Employee Redeployment Policies: Last-In First-Out vs. Performance-Based in the Philippines

Employee Redeployment Policies: Last-In First-Out vs. Performance-Based in the Philippines
In the Philippines, employee redeployment—or the selection and transfer/termination of employees when an organization reorganizes or reduces its workforce—must comply with the country’s labor laws, regulations, and relevant jurisprudence. Typically, employers resort to formal processes when business exigencies such as redundancy, retrenchment, or closure necessitate reorganizing. Two of the most common frameworks for choosing which employees remain in their current positions or are redeployed (either transferred or laid off) are:

  1. Last-In First-Out (LIFO)
  2. Performance-Based Selection

Below is a comprehensive discussion of the legal framework governing employee redeployment in the Philippines, the practical application of LIFO and performance-based approaches, and the relevant obligations of employers.

1. Legal Framework Governing Employee Redeployment

A. The Labor Code of the Philippines

The primary legislation covering employment relationships, including termination and redeployment, is the Labor Code of the Philippines. The key provisions relevant to authorized causes of termination—such as retrenchment, redundancy, or closure—are generally found in Articles 298 and 299 (formerly Articles 283 and 284) of the Labor Code. Under these provisions:

  1. Redundancy exists when the position of an employee is in excess of what is reasonably demanded by the actual requirements of the enterprise.
  2. Retrenchment is the reduction of workforce to prevent or minimize business losses.
  3. Closure of business or cessation of an operation either fully or partially may also lead to workforce reductions.

In each of these circumstances, substantive and procedural due process must be strictly observed. The employer has the burden of proving that the chosen method of selection is fair, reasonable, and compliant with the law.

B. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Guidelines

While there is no statute that explicitly prescribes which selection criteria must be used, DOLE often requires that the process used by the employer be:

  • Fair and objective
  • Non-discriminatory
  • Consistent with business necessities

Employers must submit a report of termination (via authorized causes) to the DOLE at least 30 days before the effectivity of any employee dismissal. This formal notice should specify the reason for terminations and the number of employees affected.

C. Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Over the years, the Philippine Supreme Court has reinforced the principle that employers must use a fair and transparent method when deciding which employees to let go. While courts typically refrain from questioning an employer’s business decisions, they will scrutinize the manner of selection to ensure that it is not done arbitrarily or maliciously.

Key points from case law:

  • The employer’s prerogative to organize its workforce is respected, but labor rights must be upheld.
  • Whether using LIFO or a performance-based system, the chosen method must not violate employee rights and must be implemented in good faith.
  • The selection criteria must be rationally related to the lawful purpose of the retrenchment or redundancy program.

2. Last-In First-Out (LIFO) Policy

A. Definition and Rationale

The Last-In First-Out (LIFO) policy dictates that the employees most recently hired (i.e., the “last in”) are the first to be let go (“first out”) when a company needs to reduce staff. The logic is that the more senior employees, by virtue of longer service, may have developed deeper institutional knowledge, skills, or loyalty. LIFO is also often deemed an objective measure—one based on length of service—giving it the appearance of straightforward fairness.

B. Advantages of LIFO

  1. Simplicity and Clarity
    • Criteria are based purely on hire dates, making it transparent and easy to administer.
  2. Perceived Fairness
    • Gives weight to employee tenure and seniority, rewarding loyalty and long service.
  3. Legal Defensibility
    • Since it appears less subjective, it may be easier to justify in court, provided it is consistently applied.

C. Disadvantages of LIFO

  1. Skills and Performance Considerations
    • LIFO does not consider whether a more recently hired employee might be a high performer or possess specialized skills critical to the business.
  2. Talent Retention Risks
    • Letting go of newer but high-potential or high-performing employees could harm the organization in the long run.
  3. Possible Age/Seniority Bias
    • Although not automatically unlawful, LIFO might disproportionately affect younger employees, potentially raising discrimination concerns if not handled carefully.

D. Legal and Procedural Requirements Under LIFO

  • Consistent Application: The employer must uniformly apply the LIFO rule across similarly situated employees.
  • Business Necessity: If the employer deviates from LIFO (e.g., retaining a more junior employee with unique skills), there must be solid justification.
  • Documentation and Notice: Employers should document the basis for selecting or retaining certain employees, and ensure the statutory 30-day notice (to both the employees and DOLE) is satisfied.

3. Performance-Based Selection

A. Definition and Rationale

Under a performance-based approach, employees are selected for redeployment (or separation) based on their job performance, competencies, and productivity. Often, this approach involves a matrix or ranking system grounded in recent performance appraisals, skill sets, or specialized qualifications.

B. Advantages of a Performance-Based Approach

  1. Merit and Skill Retention
    • Helps the company retain those employees whose continued employment is critical for sustaining competitiveness or quality.
  2. Alignment with Business Goals
    • Encourages a culture of accountability and excellence; signals that performance matters.
  3. Flexibility
    • Allows nuanced decisions, recognizing unique roles and skillsets that may be essential for the company’s operation.

C. Disadvantages of a Performance-Based Approach

  1. Subjectivity
    • Performance evaluations can be open to bias or inconsistent application if not grounded in objective metrics.
  2. Potential for Legal Disputes
    • Employees may challenge the fairness and accuracy of performance assessments, alleging favoritism or discrimination.
  3. Implementation Complexity
    • Requires a robust performance management system and documentation that can withstand legal scrutiny.

D. Legal Considerations for Performance-Based Redeployment

  • Well-Documented Evaluations: Employers must ensure performance reviews are properly documented, up-to-date, and consistently applied.
  • Transparent Process: Employers should inform employees of how they are being evaluated, what metrics are used, and how the final decisions are made.
  • Good Faith: Any performance-based selection must not be a smokescreen for illegal discrimination or wrongful termination (e.g., targeting employees for union activity, whistleblowing, or protected characteristics).

4. Balancing LIFO and Performance-Based Criteria

Some employers adopt hybrid methods, combining both seniority and performance criteria. For instance, companies may:

  • First identify employees who possess specialized or critical skills and rank them by performance;
  • Apply LIFO for all other employees in identical roles or job tiers; and
  • Use a matrix that weights both tenure and performance scores.

This hybrid approach can mitigate the downsides of purely LIFO (losing high-performers with critical skills) while also ensuring that loyal, long-serving employees are recognized. The key is ensuring that the criteria remain clear, consistent, and justifiable under labor regulations.

5. Procedural Requirements for Redeployment or Separation

Regardless of the selection criteria, employers must adhere to procedural due process:

  1. Written Notice to Employees and DOLE

    • Employees must be given at least 30 days’ written notice prior to the intended date of termination.
    • A similar notice must be furnished to the DOLE, detailing the reason for and scope of the terminations.

  2. Fair Criteria

    • Whether LIFO or performance-based, the chosen criteria should be fair, objective, and consistently applied to avoid claims of unlawful or arbitrary dismissal.

  3. Payment of Separation Benefits

    • For authorized causes like redundancy or retrenchment, employees are typically entitled to separation pay (the amount depends on the cause—e.g., one month pay per year of service in cases of redundancy).

  4. Avoidance of Discrimination

    • The selection process must not discriminate based on gender, age, religion, political affiliation, union membership, or other protected characteristics under Philippine law.

  5. Opportunity to Be Heard

    • While not as extensive as in termination for just causes (like misconduct), employees should still have an opportunity to understand why they were selected for separation and to question any perceived unfair treatment.

6. Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

A. Common Pitfalls

  1. Lack of Proper Documentation: Failing to keep thorough records on performance appraisals or business justifications can lead to legal vulnerabilities.
  2. Inconsistent Application of Criteria: Using LIFO for one department but performance-based for another without clear reasoning can appear arbitrary.
  3. Failure to Provide Adequate Notice: Not observing the 30-day notice period or not reporting to DOLE can invalidate the termination process.

B. Best Practices

  1. Develop Clear Policies: Put in writing the selection criteria (whether LIFO, performance-based, or a hybrid) and disseminate these policies to employees well ahead of any retrenchment exercise.
  2. Train Supervisors and Managers: Ensure they understand how to properly evaluate performance and apply selection criteria.
  3. Consult Legal Counsel: Especially for complex reorganizations or large-scale retrenchments, early consultation with labor law experts can help forestall legal challenges.
  4. Maintain Transparency: Communicate the reasons behind the redeployment or retrenchment process to employees to build trust and minimize disputes.

7. Conclusion

When Filipino employers face the need to reorganize or reduce their workforce, they must do so within the bounds of the Labor Code, DOLE regulations, and Supreme Court jurisprudence. Both the Last-In First-Out and Performance-Based methods of employee selection are legally permissible, provided they are implemented:

  • Objectively
  • Consistently
  • In Good Faith
  • In Compliance with Due Process

Ultimately, the choice between LIFO, performance-based, or a hybrid system often hinges on the company’s operational needs, organizational culture, and legal risk tolerance. What remains critical is that any redeployment or termination exercise is backed by clear business necessity, follows well-defined selection criteria, respects procedural due process, and honors the rights and dignity of the affected employees. By doing so, employers ensure not only compliance with Philippine labor laws but also maintain goodwill and trust within the workforce.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login