expert witnesses (psychologists or psychiatrists) are usually presented to support the claim.

  5. Court Decision

    • If the court finds merit in the petition, it issues a decree of annulment or nullity. Otherwise, the petition is dismissed.

  6. Registration and Effects

    • Once final and executory, the decree is registered with the Local Civil Registry where the marriage was recorded and with the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA).

7. Common Misconceptions About “Non-Cohabitation”

  1. Myth: “We have not lived together for many years, so the marriage is automatically annulled.”

    • Reality: The marriage remains valid until a court declares otherwise, regardless of how long the spouses have lived separately.

  2. Myth: “Five (or seven, or ten) years of separation is a ground for annulment.”

    • Reality: Prolonged separation alone is never a direct ground for annulment or nullity of marriage.

  3. Myth: “I can remarry if my spouse and I have been separated for a long time.”

    • Reality: Without a judicial decree of annulment/nullity or a declaration of presumptive death (under specific conditions), a remarriage is considered bigamous and is criminally punishable.

8. Key Takeaways

  1. No Direct Ground

    • The Family Code does not recognize “non-cohabitation” or “prolonged separation” as an independent ground to annul or declare a marriage void.

  2. Other Legal Avenues

    • Non-cohabitation may have evidentiary value if it is symptomatic of other recognized grounds like psychological incapacity (Art. 36) or legal separation (particularly abandonment).

  3. Legislative Intent

    • Philippine laws emphasize protecting the marital bond and do not favor easy dissolution of marriage. Hence, the list of annulment/nullity grounds is narrowly drawn.

  4. Seek Professional Advice

    • Anyone considering a petition for annulment on any ground should consult a lawyer who specializes in family law. Legal intricacies, procedural rules, and evidentiary requirements demand professional expertise.

  5. No Shortcut

    • Spouses wishing to end a non-cohabiting marriage must follow the proper legal processes to either obtain a declaration of nullity (if applicable) or an annulment based on one of the grounds recognized by law. There is no shortcut merely by virtue of not living together.

9. Conclusion

Under Philippine law, non-cohabitation on its own is not a recognized ground for annulment of marriage. The Family Code sets forth specific conditions under which a marriage can be annulled or declared void, and lengthy or indefinite separation is not one of them. While spouses who have long ceased living together may find it feasible to explore psychological incapacity (Art. 36) or other grounds, such grounds require extensive proof and are subject to a strict judicial process.

Ultimately, if two spouses do not cohabit and wish to formally sever their marital ties, they must examine whether any of the Family Code’s enumerated grounds apply to their situation. Without meeting these legal criteria, a petition for annulment would not be granted solely on the basis of non-cohabitation. For any person in this situation, legal consultation is essential to evaluate possible remedies and navigate the procedural complexities of family law in the Philippines.

DISCLAIMER

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique, and the law may change over time. For any specific questions or concerns regarding annulment or family law matters in the Philippines, it is best to consult a licensed Philippine attorney.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login