Harassment by Lending Company Before Due Date

Harassment by Lending Companies Before the Due Date (Philippine Context)

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. For specific concerns, consult a qualified attorney.

1. Introduction

In the Philippines, lending companies play an essential role in providing access to credit for individuals and businesses. However, certain practices—such as undue harassment of borrowers—can run afoul of the law. Borrowers sometimes report being harassed by representatives of lending companies even before a loan’s due date. This article discusses relevant regulations, potential legal remedies, and best practices for both borrowers and lending companies to ensure that debt collection remains fair and lawful.

2. Overview of Philippine Laws and Regulations on Lending

  1. Republic Act No. 9474 (Lending Company Regulation Act of 2007)

    • Governs the creation and operation of lending companies in the Philippines.
    • Requires lending companies to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), maintain certain standards, and follow regulations that protect consumer rights.

  2. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Consumer Protection Framework

    • While more directly applicable to banks and other financial institutions supervised by the BSP, these guidelines reflect the principle that customers’ rights and welfare must be safeguarded during financial transactions and debt collection.

  3. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173)

    • Protects the privacy of personal information.
    • Lending companies must obtain consent and use borrower data only for declared, specific purposes.
    • Misuse of personal data—such as wrongful disclosure to third parties—can give rise to complaints before the National Privacy Commission (NPC).

  4. Other Relevant Regulations

    • The SEC has issued circulars and notices reminding lending and financing companies about prohibited debt collection practices, including threats, insults, or contacting third parties without proper authorization.

3. What Constitutes Harassment?

Although the law does not provide a single, universal definition of “harassment” for all debt collection scenarios, the following behaviors are typically understood to be potentially harassing, especially if they occur before the due date:

  • Excessive or Aggressive Communication

    • Continuous phone calls, text messages, or online messages demanding payment even before the loan is due.
    • Using foul or abusive language in communications.

  • Threatening Behavior

    • Threatening legal action, arrest, or harm to person or property without a valid legal basis.
    • Issuing threats to disclose the borrower’s debt to their employer, neighbors, or social media contacts.

  • Embarrassment or Public Disclosure of Debt

    • Publicly posting about the debt on social media or messaging the borrower’s contacts or relatives about the unpaid debt.
    • Sending collection letters to one’s workplace or publicizing the debt in a way that causes reputational harm.

  • Misuse of Personal Data

    • Sharing personal information (e.g., phone numbers of relatives, addresses) with debt collectors or third parties who have no lawful reason to access it.

When these actions occur before the loan has even reached its due date, it amplifies concerns about unethical or illegal debt collection practices.

4. Legal Implications of Harassment Before the Due Date

  1. Breach of the Lending Company Regulation Act

    • Lending companies that resort to harassment—even before the loan’s due date—could be subject to administrative sanctions by the SEC.
    • The SEC requires fair and transparent collection practices; violating these can result in fines, suspension, or revocation of lending licenses.

  2. Potential Criminal Liability under the Revised Penal Code

    • Harassment that involves threats or coercion could be prosecuted under provisions dealing with Grave Threats (Articles 282–283) or Grave Coercion (Article 286).
    • Slander or libel charges (Articles 353–354) may also arise if the lender publicly defames a borrower.

  3. Data Privacy Violations

    • Lending companies that share or misuse personal data without consent (e.g., contacting a borrower’s relatives and friends to embarrass them) may face complaints under the Data Privacy Act of 2012.
    • Violations can lead to penalties, damages, and administrative fines imposed by the National Privacy Commission.

  4. Civil Liability

    • An aggrieved borrower may file a civil complaint if they suffered damage or injury because of the lender’s unlawful or unfair acts. Possible claims include moral and exemplary damages, depending on the severity of the harassment and its effects.

5. Role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

The SEC exercises oversight over lending and financing companies. In recent years, the SEC has:

  • Issued memorandum circulars detailing proper debt collection practices and prohibiting harassment tactics.
  • Investigated complaints and imposed sanctions (from fines to license revocations) against companies found to be engaging in abusive practices.
  • Released public advisories reminding borrowers to report unfair or abusive collection activities to the SEC.

A borrower who experiences harassment before the due date can file a complaint directly with the SEC’s Enforcement and Investor Protection Department (EIPD). Supporting documents (evidence such as screenshots of messages, call recordings, affidavits) can strengthen the complaint.

6. Role of the National Privacy Commission (NPC)

When harassment involves misuse of personal data, unauthorized disclosure, or invasion of privacy, the National Privacy Commission can investigate under the Data Privacy Act of 2012. Borrowers should:

  1. Gather evidence of privacy breaches (e.g., screenshots showing the lender contacting friends/family without consent).
  2. File a complaint on the NPC’s online portal or by visiting its office.
  3. Cooperate in any NPC proceedings or mediation.

If the NPC finds a violation, it may impose administrative fines and recommend criminal prosecution.

7. Practical Tips for Borrowers

  1. Document Everything

    • Keep copies of call logs, text messages, emails, or chat messages.
    • Note the date and time of each communication, and the name (if given) of the collection agent.

  2. Respond Calmly and Assert Your Rights

    • Politely inform the lending company if they are contacting you before the due date.
    • Remind them that you are aware of your rights and their obligations under the law.
    • If the communication turns abusive, end the conversation and record the incident.

  3. File a Complaint with the SEC or NPC

    • If harassment persists, gather your evidence and file a complaint with the SEC or the NPC, depending on the nature of the violation.
    • Seek assistance from a lawyer if you plan to pursue more formal legal remedies (e.g., civil or criminal cases).

  4. Negotiate in Good Faith

    • If you anticipate difficulty paying on time, proactively contact the lender to discuss possible extensions or restructuring.
    • Avoid ignoring the lender’s legitimate queries; demonstrate good faith even if the due date has not yet arrived.

8. Responsibilities and Best Practices for Lending Companies

  1. Adhere to Fair Debt Collection Practices

    • Limit collection calls to reasonable times and avoid foul language, threats, or pressure tactics.
    • Do not contact borrowers’ relatives, friends, or employers without valid, lawful reasons.

  2. Respect Data Privacy

    • Obtain consent when collecting and processing personal data.
    • Avoid unauthorized disclosure to third parties.

  3. Follow SEC Guidelines

    • Regularly review SEC memoranda and advisories on collection practices.
    • Train personnel on ethical collection methods.
    • Establish an internal grievance mechanism to address borrower complaints promptly.

  4. Transparent Documentation

    • Provide borrowers with a clear, written loan agreement outlining payment terms, penalties, and methods of collection.
    • Ensure that all reminders or demand letters are compliant with SEC regulations and do not contain threats or misleading statements.

9. Conclusion

Harassment by lending companies before the due date is a serious concern that can implicate multiple Philippine laws and regulations. Both borrowers and lenders have rights and responsibilities that must be respected to ensure fairness, transparency, and compliance with regulations set by the SEC, BSP, and the NPC. Should borrowers experience abuse or misuse of their personal data, they can seek legal remedies through administrative complaints, civil suits, or even criminal charges where applicable.

Staying informed of one’s rights—and the laws that safeguard them—is crucial. Borrowers who suspect harassment or a violation of data privacy are encouraged to document all evidence and consult legal counsel for tailored advice. Lending companies, for their part, are reminded to follow ethical and lawful collection practices to avoid penalties, fines, and reputational harm.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login