Harassment by Online Lending Apps in the Philippines
(Status as of 18 April 2025 – for general information only; not a substitute for legal advice)
1. The Phenomenon
Online lending apps (OLAs) exploded in the Philippines between 2016 and 2021, riding on cheap smartphones, mobile wallets, and the unbanked population’s need for instant cash. While convenient, many OLAs resorted to aggressive—or plainly unlawful—collection tactics:
Typical Tactics | Why They Are Problematic |
---|---|
Contact‑scraping – harvesting entire contact lists and call logs when a borrower installs the app | Violates data‑privacy principles of proportionality, transparency, and legitimate purpose |
“Shame blasts” – mass‑texting the borrower’s friends, employer, or family with debt allegations | Can constitute libel, unjust vexation, violation of privacy, and is expressly banned by SEC rules |
Threats & insults – messages implying arrest warrants, criminal cases, or bodily harm | Possible crimes: grave threats (RPC Art. 282), extortion (RPC Art. 294), or even cyber‑libel (RA 10175) |
Misuse of personal photos – editing the borrower’s selfie onto a “wanted” poster and posting online | Data Privacy Act offenses; violation of Civil Code Art. 26 (right to privacy) |
Continuous robo‑calls outside 6 a.m.–10 p.m. | Breaches SEC debt‑collection hour limits |
2. Regulatory & Statutory Framework
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Memorandum Circular No. 18‑2019 – Registration of Financing & Lending Companies
- Memorandum Circular No. 19‑2019 – Prohibition on Unfair Debt‑Collection Practices
Core rules: no profanity, no threats of violence or arrest, no disclosure of debt to third parties, call‑time window 6 a.m.–10 p.m., max 3 call attempts/day, no use of consumer data beyond collection. - Enforcement – SEC‑EIPD may suspend or revoke a lender’s Certificate of Authority (CA), issue cease‑and‑desist orders, and impose fines up to ₱1 million per violation plus ₱2,000/day of continuing offense.
Republic Act 11765 (Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act, 2022)
Expands consumer‑protection jurisdiction to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), SEC, Insurance Commission, and Cooperative Development Authority. Mandates:- fair, honest, equitable treatment;
- data privacy compliance;
- administrative penalties up to ₱2 million or higher in proportion to assets;
- criminal liability (fine up to ₱2 million and/or 5 years’ imprisonment) for willful violations causing financial distress.
Republic Act 10173 (Data Privacy Act of 2012)
- Unlawful processing (Section 25) and unauthorized disclosure (Section 27) of personal data may mean ₱500,000 – ₱4 million fines and 1–6 years’ imprisonment per act.
- The National Privacy Commission (NPC) may issue Compliance Orders, conduct on‑site investigations, and recommend criminal prosecution to the Department of Justice.
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Regulations
- Circular No. 1160 (2023) – adopts RA 11765 rules for BSP‑supervised financial institutions (BSFIs).
- Circular No. 1133 (2022) – Responsible Lending Conduct (micro‑finance, salary‑based loans).
- BSP can fine up to ₱200,000 per day and disqualify directors/officers.
Related Penal Provisions
- Revised Penal Code (RPC):
- Art. 355 (Libel), Art. 282 (Grave Threats), Art. 287 (Unjust Vexation)
- RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act) – raises penalties by 1 degree for ICT‑facilitated crimes.
- RA 8042/RA 10022 – if threats target an OFW’s employment abroad, may constitute illegal recruitment‑related offenses.
- Revised Penal Code (RPC):
Civil Code Remedies
- Arts. 19, 20, 21 – abuse of rights and acts contra bonos mores
- Art. 26 – right to privacy, honor, peaceful family relations
- Art. 32 – independent civil action for violation of constitutional rights (e.g., privacy of communication)
- Art. 2219 – moral damages; Art. 2224 – nominal damages
3. Administrative & Judicial Precedent
Year | Agency/Court | Case / Action | Key Take‑away |
---|---|---|---|
2019 | SEC | CEASE‑AND‑DESIST ORDER vs. Fynamics Lending Inc. | First mass suspension (30 apps) over “shame blast” practices |
2020 | NPC | NPC CID18‑066 – complaint vs. unregistered OLA | NPC ruled that scraping contacts without legitimate purpose is unlawful processing |
2021 | RTC Manila Br. 24 | People vs. X, Cyber‑libel from collection SMS | Conviction; court held “publicly tagging borrower as ‘scammer’ on Facebook” is defamatory |
2023 | SEC | Revocation of 80 OLAs’ Certificates of Authority in one order | Utilized RA 11765 for first time; directors were black‑listed |
2024 | Court of Appeals | In re NPC CID21‑022 | Affirmed NPC power to award damages in administrative privacy cases |
No Supreme Court decision squarely addresses OLA harassment yet, but the CA ruling solidifies administrative remedies.
4. How to Respond If You Are Harassed
Collect Evidence
- Screenshot SMS, chat threads, call logs, social‑media posts
- Secure copies of the loan agreement, e‑mail notices, payment receipts (if any)
Write a Demand (optional but helpful)
- Invoke SEC MC 19‑2019; demand cessation of illegal collection; set a deadline.
File an Administrative Complaint
Agency When to Choose Filing Mechanics SEC – Enforcement & Investor Protection Dept. OLA is a lending or financing company, registered or not Online complaint form + affidavit + evidence; no filing fee National Privacy Commission Contact scraping, disclosure of personal data Online complaints portal; mediation phase precedes formal case BSP Consumer Assistance Mechanism Bank, EMI, or quasi‑bank app E‑mail or https://consumer BSP portal; 15‑day resolution window Tip: You may file in both SEC and NPC; they handle different violations.
Pursue Criminal Charges
- Swear a complaint‑affidavit before the Office of the City/Provincial Prosecutor (or NBI Cybercrime Division for cyber‑libel/threats).
- Attach screenshots certified by the barangay e‑Notary or printed with your affidavit.
Civil Action for Damages
- Venue: RTC if damages > ₱2 million; otherwise MTC.
- Causes: violation of privacy, moral damages for humiliation, exemplary damages to deter.
- You may ask for a Temporary Restraining Order against further postings or messages.
Protect Your Contacts
- Inform friends and HR in advance that any defamatory message is a scam.
- Suggest blocking the number or reporting the Facebook account.
Pay Only Through Official Channels
- If you intend to settle, pay via the app or company bank account—not to the collector’s personal GCash—to create an audit trail.
- Keep screenshots of the payment confirmation and ledger update.
5. Preventive Measures for Future Borrowers
Good Practice | Rationale |
---|---|
Read “App Permissions” before installing; deny access to contacts/storage | Under RA 10173, lenders must obtain voluntary, informed consent; refusing permissions forces them to rely only on the data you knowingly provide |
Borrow from SEC‑registered lenders – check CA number on https://www.sec.gov.ph | Registered companies must post a Disclosure Statement, honor “cooling‑off” periods, and comply with collection rules |
Cap your borrowings; do not “roll over” loans from one OLA to another | Compounding late‑fees trap borrowers in perpetual indebtedness not covered by the usury‑rate removal policy |
Keep proof of payment for each amortization | Protects against “double‑posting” harassment |
6. Compliance Checklist for Legitimate OLA Operators
For fintechs and collections agencies seeking to stay on the right side of Philippine law.
Corporate & Product Registration
- SEC Certificate of Incorporation and Certificate of Authority (CA) as financing/lending company (MC 18‑2019).
- If operating an e‑wallet, secure an EMI license from BSP (Circular 649).
Transparent Disclosures (RA 11765, Sec. 4)
- Total cost of credit, APR, penalty rates, cooling‑off rights, borrower’s data‑privacy rights.
Data‑Privacy Program
- Privacy Manual, Data Protection Officer registration, Privacy Impact Assessment on contact‑scraping, PAIA compliance under NPC.
Debt‑Collection Rules (SEC MC 19‑2019)
- No use of profanity or personal insults.
- No threats of harm, arrest, or criminal prosecution absent court judgment.
- No disclosure of borrower’s debt to third parties (unless guarantor/co‑maker).
- Call window 6 a.m.–10 p.m.; max 3 calls/day; identify caller name/company.
Consumer‑Assistance & ADR Mechanism
- Must respond to borrower complaints within 10 business days (RA 11765 IRR).
Record Retention & Audit
- Keep call recordings and chat logs for at least 3 years; subject to SEC audit.
Non‑compliance risks administrative fines, criminal prosecution, and reputational damage that quickly de‑platforms an app from Google Play/Apple App Store (both stores delist OLAs flagged by the SEC).
7. Looking Ahead
- SEC FinTech Roadmap 2025 pledges a centralized blacklist API so app stores automatically bar unlicensed OLAs.
- Pending bills (14th Congress, H.B. 9032 / S.B. 2120) propose to codify an “Anti‑Abusive Debt‑Collection Practices Act” patterned after the U.S. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, extending coverage to all collectors, not just lending companies.
- AI‑driven credit scoring: The NPC is drafting guidelines to ensure explainability and prevent discriminatory lending decisions.
8. Key Take‑Aways
- Harassment is unlawful in multiple dimensions—consumer‑protection, data‑privacy, civil, and criminal.
- Regulators are active: between 2019 and 2024, the SEC revoked or suspended over 100 OLAs; NPC issued million‑peso fines.
- Borrowers have concrete remedies—administrative, criminal, and civil—but success hinges on preserving solid evidence.
- Lenders ignore the new regime at their peril: RA 11765 imposes higher fines, personal director liability, and criminal sanctions.
Quick Resource Phonebook
Agency | Hotline / E‑mail | Notes |
---|---|---|
SEC Enforcement & Investor Protection Dept. | (02) 8818‑6047 / eipd@sec.gov.ph | For unregistered or abusive OLAs |
National Privacy Commission | (02) 8234‑2228 / complaints@privacy.gov.ph | Data‑privacy violations |
BSP Consumer Assistance | (02) 8708‑7087 / consumeraffairs@bsp.gov.ph | BSP‑supervised lenders |
PNP‑ACG Cybercrime Hotline | (02) 8723‑0401 | Threats, cyber‑libel, extortion |
NBI Cybercrime Division | (02) 8525‑4093 | Complaint‑affidavit filing |
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not create an attorney‑client relationship. For advice on a specific situation, consult a lawyer licensed in the Philippines.