How to Combat Online Defamation and Scam Harassment on Social Media

How to Combat Online Defamation and Scam Harassment on Social Media in the Philippines
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you need specific legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.


1. Introduction

Social media platforms have revolutionized communication by allowing users to share information instantly. However, these same platforms can also be misused for online defamation and scam harassment. In the Philippines, there are legal remedies available for victims of defamatory or fraudulent online acts. This article will discuss the relevant laws, the steps to take if you become a victim, and strategies to prevent or combat online defamation and scam harassment.


2. Understanding Online Defamation

2.1 Definition of Defamation

Under Philippine law, defamation generally refers to a false statement, either written or spoken, that harms a person’s reputation or character. In traditional (offline) contexts, defamation can be categorized as:

  • Libel: Defamatory statements made in writing or a similar fixed medium.
  • Slander: Defamatory statements made orally/spoken.

2.2 Online Libel

The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10175) expanded the scope of libel to include defamatory statements made online (“cyber libel”). Specifically:

  • Article 353 and 355 of the Revised Penal Code define libel.
  • Section 4(c)(4) of RA 10175 covers online libel, penalizing defamatory content posted through the internet or other computer systems.

For a statement to be considered libelous or defamatory under Philippine law, it generally must be:

  1. Malicious in nature (made with ill intent or reckless disregard for the truth).
  2. Publicly and intentionally communicated (posted or shared in a manner accessible to at least one person other than the complainant).
  3. Clearly identifiable that the complainant is the person defamed.
  4. Tending to cause dishonor, discredit, or contempt of the complainant.

2.3 Elements of Online Libel

  • Malice: Philippine jurisprudence presumes that defamatory statements are made with “malice in law.” However, if the person accused can prove a “justifiable reason” (truth, fair comment on matters of public interest, etc.), the presumption of malice may be rebutted.
  • Publication: The defamatory content must be disseminated online (e.g., through social media posts, blog articles, or comments).
  • Identifiability: The victim must be ascertainable or identifiable in the defamatory statement.
  • Damage to Reputation: The statement must cause or tend to cause harm to one’s reputation.

3. Understanding Scam Harassment

3.1 What is Scam Harassment?

Scam harassment generally refers to fraudulent schemes carried out online, often accompanied by threats, persistent unsolicited messages, or pressure tactics aimed at defrauding or extorting money from victims. This can include:

  • Phishing: Sending fake messages, emails, or links to trick individuals into revealing personal or financial details.
  • Online Swindling / Estafa: Misrepresentation or deceit resulting in financial or property loss under Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • Harassment Through Messaging: Continuous threatening or coercive messages designed to force the victim into giving money or sensitive information.

3.2 Relevant Laws for Scam Harassment

  1. Revised Penal Code (RPC), Article 315 (Swindling/Estafa)
    • Punishes those who defraud another by using false pretenses or deceitful acts.
  2. Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175)
    • Criminalizes offenses involving the use of computer systems, including online fraud.
  3. E-Commerce Act of 2000 (RA 8792)
    • Provides legal recognition for electronic transactions and penalizes unauthorized or fraudulent use of electronic data.
  4. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (RA 10173)
    • Penalizes unauthorized disclosure or misuse of personal data, which often accompanies scam-related activities.

4. Legal Framework in the Philippines

4.1 Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175)

  • Scope: Covers cyber offenses, including cyber libel, identity theft, cyber fraud, illegal access, and other computer-related offenses.
  • Penalties: Cyber libel can carry higher penalties than traditional libel. For instance, the penalty for cyber libel may be imposed one degree higher than that provided for under the Revised Penal Code.

4.2 Revised Penal Code Provisions

  • Articles 353–362: Cover libel and slander.
  • Article 315: Defines swindling (estafa), which can apply to scams conducted online if deceitful acts lead to loss of money or property.

4.3 Safe Spaces Act (RA 11313)

  • Addresses gender-based online harassment. If defamatory or harassing content includes gender-based attacks, sexual harassment, or sexist remarks, a complaint may be lodged under this law.

4.4 Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)

  • Protects personal data from unauthorized use or disclosure. If your personal details are used or exposed as part of a scam or defamation campaign, the Data Privacy Act may provide additional remedies.

5. Steps to Take if You Are a Victim

5.1 Collect and Preserve Evidence

  1. Screenshot and Save: Capture screenshots of defamatory posts, messages, comments, user profiles, and relevant dates/timestamps.
  2. Store Electronically: Save digital copies in multiple secure locations (e.g., cloud storage, external drives).
  3. Document Conversations: Keep records of chat histories, including the sender’s username, date, time, and message content.

5.2 Seek Assistance from Authorities

  1. Report to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Cybercrime Division or the Philippine National Police (PNP) Anti-Cybercrime Group.
  2. File a Complaint: Provide all evidence collected. Authorities may issue subpoenas to social media platforms or internet service providers to obtain additional data.

5.3 Consult a Lawyer

  • A legal professional can assess the strength of your case, draft legal notices, and guide you on the filing of complaints or civil suits.

5.4 Request Takedown of Content

  • Contact the Social Media Platform: Most platforms (Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, YouTube) have mechanisms to report defamatory or scam-related content.
  • Submit a Formal Request: Cite the violation of community standards and Philippine law. Include evidence of defamation or scam harassment.

5.5 Consider Civil Remedies

  • Under Philippine law, you may file a civil action for damages under Articles 19, 20, and 21 of the Civil Code if someone’s acts cause you undue harm or injury.
  • This can be pursued alongside or independently of criminal cases for libel or estafa.

6. Preventive Measures and Best Practices

  1. Maintain Privacy Controls: Limit who can see your posts and personal information on social media.
  2. Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Strengthen security on email and social media accounts to minimize identity theft.
  3. Regularly Monitor Mentions: Stay vigilant about any suspicious references or unauthorized posts involving your name or likeness.
  4. Educate Yourself on Phishing and Scams: Be cautious about clicking unfamiliar links or downloading attachments from unknown sources.
  5. Use Disclaimers: If you manage a public page (e.g., blog or forum), include disclaimers about user-generated content.

7. Possible Defenses for the Accused in Defamation Cases

  1. Truth: If the statements are proven true and pertain to matters of public interest, it can be a valid defense.
  2. Fair Comment: Comments made in good faith on matters of public interest may be protected.
  3. Lack of Malice: Demonstrating the absence of malicious intent can refute the presumption of malice in defamation cases.
  4. Privilege Communication: Certain communications are protected by law (e.g., qualified or absolute privilege) in limited circumstances, though typically not in outright defamatory social media posts.

8. Key Challenges in Enforcement

  1. Anonymity: Many perpetrators hide behind fake accounts or pseudonyms.
  2. Jurisdictional Issues: Social media platforms are often hosted overseas, complicating legal enforcement.
  3. Evidence Integrity: Screenshots and digital records must be properly authenticated to be admissible in court.
  4. Lengthy Legal Process: Court proceedings in the Philippines can be time-consuming and costly.

9. Practical Tips to Handle Online Harassment

  1. Do Not Engage: Responding with threats or insults can escalate the situation or be used against you in court.
  2. Block and Report: Most social media platforms have blocking and reporting features that help prevent further harassment.
  3. Use Privacy Settings: Ensure that only trusted friends or followers can view your posts.
  4. Seek Emotional Support: Online harassment can be emotionally draining; consider talking to friends, family, or a counselor.

10. Conclusion

In the Philippines, online defamation and scam harassment are taken seriously under various laws, including the Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and relevant provisions in the Revised Penal Code. Victims have the right to seek justice through criminal complaints, civil lawsuits for damages, or by reporting the incidents to law enforcement. Effective measures include promptly documenting evidence, consulting a lawyer, and leveraging reporting tools on social media platforms.

By staying informed of your rights, maintaining robust online security practices, and understanding how to preserve and present digital evidence, you can better protect yourself and seek redress if you become a victim of online defamation or scam harassment.


Remember: For specific cases and personalized legal strategies, consult a qualified attorney familiar with Philippine cybercrime laws.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.