Employment Termination Due to Workplace Bullying and HR Misconduct

Employment Termination Due to Workplace Bullying and HR Misconduct: A Comprehensive Legal Overview (Philippine Context)

Workplace bullying can create a hostile and unhealthy environment that undermines productivity, morale, and employees’ well-being. In the Philippines, while there is no single statute explicitly titled “Anti-Workplace Bullying Act,” various laws, regulations, and jurisprudential rulings address (or can be construed to address) workplace harassment, misconduct, and abuse. Human Resource (HR) personnel, in particular, carry the responsibility of ensuring fairness and compliance with labor standards. However, when HR itself commits or tolerates such misconduct, the employer can face both legal and reputational consequences.

This article provides an overview of the legal framework in the Philippines surrounding the termination of employment on the grounds of workplace bullying and related HR misconduct. It also discusses due process requirements, possible liabilities, and best practices for employers seeking to avoid litigation and maintain a harmonious workplace.

1. Defining Workplace Bullying

Workplace bullying typically refers to repeated and unreasonable actions or behavior directed towards an employee (or group of employees) that cause humiliation, intimidation, or distress and may interfere with the employee’s ability to perform work. Though Philippine law does not categorically define “workplace bullying” as a separate offense, it can overlap with other legal concepts such as:

  • Serious Misconduct under the Labor Code of the Philippines (Article 297, formerly Article 282)
  • Psychological violence or harassment under various laws
  • Hostile work environment recognized in some cases involving discrimination or sexual harassment

Any behavior that significantly harms the business interests of the employer, compromises the rights of co-workers, or violates the dignity and well-being of employees can be deemed a valid ground for disciplinary action, including termination.

2. Relevant Legal Framework

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines

    • Article 297 (formerly Article 282) outlines the just causes for termination, including serious misconduct, willful disobedience, gross and habitual neglect of duties, fraud or breach of trust, commission of a crime against the employer or co-employees, and analogous causes.
    • Workplace bullying may qualify under serious misconduct if it is of such grave nature as to warrant dismissal.

  2. Civil Code Provisions

    • Certain provisions on human relations (e.g., Articles 19, 20, and 21) safeguard individuals from abuses of rights. While these are broad provisions, they have been invoked in labor disputes to show that an employer or fellow employee acted in bad faith or in a manner that was oppressive.

  3. Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 1995 (Republic Act No. 7877) and the Safe Spaces Act (Republic Act No. 11313)

    • While specifically targeting sexual harassment, these laws reflect the State’s policy against harassment in the workplace. If “bullying” involves unwelcome sexual advances or gender-based harassment, these statutes become directly relevant.
    • The Safe Spaces Act also expands protection from gender-based harassment in public spaces (including workplaces), covering acts of intimidation or humiliation due to gender.

  4. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173)

    • If bullying or HR misconduct involves unlawful disclosure of personal data or breaches of confidentiality, the Data Privacy Act may also come into play.

  5. Jurisprudence and DOLE Regulations

    • Case law from the Supreme Court of the Philippines clarifies the meaning of “misconduct” and “just causes” for termination.
    • Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) issuances and the Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code guide employers on due process requirements, documentation, and handling of disciplinary actions.

3. Just Causes for Termination: Serious Misconduct and Analogous Causes

Under Article 297 of the Labor Code, one of the recognized just causes for dismissal is serious misconduct. For an act to be considered serious misconduct, it must be:

  1. Serious or Grave in Nature – The misconduct must be so severe that it undermines the trust and confidence required in an employment relationship. Repeated or egregious bullying, threats, or abusive language can fall here.
  2. Related to the Performance of the Employee’s Duties – The act should be work-related or occur within work premises/events where the employee’s behavior directly affects the workplace.
  3. Committed with Wrongful Intent – There must be a willful disregard or wrongful intention behind the act.

Bullying often includes repeated offenses—verbal, psychological, or even physical. If such misconduct is proven and meets the criteria above, employers have the right to impose disciplinary measures, up to and including termination.

Additionally, analogous causes recognized under the Labor Code can cover severe forms of bullying that do not strictly fit other enumerated grounds but are similarly detrimental to the employer’s business interests or employee welfare.

4. Procedural Due Process in Termination

Even if the ground for termination is valid, the employer must observe the Twin-Notice Rule (as clarified by jurisprudence and DOLE regulations):

  1. First Notice (Show-Cause Letter or Notice to Explain)

    • The employer must provide a written notice stating the specific acts or omissions constituting the grounds for disciplinary action.
    • The employee should be given a reasonable opportunity (commonly 5 calendar days) to respond in writing.

  2. Administrative Investigation or Hearing

    • While not mandatory in all cases, if requested by the employee or warranted by the complexity of the issue, a hearing or conference should be conducted to allow the employee to present evidence or mitigating circumstances.

  3. Second Notice (Notice of Decision)

    • After the employer evaluates the evidence and any defenses raised, a final written notice must be issued stating the decision—whether dismissal, suspension, or other penalties—and explaining the reasons for such decision.

Failure to comply with procedural due process can expose the employer to liability for nominal damages even if the dismissal is for a just cause.

5. HR Misconduct: Legal and Practical Implications

Human Resource Departments serve as gatekeepers for employee relations and compliance. However, when HR personnel themselves engage in bullying or fail to address workplace bullying, the following issues arise:

  1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty or Trust

    • HR personnel are presumed to be stewards of the employer’s policies. Acts of bullying, covering up complaints, or mishandling investigations can amount to serious misconduct and be a basis for termination if proven.

  2. Vicarious Employer Liability

    • Employers may be held accountable if HR’s failure to address complaints contributes to a hostile environment, leading to potential claims for illegal dismissal (constructive dismissal if the employee was forced to resign), damages, or labor-standard violations.

  3. Damage to Organizational Culture and Reputation

    • The HR department’s primary role includes conflict resolution and compliance. Misconduct by HR not only creates legal problems but can severely harm the trust that employees place in management.

6. Remedies and Liabilities

Employees who are victims of workplace bullying or who have been illegally dismissed after reporting bullying can seek relief through:

  1. Filing a Labor Case (Illegal Dismissal Complaint) at the NLRC

    • If an employee believes they were unjustly or illegally terminated, they can file a complaint before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

  2. Filing Administrative Complaints or Civil Actions

    • For certain forms of harassment or abuse (especially involving discrimination or sexual harassment), employees may file a case with the appropriate government agency (e.g., the Civil Service Commission for government employees or DOLE for labor complaints in private sector) or pursue civil damages in court.

  3. Possible Criminal Liability

    • If the bullying or misconduct involves threats, libelous or slanderous remarks, physical harm, or sexual harassment, the perpetrators may face criminal charges under the Revised Penal Code or relevant special laws.

  4. Company-Initiated Actions

    • Employers, upon discovering HR misconduct, should promptly conduct investigations and, if warranted, impose disciplinary measures. This demonstrates good faith and proactive steps to rectify the issue.

7. Best Practices for Employers

  1. Clear Anti-Bullying Policies

    • Codify standards for appropriate workplace behavior in employee handbooks or codes of conduct.
    • Include a clear definition of workplace bullying and outline the procedures for reporting and investigating complaints.

  2. Regular Training and Orientation

    • Conduct training programs for management, HR personnel, and employees on recognizing, preventing, and addressing workplace bullying.
    • Reinforce the importance of confidentiality, objectivity, and fairness in handling complaints.

  3. Independent Investigations

    • In cases involving HR personnel as respondents, consider an independent investigator or an external third-party to ensure impartiality.
    • Document all steps taken, from the initial complaint to the final resolution.

  4. Prompt Disciplinary Action

    • Swiftly address proven misconduct to maintain trust and uphold company policies.
    • Impose penalties commensurate with the gravity of the offense, ensuring consistency and fairness.

  5. Support Mechanisms for Victims

    • Provide counseling or access to mental health support.
    • Ensure that there are no reprisals against employees who report bullying or harassment.

8. Conclusion

Workplace bullying has serious legal and ethical implications in the Philippines, even though there is no single law expressly labeled as an “Anti-Bullying Law” for workplaces. Under existing statutes and jurisprudence, bullying can constitute serious misconduct or analogous just causes for dismissal. HR personnel—charged with oversight of fair labor practices—must act with integrity and impartiality; failing to do so exposes both themselves and the employer to various liabilities.

Employers can mitigate risks by instituting clear policies, offering regular training, and ensuring compliance with due process. Ultimately, cultivating a culture of respect and accountability in the workplace is not only a legal obligation but a cornerstone of a sustainable and productive organization.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific cases or legal concerns, individuals and employers are advised to seek professional legal counsel or consult with the appropriate government agencies (e.g., DOLE, NLRC).

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login