Creating an Effective NDA and Non-Compete in the Philippines

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and their interpretations can change over time. For specific legal questions or concerns regarding Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or Non-Compete Clauses in the Philippines, it is best to consult a qualified legal professional.

I. Introduction

In today’s fast-paced and highly competitive marketplace, businesses and professionals frequently share confidential and proprietary information. To safeguard such information and maintain competitive advantages, two common legal tools are employed: Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and Non-Compete Clauses (or Non-Compete Agreements).

Within the Philippine context, these tools are subject to various legal frameworks, including the Civil Code of the Philippines, the Labor Code, case law from the Supreme Court, and general principles of contracts. This article covers the essential aspects of drafting and enforcing effective NDAs and Non-Compete Clauses in the Philippines.

II. Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs)

1. What is an NDA?

An NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) is a legally binding contract that creates a confidential relationship between parties. Its primary purpose is to ensure that any information deemed confidential—such as trade secrets, business strategies, marketing plans, customer lists, or proprietary technology—is not disclosed to unauthorized third parties.

2. Legal Bases for NDAs in the Philippines

  1. Civil Code of the Philippines

    • The Civil Code upholds the principle of mutual obligations in contracts (Articles 1305, 1159, 1319). Contracts have the force of law between the parties, provided they are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy. NDAs generally fall under this principle.
    • There is no specific codified law dedicated only to NDAs, but their enforceability is anchored on the freedom to contract and general contractual principles.

  2. Intellectual Property Laws

    • While there is no singular legislation solely covering NDAs, the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (R.A. 8293) protects trade secrets and confidential information in general.
    • NDAs often go hand-in-hand with the need to safeguard intellectual property rights.

  3. Data Privacy Act (R.A. 10173)

    • If the information exchanged involves personal data, the Data Privacy Act also imposes obligations to secure and protect personal information.
    • NDAs can complement a company’s Data Privacy compliance by clarifying obligations to handle personal data safely.

3. Key Provisions of an NDA

  1. Definition of Confidential Information

    • Clearly define what information is considered confidential (e.g., technical data, client lists, sales data, etc.).
    • Exclusions to confidentiality, such as information that is publicly known or already in the party’s possession before signing the NDA, should be specified.

  2. Purpose

    • State the reason why the confidential information is shared (e.g., for discussions on a potential business partnership, joint venture, employment relationship, etc.).

  3. Obligations of the Receiving Party

    • The receiving party must keep the information confidential and use it only for the stated purpose.
    • Clearly outline the steps expected to protect the information (e.g., restricting access, using secure methods of communication, etc.).

  4. Term and Duration

    • Specify how long the NDA is valid. It can be for a fixed number of years (e.g., 2–5 years) or indefinite until the confidential information becomes publicly known through no fault of the receiving party.

  5. Remedies for Breach

    • Include clauses specifying the legal or equitable remedies available, such as injunctive relief, damages, or specific performance.

  6. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

    • Indicate that the agreement is governed by Philippine law.
    • The agreement may also specify preferred modes of dispute resolution (e.g., litigation, arbitration, mediation).

4. Best Practices for Drafting Effective NDAs

  1. Clarity and Specificity

    • Avoid vague language. Clearly delineate what is confidential and what is not.
    • Outline the scope of permitted usage.

  2. Reasonableness

    • Ensure that the restrictions imposed are not overly burdensome or contrary to public policy.

  3. Mutual vs. Unilateral

    • Determine whether the NDA is mutual (both parties share sensitive information) or unilateral (only one party discloses information).

  4. Integration with Company Policies

    • Align NDA provisions with internal policies on data protection, intellectual property, and record-keeping.

III. Non-Compete Clauses (or Non-Compete Agreements)

1. What is a Non-Compete Clause?

A Non-Compete Clause (NCC) restricts a party—often an employee or former business partner—from engaging in a similar business or profession that competes with another party for a certain period, within a defined geographic scope. The intent is to protect a business from unfair competition by someone who has inside information or specialized knowledge gained during the relationship.

2. Enforceability of Non-Compete Clauses in the Philippines

Unlike NDAs, Non-Compete Clauses face higher scrutiny under Philippine law. The Philippine Constitution recognizes the right of every citizen to choose a profession or occupation (Section 18, Article II of the Constitution). Additionally:

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines

    • While the Labor Code does not explicitly mention Non-Compete Clauses, its spirit favors the protection of labor, job security, and gainful employment.
    • Courts tend to view restrictive covenants with caution to avoid unduly limiting an individual’s means to earn a livelihood.

  2. Case Law

    • Philippine jurisprudence generally upholds restrictive covenants (like non-compete, non-solicitation) if they are:
      • Reasonable in terms of time (duration)
      • Reasonable in terms of geographic scope
      • Not contrary to public policy or morality
    • Courts look at whether the restriction is “no greater than is required for the protection of the employer” and whether it “does not impose undue hardship on the employee.”

  3. Civil Code of the Philippines

    • Under Article 1306, parties may establish stipulations as long as they are not contrary to law, morals, public policy, etc.
    • An overly broad or perpetual Non-Compete Clause could be declared unenforceable under the doctrine that a contract cannot run counter to public policy.

3. Key Elements of a Non-Compete Clause

  1. Scope of Restricted Activity

    • Clearly define the specific business activities or type of employment prohibited (e.g., working for a direct competitor, setting up a competing startup, soliciting former clients).

  2. Duration

    • Specify how long the restriction lasts after the end of the employment or business relationship.
    • A typical duration might range from 6 months to 2 years. Excessively long periods (e.g., 5+ years) often risk being deemed unenforceable.

  3. Geographical Reach

    • Identify the location or market segment where the competition is restricted.
    • Narrow geographic scopes (e.g., within a specific region or city) are more likely to be viewed as reasonable than global or nationwide restrictions, unless justified by the nature of the business.

  4. Consideration

    • In some jurisdictions, courts consider whether the employee or party subject to the non-compete received additional compensation or benefits in exchange for accepting the restriction.
    • While not always legally required in the Philippines, providing reasonable consideration can help demonstrate the fairness of the agreement.

  5. Remedies for Breach

    • State the consequences if a party breaches the non-compete provision, such as payment of liquidated damages or the right to seek injunctive relief.

4. Drafting Non-Compete Clauses: Tips and Best Practices

  1. Justify the Restrictions

    • Show a legitimate business interest that requires protection, such as trade secrets or client relationships.

  2. Keep It Narrow and Specific

    • An overbroad clause that prohibits all forms of employment in an industry may be struck down.
    • Tailor restrictions to specific roles, expertise, or regions relevant to the protected business.

  3. Limited Duration

    • Limit the enforceable period to what is necessary to protect legitimate interests, typically 6 months to 1 or 2 years.

  4. Combine with Other Protective Measures

    • Use Non-Disclosure and Non-Solicitation provisions as alternatives or supplements to a non-compete, especially if a direct non-compete would be seen as too restrictive.

  5. Review and Update Regularly

    • Laws and industry practices evolve. Periodically review your Non-Compete Clauses to ensure they remain enforceable.

IV. Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

  1. Overly Broad Definitions

    • Defining “competitor” or “confidential information” too broadly can invalidate the entire agreement or severely limit enforceability.

  2. Excessive Duration and Geographic Scope

    • Failing to calibrate the time period and region covered by the non-compete to what is strictly needed often leads to it being struck down by courts.

  3. Lack of Consideration

    • In employment contexts, if the non-compete clause was introduced mid-employment without any additional benefit, courts might view the restriction as unfair or lacking mutuality.

  4. Missing or Weak Remedies

    • Not specifying clear remedies (e.g., damages, injunctive relief) undermines enforceability. An agreement without a clear mechanism for enforcement is far less effective.

  5. Lack of Compliance with Other Laws

    • Ignoring data privacy obligations, intellectual property laws, or relevant industry-specific regulations can create conflicts and liabilities.

V. Enforcing NDAs and Non-Compete Clauses

  1. Filing a Lawsuit (Civil Action)

    • The aggrieved party can file for damages and/or injunctive relief in regular courts.
    • The suit typically cites a breach of contract, seeking to enforce the terms.

  2. Injunctive Relief

    • A common remedy sought in NDA and non-compete breaches is an injunction (court order) stopping the unauthorized disclosure or competition.

  3. Arbitration and Mediation

    • If the agreement has an arbitration or mediation clause, parties may opt for these alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods.
    • ADR is encouraged in the Philippines to decongest courts, but the finality and enforceability of arbitral awards are subject to the ADR Act of 2004 (R.A. 9285).

  4. Factors That Influence Court Decisions

    • Reasonableness of the agreement terms.
    • Actual damage or potential harm caused by the breach.
    • Evidence of legitimate business interests needing protection.

VI. Practical Steps to Create an Effective NDA and Non-Compete

  1. Conduct a Needs Assessment

    • Identify the specific confidential information or business interest requiring protection before drafting.

  2. Consult Legal Counsel Early

    • Work with legal experts who are familiar with Philippine labor and contract laws to ensure the clauses conform to local legal requirements.

  3. Tailor the Agreement to the Relationship

    • An agreement with a prospective business partner differs from one with a short-term consultant. Address unique risks in each scenario.

  4. Set Reasonable Restrictions

    • Keep the language simple, clear, and no broader than necessary.
    • Use quantifiable time frames and clearly defined scopes.

  5. Educate the Parties Involved

    • Make sure employees, consultants, or partners understand their obligations.
    • Provide training or guidelines on handling confidential information.

  6. Review and Update Periodically

    • Laws and business realities change. Periodic review helps keep the agreements enforceable and reflective of the current business environment.

VII. Conclusion

Drafting an effective NDA and Non-Compete Agreement in the Philippines requires a careful balance between protecting business interests and respecting constitutional and statutory rights to livelihood. While NDAs are generally enforceable if clearly written and not against public policy, Non-Compete Clauses demand more scrutiny due to constitutional protections of the right to work and the preference to safeguard workers’ rights under the Labor Code.

Key Takeaways:

  • NDAs in the Philippines are strongly rooted in general contract principles and are widely used to protect confidential information.
  • Non-Compete Clauses must be carefully drafted to avoid violating public policy or imposing undue hardship on employees or former partners.
  • Reasonableness is the golden rule: The scope, duration, and geographic limitations must be proportionate to the business interest being protected.
  • Professional Legal Advice is critical. Each business scenario has unique risks and requirements. A well-drafted contract can reduce the likelihood of expensive legal battles and protect valuable proprietary information.

By following these guidelines and consulting with a qualified lawyer, businesses and professionals can create NDAs and Non-Compete Clauses that effectively safeguard their interests while complying with Philippine law.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login