Illegal Dismissal and Damages Claims Philippines

Below is a comprehensive overview of Illegal Dismissal and Damages Claims under Philippine law. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.


1. Introduction

The Philippine Constitution and the Labor Code of the Philippines strongly protect the rights of employees, particularly their right to security of tenure. Under these laws, an employee cannot be dismissed from service except for just or authorized causes, and only after due process. When an employer terminates an employee without valid cause or without following the proper procedure, that dismissal is considered illegal or unlawful. If an employee succeeds in proving that a dismissal is illegal, the employer may be held liable for certain reliefs, including full backwages, reinstatement (or separation pay in lieu thereof), and, under certain circumstances, damages and attorney’s fees.


2. Constitutional and Statutory Foundations

  1. 1987 Philippine Constitution

    • Article XIII on Social Justice and Human Rights declares that the State shall afford full protection to labor, including security of tenure and humane conditions of work.
  2. Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended)

    • Book VI, Title I, deals with Termination of Employment.
    • Articles 279 (now renumbered in the Labor Code) and related provisions guarantee an employee’s right to security of tenure and describe the reliefs for illegal dismissal.

3. The Doctrine of Security of Tenure

Under Philippine law, regular employees are entitled to security of tenure. This means an employee who has attained regular status (or is deemed regular by law) may only be dismissed for just or authorized causes recognized under the Labor Code:

  1. Just Causes (typically based on employee misconduct or fault), which include:

    • Serious misconduct
    • Willful disobedience of lawful orders
    • Gross and habitual neglect of duties
    • Fraud or willful breach of trust
    • Commission of a crime or offense against the employer or a co-employee
    • Analogous causes
  2. Authorized Causes (generally based on business or economic reasons), such as:

    • Redundancy
    • Retrenchment to prevent losses
    • Closure or cessation of business operations
    • Installation of labor-saving devices

In all cases, the employer must comply with the prescribed substantive (existence of a valid cause) and procedural (observance of due process) requirements. Failure to meet either element can render the dismissal illegal.


4. Procedural Due Process in Dismissal Cases

4.1 For Just Causes

  1. Notice to Explain (NTE)
    The employer must issue a first written notice stating the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for dismissal, providing the employee a chance to respond in writing.
  2. Opportunity to be Heard
    The employee must be given a fair opportunity to explain or defend themselves, which can include a hearing or a conference.
  3. Notice of Decision
    The employer must issue a final written notice of termination explaining the factual and legal basis for the dismissal.

4.2 For Authorized Causes

  1. Notice to the Employee
    The employer must serve a written notice on the employee at least 30 days prior to the intended date of termination, specifying the ground(s) relied upon.
  2. Notice to the DOLE
    The same notice must be furnished to the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE).
  3. Payment of Separation Pay
    Depending on the authorized cause, the employee must be paid separation pay (e.g., one-month pay for every year of service in redundancy or retrenchment, or half a month’s pay for every year of service in closure due to business losses).

Failure to observe these procedural requirements (e.g., no proper notices, no hearing) can make the dismissal illegal despite the presence of a valid substantive cause.


5. Consequences of Illegal Dismissal

When a dismissal is adjudged illegal, the general rule under the Labor Code is that the employer must provide:

  1. Reinstatement
    The illegally dismissed employee must be reinstated to their former position without loss of seniority rights and other benefits.

  2. Full Backwages
    The employee is entitled to payment of wages that they would have earned from the date of dismissal until actual reinstatement. Over the years, the Supreme Court has clarified that full backwages generally do not include interest unless explicitly ordered, but trial courts or labor tribunals do have discretion to impose legal interest in certain cases.

  3. Separation Pay in Lieu of Reinstatement
    If reinstatement is no longer feasible (e.g., strained relations, closure of business, or the employee’s position is no longer available), the Labor Arbiter or Court may grant separation pay instead of reinstatement. The amount is typically based on the employee’s length of service (usually one month’s salary per year of service, though it can vary depending on the final labor tribunal or court decision).


6. Types of Damages in Illegal Dismissal Cases

Apart from the basic reliefs (reinstatement, backwages, or separation pay), an illegally dismissed employee may recover different types of damages. However, damages claims are contingent on the employer’s culpability or bad faith.

  1. Moral Damages

    • Awarded if the employer acted in bad faith, fraud, or with malice in dismissing the employee.
    • Bad faith may be proven through evidence that the employer willfully or deliberately disregarded the employee’s rights, or subjected the employee to humiliating circumstances.
  2. Exemplary Damages

    • Awarded if the employer’s conduct was wanton, oppressive, or exhibited gross negligence.
    • Intended to serve as a deterrent so that employers will not act with impunity.
  3. Nominal Damages

    • Awarded when there is a valid cause for dismissal but the employer failed to follow procedural due process.
    • The Supreme Court has, in various cases, set nominal damages as a fixed sum (often in the amount of ₱30,000 for dismissals with valid cause but lacking procedural due process, though this amount can vary based on the Court’s discretion).
  4. Temperate Damages

    • Granted in certain instances when actual damages cannot be proven with certainty, but a party has in fact suffered some financial or pecuniary loss.
  5. Attorney’s Fees

    • The Labor Code (Article 2208 of the Civil Code, in relation to Article 220 of the Labor Code) allows an award of attorney’s fees equivalent to a certain percentage (often 10%) of the total monetary award when an employee is forced to litigate or incur expenses to protect their rights.

7. Criteria for Awarding Damages

To secure damages, an illegally dismissed employee must show that the employer’s actions had the following elements:

  • Bad Faith or Malice: For moral and exemplary damages, there must be proof that the employer acted deliberately, intentionally, or maliciously.
  • Causal Relationship: The dismissed employee must demonstrate that they suffered harm directly caused by the employer’s wrongful actions.
  • Actual Loss or Injury (for actual damages): If the employee claims actual or compensatory damages, they must present receipts or other concrete proof of the pecuniary loss.

The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) or the courts often evaluate these requirements strictly. The mere fact of an illegal dismissal does not automatically entitle an employee to moral or exemplary damages—there must be a clear finding of employer bad faith or oppressive conduct.


8. Filing an Illegal Dismissal Case

  1. Venue

    • Illegal dismissal cases are generally filed before the Labor Arbiter in the NLRC branch or Regional Arbitration Branch having jurisdiction over the place where the employee was employed or where the employer’s principal office is located.
  2. Prescription Period

    • An employee has four (4) years from the date of dismissal to file an illegal dismissal complaint. This is based on the general rule that actions based on injury to rights prescribe in four years.
  3. Burden of Proof

    • Once the employee alleges illegal dismissal, the employer has the burden to prove the validity of the dismissal.
    • The employer must show substantial evidence that the dismissal was for a valid cause and that due process was followed.

9. Typical Process of a Labor Dispute

  1. Filing of Complaint
    • The dismissed employee files a complaint with the Regional Arbitration Branch of the NLRC.
  2. Mandatory Conciliation and Mediation
    • The case may be referred to the Single-Entry Approach (SEnA) for mandatory conciliation.
  3. Submission of Position Papers and Evidence
    • If conciliation fails, the parties file their respective position papers, replies, and rejoinders.
  4. Labor Arbiter Decision
    • After evaluating the evidence, the Labor Arbiter issues a Decision granting or denying the claims.
  5. Appeal to the NLRC
    • The aggrieved party may appeal the Labor Arbiter’s Decision to the NLRC.
  6. Appeal to the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court
    • Decisions of the NLRC may be brought to the Court of Appeals via a Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, and ultimately to the Supreme Court.

10. Important Points and Recent Trends

  1. Strained Relations Doctrine

    • The Supreme Court has recognized that reinstatement may no longer be viable when the relationship between the parties has been severely damaged. In such cases, separation pay is awarded in lieu of reinstatement.
  2. Double Indemnity Rule in Procedural Due Process Violations

    • In some cases, if the employer had a valid cause but failed to comply with statutory due process, nominal damages may be awarded. The Supreme Court has, at times, distinguished the amounts awarded depending on whether the deficiency was in the first notice, second notice, or the hearing requirement.
  3. Inclusive of Other Benefits

    • Backwages may include not just basic salary but also allowances, 13th-month pay, and other benefits that the employee would have received. The precise computation can vary depending on the evidence and the specific rulings in each case.
  4. Mitigation of Damages

    • An employer may present evidence to reduce potential monetary liability, such as proving that the employee engaged in gainful employment during the period of dismissal (in older jurisprudence). However, under current doctrines, backwages in illegal dismissal cases are awarded in full without deduction of earnings from other sources (commonly referred to as the “Mercury Drug Rule”).
  5. No Automatic Award of Moral and Exemplary Damages

    • Even if a dismissal is deemed illegal, the employee must still present clear proof of bad faith or fraudulent intent on the employer’s part. Otherwise, moral and exemplary damages are often denied.
  6. Attorney’s Fees

    • Commonly awarded at 10% of the total judgment award if the employee was compelled to litigate or incur legal expenses to enforce their rights.

11. Practical Takeaways

  • Proper Documentation: Employers should carefully document employee offenses and properly serve notices to avoid illegal dismissal claims.
  • Compliance with Procedure: Even if there is just or authorized cause, failure to observe procedural due process can still give rise to damages liability.
  • Prompt Action by Employees: Employees who believe they have been illegally dismissed should file a complaint promptly (within four years) and gather all relevant evidence supporting their claim.
  • Legal Assistance: Engaging counsel or seeking help from the Department of Labor and Employment or reputable labor law practitioners can assist both parties in ensuring their rights and obligations are protected.

12. Conclusion

Illegal dismissal remains a significant aspect of Philippine labor law, reflecting the strong policy of the State to protect workers’ rights to job security. Philippine jurisprudence, labor statutes, and administrative regulations combine to ensure that only employees dismissed for valid reasons, and with the required procedural safeguards, can be lawfully terminated. Should a dismissal be proven illegal, employees are typically entitled to reinstatement or separation pay, full backwages, and potentially damages (moral, exemplary, nominal), as well as attorney’s fees—depending on the specific facts of the case.

Understanding these principles helps employers act in compliance with the law, while employees can better appreciate their rights and remedies under the Labor Code. Anyone confronting an actual or potential illegal dismissal scenario is encouraged to seek professional legal advice to ensure that their specific circumstances are appropriately addressed.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific questions, please consult a qualified Philippine labor law practitioner or relevant government agency (e.g., DOLE, NLRC).

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.