AWOL Employees Under Philippine Labor Law

AWOL Employees Under Philippine Labor Law: A Comprehensive Guide

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For specific concerns, please consult a qualified labor law practitioner.

1. Introduction

In Philippine labor practice, “AWOL” is an acronym for “Absence Without Official Leave.” It arises when an employee fails to report for work without informing or securing prior approval from the employer. Although going AWOL is a common occurrence in many workplaces, its legal implications can be serious. Employers and employees alike should understand how AWOL is treated under Philippine labor law—particularly regarding due process requirements, disciplinary measures, and potential legal consequences.

2. Defining AWOL Versus Abandonment

  1. AWOL (Absence Without Official Leave)

    • An AWOL occurs when an employee is absent without notice, approval, or valid justification.
    • This may involve taking an unapproved leave, failing to file a leave application properly, or ignoring established procedures for absences.

  2. Abandonment of Employment

    • Abandonment, as a just cause for termination under Article 297 (formerly Article 282) of the Labor Code, is defined as the deliberate and unjustified refusal of an employee to resume work.
    • It requires a clear intent to sever the employer-employee relationship. Mere absence, even if prolonged, does not automatically constitute abandonment. Jurisprudence consistently states that to prove abandonment, the employer must show (a) the employee’s failure to report for work for an unjustifiable reason, and (b) a clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship.

Understanding the difference is crucial because not every AWOL translates into abandonment. An employee may go AWOL without necessarily intending to resign or abandon the position.

3. Legal Framework on AWOL in the Philippines

  1. The Labor Code of the Philippines

    • The Labor Code is the primary legislative authority governing employment relationships in the Philippines. It provides grounds for both dismissal and disciplinary action.
    • Although the term “AWOL” does not explicitly appear in the Labor Code, unauthorized absences can lead to dismissal under “willful disobedience” or “gross and habitual neglect” if certain criteria are met.

  2. Just Causes for Termination (Article 297)

    • The relevant grounds for terminating an AWOL employee could fall under:
      • Gross and habitual neglect of duties; or
      • Willful disobedience of the lawful orders of the employer.
    • To validly terminate an employee on these grounds, the employer must comply with both substantive and procedural due process requirements.

  3. DOLE Department Orders and Regulations

    • Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) regulations, such as Department Order No. 147-15, reinforce the two-notice rule, which employers must observe when imposing disciplinary penalties.

4. Due Process Requirements for Disciplinary Action

  1. Substantive Due Process

    • The employer must have a valid or just cause for dismissal, which can include repeated or prolonged absences without authorization.
    • Merely labeling an employee as “AWOL” is not automatically sufficient. There must be clear evidence that the employee committed infractions justifying the disciplinary action.

  2. Procedural Due Process (Two-Notice Rule)

    • First Notice (Notice to Explain or Show-Cause Notice): The employee must be given a written notice specifying the grounds for disciplinary action, the facts surrounding the AWOL, and an opportunity to explain.
    • Opportunity to be Heard: The employee should have enough time to prepare a response. A hearing or conference is typically advised, though not strictly mandated if the employee is given the chance to submit a written explanation.
    • Second Notice (Notice of Decision): After evaluating the employee’s explanation and any evidence, the employer must issue a final decision in writing, stating the penalty or corrective action.

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has emphasized the importance of this two-notice rule. Failure to comply can result in an otherwise valid dismissal being declared illegal due to lack of due process.

5. Employer’s Rights and Options When an Employee Goes AWOL

  1. Immediate Investigation and Documentation

    • Employers should keep track of unauthorized absences. This includes keeping records of attendance, logs of attempts to contact the employee, and any communications sent to ascertain the reason for absence.

  2. Sending a Return-to-Work or Show-Cause Notice

    • Employers often send return-to-work orders or show-cause notices if the employee fails to report for work. This notice can set a deadline for the employee to respond or return.

  3. Application of Progressive Discipline Policies

    • If an employer has company policies stating that certain numbers of consecutive absences without notification can lead to disciplinary sanctions (including termination), they must still follow due process. But the presence of such policies provides clear company guidelines on how to address AWOL cases.

  4. Termination if Justified

    • If the employee fails to respond or has no valid reason for the continued absence, and the investigation shows the employee intentionally disregarded work duties, the employer may legally terminate.
    • Proper documentation is critical to defend the employer’s decision if challenged before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

6. Employee Remedies and Defenses

  1. Valid Justification for Absences

    • If an employee can show a legitimate reason for the absence (e.g., medical emergencies, personal emergencies, or other justified causes) and can provide documentary proof or communication attempts, it can mitigate disciplinary measures.

  2. Employer’s Non-Compliance with Due Process

    • Even if an employee was absent without leave, a dismissal could be rendered illegal if the employer fails to adhere to the two-notice rule and other procedural safeguards.
    • The employee may file a complaint for illegal dismissal before the NLRC.

  3. No Clear Intent to Abandon

    • If an employer alleges abandonment, the employee can argue that they had no intention to sever the employer-employee relationship. Frequent communication attempts, messages indicating a desire to return to work, or reasons such as sudden illnesses can negate the employer’s claim of abandonment.

7. Practical Tips to Avoid AWOL Disputes

  1. Establish a Clear Attendance Policy

    • Employers should have a written policy detailing the procedures for filing leaves and the consequences for unauthorized absences. This policy should be included in the employee handbook.

  2. Encourage Prompt Communication

    • Educate employees on the importance of immediately notifying their supervisor or HR department if they cannot report to work.

  3. Document All Communication

    • Keep copies of any notices, memos, or messages sent to the absent employee. Proper documentation often proves decisive in labor disputes.

  4. Engage in Good-Faith Discussions

    • Sometimes, employees go AWOL due to issues like family emergencies, illness, or workplace conflicts. Early interventions, open communication, and supportive policies help address the underlying causes of AWOL.

8. Consequences of Wrongful Termination for AWOL

If an employer hastily dismisses an employee for going AWOL but fails to comply with labor law requirements, the dismissal may be deemed illegal. In such a case, the employer could be held liable for:

  • Reinstatement (or Separation Pay in lieu of reinstatement, if reinstatement is no longer viable);
  • Full back wages from the date of dismissal until finality of the decision; and
  • Possible moral and/or exemplary damages, depending on the facts.

These penalties serve as a caution to employers that procedural and substantive due process must always be observed.

9. Summary

  • AWOL refers to unauthorized absences that violate company policy or existing laws, while abandonment requires a clear intention to sever ties with the employer.
  • Under Philippine labor law, employers can impose disciplinary sanctions for AWOL if they meet substantive (valid cause) and procedural (two-notice rule) requirements.
  • Merely being absent without official leave does not automatically equate to abandonment. Employers must prove an employee’s intent to abandon, and employees must be given the chance to explain.
  • Both parties must engage in good-faith efforts to communicate, investigate, and resolve attendance issues.
  • A dismissal that does not comply with due process can be overturned as illegal, exposing an employer to significant monetary liabilities.

10. Conclusion

AWOL situations are a common but serious matter under Philippine labor law. Employers should carefully document absences, provide notices, and investigate thoroughly before imposing disciplinary actions. Employees, on the other hand, should communicate promptly, provide valid justifications, and be aware of their rights to due process. By understanding the proper legal framework and procedures, both parties can navigate AWOL incidents fairly and lawfully.

If you find yourself facing an AWOL-related concern—whether as an employer or employee—seek professional legal advice to ensure compliance with current Philippine labor laws and to protect your rights and interests.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login