Filing a Complaint for Fraud

Below is a comprehensive discussion on filing a complaint for fraud in the Philippines. This overview is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you are contemplating filing a complaint for fraud or believe you have been a victim of fraud, it is best to consult an attorney who can provide advice suited to your specific situation.


1. Understanding Fraud under Philippine Law

A. Definition of Fraud

In common usage, “fraud” refers to any wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Under Philippine law, the term “fraud” may cover several criminal and civil wrongs. Most commonly, fraud-related crimes are prosecuted under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) provisions on Estafa (often referred to as “swindling”) and other forms of deceit.

B. Common Legal Bases

  1. Estafa (Swindling) under Articles 315 to 318 of the Revised Penal Code – This is one of the most common legal bases for filing criminal fraud cases. Estafa generally involves the following elements:

    • The accused has defrauded another by abuse of confidence, or by deceit;
    • Damage or prejudice is caused to the victim.
  2. Other Deceit-Based Offenses under the Revised Penal Code – Articles 316, 317, and 318 outline other forms of deceit and fraudulent acts, including “other forms of swindling,” “swindling a minor,” or making false statements to defraud.

  3. Special Laws – Depending on the specific conduct, fraud may also be prosecuted under various special laws, such as:

    • The Cybercrime Prevention Act (Republic Act No. 10175) for online fraud;
    • The Anti-Alias Law (Commonwealth Act No. 142) in case of using fictitious names to defraud;
    • Other related statutes if the fraudulent act falls within their scope (e.g., the Bouncing Checks Law (BP 22) if fraud involved issuing dishonored checks).

C. Distinction: Criminal Fraud vs. Civil Fraud

  • Criminal fraud (Estafa or other crimes of deceit): The government prosecutes the offender in a criminal proceeding. The penalty can include imprisonment and/or a fine.
  • Civil fraud: The aggrieved party can file a civil case for damages (e.g., an action for damages under Articles 19, 20, and 21 of the Civil Code) to recover monetary compensation for the loss or injury suffered.

It is possible to file both criminal and civil actions simultaneously or in the same proceeding, depending on the nature of the case.


2. Elements of Estafa (Swindling)

While “fraud” is a broad term, Estafa is the principal crime used to prosecute fraudulent acts. Under Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code, Estafa can be committed in several ways, but the most common modes include:

  1. With unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence, such as:

    • Misappropriating or converting another’s money or property entrusted to the offender;
    • Destroying or dissipating that property.
  2. By means of deceit:

    • Using false pretenses or fraudulent acts to induce the victim to part with money or property;
    • Includes misrepresentation of identity or making false statements about one’s qualifications/authority.
  3. Resulting damage to the offended party.

Key requirement: There must be a clear showing that the offender employed deceit or abused the trust of the victim, leading to a loss or damage.


3. Where and How to File the Complaint

A. Preliminary Considerations

  • Venue: Generally, the complaint for a criminal case is filed in the Office of the City or Provincial Prosecutor (also known as the Prosecutor’s Office) in the location (city or municipality) where the crime was committed or where any of its essential elements occurred.
  • Jurisdiction: For most fraud (Estafa) cases, the Municipal Trial Courts or Regional Trial Courts have jurisdiction depending on the amount of damage alleged. If the amount involved exceeds a certain threshold (e.g., more than PHP 2,000,000 for certain Estafa cases), it typically falls under the Regional Trial Court.

B. Documentary Requirements and Evidence

When preparing your complaint, gather strong documentary and testimonial evidence to support the alleged fraud. This may include:

  1. Sworn statements (Affidavits) from the complainant and witnesses;
  2. Receipts, contracts, or other written agreements showing the financial transaction;
  3. Bank records, emails, text messages, or digital communications that indicate deceit or misrepresentation;
  4. Photographs, videos, or any recorded statements (if available).

C. Steps in Filing a Complaint

  1. Draft a Complaint-Affidavit: Write a clear, concise, and factual account of how fraud was committed, specifying relevant dates, actions of the accused, and the losses suffered.
  2. Attach Supporting Documents: Include all documentary evidence (contracts, receipts, text messages, etc.).
  3. Notarize the Complaint-Affidavit: Sworn statements and affidavits must be subscribed and sworn to before a prosecutor or a notary public.
  4. Submission to the Prosecutor’s Office: File your complaint (and required copies) at the Prosecutor’s Office that has jurisdiction over the place where the fraud occurred.
  5. Payment of Filing Fees (if any): Generally, criminal complaints do not require fees from the complainant at the prosecutorial level, but if you are also filing a civil claim for damages, certain filing fees may be applicable in court.

D. Preliminary Investigation

Once the complaint is filed, the Prosecutor’s Office will conduct a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is probable cause to file charges in court. This usually involves:

  1. Issuance of Subpoena: The respondent (accused) is given a chance to submit a counter-affidavit and rebut your allegations.
  2. Clarificatory Hearings (if necessary): The prosecutor may schedule hearings to ask clarifying questions from either party.
  3. Resolution: The prosecutor will issue a resolution whether to:
    • Dismiss the complaint (if the evidence is insufficient); or
    • File an Information in court (if probable cause is found).

4. Court Proceedings

If the prosecutor finds probable cause and files the case in court:

  1. Arraignment: The accused appears before the court and enters a plea.
  2. Pre-trial and Trial: Parties present their evidence and witness testimonies.
  3. Judgment: The court will decide if the accused is guilty or not guilty of the crime charged. If guilty, the court will impose the appropriate penalty, which could be imprisonment, fine, or both.
  4. Appeals: The party losing the case may appeal the judgment following the Rules of Court.

5. Penalties for Fraud (Estafa)

Penalties for Estafa vary depending on the amount of fraud or the nature of deceit, and can range from arresto mayor (up to 6 months) to reclusion temporal (up to 20 years), depending on the qualifying circumstances and sums involved. Fines are also typically imposed, and the offender may be required to indemnify or pay restitution to the victim.


6. Civil Liability

Under Article 100 of the Revised Penal Code, every person criminally liable is also civilly liable. In fraud (Estafa) cases, the offended party may claim the following civil liabilities:

  1. Restitution of the thing (or its value) obtained through fraud;
  2. Damages, including moral, exemplary, and actual damages, if they can be proven;
  3. Costs of the suit.

You can opt to include civil liability in the criminal complaint (as a civil aspect of the criminal action) or file a separate civil action. However, if you litigate civil liability in conjunction with the criminal action, you generally cannot file a separate civil suit for the same cause of action later.


7. Statute of Limitations (Prescription Period)

The period within which one must file a complaint depends on the penalty or nature of the offense. Under the Revised Penal Code:

  • For Estafa, the prescriptive period is generally 10 years when the penalty is afflictive (6 years and 1 day to 12 years or higher). If the penalty is lower (e.g., arresto mayor or prision correccional), the prescriptive period might be shorter.
  • Note that counting the prescriptive period typically begins from the day the offense is discovered.

Consult with a lawyer to ensure that your case is still within the prescriptive period.


8. Tips for Potential Complainants

  1. Act Promptly: Gather evidence quickly; memories fade and documents may be lost over time.
  2. Seek Legal Advice: Fraud cases can be complex, particularly when large amounts of money or complicated transactions are involved. An attorney can help ensure the complaint is properly drafted and filed.
  3. Secure Witnesses: If there are individuals who can support your account, include their sworn statements and contact information.
  4. Keep Everything Organized: Properly label and store receipts, contracts, and correspondences. Presenting an orderly set of evidence helps the prosecutor and the court understand your case.
  5. Be Prepared for a Potentially Lengthy Process: Court and prosecutorial processes in the Philippines can take time, especially if the accused challenges the allegations at every step.

9. Possible Defenses for the Accused

While this information is primarily for complainants, it is helpful to know possible defenses that the respondent (accused) might raise:

  1. Lack of Deceit: Arguing that any failure to pay or breach of contract was due to financial difficulties or unforeseen events, not intentional or malicious deceit.
  2. Lack of Damage: No actual loss or prejudice was suffered by the complainant.
  3. Good Faith: Showing that the accused acted without malice or with honest intention.

10. Conclusion

Filing a complaint for fraud (e.g., Estafa) in the Philippines involves a multi-step process that begins with drafting a verified complaint-affidavit, supported by adequate evidence, and then proceeding through preliminary investigation until trial (if probable cause is established). Key laws are primarily found in the Revised Penal Code, supplemented by various special laws depending on the specifics of the fraudulent act.

Because of the complexity of criminal litigation and the high burden of proof required (“proof beyond reasonable doubt”), individuals contemplating a fraud case are strongly encouraged to consult legal counsel. An attorney can help navigate jurisdictional issues, identify relevant laws, gather sufficient evidence, and properly represent the complainant’s rights and interests throughout the proceedings.


Disclaimer: This information is provided for general informational purposes and may not reflect recent changes in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice. For specific guidance and strategy, always consult a licensed Philippine attorney.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.