Effect of Deceased’s Residence on Opening of Succession

Disclaimer: The following discussion is provided for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice. For specific concerns and questions regarding the law on succession in the Philippines, please consult a licensed attorney.

Introduction

In Philippine succession law, the concept of the deceased’s residence (often linked with the term “domicile” in legal contexts) plays a significant role in determining where and how the succession of a decedent’s estate is opened, administered, and settled. Understanding these rules is crucial for heirs, executors, administrators, and legal practitioners to ensure the proper distribution of assets and the observance of due process in estate settlement proceedings.

This article provides a comprehensive discussion of the effect of the deceased’s residence on the opening of succession under Philippine law, including the relevant provisions of the Civil Code of the Philippines, jurisdictional rules, and conflict-of-law principles.

1. Basic Concepts in Philippine Succession Law

  1. Succession – Under Article 774 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, succession is defined as “a mode of acquisition by virtue of which the property, rights, and obligations to the extent of the value of the inheritance, of a person are transmitted through his death to another or others.” It covers both testamentary succession (through a will) and intestate succession (in the absence of a valid will).

  2. Opening of Succession – Article 777 of the Civil Code states that “the rights to the succession are transmitted from the moment of the death of the decedent.” In other words, the moment the decedent dies, ownership of and title to his or her properties effectively pass (subject to certain formalities and processes) to his or her heirs.

  3. Residence vs. Domicile – Although the Civil Code uses the term “residence” at times, Philippine jurisprudence and legal texts often speak interchangeably of “last residence” or “domicile” when determining issues of venue and jurisdiction. In strict legal contexts, domicile refers to the person’s permanent home, or the place to which, whenever absent, they intend to return. “Residence,” in many statutes and jurisprudence, is often equated with “domicile” for the purpose of establishing venue in estate proceedings.

2. Relevance of the Deceased’s Residence to the Opening of Succession

  1. Venue for Probate or Settlement Proceedings

    • Under Philippine law (e.g., Rule 73, Section 1 of the Rules of Court), if the decedent is a resident of the Philippines at the time of death, the settlement of his or her estate should be filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of the province or city where he or she last resided.
    • If the decedent was not a resident of the Philippines at the time of death, an estate proceeding can be filed in any province or city in which the decedent had an estate or if he or she left property within the Philippines.

  2. Determining Jurisdiction and Court Authority

    • The “last residence” of the decedent is important in identifying which court has the authority to appoint an executor or administrator, supervise the distribution of assets, and settle liabilities.
    • If two probate petitions are filed in different courts, the court that first assumes jurisdiction over the correct venue (i.e., the RTC of the place of the decedent’s last residence) generally retains authority over the settlement proceedings, subject to the Philippine Rules of Court.

  3. Identification of Assets and Liabilities

    • While the decedent’s real property is governed by the law of the place where the property is located (lex rei sitae), the decedent’s personal property is generally governed by the law of the decedent’s nationality (under conflict-of-law principles in the Civil Code). Nonetheless, for purposes of actual administration and settlement within the Philippines, the court where the decedent last resided (if that was in the Philippines) will still have overarching supervision.
    • The personal property located in the Philippines will still be subject to probate or administration in the Philippine courts, especially if the deceased had established a residence or domicile in the Philippines.

3. Conflicts of Law and the Deceased’s Residence

  1. National Law vs. Lex Rei Sitae

    • National Law Rule: For questions on “intrinsic validity” of a will (e.g., who may inherit, the proportion of shares, legitimacy of dispositions), the Philippines follows the rule that the national law of the decedent at the time of death generally applies to personal property.
    • Lex Rei Sitae: For questions regarding real property, the law of the place where the real property is situated generally governs. Thus, Philippine law governs the disposition of real property located in the Philippines, regardless of the decedent’s nationality or residence at death.

  2. Impact of Residence on Conflict-of-Law Issues

    • If the deceased was domiciled in the Philippines at the time of death, and had foreign assets, the Philippine court may need to apply Philippine conflict-of-law rules to determine the distribution of assets situated abroad.
    • Conversely, if the decedent was domiciled or resident abroad but left property in the Philippines, the local courts will have jurisdiction to settle the Philippine portion of the estate under ancillary administration, even if primary or principal probate proceedings are pursued in the decedent’s home country.

4. Practical Effects on the Estate Settlement Process

  1. Primary and Ancillary Proceedings

    • If the deceased was a Filipino resident but had properties abroad, the main (“primary”) estate proceeding is typically conducted in the Philippines. Separate (“ancillary”) proceedings might be initiated in the foreign country where other assets are located, following that jurisdiction’s probate or succession laws.
    • Conversely, if the decedent was a foreign resident, the primary proceeding may occur in the foreign jurisdiction. However, an ancillary proceeding will generally be initiated in the Philippines for assets located here.

  2. Requirements for Publication and Notice

    • Under the Philippine Rules of Court, notice of the settlement and probate proceedings must be published in a newspaper of general circulation (or as the rules require). This notice requirement ensures that creditors and other interested parties are duly informed.
    • The decedent’s last residence is crucial in meeting the publication requirements properly, ensuring that individuals in that locality (e.g., potential heirs, creditors, or claimants) can be notified.

  3. Claims of Creditors and Liabilities

    • Creditors typically file their claims in the settlement proceedings taking place in the court of the decedent’s last residence. The estate’s administrator or executor is responsible for verifying, allowing, or contesting such claims, and for paying legitimate debts out of the estate’s assets.
    • If the deceased had creditors both in the Philippines and abroad, those creditors must typically bring their claims in the main probate proceeding or in an ancillary proceeding, depending on where the primary estate administration is taking place and how the property is distributed.

  4. Implications for Taxes

    • Estate tax in the Philippines is imposed on the transfer of the net estate of a decedent, whether the decedent was a resident or non-resident at the time of death, but the scope of the taxable estate may differ.
    • For Philippine residents (or citizens), worldwide assets may be subject to Philippine estate tax, while for non-residents, only the properties situated in the Philippines are typically subject to Philippine estate tax, subject to tax treaties, if any.
    • Even in the case of non-residents, the fact that the property is located in the Philippines still triggers the estate tax filing with the Philippine Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).

5. Distinguishing “Residence” for Venue from Other Purposes

It is important to note that for venue purposes (where the case should be filed), courts in the Philippines look to the “last residence” or “domicile” of the deceased in the Philippines. This can differ from:

  1. Citizenship – A Filipino citizen can be domiciled abroad.
  2. Temporary Place of Stay – A decedent could have multiple residences but only one domicile (i.e., the principal, fixed, and permanent place of habitation).
  3. Place Where Death Occurred – The place of death (e.g., if the decedent died while traveling) does not necessarily dictate jurisdiction; rather, the decedent’s legal residence or domicile at the time of death does.

6. Illustrative Example

  • Example 1: Juan, a Filipino citizen and resident of Manila, dies leaving real property in Quezon City and personal property (bank accounts) in the United States. His estate settlement proceedings, including probate of his will if any, would primarily be instituted in Manila (the city of his last residence). An ancillary proceeding might be needed in the U.S. to deal with the bank accounts (depending on local banking and probate laws), but the main probate would remain under the jurisdiction of the RTC of Manila.

  • Example 2: Anna, an American citizen domiciled (permanently residing) in Cebu, Philippines, dies leaving property in Cebu (real property and personal effects) and property in New York. Since she was a resident/domiciliary of Cebu, the Philippine court (the RTC of Cebu) would generally oversee the probate. The real property in Cebu would be governed by Philippine law, while her personal property’s intrinsic validity might follow the national law rule (i.e., American law), subject to Philippine conflict-of-law provisions. There could also be ancillary proceedings in New York for assets located there.

7. Key Takeaways

  1. Venue and Jurisdiction: The primary estate settlement or probate proceedings in the Philippines take place in the Regional Trial Court of the city or province where the decedent last resided.
  2. Conflict-of-Law Principles:
    • The law of the decedent’s nationality generally governs the intrinsic validity of dispositions affecting personal property.
    • Real property in the Philippines is governed by Philippine law (lex rei sitae).
  3. Tax Implications:
    • The residence (or domicile) of the decedent also affects the scope of estate tax liability (worldwide vs. local assets).
    • Non-residents are taxed in the Philippines only on property located here, but a filing is still required with the BIR.
  4. Practical Administration:
    • Creditors must file claims in the estate proceeding initiated in the Philippines if the decedent last resided in the Philippines (or, alternatively, in the ancillary proceeding if the decedent’s primary domicile was abroad).
    • Notice and publication requirements are localized to the place of the decedent’s last residence, ensuring proper due process.

Conclusion

The residence or domicile of the deceased at the time of death is a foundational factor in determining where succession is opened in the Philippines. It influences the court that has jurisdiction over the estate settlement, how proceedings will be administered, and how conflict-of-law rules will be applied to property—both real and personal—left behind by the decedent.

Individuals planning their estate or those involved in estate settlement must be mindful of these legal principles. Where the deceased was last habitually residing, or where they considered their permanent home, can greatly affect the formalities and procedures for distributing assets, settling debts, and navigating any cross-border aspects of the estate. For tailored guidance and compliance with the various rules and regulations, especially when foreign property or international heirs are involved, consulting a Philippine-licensed attorney remains the best course of action.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login