Filing Petition for Review in Court of Appeals

Filing a Petition for Review in the Court of Appeals (Philippine Context)
All You Need to Know

1. Legal Framework

In the Philippines, the rules governing the filing of a petition for review in the Court of Appeals (CA) are primarily found in the Rules of Court, particularly Rule 42 (Petition for Review from the Regional Trial Courts) and Rule 43 (Appeals from Quasi-Judicial Agencies). Understanding which rule applies depends on the origin of the decision being appealed:

  1. Rule 42 governs appeals from decisions of Regional Trial Courts (RTCs) in the exercise of their original jurisdiction—that is, where the RTC is the court of first instance.
  2. Rule 43 governs appeals from decisions, awards, or final orders of quasi-judicial agencies, boards, or commissions (e.g., Civil Service Commission, Office of the Ombudsman in administrative disciplinary cases, Securities and Exchange Commission, etc.).

This article focuses on the most common scenario—Rule 42—but also provides brief notes on Rule 43 where relevant.

2. Nature of a Petition for Review

A petition for review is a mode of appeal to the Court of Appeals, not by mere notice of appeal (as is typically used for RTC decisions on appeal to higher courts), but by filing a verified petition. This petition contains specific assignments of errors, supported by relevant factual and legal bases, seeking the reversal or modification of a judgment or final order.

Key differences between a Notice of Appeal (Rule 41) and a Petition for Review (Rule 42) include:

  1. Form of Initiation

    • Notice of Appeal: A simple notice to the trial court that the appellant intends to appeal.
    • Petition for Review: A pleading filed directly with the Court of Appeals, outlining issues and arguments for reversal or modification.

  2. Scope of Review

    • Petition for Review gives the Court of Appeals discretion to examine both factual and legal issues if properly raised.
    • In general, the CA has broader power to rule on both factual and legal errors committed by the lower court or agency (though typically, factual findings are respected unless there is a glaring error).

  3. Content Requirements

    • A petition is more detailed, requiring statements of facts, issues, and supporting arguments.

3. When to File

3.1 Reglementary Period

Under Rule 42, Section 1 of the Rules of Court, the petition for review must be filed within 15 days from:

  1. Receipt of the RTC’s decision or final order; or
  2. Receipt of the RTC’s denial of a motion for new trial or motion for reconsideration (if such motion was timely filed).

An extension of 15 days may be granted for justifiable reasons. However, the extended period cannot exceed 15 days save in exceptionally meritorious cases (and only upon a proper motion for extension filed and granted before the expiration of the original period).

Tip: It is critical to keep track of the date of receipt of the decision or the order denying your motion for reconsideration/new trial to avoid losing your right to appeal.

3.2 Effect of Late Filing

Failure to file within the reglementary period (including any validly granted extension) generally results in the finality of the lower court’s decision. Courts strictly enforce these deadlines, and the petition can be dismissed outright if filed out of time, barring extremely meritorious circumstances or recognized exceptions (e.g., to prevent a grave miscarriage of justice).

4. Where to File

Under Rule 42, Section 1, the petition for review is filed directly with the Court of Appeals. Practitioners typically file it at the Court of Appeals Main Office in Manila or with the appropriate Court of Appeals stations in Cebu or Cagayan de Oro, depending on the territorial jurisdiction.

5. Contents of the Petition

Rule 42, Section 2 details the required contents of a petition for review:

  1. Caption and Title

    • Indicate “Petition for Review” and the parties (petitioner(s) vs. respondent(s)).

  2. Statement of the Case

    • Briefly state the nature of the case and the proceedings before the Regional Trial Court (or quasi-judicial agency under Rule 43).
    • Identify the judgment, final order, or resolution subject of the petition.

  3. Statement of Facts

    • Clear, concise presentation of the material facts.
    • Follow the chronological order or logical sequence of events.
    • Reference specific portions of the record, if available.

  4. Assignment of Errors

    • Enumerate the specific errors allegedly committed by the court a quo (the RTC).
    • Each error should be distinctly set out and later discussed in the argument portion.

  5. Arguments/Discussion

    • Present legal arguments and relevant case law or statutes.
    • Show precisely how the lower court’s ruling is tainted by error, citing evidence and legal authorities.

  6. Prayer

    • State the specific relief sought (e.g., reversal, modification, remand of the case, etc.).

  7. Verification and Certification

    • Must include a Verification attesting to the truth of the allegations based on personal knowledge or authentic records.
    • Must include a Certification of Non-Forum Shopping, confirming that the petitioner has not commenced or is not participating in any other case involving the same issues, or if there are similar cases, provide details thereof.

  8. Proof of Service

    • Evidence that all adverse parties and the lower court have been served with copies of the petition (e.g., registry receipts, affidavits of personal service, etc.).

Note: Under Rule 42, Section 3, the petition must be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment or final order appealed from, as well as copies of all pleadings and documents referred to in the petition and relevant to the appeal.

6. Filing Fees

Proper docket fees and other lawful fees (such as legal research fees) must be paid upon filing. Non-payment or incomplete payment of docket fees within the prescribed period can lead to dismissal of the petition. Always verify the updated schedule of legal fees issued by the Supreme Court.

7. Procedure After Filing

  1. Docketing and Initial Evaluation

    • Once filed, the petition is docketed by the Court of Appeals.
    • The petition undergoes an initial evaluation to check for compliance with formal requirements.
    • The CA may dismiss the petition outright if it fails to comply with formalities (e.g., lack of verification, no proof of service, insufficient docket fees) or if it is deemed patently without merit.

  2. Issuance of a Resolution

    • If the petition is given due course, the Court of Appeals issues a resolution requiring the respondent(s) to file a comment within the specified period (usually 10 days from receipt of the resolution, or as fixed by the CA).

  3. Comment/Opposition

    • The respondent files a comment addressing the petitioner’s arguments.
    • The comment should also be served on the petitioner and must comply with similar formalities (verification, proof of service, etc., if required by the CA).

  4. Optional Reply

    • The petitioner may be given an opportunity to file a reply to the comment. This depends on the directive of the Court of Appeals.

  5. Briefs and Memoranda

    • In some cases, the Court of Appeals may require the submission of briefs or memoranda, similar to an ordinary appeal.
    • Alternatively, the CA may decide the case on the basis of the petition and comment if the issues are straightforward.

  6. Oral Arguments (if necessary)

    • The CA may, in its discretion, set the case for oral argument or clarificatory hearing, though most appeals are resolved on the pleadings and memoranda.

  7. Decision or Resolution

    • The CA decides the case based on the record, pleadings, and any additional evidence or arguments admitted.
    • The decision of the Court of Appeals can affirm, reverse, or modify the judgment or final order of the lower court (or quasi-judicial agency). In some cases, it may remand the case to the trial court or agency for further proceedings.

8. Common Grounds for Dismissal of a Petition

A petition for review may be dismissed outright for:

  1. Late Filing or filing without a valid extension.
  2. Failure to Pay Docket Fees within the prescribed time.
  3. Failure to Comply with formal requirements (e.g., missing verification, incomplete annexes, no certification of non-forum shopping).
  4. Forum Shopping or making untruthful statements in the certification.
  5. Lack of Jurisdiction (e.g., the case should have been brought to the Supreme Court via Rule 45, or to another court/agency).
  6. Frivolous or Patently Without Merit petition.

9. Special Note on Rule 43 Petitions

For decisions coming from quasi-judicial agencies, Rule 43 of the Rules of Court governs. The requirements and timelines are largely similar (15-day period, extension, verification, non-forum shopping, etc.). However, Rule 43 specifically lists the agencies from which an appeal by petition for review can be brought directly to the Court of Appeals (e.g., Civil Service Commission, NLRC in certain cases, Securities and Exchange Commission, etc.).

10. Further Appeal to the Supreme Court

A party aggrieved by a decision of the Court of Appeals in a Rule 42 or Rule 43 proceeding may, under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, file a Petition for Review on Certiorari to the Supreme Court. Notably:

  • This must be done within 15 days from receipt of the CA’s decision or denial of a motion for reconsideration.
  • The Supreme Court generally reviews only questions of law (i.e., purely legal issues). Questions of fact are usually not entertained except under exceptional circumstances (e.g., conflict between findings of the trial court and the CA, findings grounded on speculation, misapprehension of facts, etc.).

11. Practical Tips and Best Practices

  1. Observe Deadlines meticulously. Keep track of the date you receive the judgment or the denial of the motion for reconsideration.
  2. Complete Documentary Requirements (certified true copies of orders, pleadings, attachments, etc.). Missing documents often cause delays or dismissal.
  3. Verification & Certification: Ensure correctness and truthfulness. A defective or omitted verification/certification can be fatal.
  4. Pay Correct Docket Fees immediately. The clerk of court can provide a breakdown.
  5. Craft Clear and Concise Arguments. The CA appreciates well-organized and legally sound pleadings.
  6. Stay Updated with amendments to the Rules of Court and relevant Supreme Court circulars and jurisprudence, as procedure can evolve over time.

12. Conclusion

Filing a Petition for Review in the Court of Appeals is a crucial procedural remedy to challenge an unfavorable decision of the Regional Trial Court (exercising original jurisdiction) or a quasi-judicial agency. To succeed, strict compliance with the Rules of Court—especially regarding timelines, payment of docket fees, and formal requirements—is essential. Substance-wise, the petition must demonstrate cogent legal and factual grounds for the CA to reverse or modify the lower court or agency’s ruling.

By diligently observing the rules, preparing a thorough petition, and grounding arguments in solid legal principles, a litigant maximizes the chances of obtaining a favorable result from the Court of Appeals. However, always consider consulting or engaging a competent legal counsel to navigate the complexities of appellate procedure in the Philippines.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login