Harassment by Lending Company in the Philippines

Harassment by Lending Companies in the Philippines: A Comprehensive Legal Overview

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal assistance, please consult a qualified attorney.

1. Introduction

In recent years, there has been a notable increase in complaints against lending and financing companies in the Philippines for employing abusive and harassing debt collection practices. Such practices often violate the rights of borrowers and undermine the rules established by Philippine regulatory bodies. This article aims to discuss the legal framework that governs lending companies, identify prohibited collection practices, outline the rights of borrowers, and recommend remedies available to individuals who experience harassment by lending companies in the Philippines.

2. Legal and Regulatory Framework

  1. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Regulations

    • Although the BSP primarily regulates banks and other BSP-supervised financial institutions, certain principles in its regulations and circulars influence how collection practices are viewed industry-wide. For instance, the BSP has required that consumer protection and responsible lending be a guiding principle for all financial institutions.

  2. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Memorandum Circulars

    • The SEC registers and oversees lending companies (and financing companies that are not covered by BSP regulation).
    • Notably, SEC Memorandum Circular No. 18, series of 2019, also referred to in subsequent SEC issuances, prescribes rules on the disclosure of information, registration of online lending platforms, and outlines certain limitations on collection strategies. Violations of these provisions can result in penalties, suspension, or revocation of the lending company’s certificate of authority.

  3. Republic Act No. 9474 (Lending Company Regulation Act of 2007)

    • Governs the establishment, operation, and regulation of lending companies.
    • Requires all lending companies to be registered with the SEC and sets minimum capitalization requirements, among other regulations.

  4. Republic Act No. 8556 (Financing Company Act of 1998)

    • Similar in spirit to RA 9474 but applies to financing companies.
    • Both lending and financing companies must adhere to fair debt collection practices and refrain from employing intimidation or harassment.

  5. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (R.A. 10173)

    • Prohibits the unauthorized or unnecessary disclosure of a borrower’s personal information.
    • Lending companies that use or share personal data (e.g., contact lists from borrowers’ mobile phones) without explicit consent may be held liable for data privacy violations.

  6. The Revised Penal Code

    • Certain extreme collection methods—like threats of physical harm, grave threats, and blackmail—can be prosecuted under the Revised Penal Code.

  7. Consumer Act of the Philippines (R.A. 7394)

    • Provides overarching consumer protection principles, including the right to be protected against unfair trade practices.

3. Common Forms of Harassment

  1. Excessive or Threatening Phone Calls

    • Collectors may call borrowers (or even their family and friends) multiple times a day, often using threatening or abusive language to force payment.

  2. Public Shaming

    • Some lending companies post alleged defaulters’ personal details or photos on social media, labeling them as “delinquents.” This is a clear violation of both privacy rights and the borrowers’ dignity.

  3. Unauthorized Access to Contacts

    • Numerous complaints involve lending apps that require access to a borrower’s contact list during registration. Later, the borrower’s personal and contact details are used to send harassing messages to family and friends or to embarrass the borrower publicly.

  4. Misrepresentation as Law Enforcement or Government Official

    • Debt collectors sometimes pretend to be lawyers or government authorities to scare borrowers into paying immediately.

  5. Threats of Legal Action or Criminal Charges

    • While it is within a lender’s right to pursue legitimate legal remedies, threatening borrowers with criminal charges for mere non-payment of debt—especially when it does not involve fraud—may constitute harassment or intimidation.

4. Prohibited Collection Practices Under Philippine Regulations

The SEC and BSP have repeatedly emphasized fair debt collection practices, which include the following prohibitions:

  1. Use of Violence or Threat of Violence
  2. Use of Obscene Language
  3. Use of Threats to Take Any Action That Cannot Legally Be Taken
  4. False Representation or Impersonation (e.g., pretending to be an attorney, law enforcement, or government official)
  5. Publication of Names or Details of Alleged Defaulters (especially in a manner that humiliates or defames the borrower)
  6. Harassment of Third Parties (such as the borrower’s relatives, employers, or contacts who are not liable for the debt)
  7. Unauthorized Collection Charges or arbitrary fees beyond what is specified in the contract or allowed by law

5. Borrowers’ Rights and Remedies

  1. Right to Privacy

    • Borrowers have the right to refuse intrusive forms of communication, especially if the collector is already harassing third parties or unnecessarily disclosing personal data.
    • The Data Privacy Act provides recourse through the National Privacy Commission (NPC). A borrower can file a complaint if a lending company misuses personal data.

  2. Right to Fair Debt Collection

    • Borrowers have the right to be treated respectfully and fairly by collectors. Repeatedly receiving threats, profanity, or calls at unreasonable hours can be grounds for filing a complaint with the SEC or consumer protection agencies.

  3. Right to Complain or File Charges

    • If a lending company’s methods constitute a crime (e.g., grave threats, intimidation, defamation), borrowers can file criminal cases under the Revised Penal Code.
    • If the company’s conduct violates SEC regulations, an administrative complaint can be lodged with the SEC, which may penalize or revoke the company’s license.
    • For privacy violations, borrowers can complain to the National Privacy Commission.

  4. Right to Seek Legal Assistance

    • Borrowers who experience harassment can consult a lawyer or approach the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) for legal advice, especially if they meet PAO’s indigency requirements.

  5. Debt Restructuring or Negotiation

    • Borrowers who are genuinely unable to pay may negotiate for restructuring of the debt, reduced interest rates, or installment payment plans. Lending companies are often open to restructuring to maximize the possibility of repayment.

6. Steps to Take If You Experience Harassment

  1. Document Everything

    • Keep records of calls, messages (including screenshots or call logs), and any other evidence of harassment or threats.
    • If your contact list or personal information was used without consent, keep proof (screenshots of unauthorized messages sent to your contacts, social media postings, etc.).

  2. Know Your Rights Under the Law

    • Familiarize yourself with relevant regulations, such as SEC Memorandum Circulars, the Lending Company Regulation Act, and the Data Privacy Act.

  3. Attempt an Amicable Resolution

    • If possible, communicate formally with the lender to request a revised payment schedule or attempt a mutually beneficial solution.

  4. File a Complaint with the Appropriate Agency

    • SEC: For complaints against a lending or financing company’s collection methods or licensing issues.
    • National Privacy Commission (NPC): For issues related to the unauthorized use or disclosure of personal data.
    • Philippine National Police (PNP) or National Bureau of Investigation (NBI): For criminal offenses such as grave threats, extortion, or blackmail.

  5. Seek Legal Aid

    • Consult a private lawyer or visit the Public Attorney’s Office if you cannot afford one.

7. Potential Penalties for Lending Companies

  1. Fines and Sanctions by the SEC

    • Lending companies can be fined for noncompliance with registration and regulatory requirements or for violating circulars on fair collection practices.
    • Repeated or severe offenses can lead to suspension or revocation of the certificate of authority to operate.

  2. Criminal Charges

    • Company officers or employees who commit crimes during debt collection may face criminal charges under the Revised Penal Code (e.g., for making grave threats, libel, or acts of lasciviousness in extreme cases).

  3. Civil Liability

    • If the borrower suffers damages (e.g., humiliation, job loss, or other harm) directly arising from the harassment, they may seek civil damages in a court of law.

  4. Liability Under the Data Privacy Act

    • Violations such as unauthorized processing or disclosure of personal data can result in hefty fines and imprisonment for those responsible.

8. Best Practices for Lending Companies

While this article focuses on borrower protection, legitimate lending companies should also adhere to best practices to remain compliant with the law and maintain good relationships with their clients:

  1. Obtain Consent for Data Collection

    • Only collect borrower data that is necessary for credit evaluation.
    • Clearly outline data usage policies in consent forms.

  2. Train Collection Agents

    • Provide staff with formal training on lawful and ethical collection methods.
    • Emphasize respectful and dignified communication at all times.

  3. Implement Internal Complaint Mechanisms

    • Have clear procedures for borrowers to report unfair treatment by collection agents.
    • Resolve such issues internally before they escalate into formal complaints or legal cases.

  4. Comply with Regulations

    • Stay updated with SEC and BSP regulations to avoid lapses that could result in penalties.

9. Conclusion

Harassment by lending companies is not only unethical but also illegal under Philippine law. Borrowers who find themselves victims of abuse—whether in the form of threatening phone calls, public shaming, unauthorized disclosure of personal data, or other intimidating tactics—can find recourse through various legal and administrative channels. By understanding their rights, documenting evidence, and seeking appropriate help, borrowers can stand up against unlawful collection practices.

Meanwhile, lending companies are encouraged to adopt fair and transparent collection methods to uphold industry standards, protect consumer rights, and foster trust in the lending sector.

Key Takeaways

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other government agencies actively regulate lending companies, focusing on fair debt collection and consumer protection.
  • Borrowers are protected by various laws, including the Lending Company Regulation Act, the Data Privacy Act, and general provisions under the Revised Penal Code.
  • Common forms of harassment include excessive calls, public shaming, unauthorized disclosure of personal information, and threats of legal or criminal action.
  • Victims of harassment can file complaints with the SEC, the National Privacy Commission, and law enforcement agencies, and may also pursue civil or criminal remedies.

If you or someone you know is experiencing harassment by a lending company, consider reaching out to a qualified attorney or the appropriate government agency (e.g., SEC, National Privacy Commission, Public Attorney’s Office) to learn more about the specific remedies available.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login