AWOL Termination Procedures under Philippine Labor Law

AWOL Termination Procedures under Philippine Labor Law
(A Comprehensive Legal Article in the Philippine Context)

I. Introduction

Under Philippine labor law, the employer-employee relationship is a constitutionally protected bond. The 1987 Philippine Constitution mandates the State to afford full protection to labor, including the employee’s right to security of tenure. Consequently, employers must abide by strict legal procedures when terminating employment. One common but often misunderstood cause of termination is when an employee is Absent Without Official Leave (commonly referred to as “AWOL”). Despite some misconceptions, an employee’s prolonged or unjustified absence cannot be presumed to automatically sever the employment relationship. Employers must comply with the required rules on substantive and procedural due process to validly dismiss an employee on the ground of AWOL—or more precisely, abandonment or serious misconduct/gross neglect of duty, as AWOL itself is not explicitly stated as a standalone just cause in the Labor Code of the Philippines.

This article comprehensively discusses AWOL and the proper termination procedures under Philippine law, including relevant legal bases, substantive considerations, and procedural requirements.

II. Legal Bases

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended)

    • Book VI, Title I, Chapter I (Termination of Employment): Enumerates the authorized causes for termination of employment, the requirement of due process, and the remedies in case of illegal dismissal.
    • Article 297 [Formerly Article 282] (Just Causes for Termination): Provides the just causes for dismissal, including:
      • (a) Serious Misconduct or Willful Disobedience
      • (b) Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duties
      • (c) Fraud or Willful Breach of Trust
      • (d) Commission of a Crime Against the Employer or His Family
      • (e) Other Analogous Causes

    Although “AWOL” is not explicitly stated, habitual absenteeism or abandonment of work is often treated under “gross and habitual neglect of duty” or as an “analogous cause” involving willful disobedience of company rules on attendance.

  2. Constitutional Right to Security of Tenure

    • Article XIII, Section 3 of the 1987 Constitution emphasizes that no worker shall be dismissed without just or authorized cause and without due process of law.

  3. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Issuances

    • Department Order No. 147-15: Sets out the standards of due process in employee dismissal, clarifying the twin-notice requirement and the employee’s right to be heard.

  4. Supreme Court Jurisprudence

    • The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that termination for AWOL or abandonment of work requires proof of (1) the employee’s failure to report for work or absence without valid or justifiable reason, and (2) a clear intention on the part of the employee to sever the employer-employee relationship (i.e., “deliberate, unjustified refusal to report for work”).
    • Employers must still fulfill procedural due process, which includes the service of notices and an opportunity to respond or explain.

III. Substantive Aspects of AWOL as a Ground for Dismissal

  1. AWOL vs. Abandonment

    • AWOL typically means an unauthorized absence from work. However, a few days of absence without leave alone will not automatically be considered “abandonment.”
    • Abandonment requires two elements:
      1. The failure to report for work or absence without valid reason.
      2. A clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship (i.e., lack of intent to return).
    • If there is no clear proof of intent to discontinue the employment, mere AWOL for a short period might not be sufficient for valid dismissal.

  2. Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duty

    • Under Article 297 (b) of the Labor Code, “gross and habitual neglect of duties” is a just cause for termination. Repeated or prolonged AWOL may be classified under this ground if it shows a pattern of disregard for one’s responsibilities.
    • The key is “habituality” (recurring absences) and “grossness” (gravity of the neglect), as a single or isolated incident of absence may not be enough.

  3. Willful Disobedience or Serious Misconduct

    • Repeated AWOL may also be treated as “willful disobedience” of company rules regarding attendance.
    • Company handbooks or policies typically require employees to obtain prior leave approval. A deliberate violation may constitute misconduct if it is serious in character and meets the tests set by jurisprudence.

  4. Analogous Causes

    • The Labor Code allows dismissal for “other causes analogous to the foregoing.” Abandonment or prolonged AWOL can qualify as an analogous cause when it undermines the trust and operational continuity required by the employer.

IV. Procedural Due Process Requirements

Even if the employer has a valid reason (just cause) for dismissing an employee for AWOL, procedural due process must still be observed. Under Philippine law, this is referred to as the “twin-notice rule”:

  1. First Notice (Show-Cause Notice)

    • The employer must serve a written notice informing the employee of the specific charges or grounds for dismissal (e.g., repeated, unexcused absences, violation of attendance policies).
    • The notice must state the facts and circumstances surrounding the alleged AWOL.
    • The employee should be asked to submit a written explanation or appear for a hearing to address the allegations.

  2. Opportunity to be Heard (Hearing or Conference)

    • After the first notice, the employer must give the employee a chance to explain or defend themselves, either in writing or in a hearing/conference.
    • If the employee cannot be located (often the case in AWOL situations), employers should exert reasonable efforts to notify the employee, such as sending notices to the last known address, or any email or contact information on file.
    • A hearing is not strictly mandatory if the employee opts to submit a written explanation instead, but the opportunity must be clearly given.

  3. Second Notice (Notice of Decision or Termination)

    • Should the employer find the employee culpable after evaluating the evidence and explanation, it must serve a second notice to the employee containing the decision to dismiss.
    • The notice must clearly state the reason(s) for termination, as well as the effective date of dismissal.

Failure to observe this twin-notice requirement and the opportunity to be heard can result in the dismissal being declared procedurally invalid, even if the employer had a valid substantive basis for dismissal.

V. Consequences of Non-Compliance with Due Process

If the employer terminates an employee for AWOL without following the requisite due process, Philippine labor tribunals (Office of the Labor Arbiter, National Labor Relations Commission, or the courts) can declare the termination illegal. The remedies for illegal dismissal can include:

  1. Reinstatement – Ordering the employer to reinstate the illegally dismissed employee without loss of seniority rights.
  2. Full Back Wages – Payment of wages the employee would have earned had they not been dismissed.
  3. Separation Pay in Lieu of Reinstatement – If reinstatement is no longer feasible or mutually agreeable, the employer may be ordered to give separation pay.

Moreover, the Supreme Court has applied the principle that when dismissal is substantively valid but procedurally flawed (i.e., due process not observed), the dismissal may be upheld as to the cause but the employer can be held liable for nominal damages (rather than back wages).

VI. Best Practices for Employers Handling AWOL Cases

  1. Establish Clear Attendance Policies

    • Include attendance regulations in the company handbook, specifying procedures for leave requests, reporting of absences, and the consequences of unauthorized absences.

  2. Document All Incidents of AWOL

    • Maintain accurate records of attendance, notices, warnings, and employee explanations. Proper documentation is vital in proving just cause for termination.

  3. Issue Prompt Notices

    • As soon as the employee is discovered to be AWOL, issue a show-cause memo or first notice, detailing the absence and requiring the employee’s explanation.

  4. Allow for Valid Excuses

    • Legitimate reasons (e.g., medical emergencies, calamities, family crises) may justify absences. Employers should investigate and give employees an opportunity to provide documentation or explanations.

  5. Observe the Twin-Notice Rule

    • Even in cases where the employee cannot be found, send notices to their last known address (registered mail) or any other reasonable channel. Retain proofs of service and communication attempts.

  6. Avoid Summary Dismissals

    • A knee-jerk reaction to terminate without notice can backfire in labor litigation. Always follow the steps required by law before finalizing any dismissal.

VII. Advice for Employees

  1. Maintain Open Communication

    • If unable to report for work, notify your employer promptly with reasons and supporting documents (e.g., medical certificates, accident reports).

  2. Respond to Notices

    • Ignoring a show-cause memo or refusal to attend a hearing can lead to a default situation where the employer may legally justify termination.

  3. Keep Records

    • Keep personal records of communications, company memos, and any proof of valid reasons for absences.

  4. Seek Assistance or Legal Advice

    • In case of disputes, employees may consult with the DOLE, approach labor unions, or seek independent legal counsel.

VIII. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. Is AWOL automatically considered a resignation?

    • No. AWOL does not automatically mean that the employment relationship has ended. Employers must still follow due process, and employees should communicate any justifiable reason for absence.

  2. Can a single instance of AWOL lead to termination?

    • Generally, a single or isolated incident of AWOL is insufficient unless it is extremely grave or meets the criteria for serious misconduct. “Habituality” or repeated violations often weighs more heavily to justify dismissal.

  3. Is abandonment different from AWOL?

    • Abandonment is an extreme form of AWOL wherein the employee clearly intends to sever the employment relationship. Mere absence does not automatically equate to abandonment; the employer must prove the employee’s deliberate refusal to return.

  4. What if the employee can’t be found?

    • The employer should send notices to the employee’s last known address or any other known contact information. If the employee fails to respond, the employer can proceed with the due process steps and issue a second notice if the employee’s explanation (or lack thereof) is deemed unacceptable.

  5. What if the employer fails to comply with due process?

    • Even with a just cause, the employer may face liability for illegal dismissal or may be ordered to pay nominal damages for a procedurally defective dismissal.

IX. Conclusion

AWOL, while commonly invoked, is not a catch-all ground for immediate dismissal. In Philippine labor law, due process reigns supreme. Employers must carefully document absences, ascertain the reasons for the employee’s failure to report for work, and strictly follow the twin-notice rule. Conversely, employees have a duty to explain or justify their absences and communicate their whereabouts or the reasons behind their inability to report for duty.

When managed in accordance with the Labor Code, Supreme Court jurisprudence, and applicable DOLE regulations, AWOL terminations can be lawfully and fairly executed—protecting the rights of both employer and employee. Failure to do so, however, risks a finding of illegal dismissal, which can be costly and burdensome in the long run.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific matters concerning AWOL or other employment issues, parties are encouraged to consult a qualified lawyer or labor law expert.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login