Buying Property Without Spouse Consent

Buying Property in the Philippines Without Your Spouse’s Consent

A comprehensive doctrinal and practical guide


1. The Big Picture

Under Philippine law a marriage is not only a social but also an economic partnership. The Family Code assumes that whatever one spouse does with family property directly affects the other, so any acquisition—or disposition—of real property normally requires the written conformity of both spouses. The only safe “solo‐purchase” scenarios are those expressly carved out by statute or jurisprudence. Everything else is either (a) void from the beginning, (b) voidable at the instance of the “innocent” spouse, or (c) binding on the buyer but still absorbed by the marital estate.


2. Where the Rules Come From

Source Key Provisions What They Say in Plain English
Family Code (FC) Art. 96 (Absolute Community) Art. 124 (Conjugal Partnership) Art. 108, 109 (Exclusive Property) Art. 134 – 136 (Judicial Approval) Neither spouse may “acquire, dispose of, encumber, or alienate” community or conjugal property without the other’s written consent or a court order.
Civil Code, 1950 (residual rules) Art. 1390 – 1398 (Voidable Contracts) A contract lacking a required consent is voidable: binding until annulled, but annulment must be filed within five (5) years from discovery.
Land Registration Act (Act 496) & Property Registration Decree (PD 1529) Sec. 53, Sec. 79 The Register of Deeds must refuse a deed of sale or mortgage of registered land that lacks spousal consent, unless the title or the deed itself shows that the property is exclusive.
Notarial Law (RA 9344, 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice) Sec. 6(b) A notary public must ascertain the marital status of the vendor/vendee and, when applicable, require the spouse’s appearance or a sworn consent.

3. Step 1: Identify the Property Regime

  1. Absolute Community of Property (ACP).
    Default for marriages celebrated on or after 3 August 1988 (effectivity of the Family Code), unless there’s a valid pre‑nup.
    – Everything each spouse owned before the wedding (except “exclusive property,” FC Art. 92) plus everything earned or acquired during the marriage goes into one pot.
    Both must consent to buy real estate, or the deed is void as to the non‑consenting spouse.

  2. Conjugal Partnership of Gains (CPG).
    Default before 3 August 1988; still possible today via pre‑nup.
    – Each spouse keeps his/her “separate” or “paraphernal/capital” property. What the partnership gains during the marriage is conjugal.
    – Under FC Art. 124, buying land on installment / cash / mortgage likewise needs the other spouse’s signature; otherwise the sale is void.

  3. Complete Separation of Property (CSP).
    – Must be stipulated before the wedding (FC Art. 134) or later by judicial decree (FC Art. 135).
    – Each spouse may freely buy property without spousal consent. The ROD will ask for (a) the notarized pre‑nup, or (b) the court order.


4. Step 2: Check Whether the Asset Is Exclusive

Even under ACP or CPG, certain assets are automatically outside the common fund (FC Arts. 92 & 109):

  • Besides the marriage – Property acquired by gratuitous title (inheritance or donation) and the fruits thereof, unless the donor/testator expressly says otherwise.
  • In substitution – Property bought entirely with the proceeds of an exclusive property (e.g., selling inherited land then buying a condominium).
  • Personal and onerous – Property personally and exclusively used by one spouse (e.g., professional tools, personal jewelry) — but not if it becomes so valuable that common funds suffer.

If the buying spouse can prove with contemporaneous documents that 100 % of the purchase price came from an exclusive asset, consent is not required (see Griffith v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 125044, 26 Feb 1999). Expect the ROD to demand:

  1. Sworn Affidavit of Exclusivity, plus
  2. Proof of source (e.g., deed of sale of previous exclusive property, bank remittance slips, inheritance papers).

5. Forms of Consent & Alternatives

Mode When Valid Practical Notes
Spouse signs the same deed. Always safest. Both appear before the notary; names printed on the face of the deed.
Separate “Spousal Consent” or “Marital Authorization.” Accepted if similarly notarized. Must refer to the specific property, price, deed, and date.
Judicial Authorization (FC Arts. 96, 124, 135). When the other spouse is incapacitated, refuses unreasonably, is abroad, or cannot be located. Petition for special authority in the RTC‑Family Court; order is annotated on the title.
Ratification after the fact. Converts a voidable purchase into a fully valid one (Civil Code Art. 1392). Must be unconditional and in writing (SC: Spouses Abalos v. Heirs of Gomez, G.R. No. 158989, 20 Sept 2005).

6. What If Consent Was Missing?

Scenario Effect on the Deed Who May Attack Deadline Usual Remedy
ACP or CPG; no consent; land registered. Void (majority view after Spouses Abalos). Non‑consenting spouse or their heirs. Imprescriptible if void; 5 yrs if treated as voidable. Action for declaration of nullity or reconveyance; notice of lis pendens.
Buyer in bad faith; ROD registered deed anyway. Registration doesn’t cure the defect; title is also void. Same as above. Same. Cancellation of TCT; damages.
Buyer in good faith; property later falls into the hands of a subsequent buyer also in good faith. Fourth‑party transferee’s title is protected under the mirror doctrine if the original title appeared regular. Original spouse may still recover—but must refund the price (Art. 1397). 4 yrs from registration. Action for reconveyance/refund; suit vs. erring spouse.
Property acquired solely with exclusive funds (but proof weak). Deed stands, but property is presumed community/conjugal. Other spouse can demand settlement and accounting, not annulment. 10 yrs from discovery of bad faith. Judicial liquidation under FC Art. 129 or Art. 102.

7. Selected Supreme Court Decisions

Case G.R. No. / Date Take‑away
Spouses Abalos v. Heirs of Gomez 158989 / 20 Sept 2005 A sale of conjugal property by one spouse without the other’s consent is void, not merely voidable.
Cabales v. Court of Appeals 78214 / 29 April 1994 Without spousal consent, the buyer cannot rely on the Torrens title; registration does not validate the void deed.
Griffith v. CA 125044 / 26 Feb 1999 A purchase funded entirely by paraphernal money remains the exclusive asset of the purchasing wife; consent is unnecessary.
Spouses Spouses Delos Santos v. Spouses Buenaventura 235640 / 19 Jan 2021 Good‑faith subsequent buyers may still be protected, but the original void deed is not cured; equitable principles apply case‑to‑case.

8. Practical Checklist for Buyers & Lenders

  1. Ask marital status and require a Certificate of No Marriage (CENOMAR) or the PSA marriage certificate.
  2. Secure notarized consent if the seller/borrower is married.
  3. Examine the title’s acquisition document to see whether it hints at exclusivity (e.g., “by inheritance,” “donation with conditional proviso”).
  4. Demand a marital waiver citing FC Arts. 92 / 109 if the seller claims the land is exclusive.
  5. If the selling spouse is separated in fact only, remember that the ACP/CPG continues unless a court decrees otherwise.
  6. If dealing with separation of property, keep a certified copy of the pre‑nup or judicial separation order in your file, and have the Registry annotate it.
  7. For loans, let both spouses sign the real estate mortgage (REM). Banks customarily refuse solo REMs absent proof of CSP.

9. Tax & Documentary Fallout

Tax / Fee When Imposed Who Signs the BIR Forms
Capital Gains Tax & DST On the transfer deed (sale, donation, dacion). Both spouses or attorney‑in‑fact with SPA signed by both.
Estate Tax If property later declared part of deceased spouse’s estate despite the void sale. Administrator/heirs file the return; earlier buyer may become liable in solidarity.
Local Transfer Tax & Registration Fees Upon registration with ROD. ROD may refuse payment and entry if documents still defective (no consent, no pre‑nup).

10. Criminal & Administrative Overtones

  • Falsification (RPC Art. 171) – Affixing your spouse’s forged signature to the deed or consent.
  • Bigamy (RPC Art. 349) – Occasionally surfaces when the “married” seller later claims to be single.
  • Notarial Misconduct – A notary who fails to confirm marital status or who notarizes a deed without the spouse’s presence may face suspension or disbarment.

11. Frequently Asked “Edge” Questions

Q A
Can one spouse buy in the name of their minor child to avoid the consent rule? No. The funds used remain community/conjugal; the purchase still needs consent or court approval.
Does a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) suffice pending a formal deed? A MOA for the sale or purchase of land is itself a contract of sale (statute of frauds satisfied), so it likewise needs consent.
What if the property is acquired abroad? Lex loci celebrationis of the contract governs form, but the marital property regime (Philippine law if both spouses are Filipino) governs ownership; Philippine courts will still treat the asset as community/conjugal.
We are OFWs married under ACP. I bought a condo in Dubai solely with my salary. Does my husband own half? Yes, unless you have a pre‑nup or can prove the money came from an exclusive asset (e.g., inheritance). The place of the property is irrelevant.

12. Bottom Line

Buying real estate in the Philippines without spousal consent is legally safe only when:

  1. The spouses have a valid pre‑nup or judicial order creating a separation of property, or
  2. The asset is clearly exclusive under FC Arts. 92/109 and the buyer can document the exclusive funding source.

In every other case, the acquisition is void or voidable, and title—no matter how clean it looks—can unravel years later. For everyday transactions, the golden rule is simple:

“When in doubt, get the spouse to sign.”


This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. For specific cases, consult a Philippine lawyer experienced in family and property law.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.